Are Gorgeous Women Better in Bed?
reverendhornibastard
Depraved Deacon of Degeneracy
I don’t think so.
But I admit that I will spend a lot more time and effort trying to fuck a woman who scores 950 millihelens or better on the Helen of Troy beauty scale than a fugly skank who clocks in at a measly 125 millihelens. I also admit that my own enthusiasm in mounting a beauty in the high 900 millihelens range will far surpass my level of ardor when I crawl into bed with a woman who I know will never crack the 500 millihelens threshold.
That said, once my motor is running and I get busy gluing my woman (or whoever’s woman she might be) to the bedsheets or the coffee table, how hot she looked before I commenced my assault becomes secondary to her own sexual technique and the level of enthusiasm she shows as she reciprocates my attention.
I have been fortunate that the majority of the women I have been privileged to desecrate rated 750 millihelens and above. But, under the influence of a few too many cocktails, I have also invited a few women who scored under 500 millihelens to my home, apartment or hotel room. Upon realizing my mistake, I always did the chivalrous thing. I just gritted my teeth and did my duty as a gentleman.
A true gentleman will occasionally canoodle moderately unattractive women just to be polite.
When canoodling moderately unattractive women I found that they can sometimes be exceptionally enthusiastic in the sack. They are always clearly grateful to be getttinf any attention. Less attractive women NEVER behave as if you should consider yourself lucky to be in bed with them. The less attractive woman will sometimes show her gratitude by cleaning up your home or doing the dishes before she walks home.
https://tuscl.net/photo.php?id=3632
Despite the many advantages offered by the less beautiful women, I admit that I am still willing to put up with a lot shit for the privilege of nailing a goddess.
https://tuscl.net/photo.php?id=3633
Got something to say?
Start your own discussion
39 comments
Latest
But to your point, are better looking women better at sex ? No, they are not. But I sure enjoy it better. When I am laying the wood to a 900, even if she is just laying there, I get hot by seeing those wonderful breasts sway back and forth while I thrust away. And if the girl is less than a 600, then I'm not sure I care how amorous and talented she is. I don't want her to touch me.
But would I rather have a 700 that is really into it than have a 900 dead fish. Yes, I would.
The greater the effort the better the reward
That’s a very logical and brilliant analysis!
If I can get my brain re-wired so that the dopamine gets squirted out more easily and more often, I can stop wasting time in the strip clubs, save a lot of money and be a much happier man!
I wonder if I can have my brain rewired so that I can get my dopamine kick every time I see a Taco Bell commercial on TV.
I always thought the Taco Bell chihuahua was kind of hot anyway.
Point is, not all the plain ones get all aggressive and needy.
Honestly, I think not hot women have that much less experience being fucked by guys lusting after them, and so many more experiences with getting half heatedly fucked by drunks with whiskey dicks they just aren't as excited about getting fucked and more tuned into getting it over with....
“We have many ways of creating our realities based on the the different ways we perceive.”
~ Zamm Zamudio
I will play along
To answer your question: Not necessarily.
in general terms in our American culture/society, women perceived as beautiful, can get away with things ordinary people can't.
Remember the Seinfeld episode where Jerry takes advantage of his beautiful girlfriend Nicki's ability to get anything she wants?
This in general discourages “beautiful” women from “making the effort”, practice more, study more etc. then the stereotype of the beautiful Dum Blonde appears.
Since perceived beauty is enough for getting men and American women live in this conflicted sexualized but repressed society many “beautiful women” don’t develop sexual abilities and don’t enjoy the “chores” of sex.
I have been with one of the most beautiful girls I have seen in my life, a real 10 from Russia, and it was the best sexual experience in my entire existence to this day, that is why she is my ATF woman.
https://tuscl.net/article.php?id=50809
But there is hope, thanks to advances in communication and plenty of information some American woman are starting to free themselves from the sexual repression and seem to enjoy sex.
Many women including the “beautiful women” start to feel freer to examine and express their sexuality, so hopefully they will be perceived as better in bed in the not distant future...
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9IUZkug8…
For me personally, I do think avg looking women often aim more to please - hot chicks IMO are more prone to be pretentiousness and used to things being handed to them w/ much less effort (probably applies to good looking guys to, just ask Juice - there are a lot of good-looking guys that think they are the shit and in part it's b/c women have often kissed their ass).
For me - even as a kid - the girl in the class w/ the best/most-developed bod, is the one I wanted the most, vs perhaps the prettiest-girl in the class which most of the other boys seemed to prefer/like-best - so for me good-looks and sexual-attraction are not necessarily a one-to-one correlation - e.g. yeah, I find models "attractive" - but actually even Victory Secret models are not at the top of the type of women I most want to fuck - they may be considered among "the most beautiful women in the world", but when I wanna toss-one-off a Victoria Secret Model is not what I look at or think about, even though I do think they are attractive.
Of course I realize I'm a bit different than most guys in terms of what type-of-woman turns me on the most sexually - I've always been more about the bod and have lusted more w.r.t. the bod, than the face - for me a pretty-face is a nice plus but not a must-have, I've never gotten a hard-on from a pretty-face - 9 times out of 10 I'll take an avg face and my type of bod, vs a pretty-face and avg-bod that is not my type even if it's still a nice bod to most other guys.
So for me - when I've been w/ a woman that would be considered above-avg attractiveness which I assume often means the face, the encounter has been meh to ok and many have been a dead-fish not used to giving but just being given - not saying there aren't good-looking women that are sexual-dynamos, and not saying most avg women are, just that IME I've found avg looking women more into it and more into giving satisfaction than good-looking women that may take it for granted b/c things have often just been given/handed to them.
But - when we are giving our opinions, could often be the case we may be biased based on one reason or another whether consciously or subconsciously.
My PFP experiences are usually the most attractive (A team) women provided average to good experiences, whereas the not as attractive (B team) usually provided good to great experiences.
That being said, attractiveness is not the only reason for a good experience, her mood, the chemistry, the timing, the negotiation, her experience, all contribute to a worthwhile romp.
In the Civvie world, the experience was more dependent on the type of relationship than her attractiveness.
But I must admit, as I scrolled down, I liked the look of her body, and that pussy looked mighty inviting.
So if she came to my house wearing a bag over her head, I'd hit it.
That said, there have been nights in the club where I "settled" for less, but wound up getting more.
But I still shoot for women who are at the higher end of the scale looks-wise. Because I want it all.
SJG
SJG
Over thirty years she morphed into ‘the woman that I don’t want to be with’.
+1 to the hotties