discussion comment
a year ago
Not sure what a parking-lot review is? If it's a review only describing the parking-lot I don't recall seeing one of those.
I guess there could be some intances of someone that drove up to the club's parking lot and for w/e reason didn't go inside but still decided to write a review; but I don't recall a review like that.
discussion comment
2 years ago
What ever title they have means they still get a shit-ton of $$$ and don't really have to work (along with homes; personal-security; personal-staff; etc).
discussion comment
2 years ago
"... I would never go someplace *just* for the clubs. I want other things to do during the day ..."
Areas with a good club-scene (read multiple clubs of interest) should keep a PL busy day and night (with the rest of the time sleeping-in-late; going to get food/Starbucks/etc: and in certain areas fighting-traffic) - of course this would likely be predicated on a PL liking the variety-model vs the PL that prefers to focus on a specific dancer for the visit; and also predicated on whether the PL enjoys dayshift SCing (assuming a good dayshift).
discussion comment
2 years ago
Yeah the current chat alert is barely an alert - one has to purposely stare at it for a few seconds to be able to pick up one has a new chat(s) - unless one is purposely staring at it you'll likely be unaware you have an unread chat(s).
When there are new chats, the chat icon should change to a color that's easier to pick up like red, green, or blue.
review comment
2 years ago
Great review đź‘Ť
discussion comment
2 years ago
w.r.t. Miami/SoFlo; I think ur safest-bet would be Cheetah Pomapano (particularly dayshift) - it still has the Miami/SoFlo negatives but not as egregious as most other SoFlo clubs.
You could also try one of the few SoFlo non-ITC-extras clubs like Scarlett's Hallandale; Vixens Davie; Rachels West Palm; that tend to have good-talent which u can possibly pull an OTC out of?
discussion comment
2 years ago
“… Thanks Papi. But you didn't give me any suggestions …”
I did – my suggestion was to hit a club/area of interest you hadn’t been to b/f basically for the novelty of it – it seems you already know the better areas/clubs to hit – each area/club(s) will have its pros/cons - I see hitting an area/club new-to-me as a pro.
discussion comment
2 years ago
I would assume most of us are experienced-enough and TUSCLarly-educated enough to stick to the clubs that suit-us, and avoid the ones that don’t (e.g. ROB-clubs; low-ROI-clubs; etc).
A club w/ ROBs one would usually consider a low-ROI club where “the juice is usually not worth the squeeze”.
w.r.t. the options given in the OP; 9 times out of 10 I’d leave – in some “corner cases” a club may have something about it I may want/like; in that “corner case” my M.O. is to try to preempt a ROB-episode (i.e. never paying upfront; telling them upfront to let me know every time they (dancer) starts a new song; verifying the dance-price upfront; etc) – this is particularly important w.r.t. to my dancer-sampling/variety SCing-style were I increase my “ROB exposure” by getting w/ many different dancers and not really going thru the more time-consuming vetting-process.
Once I became TUSCLarl-educated I refused to pay a ROB unless it was exceedingly extenuating circumstances – not saying that my method is the right one; but I just can’t live w/ a ROB putting-one-over-on-me.
Although infrequent; there’s been times I’ve been told by staff to pay the ROB or leave (even in clubs where I would have o/w stayed) – I just moseyed on down the road w/ my PL-ego (more) intact.
discussion comment
2 years ago
Porthole is more of a blue-collar-dive; thus smoking is likely a bit more of an issue there – most other SoFlo mixed-clubs are filled w/ Cuban-dancers and IME they don’t tend to be smokers although some of them are.
