discussion comment
14 years ago
The only "bad attitudes" I've observed at this club are from known ROBs who object to the fact that they're known ROBs and from a very few girls there who just shouldn't be dancing.
discussion comment
14 years ago
Here's the link: http://espn.go.com/endofcentury/s/other/bestrivalries.html
The first thing to remember is that, as Clubber says, you CAN'T quantify something like this. The piece is designed to stir folks up, get 'em to comment, and ultimately get more hits on the website.
All that said, I cannot believe that Army-Navy didn't even make the list. Despite the fact that the two teams have little relevance as far as national rankings, there's so much more depth and significance to this rivalry overall that I think it blows all the rest away.
I'll give 'em a personal nod for including the UNC rivalry despite the fact that they spelled "Dook" wrong.
discussion comment
14 years ago
I think you're on to something there, Clubber. Upon reflection, Lopaw is much more "one of us" than a standard civilian woman.
discussion comment
14 years ago
I've been given the "nice touch" line a few times over the last year or so. I've never heard the "nervous" line.
However, bottom line is to have Lopaw's attitude. You'll tie yourself up in knots trying to decode this crap. It's hard enough to figure out "civilian" women OTC (no offense, Lopaw).
discussion comment
14 years ago
4's and 5's.
discussion comment
14 years ago
No.
discussion comment
14 years ago
Although these things are nice to hear, I give them the same veracity as "Now I have to go change my panties!"
discussion comment
14 years ago
I think you're going to do quite well, regardless of hair length.
discussion comment
14 years ago
Erin Esurance.
discussion comment
14 years ago
When I started in this hobby, I'd routinely go to a local university library and look over Yellow Page listings prior to work road trips. Once I got on the internet in '96 or so, I discovered ASS-C on the Usenet lists, and on the web I found the Grimace Nudie Club list, Zbone's list, Biff Dickmann, and TUSCL, likely by using yahoo or webcrawler.
discussion comment
14 years ago
"Hey, sweetheart"
discussion comment
14 years ago
When this happens my favorites typically ignore the stage call.
discussion comment
14 years ago
I think Lopaw may be on to something. I wonder if anyone's ever tried asking an annoying dancer, "What do you do when you're out for an evening at a dance club or bar and some guy/gal you're not at all interested in keeps hitting on you?" Do you reckon she might get the hint?
discussion comment
14 years ago
Thanks Shadowcat.
discussion comment
14 years ago
In general this doesn't bother me; however, there have been a couple of extreme cases where the combination of voice, delivery, and lack of intelligence overrode any evident hotness.
discussion comment
14 years ago
MisterGuy,
Your last post prompted a reaction and question.
First, the question: In your last sentence you seem to be implying that the only way to determine whether PP objectively deserves its rating is for you to visit the club and evaluate it. Is that what you meant? Or, did you mean that the only way to determine if you AGREED with the rating was to visit?
I also started thinking about your use of the word "shill." When I use the word shill in the context of TUSCL, I'm referring to someone connected with a club monetarily, as in an employee or someone else with something to gain from artificially inflating ratings. When I look up the word "shill" (noun) in Webster's New World dictionary, this is what I see:
shill (shil) [slang] n. a confederate of a gambler, auctioneer, etc. who pretends to bet, bid, etc. so as to lure others.
I think that's pretty much in line with the way I perceive and use the word.
So, when you say that Shadowcat, myself, and others have been "shilling for PP for many years" you're implying that we gain some benefit from our high ratings of the club or are otherwise some kind of "confederate" of the club. What do you believe is that benefit or the nature of that confederate relationship? Or, are you using the the "shill" in a different way?
As for my ratings of the club, I concede that they are subjective. I'd argue that all such ratings are subjective based on the experience of individual reviewers in the club in question and their experiences in other clubs that they use for comparison. However, for what it's worth given that we're on an internet message board, I am not connected with the club in any way and can assure you that, though my ratings are subjective, they are completely independent. I also believe that is the case for Shadowcat and I'll tell you why. He's never been shy about being critical about certain aspects of the club and specific employees; that's not the way shills generally operate.
I'll close by asking if the Founder has ever revealed the method he uses for calculating ratings. Is there a previous discussion or link?
discussion comment
14 years ago
This is addictive.
http://www.forkparty.com/45-sexy-demotivational-posters/
discussion comment
14 years ago
Sunshine.
discussion comment
14 years ago
Glad to see you back, Shadowcat. Good luck in your contest against the demon rum.
discussion comment
14 years ago
![]()
rickduganVerified and Certifiable Super-Reviewer
Never.
discussion comment
14 years ago
Had some great times there in the mid 90's. Had really gone downhill in recent years.
discussion comment
14 years ago
My preferences are:
Day shift at Platinum Plus.
Night shift at Heartbreakers.
discussion comment
14 years ago
Some dancers have amazing memories. I've had dancers recognize me on a second meeting as much as six months after the initial. With bartenders/waitstaff, it takes a minimum of three visits in my experience. I think that's pretty impressive as well. It must pay for these folks to recognize regulars.
discussion comment
14 years ago
I haven't been in a year or so, but during the two years prior I noted a good number of eastern European women at Masters in Myrtle Beach, SC. Again, no common theme. A couple were outstanding.
discussion comment
14 years ago
Like 'em. Don't see 'em enough, though.