discussion comment
10 years ago
The only way out of the darkness is to be fiscally conservative and socially moderate. Moderation is the key. We need to stop legislating morality. Just regulate and tax such things. Hell I don't care -- legalize MJ and prostitution for all I care. Use the new taxes to improve our schools and make college cheaper for our youth so the next generation are more employable.
Stop spending MY money protecting me from me -- just protect me from you. The hole our communities and our country are in are too large to be solved through cost cutting alone. Eliminate corruption and waste -- absolutely. But the only way out and up is through growth and the only way to have growth is to create a pro-business environment within which profits and jobs stay IN our communities instead of being shipped elsewhere to the lowest common denominator whether it be China, Mexico or Mississippi. Through policy, encourage business creation and innovation. Employment will follow. Competition for committed or talented employees creates wage inflation far better than mandating wage increases.
Hey House. Hey Senate. Hey Governors. Let's stop fucking around! Let's go!! USA USA USA !!!!
discussion comment
10 years ago
![]()
motorheadFat, drunk and stupid is no way to go through life
It first hit me the last time I was in Vegas. I used to think Vegas was "my town". Last time, I felt as if I was an unwelcome intrusion in some younger guy's party. What's next -- early bird specials?? Then again, I was there with the ball n chain --maybe she's the one that makes me feel old.
Whatever. Sucks to age!!
discussion comment
10 years ago
In this one hour series on CNN, Lisa Ling's very first episode was entirely about sugar daddies/sugar babies and seekingarrangement.com. Not hard hitting news but an interesting view into an interesting subculture. Ling knows, sex sells.
http://www.cnn.com/SPECIALS/us/this-is-life-with-lisa-ling
discussion comment
10 years ago
Johnsmith -- having enjoyed sc's around the country for years, I too prefer UHM clubs and/or extras. That having been said, MBOT, in my opinion, is a place that avid PLs have to be able to say they've been at least once. You wouldn't go to Washington DC and not at least drive by the monuments, right?
Check out the "SHOWS" tab on their website: http://www.ofarrell.com/
The live girl-girl sex shows in the various rooms are unlike anything i have encoutered elsewhere and worth seeing (I've never been to TJ). I wouldn't be able to afford this place as an every week go-to place, so I am glad it is not in my hometown, but I go once every year or so and hit all the various side rooms as each one is a somewhat different experience/vantage point of the action. Arrive before 7 pm and admission is only $20. Also, earlier in the evening, you are more likely to find parking on the streets immediately surrounding the theater. Some streets are kinda sketchy, especially the further east you go from MBOT, but nothing has ever happened to me over the years and I've been in there anywhere from 5 PM to 2 AM. Just have your head on a swivel. I used to enjoy driving around the oneway streets checking out the abundant SWs before the city cracked down -- it used to be the wild west.
Let us know what you decide to do.
discussion comment
10 years ago
Its time to swing for the fences. Tell her you'll only have sex if she brings a coworker for a threesome. Indulge your wildest fantasies. Either she'll run for the hills or maybe you will have struck gold.
discussion comment
10 years ago
I have heard of a US Passport Card which is supposed to be cheaper and quicker to obtain. Its use is limited to Mexico, Canada, Caribbean and travel by land or sea (ie., excludes international travel by air).. It fits in your wallet. Be sure to write and describe your visit so we can live vicariously through you.
http://travel.state.gov/content/passports/english/passports/information/card.html
discussion comment
10 years ago
BTW Hottest of all time -- Elizabeth Berkley in Showgirls LDK!!!!
http://www.xnxx.com/video1298655/elizabeth_berkley_-_showgirls_lapdance_
discussion comment
10 years ago
TMZ investigation skills > FBI or CIA
Check out the latest Adrian Peterson rumors . . . ugly
discussion comment
10 years ago
Celebrities playing strippers:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=reRh2CzUDe4
Enjoy!!
discussion comment
10 years ago
Agree with Skibum, not worth it. 200 will go a long way at virtually any casino bar on lv blvd. Negotiate an in-room striptease and then some.
discussion comment
10 years ago
@Shadowcat: The ratings are fucked up enough already with guys over rating a club just because some girl touched his pee pee for the first time. LOL Totally agree!
