discussion comment
2 years ago
I drive into TJ and park at my hotel
Added benifit is that you can explore a bit in the day time but you must have a global card (or equivalent) and have you car register to it plus you should get Mexican insurance rider for the number of days. Very cheep online.
review comment
2 years ago
Not a lot of club details, but then nothings changed in at least half a dozen years. I am surprised that there was so much life in the place this late on a Tuesday. I would have expected dead dead dead. Curious how many customers were there when you got there and when you left?
discussion comment
2 years ago
I have never paid up front and I have never tried to not pay in thousands of dances over more than 3 decades.
I consider a dancer who insists on pre pay to be stupid business wise or maybe a ROB. Why else would she demand that? Plus it likely seriously reduces the event when one intended dance ends up being 12 or 20 (a common problem I have, my bad). OTOH I would likely not be caught dead in a place so pompous they thought $50 hands off dances were standard.
Like Mark Twain said (or was P T Barnum?) “A fool and his money …..”
discussion comment
2 years ago
@Bubble - "As stated a plethora of times, it's about dancer SAFETY and PRIVACY. "
Please quote a real life example or two of how a review created these issues. If your in a profession that has a boss (pimp or manager) that will react to a made up online review badly I would say that scary situation is not because of a review. I can quote examples of dancers that get more business by being mentioned in a review, not a lot more but some.
There is far, far more privacy risk issues presented by the potential of having someone walk thru the club door who knows you in real life than someone writing about your FAKE name in a quite possibly FAKE review. As far as security, if there wasn't already inherent danger I might agree, but paying a bouncer to walk you to your car already indicates that the chosen job comes with built in risk, with or without reviews.
discussion comment
2 years ago
I think that would be great. Tell (insert dancer fake name) that (insert tuscl fake name) is good/bad (insert your opinion here).
That makes sense.
At least you made me smile.
discussion comment
2 years ago
@Sancho - I stand corrected.
discussion comment
2 years ago
@atac, I completely agree with your approach to reviews. I think that is the classy way to go. But the review still needs to have details, a good dance to someone with the 4 foot air dance wear someone else might feel cheated if they’re not hands-on. Of course mileage varies, but there is a big difference, and not describing a experience with details leaves way too much to the imagination.
discussion comment
2 years ago
Can you imagine the comments if they had let the strike happen and inflation went to 20%?
That is a serious question to all those saying Biden is a thug. By the way, they also call him a pussy, so which is it?
discussion comment
2 years ago
I wasn’t suggesting that naming extras producing dancers should be mandatory. I was only asking why that practice was becoming so vilified. I don’t do it, mostly because of what shadowcat said was his reason, but I also don’t think it’s wrong.
I do think there is far more danger to a girls safety or reputation if cousin Felix comes thru the club door unexpectedly. Felix knows her real name and probably her grandma too. But she took that chance when she started dancing.
There are nut jobs everywhere and every dancer has learned to deal with them, reviews aren’t going to noticeably move the needle on how many times in a week they get approached by wackos. Again part of the territory of being a dancer.
Dancers are not fragile little flowers that need protected and our little community of PLs doesn’t have the influence or size that many posters here seem to think it has.
discussion comment
2 years ago
First there are those who wish to ban talking about mileage details in reviews.
Now this discussion seems to be advocating for elimination of some dancer details.
The problem is that eventually every review will read “went in, saw a brunette, had a good/great/ok time; left happy” whatever that means.
Without details every review is neutered and eventually this site is just a list of clubs that may or may not have bare chested entertainers.
discussion comment
2 years ago
In the first place the names used at clubs are not their real name.
In the second place my original question was basically “why did we start rejecting reviews strictly because they include names or explicit details?”
The answer I got was that the site is starting to get “woke” or influenced by political correctness. Maybe that is a good thing IDK. Makes it less useful thou.
I will continue NOT naming dancers in my reviews, as I have always done. Mostly cause I don’t usually remember names from clubs anyways. Because like I said. They are all made up names.
I will also continue to NOT reject a review (for an already known extras place) just because it has a name in it or it is explicit, as long as it has some useful info. News flash; a lot of the explicit stuff is made up also.
discussion comment
2 years ago
To icee:
OK, genius, since the site has become much tamer given the PC policing why wasn’t it shut down long ago when it was so much more raunchy. I would think the inclusion of a section for personal ads exposes the site to critics far more than made up reviews with made up names by anonymous users.
