discussion comment
5 years ago
![]()
AtAboyStill learning to proofread
No disrespect, but I have a question: why do you care?
It seems like many people on TUSCL use ignore because they want to send a message to people and not because they actually want to ignore the person.
I only ignore two people. I don’t ignore them because I want to send them a message or because I care whether they read my little jokes. I ignore them because they are psychologically-damaged individuals who bore the shit out of me. I don’t care if they read what I say. I don’t care if they comment on what I say. I suspect they are bored with insulting me and have moved on to insulting somebody else.
Relax and enjoy the Algonquin kiddie table that is TUSCL. If somebody wants to troll you enjoy the trolling. If the trolling gets boring click ignore. It’s the brilliant way! ;)
discussion comment
5 years ago
ATACdawg, is the Iranian stripper a hijabi?
That would be aces! Allah would want her to cover her hair in the interest of modesty. Remember, as long as she shaves there is no need for a pubic hijab! ;)
discussion comment
5 years ago
Brilliant story reverendhornibastard!
discussion comment
5 years ago
Brilliant question SergeD. But I do think it Spillthebeans means that he scans a lot of hotel clerk IDs.
And it works. It turns out that demanding to scan the desk person’s ID will consistently get you an upgrade to a beautiful suite in the alley behind the hotel. The suite is detached from the actual hotel but it has delightful smells and free food (albeit partially eaten food). All you have to do is vacate the suite when the big truck removes a day’s worth of food.
The best part: this beautiful suite is free! ;)
discussion comment
5 years ago
Hope you have a brilliant Father’s Day FatherofNicole94!
Are you disappointed that your lovely daughter no longer wishes to be a foghorn lawyer?
discussion comment
5 years ago
“No Rick Dugans”
Brilliant!
I wonder how many clubs wish they had a “No Shirt, No Shoes, No Service...also, No Rick Dugans” sign posted? ;)
discussion comment
5 years ago
Aces thread!
discussion comment
5 years ago
Is this the crazyjoe gas station?
discussion comment
5 years ago
Brilliant epilogue! You truly deserved the title of Rev. reverendhornibastard!
discussion comment
5 years ago
RedJohnson, no disrespect, but a little more context for your rant may be warranted.
Inquiring minds want to know why you have a bee in your bonnet! Who is Papi_Chulo’s pedo bestie? Why are you fascinated by ”pigish sluts” from a shithole? Do you want to share regarding Lido BJs? You imply that you don’t, but you have shared the punch line at this point! And what is the point of TUSCL if not to discuss BJs? Without BJs it would just be rickdugan overreacting to doctorevil’s comments!
Sounds like you might have some brilliant crazy stories but remember this: nobody will know your crazy stories unless you share! Do you want to be known for crazy stories or for just being crazy as a loon? Go for the former RedJohnson! ;)
discussion comment
5 years ago
RedJohnson, a few comments:
First, ????
Second, relax. Maybe get one of those mean ass BJs. Also, is a mean ass BJ a good thing? If so, brilliant! Mark me down for one! ;)
Third, rickdugan showed the patience of Solomon? Color me skeptical. But I’m glad doctorevil posted that because I need a good laugh!
discussion comment
5 years ago
GhostOfHell, two things:
Yes, LDK is the goal. And why not? You get the joy of cumming in your pants and get some laughs when people criticize you for wanting to cum in your pants.
Seriously though, I can see why a lot of folks say LDK = brilliant. If you’re married or in an LTR it isn’t really cheating to keep your dick in your pants but cum. And even if you aren’t in a serious LTR who doesn’t like to cum?
Second, you might want to consider using paragraphs. Or better yet, just short and sweet declarative sentences with lots of space. If you make your posts hard to read nobody will want to invite you to the Algonquin kiddy table! ;)
discussion comment
5 years ago
mark94, thanks for the sincere answer. I’m not bothered by political threads. I mostly ignore them the old-fashioned way: by not reading them. My reason for ignoring them is that they are almost always the same old same old. I come to TUSCL for a laugh after all!
The thing that does interest me is motivations of individuals. For example, I think flagooner just likes to rile people up and doesn’t care exactly what he posts. For all we know he could be a (gasp!) progressive getting some laughs by posting pro-Trump material to stir the pot. Ok, I doubt that that the case, but I am amused by the idea that flagooner is actually a woke 21-year old with white-boy dreadlocks and three hobbies: playing hacky sack, smoking “loser leaf,” and getting conservatives on a strip club web site riled up! ;)
But I have always pictured your motivations differently. Like I said, you seem sincere. My suspicion has been that you embraced orthodox neocon positions but when Trump ran he spoke to you at a personal level. This made you want to like Trumpism despite being skeptical. So you are actually debating with yourself regarding Trump’s heterodox policy positions.
discussion comment
5 years ago
Baseball to the testicles = not brilliant! :(
discussion comment
5 years ago
Realistically, how is PL of the year different from monger of the year?
I was only pushing rickdugan as monger of the year because he is a brilliantly entertaining poster. Entertainment values is all we can assess. After all, everything anybody posts can be fiction. In fact, I sincerely hope some posts are fictional!
Except juicebox69. Everything that guy posts is the gospel truth. And he needs to post more. He’d be a shoe-in for monger of the year if he shared more juicy stories!
discussion comment
5 years ago
Brilliant! I got rickdugan to respond to me despite claiming to have me on ignore! ;)
bubba267, the use of “exercise” was intentional; hence the scare quotes. I agree that most people wish to exorcise their demons, but rickdugan wants to keep his demons. He just uses TUSCL as an excuse to give them some exercise!
