Comments by Iam4u2screw (page 5)

Not necessarily because the reason for women controlling the majority of consumer spending ties into the fact that they are the party that does a lot of the household spending. Women are more often responsible for most, if not all, of the household because they are the primary support for the children and by default the entire family. As a result, decriminalizing prostitution would really have no impact on this because for the most part women are not going to give their significant other money to visit prostitutes just because it is legal and johns are going to visit prostitutes regardless of the legality, thus the increase in revenue would not be astronomical. Yes, there would be an increase, but some of that would then be offset by the government wanting their cut in taxes on the women's revenue. Overall it would not have a huge impact to stimulate the economy.

^her strap on and his dick felt the same. LOL

Hey I might have found a get candidate. Ed Butts Ford in LA. Placard that across your cute heinie : )

^scratch that. he is an ogre ==> smacks self in head you dumb ass

SHREK is the real troll

@Meat72: you are wrong my friend. MackTruck knows his shit and everyone else's that he hauls around. : )

Ahhhhh......no

All I have to say is that I would start a life in crime if the Punisher (#7) or Batman (#10) would take me into custody. LOL

It seems to me that the vast majority of posts and threads are not the problem, only that 5-10% that torque someone the wrong way and the issue is we do not want censorship. Instead of putting the control to moderate the board in the hands of 1 person to decide, thus opening the opportunity to direct the board, could a moderator panel be established. Make it like a "appeals court" situation where we have 5 people as moderators, that way we can have a simple majority to decide if the post/thread needs to be closed/deleted. I say 5 because 3 makes it easier to guide the board if 2 of the 3 are of similar philosophy, but the odds of 5 having a majority element that agrees on everything is probably significantly less. To reduce the demand on the panel, some type to method could be established to nominate posts/threads to the panel for their adjudication. Just a random thought from a newbie here

When the liberals figure out a sure fire way to tax it, then it will be legal. Look at the states that have legalized pot and there tax revenues from it. Until it can be regulated and taxed, it probably won't be made legal.

Would there be a way to utilize Nice's idea #1 on individual posts to combat the threadjacking that 25 suggested. Some form of like/dislike that if a poster received some number of dislikes for a specific post, then they are barred from posting anymore on that respective thread and the disliked post(s) are removed from the thread. That might make it harder to jack threads, but still allow for the slight deviation that all threads seem to take. That would put the onus on us, the forum users, to police our community and make so no one single person or group can edit the board to match their opinions.

^that is NJballa's MO (thump-her)

"I just don't LIE men with narrow ass views" - translation: you don't like guys who prefer small posteriors on their women So do you LI(k)E men with wide ass views? Does that mean I have to have a fat ass before you would interact with me? Just wondering. Still wouldn't get a dance from you because of your abrasive attitude, your marginal grammar and spelling skills, and your overall trolling persona you try to convey.

"My organization will exist on the ground, not with people from this forum. It will never advertise, invitation only, and the standards are very high, especially for the men." So is this the new "wonder religion" called San_Jose_Guy-ology where all things wrong in male & female interactions are fixed? I think I shall opt out of this nut case's philosophy. SJG, you can save the postage on my invite thank you very much.

So was it 1, 2, or 3 Dominicans that came up to dance? How do you get "about" a person? Was he so drunk he his vision was blurry?

@ime: might be the case at your Chick Fil A, but at mine, they all come with the potential of 5-10 in the state pen (all under age).

LOL She has a sister name PinHOEchio

@Juice: better question would be "does anybody NOT know a stripper named Bambi" : )

Hey Flag can always pet the cat, but they don't serve soup everyday. LOL

@Vanta: Fiats = fix it again Tony crap Chrysler = perpetual rust issues Maserati = looks good, reliability a BIG question mark Dodge = other than trucks, same issues as all Chryslers Alfa Romeo = see Maserati above So Papi probably knows they look good, but under the paint they are a BIG question mark on quality

@Skibum: tell us how you really feel. LOL I do agree with ya though

@Juice: so which BBQ sauce did you copy the scent from? Or was it Arby's sauce?

To answer your concerns: 1) here texting at 10PM: block her number if you don't want her texts 2) her taking their time to walk over to you: deal with it, she isn't your servant that is waiting for you at the door with your smoking jacket and slippers for when you arrive 3) her eyeing other customers after you bought her a drink: try engaging her in order to keep her attention Sounds like the ATF has run it's course and it might be time for you to move on to someone new since it sounds like both of you do not relish the time together anymore.

@Juice: you need to turn down the Juice-appeal. Now you are attracting both sexes mane. OT: Coming to a store this Christmas. From the people that brought you the veggie-slicer and the collapsible hose, we introduce the newest revolution in stripper attraction. Juice-Appeal cologne for those gentleman who want to maximize the clubbing experience and just don't have the game.

@blah: When are they starting production on the blahblahblah23 model? What options will they be offering? : )