It's a sausage fest here. Founder please bring back free VIP for dancers!
RonJax2
Strip Club Connoisseur
However, it seems to have gotten much worse of late. We used to have a small cadre of dancers who posted and commented regularly. I don't see any of these dancers at TUSCL anymore, not since the free dancer VIP went away.
I think there's a lot lost without stripper participation here. I'll point to a few examples of how strippers at TUSCL have added value to my own experience:
* KittyCreamyKat discussing her thresholds for when she'd consider OTC.
* Cruz_LV discussing what's customary for tipping in Vegas clubs.
* BubbleYum's discussions of how to be an ethical monger in an extras club.
I even miss BlahBlahBlah's mildly psychotic quips. And of course there's the prurient interest of seeing dancers post photos here. I could go on, my point is that the ladies here have always added a ton of value.
@Founder, I think, for now, you've cornered the market on the directory and review aspect of strip clubs. What you don't have a lock on is the social media side. Your site is one of many places PLs can go to discuss their mongering experiences. You're competing with a few other small sites, and increasingly bigger tech platforms like Reddit that are now home to these discussions.
And hosting a social media site is like hosting a party, if the ladies don't show up the party sucks. I think that you're missing out on a lot of social media traffic, which in turn, I would wager, would boost reviews and subscriptions.
So, bring back the free VIP for dancers!
Just putting in my 2 cents. And either way, I appreciate everything you do.
Got something to say?
Start your own discussion
56 comments
Latest
Solid points you raise Ron!
For each example the OP provided, each of those points would make a great article. IMHO, that adds way more value to the site than their periodic musings through discusstion topics.
The OP has also drawn the conclusion that the reason for dancer participation in the past was tied them having "lifetime" VIP access. IMHO, there isn't enough evidence to conclude that.
Also, IMHO, the few dancers that did participate would tend to make discussions more volatile. This site is for monger intel. I don't need dancer insight on how to monger or conduct myself. Even one of the recent topics had Honeydwemelons chime in that the topic was not a "front page" discussion. Notice that no mongers made that comment.
There are other places to interact with dancers - mongers should go there for that.
If there is that much of a interest, dancers can email founder.
Amen! LOL!
A lot of women aren't too far from being nothing more than a lizard-brain limbic system. You don't ask those how to attain sweet kitty.
They're likely evolved to not be straight-up about it- it's against their own interest to tell bad DNA (graded based on their own genetically codified instincts) how to circumvent the girl's defenses and impregnate them anyways.
Sometimes you see it in public spaces. Saps follow the girls' spoken word, then whine endlessly about how it never works for years on end, yet somehow the years-long outcome in the making never rings any bells for these poor saps.
While it can be helpful to hear different perspectives, logic takes too much of a backseat in discussion spaces when too many ladies dominate the communication.
In terms of cost-benefit, quality of advice will likely remain higher if dancer participation remains lower in spaces like this.
And you're right about posting activity being down in general here. Surely, having more ladies posting here would help with the second problem here at least, right? I don't know what you do about the first problem other than ignore it and not engage.
> Free VIP already exist for dancers. They just have to put in some effort to receive it.
You're absolutely right that the points I referenced WOULD make for great articles. But it takes serious effort to write an article or good review and it's unlikely any dancer is going to put the time into it just for 1 month's access to this site. My evidence on this point is exhibit A: other than @nicespice in this thread, there's been like zero other dancers participating here, since the free VIP expired.
Free unlimited VIP is not going to bring a mass amount of dancers into the forums.
How many were participating when that was the case? 4-5???
Dancers are still posting pics and able to advertise where they dance. That what most of them use the site for. Don’t need VIP for that.
Point taken, but let me ask you this: would you rather be at a SC with zero dancers? Or 4-5 of them?
The enticements that drive customers to use the site can't be counted on to create participation from dancers. They need work-related motivations, which TUSCL has recently shed.
I don't know if it created tons of work for founder, but the free VIP for dancers never impacted me negatively, and I did enjoy a few more dancers being here.
As always, though, it's not my sandbox.
Bad analogy.
I go to the SC FOR the women. I don't come to or use this site to interact with women.
I don't have an issue with them being here, but see no reason to provide them unlimited VIP because we are "graced" with their presence. And that's if they even choose to participate.
We don't know the numbers but founder does and over the course of this site existing he's probably handed out thousands of free unlimited VIPs with maybe 40-50 dancers actively participating on the site beyond their advertisements.
That's a lot of giving and very little receiving. I consider that a bad investment. At least make them earn it. That way if they choose not to participate anymore, the access goes away - it's not some indefinite access where you can go away and resume where you left off next year.
And I'm unconvinced of the relationship between dancer participation and VIP access.
also I agree with whoever said like I said most dancers are not going to sit down and write a though provoking article every month to have access Im retired and I dont have time to do it...
@ww thats why the founder made different places for commenting on particular discussions
Articles are not the only means for free access. One can do a review (a short one at that) or simply pay for access. IMHO, continuous VIP access isn't needed every single month.
If you are retired, do you really needed unlimited VIP? If so, for what purpose? You still have the ability to post in the discussion boards.
Just like how mongers complain of the current system of writing articles and reviews has a degree of abuse, there are ways to abuse "proving" you are a dancer.