Ratings ARE over-inflated. Every club is like 3 or 3-1/2 stars -- I can't tell good from bad. What we need to do is DEFLATE the ratings when PLs have bad experiences that are not properly handled by management. One crazy stripper -- NBD. On the other hand, ROB strippers supported blindly by bouncers and managers -- that is entirely different. I know, realistically, one bad rating isn't going to move the needle on a club's overall ranking -- but it is a start.
If a super hot stripper robs me in a clean, well appointed club -- should the review say Dancer 10, Value 1, Atmosphere 10? That is a 21 divided by 3 = 7. That's 3-1/2 stars. For me, if a club rips off people often, an overall rating of 3-1/2 stars is too high -- I don't care how hot the girl or how nice the club is. Anyway, I wish we could give 2 rating scores for Dancer (one for Dancer Hotness and one for Dancer Experience). That would clear things up. That would differentiate betweeen: VHM hot dancers, VHM mediocre dancers and low mileage hot dancers. Don Quixote, I guess.
Just glad Ujay got out safe at the end of the day.
discussion comment
10 years ago
Sorry, I am all for truth, justice and the american way, too. However, discretion is the better part of valor and we are talking about Jersey here. Let me say again JERSEY! Ujay said they locked the door and wouldn't let him leave. What one might do "in theory" and what he chose to do "in the heat of the moment" are two very different things. Better to live to fight another day, I say. Ever been in Vegas in the 70s or 80s? or Chicago?? or JERSEY?!!? Some guys you just don't fuck with, Monday morning quarterbacking bravado aside. Anybody that isn't a little afraid of organized crime or corrupt cops is begging for a beat down.
I repeat -- bad mouth the club by name, tank their ratings, spend your money and time elsewhere.
discussion comment
10 years ago
Ujay, I read your review. The place was Delilah's Den in Toms River, NJ, I believe. I have several comments:
1. Why would you rate your club experience with 5s and 6s? Sounds like it should have been straight 1s.
2. Why would you go back when your August review of the same club warned of ROBs also?
3. The place sounds mobbed up. Remember, you're seeking illegal playtime (essentially) from criminals. Drug deals go bad every day, too. Getting out was the right move. Threatening to call the cops on the club is a risky bluff that might get you smacked or worse. Your face is worth more than the $100 you spent to get away. In retrospect, I wonder what would have happened if you had tipped the bouncer to fire the crazy-ass ROB bitch, pointing out that you are a regular and know how the game is usually played (if he and the dancer are running the scam together, that wouldn't work).
4. Our only recourse as consumers is to bad mouth the club, tank their ratings and spend our money elsewhere.
discussion comment
10 years ago
Good one Steve! Relax by Frankie is the quintessential LDK or BJ song!! I can picture Melanie Griffith right now.
discussion comment
10 years ago
Sadly, after many years, I've concluded that JS69 and SuperDude are exactly correct. True love is the 1%. 99% of all human interaction is merely commerce -- the exchange of cash or equity for goods or services. Looking back on it, in my 20's, when I bought a brand new car and upgraded my wardrobe (after a promotion), I instantly enjoyed many more women interested in me. At the time, I didn't know why -- I just accepted it. Now, I realize -- girls desire dreamy-eyed handsome. muscular boys. When they grow up, women want walking wallets. Thank goodness, because most of us don't get better looking as we age, but we can get wealthier (thus more attractive). (Ref., see Hugh Hefner, et al)
discussion comment
10 years ago
Sadly, I think Diceman is still touring at age 56 -- he should have saved his fortune instead of pissing it away like a PL on hookers and at strip clu . . . wait . . . never mind.
discussion comment
10 years ago
Jack and Jill
Went up the Hill
Each with a buck and a quarter
Jill came down with two fifty
That fucking whore!
