discussion comment
14 years ago
I've followed a couple of SC web sites, both stand-alone sites and ones on places like MySpace. I think the reason so few clubs have web sites (and why those that have them let them just set there without any new input) is because SC owners are just plain cheap. one club had a site, updated it from time to time, then let it go when they had to pay the fee to reserve the domain name (we're talking something like $9.95, to give you an idea of how cheap these people are!). they turned around and found out one of their dancers knew enough to set up a site on one of the 'social networking' sites. she did an okay job of it, but then they let her go in a re-organization and now the site's just setting there with info that multiple-months out of date. makes them look bad, but I don't think they give a shit. just saving a few bucks.
discussion comment
14 years ago
is it me, or does anyone else notice how often it's a Fox station that carries stories like this (see the thread about "expose" in Cleveland)? states are getting the pinch. on the one side they've got the folks who've been convinced any tax is "taken" from them. on the other side, they've got people who would like to make enough to actually live while working for the state. a no-win situation, and I don't see it getting better anytime soon unfortunately.
discussion comment
14 years ago
watched the video. don't know who's the bigger douche, the reporter or the "spokeman" for the group who pushed the law in the first place. buncha fuckin' idiots.
discussion comment
14 years ago
hey, they're bringing in what the market demands! lol!!!
discussion comment
14 years ago
have to say, I hate the music, but damn, love that pole work! now, if only she'd have been willing to wear a little (or a lot!) less....
discussion comment
14 years ago
the whole idea of making a SC a "private" club to get out from under the different 'blue laws' is something I fear we're all going to be facing in the none-too-distant future. with the way state and local governments are cracking down on "adult" industry outlets like SC's and adult book stores, they're either going to have to get creative or get out of business. if it's a choice between no SC or going to a "private" club so I can have a good time and see women get naked, I vote for the latter.
discussion comment
14 years ago
"In exchange for smaller federal government, they want more intrusive government involvement in private lives. And they don't see the contradiction. Morons."
agreed, people who can't see they're making a mockery of the very thing they profess to support. fuckin' bible-thumpin' idiots.
discussion comment
14 years ago
samsung,
your story sounds like one of those urban myths. I mean, hell, if they handed over the tape, they'd have to admit they knew prostitution was going on in their place of business.....not a good thing to do to the police.
discussion comment
14 years ago
actually, based on personal experience, I'd reverse your recommendation on which of the lingerie shops to go to and rank Chantilly over Exclusive. Chantilly actually has a web site (google the name and add the city if that doesn't work) so you can have a rough idea of what the women look like. Exclusive, the last time I was there, well, I wouldn't like to say the women were past 'sell by' date, but they're not far from it.
one thing I can tell you, though thankfully not from personal experience, is to avoid the single massage parlor listed on that link like the plague. everything I've heard is old women, dirty inside and just generally not worth a visit. check the usasexguide link for Rockford to get the 411 on what's what if you're looking for some fun. good hunting.
discussion comment
14 years ago
"Authorities cited four employees of a Little Rock strip club on prostitution charges and two others for public sexual indecency during a raid Thursday, the Little Rock Police Department said."
let's see, "sexual indecency", does that mean they weren't wearing those head-to-toe robes Muslim women are forced to wear (and what most Bible-thumpers seem to think all American women should wear too)?
discussion comment
14 years ago
"ARLINGTON, Texas — Hines Ward and Ike Taylor on Tuesday refuted an online report that they headed to a Dallas strip club only hours after landing here for Super Bowl XLV.
Ward, Taylor and a number of other "huge linemen" were seen partying at Dallas Gentlemen's Club on Monday night, Dallas Morning News reporter Gromer Jeffers Jr. wrote on his blog."
geez, like who the fuck's business is it anyway? besides, if this pencil-necked geek reporter had gone up and asked who these guys were, if they'd been real NFL players, his next stop would probably have been the trash can in the men's restroom.
what bull!
discussion comment
14 years ago
like the question 45, also the one about trading sex for money or other good. don't I wish!
discussion comment
14 years ago
let's see, most of us like young, slender women dancing at the pole, right? why does giving a woman like this a couple of pounds of chocolate (which is likely to cause her to put on 5-10 pounds!) seem like a bad idea?
discussion comment
14 years ago
he'd probably be better off trying to encourage more SC's in Miami by loosening up the rules.....and then taxing all the booze they'll be selling.
discussion comment
14 years ago
here's the logic of it all:
dancer sees other dancer hanging out with a guy for long period of time. this dance thinks "Aha! He's got MONEY!!!". so when your 'fav' leaves, the other dancer pounces, hoping to separate you from a few of the $$$ you were (in her mind) planning on dropping on 'fav'. it's all about who can collect the most coin at the end of the night in their minds.
discussion comment
14 years ago
a guy who does porn and uses the 'stage name' of "Seymore Butts"? you have got to be joking......
discussion comment
14 years ago
this should be reason #1 why you should keep a curb on your intake of booze in a SC (besides, if you're totally wasted, how much can you enjoy a lapper anyhow?).
discussion comment
14 years ago
.....and to think I always wondered why they have the dancers put a towel on the customer's lap before they start grinding away...lol! guess you could think of it as a compliment, as in you got her hot enough to leave 'sign' behind.
discussion comment
14 years ago
geez, runnoft, do you have to rub it in to all us poor bastards who aren't that lucky?
;)
discussion comment
14 years ago
actually, unless their wording is very specific, as long as you keep the original building, an addition should come in as just part of a "remodeling" job. after all, it isn't a separate structure, capable of standing on it's own, is it? so unless you're worried about crowding the property lines or something similar, WTF should they complain about. *DO* get a good lawyer to go over the law in detail to make sure, but if you are allowed to do "remodeling", then any attached structure should qualify under that wording.
discussion comment
14 years ago
'Dancer: "Do I have to dance for you? I thought we could just have sex."'
LMFAO!!!! excellent!
discussion comment
14 years ago
yeah, and it doesn't like Linux machines either. oh, well, time to fire up Windoz I guess.
discussion comment
14 years ago
"Dissatisfied when Las Vegas Exclusive Personals didn't arrange for a refund, Blackman said he contacted Metro Police and was told he faced arrest for such conduct and was advised to contact the Better Business Bureau."
he calls the cops because he's not satisfied with the service a hooker gives him? what a fuckin' moron!