Comments by anonlvone (page 17)

Finding a bf is not difficult. Finding a good bf is another story. Most decent guys are gonna try to pressure her to stop dancing. The shitty bfs don't care if she dances. This is what I've seen.

Not being judgemental, just realistic. I've told him straight up to go chase pussy all over town if that's what he wants. But if you're gonna take risks do so in a controlled way. When you're jeopardizing everything in your life, that's not being in control. Kind of hard to chase pussy when you're in prison, or a hospital or just dead. There's a smart way of doing things, and then there's dumb. This is just dumb.

This seems like it would be perfect for lazy or uptight dancers who don't want to make an effort, and less attractive dancers who can't compete. A top dancer would drive to a better club or hop on a plane and move to another city.

Normally you can identify a club as high class, middle class or low class. This club wouldn't even be low class. It's like the Sam's Club of strip clubs.

Do they give you your balls back when you leave for the night? Or do they just throw them in the dumpster since you obviously aren't going to be using them? As for waiting for the "hottest/most in demand" strippers, I don't see that being much of a problem since those types of dancers would never work at a club like this. So why not just go all the way and have the door girl hand you a ticket for the next available stripper as soon as you walk in? I know this might make the interactions a bit more "transactional" but I don't think many guys would care apart from the ones who are hung up on useless stuff like looks, personality or individuality. Pussy is pussy, right? Take a number that gives you a place in a queue, but doesn't even guarantee you a dance? And what if you select multiple dancers and two numbers come up at the same time? How do you even select these dancers? If they're all busy giving dances non-stop, how do you make a choice? From a headshot? How do you find out who has tats, piercings, breast implants, is overweight, or has a bad attitude? This has to be one of the dumbest ideas I've ever heard of. No way am I waiting on a number in a queue when I have my car, the locations of four top clubs programmed into my phone, and the phone numbers a dozen top strippers.

Your emotional reactions don't match the story you're telling. But if your story has any basis in reality, you should review your medical insurance, find a good shrink, and a better attorney. Going to prison b/c a pissed off drug dealer or desperate stripper set you up is one of the least things that could happen to you.

gawker: "You assholes who criticize the danger, the excitement and the rush that accompanies the life with my ATF. My wife is in a nursing home with Alzheimer's & severe dementia. I took care" <== Your emotional reactions don't seem to match the story you're telling. But if this story has any basis in reality, you should review your medical insurance, find a good shrink, and a better attorney. Going to prison b/c some pissed off drug dealer or stripper set you up is one of the least things that could happen to you.

there's a universe of possibilities between bingo & shuffleboard and fucking some insane, suicidal, drug addicted stripper. my guess is that gawker's brain is fogged over partly b/c he's fucking her, and partly b/c he doesn't think he can do better. my prescription would be: 1) kick her out of your house; 2) identify the three best men's clubs in your city; 3) each night go to a different club and get dances from the three hottest women you can find, and keep doing this until you find a hot woman who isn't insane and who isn't going to get you killed. this isn't rocket science.

@Ch3ll - I don't know the details of Gawker's story, but just from this one post, it's clear he's going to stay in denial until he winds up in prison or a hospital or a funeral home. He's not helping her, he's enabling her. Half hour blowjobs and walking around naked are done to control him. He gets pussy, she gets access to his home, car, money and whatever other resources he has. But control is the wrong word as actually they're both completely out of control. He's a slave to her pussy, while she's a slave to her drugs. And she's not thankful. If she had any regard for him, any respect for him at all, she wouldn't use him like this. @Gawker - When you say "bartered" I assume you mean she fucks you in lieu of rent payments since she has no money? Which is why she steals drugs from a drug dealer, and then gives him your money to keep the two of you from getting killed. So I'm guessing the drug dealer wasn't willing to accept her pussy as payment? She's putting your life in danger when you're the only thing keeping her off the streets, when you're the only reason she's still alive herself. Do you have any idea how insane that is? The only sane response to a situation like this is to walk away.

How does someone get to be 55 without learning not to allow this type of trouble in your life? Someone really needs to review the hot crazy matrix, b/c if you walk away with only your car getting keyed it'll be a miracle. You need to call some friends and have them stage an intervention. Run for the nearest exit. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vwbKYcBdVyk

@EveHartley - I think I have good situational awareness. I consider the club I'm in, the management and the dancers. Occasionally I've had a bouncer tap me on the shoulder b/c a dancer was feeding her nips into my mouth on the main floor, or a manager might come over and say something if he feels my hands are roaming too much in VIP. But I know they only do it because they're concerned about other guys seeing me. One time I was in VIP with a dancer's pussy about an inch from my mouth when the club manager came up the stairs. He looked at us for a few seconds, saw that we were alone, then turned around and went back down the stairs without saying a word.

