Comments by Call.Me.Ishmael (page 7)

In a row down the ribs, black sun symbol, broken sun cross, and a simplified Celtic cross. Neo-Nazis don't get my money.

This is true at many clubs, including those that aren't known as extras friendly. I sort of hope that this is trolling. Because if it's sincere, then this guy just did the equivalent of bursting into a busy seafood market to announce "Hey guys! Fish swim in WATER!"

I'm with puddy_tat on this one (on both points).

What tends to get lost on some users here is that this is primarily a fun-related site for the customers who are here, whereas it's a work-related site for the dancers. The enticements that drive customers to use the site can't be counted on to create participation from dancers. They need work-related motivations, which TUSCL has recently shed. I don't know if it created tons of work for founder, but the free VIP for dancers never impacted me negatively, and I did enjoy a few more dancers being here. As always, though, it's not my sandbox.

I'll give you pretty much the same answer that you got when you posted this over on reddit... Well, then you should go back and ask her so that she can choose to provide that information, or not. We don't know who you are and what you're all about. You could be a relatively normal, non-threatening guy. Or, you could be a dangerous predator / stalker. You could also be a lunatic current / former partner of hers looking for evidence of "misbehavior". So, please don't ask for or give out this type of potentially private information in public places like this. It's not a good look.

Hank said "I suppose the commentary is still relevant but did we need to resurrect a thread from 2018?" No. I commented without looking at the date. This is one of SL777's dumb but regular maneuvers.

^ I do the same as 25. Same success rate and less elaborate. Jascoi... If that works for you, then keep on keeping on. But I'd worry about some dancers thinking, "Great. This guy figured out how to stalk me ITC." I also don't love the optics on following a dancer around the club like a walked dog (but that might be a 'me' thing...).

Some number over 10 for one dancer and some number over 15 with another dancer (but less than 20... I think). Those COVID years when the clubs were closed bumped up those numbers a bit.

Welcome to the TUSCL remake of "Alien versus Predator". I'll let you guys debate which one is the alien and which is the predator.

I have seen a handful of dancers who might have been in the early stages, but not very visibly pregnant. It's not my thing. I'd pass.

For idealogy-focused investors on the conservative side, consider God Bless America ETF. YALL is the ticker, which I find humorous.

Thankfully, this isn't a thing where I am.

I do like getting extras. That's why I primarily go to a well-known extras club. But I acknowledge that other guys have other priorities and tastes when it comes to strip clubs (and rating them). And, because I like extras, I'd rather that TUSCL not post an obvious shopping list for the news media and cops. That's the sort of dumb shit we can easily avoid.

^ Because some guys don't like or want extras. Not every PL judges clubs based on your criteria. Because which clubs offer extras can shift gradually over time and keeping track of that is a ball-ache. Finally, in the majority of places what we consider to be extras are illegal. So, are you so fucking stupid that your simultaneously asking (A) that TUSCL carry the liability of not just documenting but actually ranking illegal activities and (B) that TUSCL potentially provide both cops and/or news media with the best places to go for either a bust or a salacious expose story on the evening news?

Monger said "That’s why I gave u guys an updated list so for those who are strictly looking for extras don’t have to ask the same questions over and over and don’t waste their time in a club that is isn’t guaranteed for extras" Hardly anyone will remember or look at this thread after it drops off the first page. This site doesn't even have a search function. There is literally nothing you can do to coerce people into searching a site for information before they create a new thread asking a question that has been answered a million times. For example... https://www.google.com/search?q=tuscl+pants&rlz=1C1CHBF_enUS899US899&oq=tuscl+pants

Don't connect dancers by name to extras or OTC in reviews or posts, even if it's a club where "everyone knows" (which might be true for the club, but not for individual dancers). TUSCLers with access to these reviews can include club managers, staff, and other dancers, who can use that information against a dancer. It's also not impossible for local reporters to access these reviews to find incriminating quotes for their expose piece. This actually happened in Providence, RI, when Cheaters got busted for the last time years ago. We got to watch incredibly explicit reviews (with blacked out bits) for several of the clubs scroll across the screen on the evening news. It wasn't great.

Prepare to be surprised...

The New York Post (and other tabloid media) is well known for approaching creators on OF, Instagram, TikTok, YouTube, etc., with "repost" contracts that allow them to share creator content while providing "exposure" as payment. That content sharing usually entails coming up with an entirely fabricated "article" about the creator. Depending on the contract they sign, the creators often have little or no input to the article. So, stuff like this is never true. It's pure click bait.

We complain about dancers online all the time. Dancers complain about us online all the time. [shrug] I only care about what happens when I'm in the club and with a dancer.

So... you guys still actually think the original story is real thing?

^ My gut tells me that's not coming back.

I'm sort of surprised that she knew enough to even refer to it incorrectly. I've had a couple of dancers ask me about aging pop-culture references used by their decades-older regulars. The only one that stands out as humorous is the time a dancer asked me if "I'm Loving Lucy" was vintage porn.

Certainly not all. But most still are.

Hey, have you jackasses forgotten that there's a forum specifically for politics?

Cheaters certainly had diamonds in the rough. It was also as close as you could get on Earth to the cantina scene in Star Wars. Several of the bartenders were smokeshows.