discussion comment
7 years ago
Fake asses are harder to spot. Especially ones where the girl didn't go overboard. COI folks may know the infamous Sky, a dancer with a huge fake ass. Yet when you feel it it's surprisingly soft. You can tell she got the fat transfer and not the silicone. I don't mind the fat transfer fake asses one bit, since they usually feel just as soft as a real big ass. Those silicone ass implants however, should be outlawed.
discussion comment
7 years ago
I thing JS69's method is as respectful as it gets.
But for me I usually just go for it. Not a crazy grope or anything but I just slide my hands up there and see what she does. If you're in a good 2 way contact club, boob grabbing is par for the course. Still you might find those girls in these types of clubs who will brush your hand away. That's pretty much the worse that happens. They won't call the bouncer over 1 attempted boob grab. But if you press the issue it might be different. Anyhow, those are 1 dance girls for me. Like you and JS69, boob grabbing is a must. If I can't get that, I have no use for a dancer.
If you're in a low contact club it's probably not accepted. I found this the hard way in SF last week. No worries, that was my last visit to that club.
discussion comment
7 years ago
Saltynuts I don't understand your question. You asked if a pussy flash is an extra? No it isn't but I don't get what that has to do with my statement. As for your second question about would I rather not see the pussy because I liked to be teased? I don't mind if she doesn't flash her pussy, just as long as I can grab some ass and boobs all day and she grinds me like a pro.
My statement was I'd rather take a high mileage 30 year old than a skittish, prudish, air dancing (lowest of low mileage) 20 year old. Has nothing to do with extras or pussy flashing. I dislike air dancing and I dislike no contact. I don't see what's so hard to understand.
discussion comment
7 years ago
^^^^^ I'll take a high mileage 30 year old over some prudish, skittish, air dancing 20 something year old any day of the fucking week.
discussion comment
7 years ago
Mdb2203 hasn't posted in awhile actually. I wonder if he saw that the only guy in his corner was SJG and realized that's worse than any other situation and bounced.
Speaking of SJG, I find the hypocrisy quite hilarious. He posts in every LDK thread calling everyone chumps then turns around and posts this:
"Problems only occur when some do not want to respond in a constructive manner, but want to go into a personally vindictive negative meta-narrative. "
So calling everyone chumps is constructive? Yeah sure thing hypocrite.
discussion comment
7 years ago
Yes, the worst trolls are gone AND he's making improvements to the forum. I noticed another one in the review section. Nice work!
discussion comment
7 years ago
![]()
flagoonerEverything written by this member is a fact.
Damn, you've outdone yourself with his one Flagooner! Lol dude might have to go the Dougster route and just bounce from the site.
Are you gonna score the club all 10s like he does?
discussion comment
7 years ago
Dude, it's called a forum. The purpose of posting is to engage in conversation. If you don't want feedback, why even post? Why not just keep a diary/journal? That way you can do all the therapy writing you need and don't have to worry about positive or negative responses.
I'm not trying to be mean or condescending. I'm just trying to understand your purpose for posting here if you don't want any responses.
discussion comment
7 years ago
![]()
shailynnThey never tell you what you need to know.
Sorry, but the top 40 is still too susceptible to shill reviews. Case in point, Pure Gold in Rancho Cordova. Mdb2203 has done about 17 reviews of this club within the last 5 months or so, scoring the club all 10s every time. While his reasoning is that he 'looks for the positive in everything', in reality it's just skewing the ratings big time.
If you read other reviews of this club you can see it's not even a top 40 club in California. Yet this one guy and his positive reviews have propelled it into a top 40 club in the nation overall.
I think the lists need more tweaking. Not just recent review wise, but user wise as well. Maybe something like, repeated reviews of the same club for a member don't count towards the ratings. Otherwise, those club ads that desertscrub and the rest of us hate so much will continue to fuck up the rating system.
discussion comment
7 years ago
![]()
flagoonerEverything written by this member is a fact.
So SJG can call everyone chumps, but no one else can insult any other person?
Ok got it. What a piece of work.
discussion comment
7 years ago
![]()
TFPAdventures of Assjobman
Ok Shadowcat is the Godfather, and you Papi are Scarface. Both people not to be fucked with.
I'll just wait until Founder is done tweaking, because I'm seeing the stats for everything jumping all over the place.
discussion comment
7 years ago
![]()
TFPAdventures of Assjobman
Ok disregard the last paragraph in my previous post. At first I was seeing contribution level as a high number. For Papi Chulo it said 559000 or something like that. Then for SJG it was reading 879000 or some number like that. I see it's back to normal single digits which is cool.
