Comments by Papi_Chulo (page 14)

Wasn't aware the Cubana-invasion had reached the PNW - I assumed the Cubanas would mostly stick to warmer-climates but I guess they'll go wherever they have-to to get ahead.

No club I know off has $60÷ dance prices - even NYC club are often $20/song - most clubs have a club-price - clubs where dancers make their own dance-prices are the exception if not rare-exception (it's how most of the industry works o/w it'd be a shitshow). The $20 house-fee is a different matter - many clubs have some kinda dance-area-fee - just bc a club has a dance-area-fee doesn't mean there also isn't a per-song club-dance-cost where the dancer still gets paid - no one expects a dancer to do a dance "for free" and it doesn't require dancers charging w/e they want to fix that.

w.r.t. the Republican ticket - I think DeSantis will pull it out - the RNC establishment probably prefers him and I think a good # of Trump-supporters may feel DeSantis is more electable in a general-election (i.e. a safer bet even if they prefer Trump).

IDK too much about RFK - he seems to be a bit at odds with the DNC and thus I think the DNC-machine would kneecap-him like it seemed to happen to Bernie Sanders.

Perhaps the strip-club-equivalent of "A bird in the hand is worth two in the bush" has some application here.

Can't say I've been in a similar situation since I don't do OTC nor am I into faves - but *if* I was in such a situation I'd probably not get with another dancer *if* I had already arranged something with a specific dancer and that was her pet-peeve - it would basically come down to which dancer I wanted to be with more. There are certain "unwritten club politics/games" one often needs to play in strip club bizarro-world - and at the end of the day one is still dealing with a woman and there's usually some built-in concessions already.

"... I bought a drink for dancer. That was $16. She downed it in 2 seconds and was ready for more. I didn’t buy the 2nd one ..." That makes me think the dancers probably get a cut of every drink bought for them - and would not be surprised if those dancer drinks have no alcohol in them.

I'm not familiar with this club but no way can the price be $80/song for a dance - you have to be a noob to fall for that and pay it. It def smells like you got ROBed. I skimmed some other reviews and seemed like they said dances were $20 but seemed dancers would wanna charge more (or maybe it was the same dancer u ran into). If one is unfamiliar with a club best to read reviews b/f visiting - if not then better to ask a manager or staff person what the prices are b/f interacting with dancers and then verify that price with the dancer b/f agreeing to a dance (often times staff are douches a custy can't count on but it's worth a try).

Review is a bit too-criptic - hard ro decipher what u got or didn't get - plus dances here are not $30 nor did u mention where u got the dance - also no mention of what u paid for VIP

I'm not worried - I eat Organic

As has been mentioned; I wonder if the younger-girls now see being identified as a "sex worker" as some kinda "woke badge of honor" - seems these days self-identifying as anything is "the in-thing to do". But could also be a way of "not having to live in the shadows" per se and not having to "hide" one's "career"? I guess "sex worker" fits to a certain-degree even if she's not having sex - but one would think there could be a better-name for it o/w is a swimsuit-model or Victoria-Secret-model a "sex worker" bc she's using her sexuality?

TUSCL M.O. is to not connect specific dancers to anything more than dances (e.g. extras). You can describe what kinda action u got but avoid outting the specific dancer either by name or giving a very specific description about her.

The few interviews I briefly saw with him he seemed like a pretty-smart-guy - w.r.t. the show I guess the money was too good and too easy to turn down.

LOL - nothing wrong with liking different aspects w.r.t. strip-clubs - different people enjoy different things - as long as one is enjoying themselves that's what SCs are for.

Don't all Atlanta clubs allow smoking inside? Or does it depend what jurisdiction they're in?

I visited this club from out-of-town pre-Covid and if memory-serves-me-correct I think there were dividers b/w each dance-booth that were about shoulder-high - but this was about 4-years-ago so maybe I'm not remembering correctly.

I'm in the camp that a theatrical, or athletical, stage performance, doesn't really do that much for me, in terms of turning-me-on which what I go to the club for. I get more turned-on by her locking eyes with me; squeezing her tits together as if saying come get these; spreading her legs open while full-nude a couple of inches from my face; etc - I get more turned-on by something resembling a porn-scene vs a theatrical or gymnast-style pole-performance. Not saying that I can't enjoy a theatrical/athletic pole-performance; just that it's not what gets my juices (nor my $$$) flowing.

As others mentioned; there are small cities/towns that will reduce the speed limit on a road/freeway going past their city/town seemingly for no-reason other than to create speeders they can fine. I recall years-ago one of the network evening news shows doing a critical segment of a small Midwestern town that had this practice and in-turn their speeding tickets were way above the avg for the area. I'm sure there are many, usually smaller, municipalities, that are actively looking/hoping for speeders bc it's probably a major source of revenue for that area that may o/w have a suppre$$ed tax-base. I recall when I drove backhome from Dallas to Miami that for w/e reason as soon as I crossed into FL (from Alabama I think) that I started seeing a lot of FL state troopers right past the FL border where I had rarely seen any police-activity b/f crossing into FL.

We all have our different "fetishes"/things-that-get-us/going. My personal view: I'm cognizant/expect than on avg men and women see/feel things differently particularly w.r.t. sex - I doubt the avg dancer routinely gets turned-on like we custies do - dancers go to the club to make-a-living - custies go for enjoyment/satisfaction - so there are kinda opposing needs/desires w.r.t. why dancers and custies hit a club; not to mention than on avg men and women are just usually wired-differently in many ways particularly w.r.t. sex and more-so indiscriminant-sex - there's an old-saying I once heard ... "women use sex to get love; and men use love to get sex" - in the context of P4P one can substitute "love" for "money". I doubt the avg dancer that is at the club several days per week for months/years on-end get as "excited" as we custies do - as the female-rapper sings in her rap-song "money makes me cum". Thinking the avg dancer sees the interaction as we PLs do (for the pleasure of it) IMO is more wishful-thinking than reality. Are there exceptions? Of course - most things have exceptions. At the end of the day, IMO the stripper/custy interaction is a business-one especially for the stripper - all I expect from a dancer is that she provides fair-service and I in-turn feel obliged to provide fair payment - if she "genuinely" gets into it, that's a nice plus; but it's not something I expect nor need to enjoy SCs for what they are.

Didn't read the lengthy OP but in the back of my PL-mind I sometimes think/wonder if SCs are kind of a relic of the 20th century and may perhaps be on their way to obsolescence vs continuing to be a strong/viable business model? With the changing culture (Woke-ism; Gentrification; etc); seems to me SCs have more headwinds than tailwinds; not to mention upcoming generations being saddled with debt, and perhaps indoctrinated as SCs "being bad" according to The Church Of Wokeism. Perhaps if SCs evolve to more benign entertainment (e.g. combo/psudo nightclubs; etc); perhaps they can survive into the future?

Switzerland

I think @Muddy is entitled to his title-characters reparations

I'm not necessarily a Jets-fan but I'm not a Jets-hater either so I'm kinda looking-forward to watching a Rodgers' Jets team

I don't think Rodgers has declined - IMO he's a proven HOF QB and IMO still pretty-much at the top-of-his-game - franchise QBs def don't-grow-on-trees; how many 1st-rounders don't pan-out even as starting-QBs let-alone a franchise-QB - sure Rodgers is a bit "eccentric" but IMO he's still as talented as anyone plus a shitload of experience - IMO it would be riskier trying to go with a "talented college QB" unless it's a total-crap-team in rebuild-mode which IMO the Jets are not.