discussion comment
16 years ago
flowers, american flags, chocolate, etc. WTF???
The strippers like cash. Flowers are for lovers.
discussion comment
16 years ago
back to the monkey - can he do the organ-grinder act with a cute little pillbox hat on his head and a cute little tin cup in his hand? And would you happen to have an organ-grinder available to go with the monkey?
discussion comment
16 years ago
Concerning paragraphs
It is 9 pm (Central) on Sunday night. Within the last minute I have looked at BobbyL's review of Spearmint Rhino twice. Going through two different paths to get there. In one instance the review was under the heading "BobbyL". There were no paragrphs. In the other instance the same review, word for word, was under the heading "Spearmint Rhino". There were numerous paragraphs.
So I believe that BobbyL wrote the review with plenty of paragraphs, but for some strange reason, the software removed all the paragraph control characters when it copied the review into the BobbyL personal space.
Go figure.
discussion comment
16 years ago
Back to the question of authenticity.
I thought everybody knew, or at least assumed, that a lot the reviews we read on TUSCL are fake. If I were forced to place a cash bet on one side or the other, I would have to bet that BobbyL's review of Spearmint Rhino WAS fake, but I can't be sure, and neither can NJSCFAN. But it really doesn't matter.
Remember the phrase at the bottom of the page: "Everything written on this site should be considered a work of fiction."
If the review is fake, it is more in keeping with the disclaimer than if it were completely truthful.
discussion comment
16 years ago
why should someone want to reply to a silly attempted insult?
why would anybody consider poor spelling a big deal on an anonymous discussion board?
WHY WHY WHY - tell me why
discussion comment
16 years ago
If there was an Oscar for TUSCL posts, I would nominate ozymandias. Great job, man.
discussion comment
16 years ago
imho best to ignore people like bobbyl and parodyman
but will we ever learn????
discussion comment
16 years ago
casualguy - you mean they should bite your cock? ouch.
discussion comment
16 years ago
If I discovered my wife was secretly moonlighting as a stripper it would be the happiest day of my life.
My daughter? Way too heavy, way too judgmental. (Well my wife is also too judgmental, IMHO. That is why I would be so thrilled if I discovered she was a secret stripper. We could redefine our relationship.)
discussion comment
16 years ago
The main advantage of old age is: you haven't died yet.
discussion comment
16 years ago
Parodyman - I agree with almost everything you said at 12:55. And also I want to think you for you terse post of 8/14, because it stimulated me to put down my thoughts.
The only thing I disagree with is the phrase "self-serving". I do not see why it is any more self-serving than any of the others we see day in and day out on this board.
Now if you had use the word "self-aggrandizing" I would totally agree. But there is a big difference IMHO. It is obvious that BobbyL has a strong need for recognition and approval from others who post on this board. Puzzles me why, but I do not know the man, and the charm of this board is the interesting comments and viewpoints. Including your own, by the way, when you are not denigrating shadowcat.
discussion comment
16 years ago
Really casulguy? You are worried about how many guys a stripper has slept with? How come?
Do strippers who do porno movies sleep with more guys than strippers who do NOT do pornos?
discussion comment
16 years ago
Parodyman, let's turn the question around, and ask, "Who cares about your oft-stated opinions/insults/lies about Shadowcat? Duh - THE AUTHOR CARES. Nobody else cares at least not much.
But at least BobbyL was focusing on the mission of this board -- to PROVIDE INFORMATION ABOUT STRIP CLUBS. I do care, and I have some comments.
My major complaint about his review - since BobbyL asked for feedback - is that it is WAY TOO MUCH about BobbyL and therefore needlessly wastes the reader's time.
To paraphrase and extrapolate Parodyman, the average reader DOES care about the specifics of the club being reviewed. Bobbyl provides a few specifics of the club, but was extremely wordy in doing so.
But nobody really cares about BobbyL, either as a strip-club attendee or as a consumer of Escort services. BobbyL, I counted 40 occurrences of I, me, or my. THAT'S RIDICULOUS. To quote Parodyman, "Who Cares".
The piece was also way too long, but if you write a review that long, for crying out loud give us some paragraphs. Show a little mercy, man.
I did appreciate the insight on Las Vegas business practices. You reinforce my suspicion that one can sometimes find a willing hooker among the population of Las Vegas strippers. The negotiations and the end result (you never specifically said you got laid, but you did imply it) were moderately interesting.
