I honestly don't care what you think politically or whether you think the Clinton's have a 40-year history of killing people. But I am curious why you keep posting about the topic. Are you actually trying to convince people?
I was curious so I checked how many discussions you've started. You've started 7, of which 6 are Clinton conspiracy theories.
I like science and tech, so I approach the conspiracy theories like a scientist. We have two theories:
First, Hillary Clinton is a polarizing and non-charismatic politician that supports policies about 40-45% of voters (including many TUSCL posters) believe to be non-ace. Polls during the 2016 election were basically accurate but some in the news media erroneous interpreted them as giving her a higher likelihood of election than she actually had. When the election arrived another 5% or so percent of the population shifted toward that 40-45% who fall on the spectrum of beliefs fromhate the Clintons to hate the Democrats to feel uncomfortable with either.
Or second, the Clintons have an ongoing murder streak where they have arranged to have a huge number of people in on it, including the highest echelons or law enforcement and the news media. Their grip on people in the know is so strong that not a single person with evidence has broken ranks. But Internet weirdos can figure it out. And they also fixed the 2016 election with 3 million (or more) illegal votes but did so in the wrong states to affect the election. Suggesting that they don't understand the electoral college.
We can summarize theory 2 as "the Clintons are like the worst James Bond villains ever! :("
You clearly believe theory 2. It's a free country, so believe it. Post about it if you want. But don't be so offended when others find your theory less brilliant than the non-murder theory.
And maybe post about naked horny women on the strip club discussion board. At least occasionally. That's the brilliant way! ;)
You're not a scientist. Unless I'm mistaken, you're the person who seems to think I need to be educated about Occams' Razor, and yet doesn't follow it himself.
As for the polls you reference, you obviously never studied them if you believe they were "basically accurate." They weren't. The polls had numerous flaws in terms of methodology, one of the primary ones being that they consistently oversampled Democrats. This was deliberately done in order to attempt to suppress Trump voters by making it appear that Hilary had more support than she actually did.
Regarding the Clintons's murder streak, once again you are speaking of things which you clearly have never studied. Former insiders have broken ranks, and have confessed that they have committed murder on orders from the Clintons. Not that such confessions are necessary. Occam's Razor, which you yourself referenced, would indicate that the Clintons have never been shy about killing people they found a nuisance or a threat. That is by far the simplest and most elegant theory to explain all the observed facts.
And by the way, these two "theories" are not mutually exclusive. That is another false premise on your part.
As for attempting to fix the election, the DNC and the Clintons attempted to do so in myriads of ways, as exhaustively documented in a series of videos by Project Veritas, to give just one example. Once again you are speaking out on subjects which you've clearly never studied.
I suppose you can chalk my posts up to curiousity or a sociological experiment. I wanted to know just what sorts of pathetic losers actually post on Tuscl, and now I know. The impression I've obtained, right or wrong, is that the average poster on Tuscl is poorly educated, poorly informed, and incapable or unwilling to think for themselves. In other words, the average poster on Tuscl is, at best, a Beta male.
As I've said before, I have never found it necessary to P4P. If others do find it necessary, and are willing to do so, that's really none of my business. But the observations I've made certainly go a long way towards explaining why so many of you do find it necessary.