It's really sad that some of you have no idea how pathetic you are. I can't tell you how entertaining it is to be "insulted" by one's intellectual inferiors. "Seth Rich there is implication by Julian Assange... that he in fact was the person who leaked information to Wikileaks about illegal behavior of John Podesta and others inside the Clinton camp. there was a motive to kill him, and we know and I know because I fought the Clintons for many years, that 80 witnesses vanished or were killed during the Clinton administration in the 1990s." Larry Klayman, the founder of Judicial Watch, former US Justice Dept prosecutor who brought dozens of lawsuits against the Clintons https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8F-APZ3ej68 Now by all means please continue your important discussions about how to date strippers and how to P4P. I've better things to do.

I'm going to take your lack of response as an admission that you can't counter my arguments. At first this website was mildly distracting. Now it's just boring. The two most common concerns seem to be: 1) how can I date strippers; and 2) how can I arrange P4P? But I myself have never had any difficulty dating strippers, and I don't do P4P, so what exactly is there for me here? San Jose Guy has his esoteric pretensions, but he clearly doesn't know how to put on his socks without help. Not much stimulation there. The rest of you are only slightly better. Your political naivete is matched only by your desperation to be modern day Babbitts. You mock someone like Trump, ignoring the fact that he became president in opposition to the DNC, the RNC, the news media, hollywood, the entire washington establishment, and its intelligence agencies, clearly evidence of his inferior intellectual ability. But I'm digressing. I guess the final answer is that I'm just not as much of a deviant as the rest of you. Take the topic du jour - the breakthrough revelation that strippers have daddy issues. Wow. I've only known that since forever, and in fact it's one of the reasons I don't do P4P and have also turned down the majority of strippers I could have bedded. Where is the challenge? So take solace in the fact i won't be around much longer. I'm about ready to conclude my observations here.

From my reading this paper doesn't really address the fundamental issue. I'm sure the father preacher referenced above by bubba would be only too happy to engage in "parental monitoring." The situation which is not being addressed by this paper, the situation with which most every TUSCL member seems to be familiar, isn't one where the father is a shielding influence from some harmful factor, but rather where the father himself is the harmful factor. This seems like a huge waste of time and effort, which of course is exactly what I would expect from an academic.

if the lace underwear fits, wear it... http://graphics8.nytimes.com/images/2009/01/20/nyregion/obamaandroommate-480.jpg

someone needs to photoshop obama wearing one of those. would be perfect for him.

this is a fucking joke right? must be the latest fashion wear for pre-op trannies.

I hope no one received funding for that study, because this isn't exactly ground breaking science. I can attest from personal experience that more than 30 years ago books were being written based on studies which had already been done showing the same thing. Absent fathers, abusive fathers, are strongly correlated to lesbian daughters, risk-taking daughters, etc. I can also attest from personal experience that pretty much every stripper I've ever gotten to know well had a messed up relationship with her father.

Funny, if conspiracies don't exist, then why are there numerous federal laws against conspiracy? 18 U.S. Code § 371 - Conspiracy to commit offense or to defraud United States - If two or more persons conspire either to commit any offense against the United States, or to defraud the United States, or any agency thereof in any manner or for any purpose, and one or more of such persons do any act to effect the object of the conspiracy, each shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than five years, or both. 21 U.S.C. § 846 - This provision states that it is illegal for anyone to commit a conspiracy for the manufacture, distribution or possession with intent to distribute illegal, controlled substances. Someone better contact the federal government and have them remove these laws (and numerous others) since conspiracies don't exist.