All I’m saying is that the site doesn’t need to be so neutered simply because there’s a few who are too politically correct to be completely honest in reviews. Probably fearful that the blow job queen will have her feelings hurt.
discussion comment
2 years ago
All interesting arguments but they seem to ignore the fact that this sites prime purpose is to share information.
Just because I said that linking names in all extras clubs is OK with me does not mean I would do that, I think its classless and in 200+ reviews I don't think you will find any examples of me doing that unless the girl is a complete ROB. Maybe if she works in Germany or Tijuana but even then I doubt it.
I just don't think it is a good enough reason to reject a review.
If a new dancer approaches me with "I'll blow you for $xx" I think she has already taken the first step in that being public knowledge. So I would not have any trouble if that knowledge became a bit more public. It might also help me choose a club in a strange town if I had a bit of a price list as a starting place. Reviewers who report "left happy for $500" or "had a good time for $300" are not providing any information. We all know there are plenty of PLs that will spend a grand and bring roses the next night for the hint of a tug job.
As far as other PLs arriving with review in hand saying "I want what Bill got", I don't know a dancer who has danced for more than a week who doesn't get this anyways. And any dancers who have been around for anytime at all will says "Bill is a liar and you need to go fuck yourself". Again, we are talking about all extras clubs here.
Knowing who does the best whatever and if the going rate is $500 or $100 is information I can use when I have one or two nights in a city. Plus I don't then have to visit 4 other clubs to find the overachievers.
review comment
2 years ago
Not just a bj but a covered one. I’ve never paid more than a benji anywhere, ever, nor would I. But that’s just me. I take that back now that I think about it, I paid $125 last time I was in Florida, but she was at least a 9.5 and she included a couple dances.
discussion comment
2 years ago
For tuscl to change the industry it would have to be on the radar of a large percentage of the total attendee list of clubs. I doubt that the readership is that large. I would hazard that way less than 1% of club attending PLs even know about the web site and a large number of those don’t deep dive research before visiting. Their visits are more spur of the moment.
discussion comment
2 years ago
Some of the clubs I go to including Chicas in Las Vegas have a strict “no dancer phones on the floor” policy. Wish they all had that policy.
review comment
2 years ago
The paper towel machine is a hands free motion activated deal mounted on the wall just OUTSIDE the bathroom door. The bathroom, if you can call it that, is so small there would be no room for it inside.
review comment
2 years ago
Same price as others, $100 and she was better than expected. I did tip a small amount though.
discussion comment
2 years ago
![]()
ilbbaicnlKeep it in my pants when I do OTC. If I were a stripper it would stand for I like big bucks and I can not lie.
25. That quote was first attributed to Mark Twain. If Antony is claiming it he is a plagiarist but it’s more likely that anyone born after the boomers has no clue who Mark Twain was.
discussion comment
2 years ago
It is, or has been, a real club. Has had many different names over the last decade, I’m not sure if they can keep it going or if it’s actually going right now. It’s near the town Square shopping mall couple blocks away from there.
discussion comment
2 years ago
For anyone in mgmt or as a small proprietor to show their political bent so openly risks alienating at least some percentage of their patrons, sometime to the point of having them never return. Of course no one ever accused club owners or managers of being savvy business people.
discussion comment
2 years ago
Technically peppermint hippo is on the strip although way at one end. I had a decent time there on the one daytime visit I had a week ago just to check things out. No cover, $8 beer, only 4 girls working on a Wednesday afternoon but it only takes one. $25 floor dances were high mileage from the young black girl I visited.
discussion comment
2 years ago
![]()
Papi_ChuloMiami, FL (or the nearest big-booty club)
Golden steer is probably the oldest steak house in Vegas. It is in a strip mall very near the only crazy horse two club on Sahara. Very good food, super cool only Vegas vibe inside, very pricey but what isn’t lately, but nearly impossible to get a reservation on short notice. Expect a 3 week or more lead time required.
You expect mobsters in every second booth and they probably were at one time, the place is that old. There is story that one of the mob bosses had a secret escape door built in the back so he could vanish when the feds showed up looking for him.
discussion comment
2 years ago
![]()
MaxMaximaSeeking spinners without inhibitions
If asked for ID I would hand the global card and keep the passport in my pocket. That is what I did last time with myNEXUS card and I was never asked about my passport. I have both the book and the card but didn’t show either.
discussion comment
2 years ago
Something I didn’t see mentioned is the oft used starting word “Frankly”.
Especially when a politician start to answer a question with “Frankly“ you know whatever follows will be a lie or at least only a half truth.