Except Papi Chulo isn't a level 10 contributor anymore. Oh the horror!
discussion comment
7 years ago
![]()
TFPAdventures of Assjobman
SJG I just noticed that. Yes it would be nice to go back and revisit some old threads that had great info in it. And to see some historic threads. But certainly not to see any of your numerous threads where you basically talk to yourself for 200 or more posts. Sadly, that's probably why Founder had to get rid of really old threads and posts. Maybe they were taking too much memory and causing the site to slow down. I hope that's not the case and those old threads are still there.
In other news, I hope Founder continues to tweak that contribution algorithm. Because when I see that the Godfather Papi Chulo has almost 300,000 contribution points less than SJG, who doesn't have a single review posted, something is seriously the fuck wrong.
discussion comment
7 years ago
Yeah I consider a HJ an extra. That's the first level extra IMO. And like the other posters have said, it's not just about FS to all guys. So you might still be able to keep him as a regular.
And Dirk Diggler I've done covered Russian before. Of course it's not as good as uncovered but still better than an ITP titjob. I've learned through trial and error that you just have to find the girls that are cool with uncovered. In some clubs that's like finding a unicorn.
discussion comment
7 years ago
![]()
TFPAdventures of Assjobman
The ignore feature isn't new. But yes it's highly effective. If you were here say a month or two ago you would have needed to block a handful of folks to really use the site efficiently.
discussion comment
7 years ago
![]()
founderslip a dollar in her g-string for me
So basically getting trust from someone like Papi Chulo will sky rocket your trust score.
Sounds like something from Xbox live lol.
discussion comment
7 years ago
I don't visit too often so documentation isn't really necessary. All my visits are pretty much documented by memory. All the really good visits are definitely locked in. I can remember specific visits from even half a decade ago that were so good that I STILL use it as jerkoff material.
discussion comment
7 years ago
I need to step my game up. I've only had 6. Of course I only visited the strip club 6 times last year :). 3 LDKs, a titfuck finish, and 2 assjob finishes.
This year off to a rough start. 2 visits to SF strip clubs, zero LDKs. Got trips to Philly, Vegas, SoCal and TJ planned so I better triple last year's total.
discussion comment
7 years ago
^^^^^^^^such a beautiful thing. Not gonna lie, this place is a lot more enjoyable now. Even when I don't log in it's not that big a deal anymore.
discussion comment
7 years ago
SLD has this shit down to a science! Amazing observations!
I'm nowhere near as picky as SLD. Fake boobs are ok with me. As long as they're not rock hard. And I hate those jobs where there's hella space in between each boob. Other than that, shit, bring on the fakeness. I love real boobs just the same, as long as they're big! When they can fill up my hands that's when they're the right size.
discussion comment
7 years ago
Cool story. It explains why a lot of your reviews read like club ads.
It's good to point out the positives. But in reviews the goal is to inform the reader so it's also your duty to point out the negatives as well. Otherwise, as you've seen, folks will write off your reviews as shills. Then your writing just becomes therapeutic instead of useful to others. Which is fine if that's your only goal. But if that's the case, might as well just write all this stuff in a diary.
Anyhow, I'll be headed up to your area to try out some clubs tonight as a matter of fact. Hopefully I get to experience those positives you listed.
discussion comment
7 years ago
I knew there would be these type of responses here. Overwhelming in favor of natural everything. Even though the OP herself has said that guys seem to flock to her fake asset having co-workers. I'd be one of those guys, as I just love big asses and big tits, real or fake. Just not the rock hard fake stuff.
So I see that despite being in the minority on this site, that out in the world there's a lot of guys with my same mindset in regards to enhanced T & A.
discussion comment
7 years ago
Thank you for actually listening to the feedback, Founder.
discussion comment
7 years ago
I agree with you 100% and I saw that other members mentioned the same thing. I'm thinking the change makes it easier for Founder in some way. Maybe it saves bandwidth? I don't know anything about running websites, so I'm not sure.
All I know is, the recent reviews was infinitely better the way it was. I used to be able to go on a flight where I had no access to WiFi and just load up a long page of reviews and read them all. Also like the OP, this is how I plan trips to the good areas/clubs. With this new method, I can only have one review loaded up and that's it.
Some of the changes are ok, but the recent reviews tab was perfect the way it was before. I also vote to revert this section back to the old way.
That's funny, OP. I have the EXACT same list of places I want to visit AND avoid. I mean exactly the same! Lol!