discussion comment
5 years ago
Fill the lunch box with Benjies and show it to her. She'll be fine with your real ride pictured here:
https://www.amazon.com/Original-Wheel-Spin-Out-Racer-Trike/dp/B003UPVCI6
discussion comment
5 years ago
Look on the internet and see if you can 'flag' one for sale?
discussion comment
5 years ago
Wondering why your turd looks like a bratwurst...?
... and also wondering why the last brat I ate tasted like shit...?
review comment
5 years ago
Can't believe Natalie is still alive, let alone dancing. Most annoying stripper in the world.
discussion comment
5 years ago
Stupid... should be looking for men over 45. Just saying.
discussion comment
5 years ago
Although I have been going to 4 local clubs for well over 25 years, I am a somewhat infrequent visitor - maybe each club 2 to 3 times a year.
So it's quite common to be asked by a noob dancer if it's my first time at the club. When I explain that I've been a customer for decades, I will often then be asked "how often do you come here?"
My answer is always the same: "About 3 out of 5 times." Then I grin at her and wait. And wait. And wait.
And that's how I know she's not only a noob, but she has yet to gain an understanding that the path to my wallet goes through my zipper (or through the pant leg of my shorts).
discussion comment
5 years ago
Not married yet. But I think when I do get married my answer to this will be to have the ceremony in a strip club.
… at least I know all my buddies will show up. :p
discussion comment
5 years ago
It's obvious by the above comments, that users here are NOT representative of the "typical" (whatever the hell that is) club customers at large. I also prefer smaller, firm and natural to fake, and I'm especially not a fan of giant fakes.
But the empirical evidence seems to overwhelmingly show that dancers (and to some degree, porn stars) see a revenue increase with bigger tits.
I think it's also useful to understand that each PL's culture and background impact their perception of the "perfect" rack. My preference leans, as does the Reverend's, towards slim, petite, Asians and Latinas (the classic LBFM, if you will). But there are many PL's who prefer some "meat on the bones" or the stereotypical "blond bimbo" look. This leads me to the conclusion that posting an overly-general question like this here, as well as posting replies is ultimately useless.
Last thought: As my good friend Rico (not his real name) says, "If I can touch them, they are real!"
discussion comment
5 years ago
"Our prescribed activities, if not exactly permitted by the law, are at least not yet prohibited by existing laws."
A lawyer once told me that any act, if not prohibited by law, is legal.
So it's never necessary to ask "is this legal?" The correct question should be "is this illegal?"
discussion comment
5 years ago
You are using the wrong song. Try Tubthumping by Chumbawamba.
https://youtu.be/2H5uWRjFsGc
discussion comment
5 years ago
@Eric2100
".waiters I know have an app to keep track of their tips over time.)"
I think I know a few strippers who use an app to keep track of PL "tips". And pretty sure it tracks shafts, girths, and ball sweat as well! :p
discussion comment
5 years ago
![]()
whodeyFat bastard that can afford to fuck hot strippers
So...……
It's basically tequila? :p
discussion comment
5 years ago
@twentyfive:
"@OP keeping a spreadsheet isn’t normal pervert behavior"
Agreed.
And I'm sure writing a web & iOS app which accesses a 3GB mongering history database isn't normal pervert behavior, either.
But here I am.
discussion comment
5 years ago
I thought the position described by @Nidan111 is called a "68" or "You do me and I'll owe you one."
discussion comment
5 years ago
Congratulations! I'm sure your parents will be so proud of you for your patent!
BTW: I'm not a doctor, but if your "ejected" item is really purple-bluish-pink, you might want to get that looked at - or professionally photographed. :p
discussion comment
5 years ago
"The left wing anarchists were out in force"
Does no one see the irony in anarchists who organize?
discussion comment
5 years ago
@Bharlem81, I salute your goal to control your alcohol intake.
Yes, drunk, pretty girls are fun for guys. But only because we are hoping your inhibitions will be lowered. I'm a big defender of consenting adults. But I'm not a defender of taking advantage of "consent while impaired". If you want to cut down during work time and so, have better control of your behavior, it's totally ok to decline a drink or suggest something non-alcoholic instead.