-- classic Diceman
discussion comment
10 years ago
Great and useful review and will definitely affect my future spending decisions. Wish the owners could see this and fire the douche. Cudos to the reviewer!
Only criticism, I wish reviewer had given straight "1" scores. In my book, 5 is average. 6 and up is above average. Nothing about these awful visits should be construed as anywhere near average or acceptable (much less above average or exceptional). Far too many clubs have composite scores of 5 or 6. It makes it impossible, at a glance, to tell the good ones from the great ones.
I've been meaning to start a thread on this -- does it drive anyone else insane to read a lengthy review that ends with something like "worst SC experience of my life -- would never return under any circumstance" and then I see an overall score of 6? or 5? or even 4? Whaaaaat? Try a "1" !!! It is really an issue with the algorithm that computes the overall score. Reviewer is asked three questions: Physical Club Ratiing, Monetary Value, Dancer Quality each of which is added and divided by 3. Instead of Physical Club rating, let's say "Club Atmosphere" -- therefore, dickhead managers/bouncers or shitty/annoying waitresses would be easily reflected here. Instead of Dancer Quality, let's say "Dancer Experience" -- therefore, if she is hot as hell but treats me like I am a leper and avoids all contact, my experience was poor and my score would reflect as such.
For what its worth . . .
discussion comment
10 years ago
Remember that movie from around 1985, Hardbodies? The hot young women were all seemingly in search of the BBD. The bigger, better deal.
BTW, I never said women spend "their lives" looking for a rich partner. They only look long enough until they find one that they think will reasonably meet their needs. Game on. If circumstances never change -- 50 years of wedded bliss.
However, if circumstances change and their financial needs are no longer perceived as being met, then it is game over. Reload and the search begins again. Not for handsome. Not for charming. Not for wittty. But for the BBD. Every divorced couple I know personally were having money issues. Literally, every one. By the way, I think you could argue that women ARE waiting longer to get married. 27 is the new 21. Wait until the Millenials hit the streets with their massive student debt. Ugh, I shudder to think.
PS, before I get called grouchy, I'm still happily married. Well, I'm still married, anyway. LOL I see what I see with my own eyes and this is what I see in my corner of the world.
discussion comment
10 years ago
I have to agree with Jerikson on the idea that women are looking for a big payday. Here's the proof:
When the credit bubble burst and the housing market cratered, we saw unusually large numbers of seemingly affluent couples suddenly upside-down in their homes with wave after wave of debt. Shock of all shocks -- when the money ran tight, the couples divorced. Then the women lost 25 pounds and put themselves back on the market. Some of the men wound up on this site. LOL Seriously, though, follow the money -- it tells the story. Remember -- a cliche becomes a cliche because it is often true. Why else do you think 51% of the country is currently single? The economy has not improved enough, yet -- there are not enough prosperous catches.
You know what makes for a good catch to a 26 year-old stripper? A 45 year-old making $90K (that used to make $150K)! She thinks it's a lot of money! To the ex-wife, not so much.
discussion comment
10 years ago
If you are single -- clearly, go for it.
If you are married and mongering in secret -- no way. Don't shit (or fuck around) where you eat.
discussion comment
10 years ago
You never paid for sex. You pay to make sure she goes away AFTER sex, though.
discussion comment
10 years ago
I agree with the "crossing the line" comments above. I think it is because a dude having sex with a dude commonly creates the perception that one or the other are, in some way, feminine. Fair or unfair, the stereotypical gay male is portraited as flamboyantly feminine. However, a woman having sex with a woman doesn't result in the perception that one or the other women are overly masculine (yes, I know there are bull dykes, but that is not the first or only image that comes to mind).
Here's another way of saying it -- for me anyway -- two dudes together (even just kissing) is a major noodle buster. No bueno. However, two women together is very arousing (for me).
I wonder -- ask the average hetero woman -- would she say that seeing two women together is a turn-off? Would she say that seeing two men going at it is a turn-on? When watching porn with my SO over the years, I would say she would be more ok with watching girl-girl than boy-boy. I don't know why, just is.