However, I’m going to be serious for a moment. I suspect rickdugan isn’t as much of a d-bag IRL as the character he plays on TUSCL. We all have are demons in life. His demons just happen to be entertaining, and all of TUSCL benefits from it.
Hence my support to make him monger of the year!
discussion comment
5 years ago
Rather than discussing Trump’s victory or lack thereof, I have a question for mark94: why do you spend so much time discussing Trump’s strategies and his (potential) wins?
The results of the Mexico negotiations may be a with for Trump. Or Mexico may make some token efforts and things will basically stay the same, like the North Korea “win” where Kim is basically where he was before all the brouhaha but with a lower likelihood of sanctions. We’ll know in about six months in the case of Mexico, when everybody has stopped paying attention.
But the thing that interests me is why you (mark94) feel compelled to discuss Trump’s brilliance so much. Unlike flagooner, who is largely trying to rile people up, you seem sincere.
Here’s the reality: none of us know what’s really going on behind the scenes. Maybe you’re 100% right and Trump is solving previously intractable problems. Or maybe it is all smoke and mirrors. Who knows? But why spend so much time obsessively justifying his moves? It is just that you seem inordinately obsessed with explaining how brilliant those strategies are to a message board for deviants. Why?
discussion comment
5 years ago
But JohnSmith69 would have won hands down in his DS phase. Every DS = truly brilliant! ;)
How many DS’s was he up to? It seems like he got to DS 69 and stopped. Nice!
discussion comment
5 years ago
Much as it pains me to agree with flagooner and go with rickdugan. I think we all know that flagooner is simply trying to get folks riled up by nominating rickdugan, but he isn’t wrong.
Both JohnSmith69 and gawker tell better crazy stories than rickdugan, but their output has decreased. I also think that JohnSmith69’s crazy stories are completely truthful. I go back and forth on gawker’s. If they are fiction I say “brilliant fiction!” If they are true I say “you’re crazy gawker!”
goldmongerATL is another contender for monger of the year. That guy seems completely truthful and he has truly aces stories.
But let’s face it, rickdugan dominates the board in a way nobody else can. He does have some brilliant crazy stories. Maybe they aren’t as well-written as JohnSmith69, but you have to admit they are worth some popcorn while you read them!
But his weirdo psychology is what clinches it. He is so damaged it is like watching that “After Life” program on Netflix. Not in specifics mind you. The similarity is that you are watching a man that is truly “exercising his demons!” (As he would put it himself!)
Just consider his ignore games. He doesn’t ignore people because he’s bored or irritated with them. No, he feels (probably unconsciously) that he is control if he can click ignore and people still talk about him. What he doesn’t realize is that they are talking about what an assclown he is and watching the pratfalls of an assclown is kind of entertaining.
So, even when he has you on ignore, responding to him is win-win: he gets to feel in control and you get to be entertained by watching the equivalent a moron walking through a yard of rakes, hitting himself in the face every few steps.
There are worse outcomes! ;)
discussion comment
5 years ago
![]()
IceyI put your ATF on a winning team
A comment and a question:
skibum609 seems like good people if you factor in his basic disconnect from reality.
herbtcat, are you implying that you are a cat? Sort of like the lion guy? If so, brilliantly played! Hopefully we’ll be getting a whole herbtzoo!
discussion comment
5 years ago
Maskath, did you show the other stripper your Arby’s sauce satchels and travel size bottle of listermint?
Not brilliant my friend. Do not try that. juicebox69 can pull it off, but he’s special! ;)
discussion comment
5 years ago
Brilliant story, but I have one question reverendhornibastard.
Is this a long-form introduction to a character that will later reveal to be Yuri Bare the Bear? Sort of like Rick the Lion?
Just trying to anticipate the twists and turns! ;)
discussion comment
5 years ago
![]()
Papi_ChuloMiami, FL (or the nearest big-booty club)
No disrespect Papi_Chulo, but georgemicrodong always struck me as one of the more sinister posters on here.
Clearly you seem to think he’s an ok guy so maybe I’ve misread him. But I always figured that some day I’d tune in to Dateline and there would be a disturbing story that ends with the Dateline guy’s voiceover saying “and he regularly posted to a website named TUSCL with the handle ‘George with the micro dong’.”
discussion comment
5 years ago
![]()
rickduganVerified and Certifiable Super-Reviewer
rickdugan, I think you are exaggerating the issue. As usual, you haven’t thought carefully about the potential set of biases.
All review sites suffer from something called “ascertainment bias”. I know that is a big word, so I’ll explain it to using Yelp restaurant reviews as an example.
On average, people who post Yelp reviews are more irritating to the wait staff than people who don’t post Yelp reviews. When the wait staff are irritated they are more likely to add boogers and cum to food. This means that the reviews you read on Yelp aren’t reviews of the average meal you are going to get if you show up. No, they are reviews of the average meal you are going to get if you show up and act like a jerk (but you wouldn’t know anything about that, would you?)
Here is what you don’t understand. If you take food from a Michelin starred restaurant and add a soupçon of boogers and cum, it is still better food than McD’s with boogers and cum. Perhaps there is the oddball case where food is improved by boogers and cum, but those are rare.
The upshot: the Yelp reviews are still correlated with food quality, despite the prodigious amounts of boogers and cum consumed by the reviewers.
It works the same way for TUSCL; you just need to substitute different bodily fluids. Isn’t that brilliant?
discussion comment
5 years ago
Search your feelings flagooner, you would have given Marcia Cross many a rimjob. You know it to be true!
I mean her pre-cancer butthole. Eating post-surgery butthole doesn’t sound appealing. But I bet she had a truly brilliant butthole back in the day. You’d eat it in a New York minute! ;)