Or, perhaps you can ask your bartender(s) to withhold or short pour your booze when a PL orders you a drink?
discussion comment
5 years ago
Here's my data:
5% 1. Lap dances
10% 2. Lap dances with extras
10% 3. OTC with one or more strippers
60% 4. Sugar babies
0% 5. Pro escorts (not strippers)
15% 6. Porn stars
0% 7. Tinder/BumbleBee dates / "UTR pros"
0% 8. Civilian pickups that required some form of gift
N/A 9. Current spouse/GF (and yes, it may not always be cash, but you are still paying for it.)
discussion comment
5 years ago
So let me guess.. your local Chick-Fil-A closed? :p
review comment
5 years ago
* meant a "...bug up it's ass..."
review comment
5 years ago
Thank you for the review. Sad to hear this, but not really surprising.
This location has been a club with different owners and names going back to the 80's. Throughout most of that time (say 80's through to 2010's), it was notorious for virtually unlimited extras. And so it was also a favorite target for vice stings every 2 to 4 years, whenever the local "moral community" got a but up it's ass about Valley clubs enabling prostitution. In other words, some ultra-right wing wives got tired of thier hubbys stepping out for the BJ the wives refused to give. These stings also generally started ramping up about 2 to 4 months after LE stings in the area for street walkers started to dry up. Generally, after the club was raided everyone had to "behave" for 2 to 3 months, before resuming BAU (Business As Usual.)
With the latest incarnation, D&G, which includes a renewed liquor license, and ownership by Spearmint Rhino, I'm sure the city put the club under rather harsh scrutiny. I'll speculate that SR execs had to provide quite a demonstration of sincerity (read $$$$$$$$) to the regulators that control thier licenses that management would tolerate no hanky-panky in the Hanky-Panky booths. This tracks with the reduction of available extras as well as the PL traffic drop off at the nearby SR in Van Nuys (about 4 miles from D&G).
It's become clear to me that the average PL who wants to resume a high conversion rate for extras will need to step up his OTC game as well the logistics required (negotiation skills, safe place to host, scheduling, secure [aka wife-proof] communications tech, etc.). Or he will just need to make the longer drive to COI.
discussion comment
5 years ago
What's your web URL, please? I need a few pounds of nutmeg.
Or do I need to pound my nut into a Spice Island gal named Meg? :p
discussion comment
5 years ago
I'm still waiting to see the clear heels with a gold fish in them come back.
discussion comment
5 years ago
![]()
Papi_ChuloMiami, FL (or the nearest big-booty club)
Maxine is not well informed here. FB doesn't "own" Libra. And the best way to STOP innovation is to let regulators set the rules before the technology is developed. If the technologists waited for regulators (who are hugely funded by big protectionist industries), our phones would still be wired to a wall, our solar panels would not exist, our cameras would still need film, and we would not have satellite or cable TV.
The problem with Waters' request, even if driven by her desire to protect consumers, is that legislators and regulators do not understand that developing new tech requires a balance between risk and reward. Regulations are specifically written to eliminate all risk.
This ship has already sailed. Forcing FB to step away will not stop the development and deployment of this tech. It will only restrict FB from engaging in an are of commerce where they have deep expertise and potential to provide a valuable service to a global economy. Yes they will be one of the providers who can make lots of money. But they also run the risk of losing lots of money as well.
discussion comment
5 years ago
![]()
Papi_ChuloMiami, FL (or the nearest big-booty club)
The answer is:
What ever the market will bear. As demand for SC's and (lap dances) increases in a local market, the number of clubs, and by extension the number of dancers will increase. As demand decreases the reverse will occur.
The key underlying question is: What forces tend to increases or decrease demand?
The obvious forces are probably:
1. Local laws and regulations on the industry. Tighter rules tends to lower demand.
2. The local economy as measured by the amount of disposable income on hand for the typical PL. If you can't buy food and pay your rent, you probably are not going to a club this moth (unless you are the OP :p).
3. The unemployment rate for unskilled jobs, especially jobs suitable for college students and single mothers. Although there is a (growing) segment of dancers who dance for reasons other than desperation, having alternative jobs available makes an impact.
4. The cost of formal education and job skills training, and the availability of grants, student loans (and I suppose Sugar Daddies).
5. Have to include this: The overall volume and efficacy of local pimps.