I noticed another change while reading an old thread. It seems that you can't comment on old threads after a certain period of inactivity. Seems like a smart change to deter the trolls and SJG from bringing old, useless threads back to the top of the list. For old but useful threads we can just make a new one. A welcome new feature.
What other changes have you guys found?
The ignore feature isn't new. But yes it's highly effective. If you were here say a month or two ago you would have needed to block a handful of folks to really use the site efficiently.
Unlike previous upgrades, for the most part I like the current changes.
Especially like the way a TUSCLer's stats are now more clearly individually displayed vs being all cramped together
It would be helpful if with a long hotlist could order clubs by date of last review so don't have to scan them all to see which are new since last visit.
Good idea davephx. Look for it soon
Seems the landscape photo on my profile looks a lot better/sharper/clearer - but I'd still get rid of the avatar circle if possible
One concern, with the listings of people's threads and posts we have lost pages beyond the first.
The old threads and posts are very important. We should be adding to them when there is no info, not just making new ones.
SJG
The history of conversations is what gives definition to the community.
SJG
SJG I just noticed that. Yes it would be nice to go back and revisit some old threads that had great info in it. And to see some historic threads. But certainly not to see any of your numerous threads where you basically talk to yourself for 200 or more posts. Sadly, that's probably why Founder had to get rid of really old threads and posts. Maybe they were taking too much memory and causing the site to slow down. I hope that's not the case and those old threads are still there.
In other news, I hope Founder continues to tweak that contribution algorithm. Because when I see that the Godfather Papi Chulo has almost 300,000 contribution points less than SJG, who doesn't have a single review posted, something is seriously the fuck wrong.
Ok disregard the last paragraph in my previous post. At first I was seeing contribution level as a high number. For Papi Chulo it said 559000 or something like that. Then for SJG it was reading 879000 or some number like that. I see it's back to normal single digits which is cool.
Except Papi Chulo isn't a level 10 contributor anymore. Oh the horror!
shadowcat is the godfather - I may perhaps be the godson
Ok Shadowcat is the Godfather, and you Papi are Scarface. Both people not to be fucked with.
I'll just wait until Founder is done tweaking, because I'm seeing the stats for everything jumping all over the place.
I'm no longer a homosexual....thanks founder
One thing I noticed is that the reviewer isn't nearly as prominent when reading a review. I kinda liked seeing some stats on the reviewer for the reviews, particularly the # of reviews/clubs. I could understand if the trust rating replaced it, but I'd rather see at least one
I’m late to the game, but I just started using the ignore feature. Literally put one person on ignore and it changed my experience with the site completely. Definitely gonna use it for trolls who don’t even contribute to the site other than their trolling