Comments by pensionking (page 22)

How did everybody leave off . . . Sasha Grey??? That's one freaky, wild, spirited woman.

lol

prime rib -- lawry's. otherwise, ribeye.

in n out burgers are overrated. blow jobs are not lol

Best. Link. Ever.

The Republican Party will never again win a national Election with a candidate that panders to the Religious Right and their social issues. Too many moderate women and latinos that will pivot left if pushed. To my own personal horror, Trump is the only republican candidate perceived as powerful enough to lead, independent enough to say fuck off to the religious right, and nasty enough to capture the frustration of the average American as it concerns Washington gridlock. Lastly, Hillary will be nominee (as Bernie is off the reservation left), but she has too many haters in the middle. For these reason, shockingly, Trump will win. Not saying I endorse Trump -- just how I see it playing out.

Dennis Hof is a douchebag

The only reason to go to Pahrump is . . . it is legal. Period. You will spend 1.5 to 2.0 times more in brothel than you would have spent with a pro in virtually any LV casino. More specifically, 250-400 versus 150-250. The nicer the casino, the hotter the date and the higher the cost. Bargains starting at 100 or 150 can be found at the middle- or lower-end LV Strip casinos without possessing huge amounts of game. There is talent for rent at or near the bar in virtually every casino on the LV Strip. It is like shooting fish in a barel. Look for a hottie with a small purse sitting without male companionship at or near the bar in any casino and just say hi. That's all. She'll do the rest if she is for hire. I will never patronize the legal pros again until they normalize their pricing -- which may never happen.

sclvr is probably correct. The most you can do is text back and wish her well in her future. Tell her you enjoyed your time with her in the club and (slyly) offer to get together with her outside the club if she ever runs short on cash and wants to party a little on the side. Wink wink, nudge nudge. Try not to come across too pervy. You never know . . .

I would post something in this thread but I am busy lurking. Sorry.

I was at heavenly bodies in IL awhile ago and got a grind only 5-song lapper from an 8. There was no groping given/permitted and no stick shifting and no kissing or nuzzing. She kept her back to me most of the time and worked it up and down like she was waxing a car. After being rebuffed several times to secure more intimacy, I was bored to death somewhere around song 2 or 3. There was no illusion of a sexual encounter whatsoever. I might as well have put my knob against a shoeshine machine. Maybe I am old and numb and jaded, but simple grinding is passe. No thanks, anymore.

Lol @Deuce As a rule, whenever a dancer asks what I want to do, I say "how about we just do what we did last time" even if I have never met them before. I think she assumes that she simply doesn't remember me and we go do what I would want to do. They are there to get paid to please and most of them get it. In sales, it is known as the assumptive close.

Shill reviews inflate rating scores, which sucks. For some of us, time and money are precious commodities, neither of which we can afford to waste. If Sheriff Scrub helps me call into question an overly flattering or overly generous review, I simply say thank you. I venture a guess that Scrub is correct 20 times for every 1 misfire. Either flagging or propping a bullshit review helps me skip over its contents quickly, which I also appreciate. Shrub for Sheriff of TUSCLtown!

I think that is it. If the author wishes for a back and forth conversation -- soliciting points of view, or has a brief observation, then the post belongs in Discussions. If the author wishes to present a series of facts or opinions -- in other words, tell a story that will require more than a few paragraphs, then Articles is probably a better location.

This is why being forced to have your ID scanned is a terrible idea. Clubs that do so should be boycotted out of business.

+10 @Corvus Excellent point missed by most of us. Her profession is irrelevant. Would the tragedy be less tragic if she was working as a bank teller or a hairdresser? Is she to be thought of as more negligent because of her profession? The characterization as a stripper is meant to degrade and demean the mother and titillate the reader. For shame.