@4got2wipe - I really do have better things to do with my time, but I'll try once more because I'm stubborn like that. Occam's Razor was not designed as some cure-all for "conspiracy theories". If a conspiracy theory is the most elegant explanation for an observed phenomena, then Occam's Razor would argue that you adopt said conspiracy theory. And for those who are unaware, conspiracy theories happen every day. Another name for "conspiracy theory" is simply organized crime, as in the crime cartels that bring in drugs to this country. That is a highly organized, well-funded, very successful conspiracy theory which has now existed for decades. However, "conspiracy theory" in the sense that most brainwashed simpletons use it, was coined by the CIA in the aftermath of the JFK assassination, in order to combat the widespread public distrust of the official coverup. Since then, "conspiracy theory" has become synonymous with whatever item of information the government controlled media doesn't want the public discussing. In the case of Seth Rich, there are numerous observable facts which should immediately blow away any assumption that this was a simple robbery, such as: 1) why is the FBI involved; 2) why is the DNC paying for a "CRISIS" manager to handle the family; 3) why did Seth die in the hospital after undergoing successful surgery, when the attending physicians expected him to live and 4) why is the media, which sees signs of "russian collusion" everywhere, completely ignoring the fact that the Seth Rich murder was just one of several recent murders connected to Hilary Clinton, the DNC, and Debbie Wasserman Schulz? This isn't even a complete list but off the top of my head: 1) John Ashe (killed before he could testify against Hilary), 2) Shawn Lucas (a potential witness in the DNC case, who died 3 weeks after serving a subpoena to DWS), 3) Beranton Whisenant (prosecuting attorney on the DNC/DWS case, who was discovered murdered on a beach), 4) John Jones (Julian Assange's lawyer, who supposedly killed himself by jumping in front of a train), 5) Gavin MacFayden (one of the co-founders of Wikileaks, who has been identified as the person who met with Seth Rich, suspiciously dies of a "very aggressive cancer" which the CIA is known to employ for assasination), 6) Victor Thorn, found murdered after writing Crowning Clinton: Why Hillary Shouldn't Be in the White House; 7) Eric Braverman, former head of the Clinton Foundation, who hasn't been seen by anyone after being identifed by John Podesta as a leaker. Eric Schmidt supposedly gave him a job overseas, but if you check out his Twitter all you see are retweets AND NOT ONE NEW OR RECENT PHOTO When someone is murdered, but doesn't have anything taken from them, there is nothing about Occam's Razor which would argue that the murder be treated as a robbery. That doesn't just fly in the face of common sense, it also flies in the face of all police procedure. And finally, for those who don't believe that the Clinton body count is a real thing, http://www.whatreallyhappened.com/RANCHO/POLITICS/BODIES.php#axzz4P63ZnklB I just learned that no less than 25 of Hilary Clinton's own bodyguards hav died. That in and of itself should raise red flags everywhere, because who is going to have more direct, first hand knowledge of wrong doing than a bodyguard? http://12160.info/forum/topics/america-s-deadliest-job-hillary-clinton-s-25-dead-body-guards

You're not a scientist. Unless I'm mistaken, you're the person who seems to think I need to be educated about Occams' Razor, and yet doesn't follow it himself. As for the polls you reference, you obviously never studied them if you believe they were "basically accurate." They weren't. The polls had numerous flaws in terms of methodology, one of the primary ones being that they consistently oversampled Democrats. This was deliberately done in order to attempt to suppress Trump voters by making it appear that Hilary had more support than she actually did. Regarding the Clintons's murder streak, once again you are speaking of things which you clearly have never studied. Former insiders have broken ranks, and have confessed that they have committed murder on orders from the Clintons. Not that such confessions are necessary. Occam's Razor, which you yourself referenced, would indicate that the Clintons have never been shy about killing people they found a nuisance or a threat. That is by far the simplest and most elegant theory to explain all the observed facts. And by the way, these two "theories" are not mutually exclusive. That is another false premise on your part. As for attempting to fix the election, the DNC and the Clintons attempted to do so in myriads of ways, as exhaustively documented in a series of videos by Project Veritas, to give just one example. Once again you are speaking out on subjects which you've clearly never studied. I suppose you can chalk my posts up to curiousity or a sociological experiment. I wanted to know just what sorts of pathetic losers actually post on Tuscl, and now I know. The impression I've obtained, right or wrong, is that the average poster on Tuscl is poorly educated, poorly informed, and incapable or unwilling to think for themselves. In other words, the average poster on Tuscl is, at best, a Beta male. As I've said before, I have never found it necessary to P4P. If others do find it necessary, and are willing to do so, that's really none of my business. But the observations I've made certainly go a long way towards explaining why so many of you do find it necessary.

this isn't even close to being a complete list...

COVFEFE- a condition which arises when members of the mainstream press have their heads so far up their own asses, they can’t differentiate between an actual controversy and a manufactured political scandal. Journalists suffering the condition may exhibit symptoms, such as: publishing stories based entirely on unverifiable sources, expressing shock over the results of elections they called prior to poll closure, increasingly rapid oscillation between screams of “racism” and “sexism” in reports that are often about nothing at all, and calling any information with which they disagree “fake.” Resulting complications include total loss of press credibility and the erosion of the 1st Amendment.

@Dominic, you're the fucking coward. You'd rather attack the messenger than analyze the message. That form of attack is so old and so lame that 2,000 years ago philosophers already had a name for it - ad hominem attack. You're on ignore too, you fucking loser.

What Kathy Griffin said when she began to realize how badly she fucked up: "Oh Covfefe!"