FYI – at least per my last Porthole visit in the Fall of 2021; nightshift was heavily-AA (in case chocolate is not your pref) – most/many of the Porthole regulars seem to stick to dayshift where it’s more mixed.
discussion comment
2 years ago
For me trannies in the club would be a double-whammy – given my pref for ebony-dancers; running into an ebony-tranny would also mean a high-likely-hood of “her” junk being way bigger than mine adding insult-to-injury
discussion comment
2 years ago
Given my personal PL-propensity for variety and liking/experiencing the-unknown (w.r.t. SCs); I’d personally be inclined to try a club(s) I’ve never been to b/f so I could experience-it-for-myself vs “wondering” what it’s like just from reviews.
w.r.t. if Tijuana is safe – you’ve been on TUSCL long-enough to have a feel for that answer – given the thousands of Hong Kong reviews and how many TUSCLers (and likely non- TUSCLers) go there on a regular-basis and have been doing-so for years w/ no issues; I think the proof is in the pudding per se (there are no guarantees though and there will never be).
Lastly – part of me wonders if SCs will have the same appeal to you after all you’ve experienced via SA – it may take some time to get your SC-muscles used to it again.
discussion comment
2 years ago
Along the lines of @Sinclair’s post; if our society keeps going in the same-direction it’s going; part of me wonders if it’s only a matter of time that:
1) trannies start invading SCs
2) a club can’t even ask (nor assume) if she is/isn’t a woman b/c in our current times a tranny *is* a woman so asking would be offensive if not illegal/”discriminatory”
We already have boys using girls’ bathrooms in schools – convicts demanding to be sent to women’s prisons b/c they all of sudden “identify as a woman” (and subsequently impregnate female-prisoners); men using women’s locker-rooms b/c of “how the identify”; etc.
The Left is in power-now and the are seemingly fighting tooth-and-nail for there to not be any distinction b/w a woman and a man identifying as a woman – as long as this is the trend one would assume SCs are not safe and SCs themselves may be powerless to stop-it against the power of a Leftist/Progressive government – hopefully I’m wrong.
discussion comment
2 years ago
![]()
Papi_ChuloMiami, FL (or the nearest big-booty club)
The article kinda reminded me of Will Ferrell’s character in the movie “Wedding Crashers” where he ups-his-game w.r.t. scoring chicks by “graduating” from crashing-weddings to crashing-funerals.
discussion comment
2 years ago
![]()
Papi_ChuloMiami, FL (or the nearest big-booty club)
I think the article’s OP said he lives in Vegas – I can see Vegas attracting some “strange birds” per se w.r.t. making Sin City one’s place to live (unless one is a retiree I guess).
discussion comment
2 years ago
In addition to my prior-post – I think SCing “chose me” more than I chose SCing.
In the past I’ve posted how I became an SCer somewhat ”by accident” vs a “conscious choice” per se. Prior to becoming an SCer I didn’t see the appeal and def was not keen on what I perceived as poor ROI – this was mainly due to not having visited good clubs in my 20s (could count in one-hand the times I SCed in my 20s and I was not really “that impressed”).
At age 30 I moved to Dallas and was making good money especially in contrast to my living-expenses given I was single – so I had a little-money to play with; and purely by chance I happened to one night drive by “Baby Dolls Dallas” (the old location) – I noticed how packed the parking-lot was and I was intrigued so made a mental-note of the place and came back a week later out of boredom to check it out – given my previous “meh” SCing experiences in my 20s, I wasn’t expecting much nor was I looking for clubs to hit nor was I looking to become an SCer; I mainly checked out Baby Dolls out of curiosity and not having anything to do that particular night (this was shortly after I had moved to Big-D) – needless to say, I was blown-away by BDs (vibe; huge number of attractive women; good-value; etc) – thus I got the proverbial “SC bug”.
By age 30; around the time I moved to Big-D and “found SCing”; I had started leaning towards not wanting to get married – as I’ve posted in the past; not b/c I have anything against marriage; for various-reasons it was just something that felt more like something “I was supposed to do” vs something “I really wanted to do”. I still dated and was in relationships in my 30s; but w/ time I started to question myself w.r.t. why I was getting into relationships if I didn’t have the goal/desire of marring – the reality was that I wanted access to women; but didn’t want the constraints/demands of a relationship.