What's to stop a "cute" guy from playing dressup? What to stop a monger from getting their female cousin to "play" dancer? All for the purpose of receiving free, unlimited VIP. You only need to prove it once and you're set for life.
At least with a crap article or review, you only have 4 weeks access compared with indefinite.
> There are 3 main places of discussions
Just a nit on this. Every strip club has it's own discussion board too. E. g, this is the one for Playhouse Lounge in NJ:
https://tuscl.net/forum/3010
There's also a discussion on every single review that gets posted. Without VIP you can't see or participate in those discussions.
To your other points, it sounds like you just don't want dancers posting here? Or at a minimum are indifferent to it and don't want them to get special treatment? I feel like fundamentally we can agree to disagree on this point. Count me firmly in the camp that wants to see more dancers posting here.
@founder should consider both perspectives here. But ultimately what's most important is, what would drive subscriptions more? My hypothesis is letting the ladies back in for free is more likely to improve founder's subscription rate more than keeping them out.
I'm aware of the separate club boards - those are not the "main" discussion threads.
You can read ALL discussions by clicking the discussions link, which will include the smaller club discussions. Anyone can participate on the smaller board threads.
The "discussion" you are referencing on the reviews are actually comments. If anyone wants to view or add to that, they can just get VIP in the ways previously discussed.
"To your other points, it sounds like you just don't want dancers posting here?"
^^^You are misreading what I've stated. I've stated several times I have no issue with dancers posting. My issue is providing them unlimited VIP access for gracing us with their presence. Give it for free to everyone or give it to no one. Interesting how women want equality for everything, except for when they don't.
And very few are going to purchase a subscription for the potential chance they get to interact with a dancer on this site. There are other places across the internet to increase your chances of that.
Honestly, if you want to interact that much with dancers, meet them in-person, get their contact info and go from there.
What posts, from whom, on this thread are "exhibit A"?
What exactly is an "incel type"?
Can't we all just get along?
https://tuscl.net/discussion/6998
We no longer have 10 stages though there, there's just two:
Stage 0: Stripper opens the door here, sees whats going on, sees it's no longer free, leaves.
Stage 10: Same as stage 10 before except I guess I'm the PL who is lionizing the strippers who no longer post here 😔
@5footguy
> What posts, from whom, on this thread are "exhibit A"?
C'mon my dude, you don't need like magic woke goggles to see what she's talking about. Literally one commenter calls women "nothing more than a lizard-brain limbic system".
Ok, but her comment and 25's comment made it sound like there was an explosion of "incel" posts and honestly I don't even know what that means really. If it means "disrespectful to women" then ok. But I thought it was something a bit more nuanced.
I dont know if they are dancers or just "regular" woman, but I have seen females do reviews.
Have no idea if they were a dancer reviewing their own club or a different club. Regardless, I would hope a dancer would recognize not to use the same name here as the stripper name they use at work.
The review itself does not have to be good or bad. It could just state the facts. And as far as trusting the review, that is up to the reader. There are a ton reviews that I don't trust. You gain what insight you can from a good cross-section of reading and you draw your own conclusions of a club.
Either way, the owner/manager should have no idea if a dancer that works there does a review unless the dancer drops clues that identify who she is.
When a woman cannot get laid, she is a "Celibacy Advocate." I first saw that term in the X profile of some leftie who enjoyed attacking Princess Kate amidst her cancer battle. Says all you need to know about the profile holder.
Some comments on this thread are from some agreeing with each other that stripper participation is not worthwhile because strippers cannot give actionable advice of “how to monger.”
Except there have been, and still are, plenty of contributors who get all the mileage that they want. Some individuals are extras hounds, and some are more go-with-the flow-types. And whichever category applies to them, they are/were pretty cheery about their fun at the club.
Starving people are more likely to consider food extra important than others would. Sick people are more likely to consider breathing through their noses more important than others would. And incels are more likely to consider discussion board posts of how to ask for extras in extras clubs, or OTC at clubs—during a time period with a precarious economy and all-time-low amounts of shaming from dancers at each other for x rated activities with customers—as a more important topic over anything else. And from that perspective, a post from a stripper isn’t just something to scroll past, but something that is something worth getting grumpy about.
Never mind this discussion board could and previously has benefitted from a variety of other subjects. Some could write erotica recollections about filthy sex involving body fluids going all sorts of weird directions. Some could write goofy puns for this site. Some may post “scrotum” below other people’s posts for their own entertainment. Some like to think about deepthroating Olive Garden breadsticks. Some may just simply write about something random like food options in a city, tv shows, or other whatever other topics might be amusing.
And in reply to muddy-yep, I do have lifetime vip membership on this site.
You’re mixing two different issues, whether dancers should get free VIP and abuse by dudes. You didn’t say what objection you had to dancers getting free VIP, if you had one. If Founder agrees it’s being abused and since it’s his free VIP that is being spent, he can bolster the vetting process. Otherwise, it’s not really for us to worry about IMO.
"You’re mixing two different issues, whether dancers should get free VIP and abuse by dudes pretending to be dancers for free indefinite VIP"
Fixed it for you.
The issues are related. And this whole thread is not for us to worry about.
I'm paying for vip for now, but I don't intend to last long if I have to pay monthly from here on. Sad state for me
(and it still ain't together yet.)
Look for it soon
Dancer VIP was one such piece of functionality, but as you can see from the thread, founder has promised an update on this...