I look forward to reading your second PUBLISHED REVIEW and hope it shows improvement. I know u have it in u to do better.
Finely (sic): Next time, consider removing the personal and dancer-specific items from the CLUB REVIEW, and put them into a BLOG. You can discuss "I/me/my" as much as you want in a blog, without detracting. A lot of what you write on the discussion board might be more suitable as a blog, also. (The first word of this, my closing paragraph, is the first word of the last sentence of BobbyL's review.)
discussion comment
16 years ago
No, I don't care for these so-called novelty acts. Midgets, giants, bearded ladies - fuggedaboudit.
Features are for tourists and newbies. I remember the first couple of times I attended a Feature I was pretty thrilled. Then the excitement went away, and now they seem like a drag - a distraction - to me. But some Features do have very glitzy well polished acts. Gypsy Rose Lee and Sally Rand were famous Features from the olden days but times have changed.
discussion comment
16 years ago
I recommend Flight Club in the afternoon.
Stuff like this is hit-or-miss
discussion comment
16 years ago
I would say the whole lot of them are pretty silly.
But perhaps only a little sillier than the rest of us who post here.
discussion comment
16 years ago
well did they clap, cheer, pat you on the back?
Or did they throw you out and tell you to never cum back?
discussion comment
16 years ago
If you were going to slit your wrist do you think one of these Shick razords would be the best way to do it?
discussion comment
16 years ago
If you haven't checked out Broadway Showgirls, I recommend it. Why don't you try two or three SF clubs just to see if Centerfolds is ripping you off.
discussion comment
16 years ago
Sorry -
Archibalds (not AArchibalds)
discussion comment
16 years ago
The three strip clubs that are closest to George Washington University are AArchibalds, Royal Palace, and Louis' Rogue
There may be other important factors to consider besides distance from GWU.
discussion comment
16 years ago
I have been to quite a few clubs and I love to read the reviews of those clubs to see how they compare with my own experience. For the most part, they are quite compatible and therefore I think these reviews are FOR THE MOST PART pretty accurate. Sure, some of the reviews are adverts in disguise, and some reviewers will totally diss a club just because HE had an annoying personal experience with a doorman or a dancer (BAD ETIQUETTE IMHO) but if we filter out these outliers, I do believe we can get A LOT OF USEFUL INFORMATION from the reviews.
Shadowcat's comment that knowing the reviewer personally is a NON SEQUITER of the first magnitude. 99% of all the people that post on this site know NONE of the other reviewers fer chrissakes. I will give Shadowcat the benefit of the doubt that he knows several reviewers personally but that is TOTALLY IRRELEVANT (sorry Shadowcat)
discussion comment
16 years ago
![]()
minnowAny place that interests me.
63, 63 plus 3. Interesting title. Took me a little while to realize that 63 is years, 3 is days. That made it even more interesting.
Dougster, I would not such harsh language as Clubman2 did, but for whatever it is worth, I do agree with the general tenor of his remarks. Consider just one huge blunder you made: stating that Japan would not have been able to successfully occcupy America. (False premise) Read some some history, Dougster. Japan had NEVER had any interest in occupying America, or even in "DEFEATING" America. The objective of Pearl Harbor attack was to take out the American Pacific Fleet, and then consolidating their gains in the eastern Pacific region without pesky interference from America. The militarists took a huge gamble and ultimately lost. Hard to predict WHAT would have happened in the Pacific if the Japanese Battle Plan for Midway had succeeded. There is a book "Miracle at Midway" which convinced me that America was VERY LUCKY to achieve our tremendous victory at Midway. If the Japanese had sunk the American carriers instead of vice versa, it is possible that America would not have been able to prevent Japan from consolidating its Pacific conquests. There are so many imponderables and unknowns....
discussion comment
16 years ago
Budweiser in a can sitting out on the patio. Very pleasant out here today. Can't believe the great weather we have today.
discussion comment
16 years ago
Actually I can't say I recall Shadowcat making any misogynist remarks, so how about Parodyman or some other anti-Cat person refreshing my memories. Certainly the comments in his Original Post are not misogynist, but I agree with Parodyman that the hee hee lol rant is childish.
Before responding please remember that "misogynist" applies to females in general, not ONE particular female.