And this is where SCing seemed to be a good-fit w.r.t. my conundrum of wanting to be with/enjoy women w/o the commitment/demands – and once I got introduced “to proper Sing”/good-clubs: SCing seemed/felt to best fit my needs/wants (especially after I was “TUSCLarly educated”).
discussion comment
2 years ago
I’m a $aver by nature – even as a kid I would usually save any money I got via gifts – I would usually save my money b/c I wanted to save to get something in the future – I grew-up working-class-immigrant where money was an issue (a “financially insecure” situation I guess); and I knew/felt that my parents were unable to give me stuff/wants other than pro¬viding safe-shelter and for us to not go hungry - growing-up, as a family we usually spent almost exclusively on needs, and very-little on wants (we hardly ate-out; didn’t take vacations; etc) - as a ¬side-note; for w/e reason; my older brother; who grew-up w/ the same circumstance$ since we grew-up-together; he would spend w/e money he got as soon as it hit his hands (behavioral-economists say we are born w/ a particular “financial personality”; I don’t recall the correct term).
The above preamble is to give context w.r.t. my SCing-career – i.e. given my upbringing + “financial personality”; for a good-part of my SCing career I’d beat myself up a bit w.r.t. the amount of money I was spending SCing – although I was never in debt (given my “financial personality”); and usually had savings; I still worried about the amount of money I was spending SCing.
Now that I’m “over the hump” age-wise (past-50; early-50s); I don’t stress as much w.r.t. spending – by “spending” I don’t mean spending just for the sake of getting stuff just b/c I can; but more-so not worrying about spending if it brings me happiness (e.g. SCing; etc) – now that I’m past 50; my concern is missing out on things that bring me joy vs forgoing certain things “b/c I should save the money just in case” – i.e. now that I’m past 50; time & health seem more important of a “commodity” to me, vs money
With the benefit of hindsight; I don’t regret all the SCing I’ve done and related-spending – i.e. the good times/experiences I had were def worth the investment.
discussion comment
2 years ago
![]()
Papi_ChuloMiami, FL (or the nearest big-booty club)
"... Grab the popcorn after you make sure you're under the FDIC threshold in all of your bank accounts ..."
One of my concern$ is that it may get so-bad w.r.t. the banks/economy, that the government/FDIC may not be able to cover depositors even if under the $250k insured-limit; i.e. that one may at least have to take a haircut even if under the $250K limit – our economy seems pretty-unhealthy least of which is a 31-trillion-dollar national-debt which hamstrings what can be done; or maybe we just keep increasing the debt w/ no end-in-$ight
discussion comment
2 years ago
AFAIK all South-FL clubs allow smoking inside - they're behind the times.
discussion comment
2 years ago
![]()
founderslip a dollar in her g-string for me
The photos in my profile are gone including my priced award-winning personal dick-pics
discussion comment
2 years ago
![]()
Papi_ChuloMiami, FL (or the nearest big-booty club)
So many politicians are of avg-means when entering politics and are “miraculously” wealthy/multi-millionaires by the time they leave – SMH.
discussion comment
2 years ago
![]()
Papi_ChuloMiami, FL (or the nearest big-booty club)
^ no
discussion comment
2 years ago
![]()
founderslip a dollar in her g-string for me
^ I would assume it was due to harassment
discussion comment
2 years ago
![]()
founderslip a dollar in her g-string for me
Seems the dancer-stuff (profiles; etc) is gone - I don't see the Personals section either.
I would "assume" some sickos may have been giving some of the dancers grief - it's happened in the past even b/f Founder had instituted those sections.
article comment
2 years ago
Of all my time on TUSCL this is one of the oddest entries I've seen/read.
review comment
2 years ago
For various reasons; TUSCL M.O. is to not identify specific dancers when getting anything more than dances - M.O. is to describe what's available but not tie a specific dancer to it.