@s88 -- kind of a long story. I was invited to "her" apartment. She said she would give instructions when I arrived because she said she was kinda hard to find. She was kind of sketchy on details (other than a street address). Then she asked me what kind of vehicle I was driving. In retrospect, that was an odd question. I arrived 20 minutes early at the address given, but parked up the street a little ways away to scope it out. I called her and told her I was 20 minutes away and that I would call again. I got out and walked down the street. The address was a run down hair/nail salon in a 2-story converted old house. Looked out of business at first glance. That is when I noticed that there were like 5 men in the salon and 1 women, just milling around talking -- nobody getting hair or nails done. They were mostly beefy-looking white guys in a mixed but mostly black neighborhood. Something just didn't feel right. I kept walking past the address and called her a few minutes later up the block. She said I was to walk around to the back of the building and locate stairs to a second story apartment. She said to come on up and let myself in -- that she would be waiting for me. Let myself in?? Who does that?? Thinking it through, I recalled that we had discussed explicit things on the phone (rookie mistake). I decided to bail and walked back toward my car. As I passed the salon, the guys that were inside couldn't be seen, but none had come out the front. As I passed the far side of the building, there was an older white guy around the corner. He stopped me and asked me if I was looking for someone. Huh?? I said no no no and got the f out of there. Two weeks later, I read in the news of an undercover reverse LE sting that nabbed a bunch of johns over that very weekend using backpage. I suppose I could be wrong, but I am pretty sure I dodged a bullet. Lessons learned: control the where, arrive earlier than anticipated and scope out the situation, never discuss explicit details (I only mention money for time now -- if she is real, she knows what the time is for, as do I). LEO wants explicit details confirmed upfront and would never agree to come to my hotel or the location of my choosing -- too much risk for them; too many variables.

#1 at first. Then #3. Nothing else.

SJG: serious question . . . why do you post lines and lines and lines of material completely unrelated to the topic? It seems as if you are trying to bait others into either lashing out at you or placing you on ignore. I have not ignored you because occasionally you are interesting. Seriously, why do you hijack these threads??

Multiple reviews on TER decrease the probability that the BP escort is LEO. LEO is why I have stuck with SCs more recently. Long story, I got very close to being pinched in a BP sting once. Freaked me out. Just like DUIs now, in 2016, you get your friggin' picture in the paper -- they're all about ruining your life as punishment.

I imagine Taffer could "rescue" a SC in a place like Las Vegas -- where ridiculously large amounts of the strictly legal money flows like water. In a place like the Big D, fuggetaboutit. No fuckin chance.

The argument to skip "if not liking the man" works for your neighbor or your distant cousin. In fact, I like that -- "if I wouldn't visit him while alive, why would I now." I may use that one, myself. However, in this case, it is disrespect for the office that makes his absence egregious. Just like skipping the funeral of the Major General killed in Afghanistan serving under current POTUS. Even if no personal connection to the man, the title demands respect. @how: I get it. The president nominates; the Senate confirms. I take issue with Senate leadership indicating they will not confirm ANYONE nominated no matter what until after the election. Stating their intention not to confirm ANYONE betrays their ultimate motives -- to circumvent the constitution for political purposes.

+1 lol Georgemicro

To be fair, IMO Scalia is not a reactionary, just a conservative. Furthermore, POTUS has not pandered to the religious right whatsoever -- if anything, he has, at times, needlessly tormented the religious right. The idiot religious zealots fall for the bait ever time. So predictable. They seemingly never got to the bible verse about turning the other cheek! If it needs stated, I can't stand the positions taken by extremists in either direction, left or right. Full disclosure, I consider myself leaning fiscally conservative and socially liberal.

Those who would give up essential Liberty, to purchase a little temporary Safety, deserve neither Liberty nor Safety. -- Benjamin Franklin Does a branch of the federal government have the authority to direct a private corporation to assign money, time and intellectual resources for completion of tasks aimed to assist the federal government in matters to which said corporation is neither an accused nor is a direct party? I suspect, upon appeal to right-minded constitutional experts, the answer is no. IMO, Furthermore, Cook has a fiduciary obligation to Apple shareholders to refuse these demands as to comply most certainly would adversely affect future iPhone sales dramatically.