discussion comment
9 years ago
![]()
shailynnThey never tell you what you need to know.
Not to nitpick, but, among other things, she needs to learn to use paragraphs. What are teaching these days in college? Certainly not how to write intelligibly. Also, apparently, not to bareback fuck somebody who already gave you an STD.
It could be argued that that is so obvious it doesn’t need to be taught in college, maybe middle school.
discussion comment
9 years ago
Counseling ?? If I had found any pussy to fuck when I was 15, I'd still be thinking fondly about it. Hell, I still think fondly of my first fuck at age 18. She was about 10 years older. Would love to see her again, talk old times. Who knows what we might do even at our advanced ages. She must be 80+ by now.
For a 15 year old male to fuck pussy is nothing traumatic, just really great fun. The ultimate in physical and mental health. It's only a problem if there's a STD or the girl gets pregnant. If the girl takes care of those problems, it's just a great big favor to the little boy and his little head.
discussion comment
9 years ago
The fact that the license plate is the property of the state seems decisive to me It's like if you wanted to put "FUCK" on my bumper, and I said "No." I can't see how it's reasonable to say you're permitted to write "FUCK" on my bumper if I don't want you to.
The Confederate Battle Flag is the predominant symbol of white supremacy in America. It's display is socially disruptive and should be discouraged. Like the display of Nazi or ISIS flags.
I don't think the Supreme Court has a copy of the Ten Commandments on any of its walls. At least I didn't notice any such thing the last time I was there about 20 years ago.
By the way, have any of you actually read those things? Even just the First? "“I am the LORD your God, who brought you out of the land of Egypt, out of the house of bondage. You shall have no other gods before Me."
Why on Earth would you want a thing like that in a Court of Law?
The Second is even more bizarre: "You shall not make for yourself a carved image—any likeness of anything that is in heaven above, or that is in the earth beneath, or that is in the water under the earth; you shall not bow down to them nor serve them. For I, the LORD your God, am a jealous God, visiting the iniquity of the fathers upon the children to the third and fourth generations of those who hate Me, but showing mercy to thousands, to those who love Me and keep My commandments."
???
discussion comment
9 years ago
Switzerland has half the number of guns per capita, both military and private, as the US has private guns. The Swiss have stringent regulation of access to guns and ammunition. Ammunition for military weapons (over 70% of the guns in Switzerland) must be kept at arsenals. This eliminates shooting your wife and kids in a fit of rage.
Weapons acquisition permits and gun carrying permits are required. The number and type of guns an individual can purchase is limited in multiple ways. The per capita private gun ownership is about one-seventh that of the US and the homicide rate is about one-seventh that of the US. Coincidence?
discussion comment
9 years ago
no mileage - air dance
low mileage - light grinding
mid mileage - two way contact including titties and ass
high mileage - titty sucking, full two way contact including pussy
very high mileage - HJ, DATY
ultra high mileage - BJ, FS
discussion comment
9 years ago
Here's a better way:
Guns per 100 residents, Murders per million residents.
All countries with median GDP per capita in excess of $20,000 per year.
Guns Murders
89 50 United States
16 10 Median for 39 countries, excluding US
1/6 1/5 Ratios 39 countries/US
30 3 Iceland
30 5 Austria
1 5 Singapore
1 5 Japan
31 6 Norway
25 6 Bahrain
14 6 Slovenia
46 7 Switzerland
25 7 Oman
30 8 Germany
23 8 United Arab Emirates
19 9 Qatar
16 9 Czech Republic
12 9 Denmark
10 9 Spain
35 10 Saudi Arabia
32 10 Sweden
23 10 Greece
12 10 Italy
12 10 Malta
4 11 Netherlands
15 12 Australia
9 12 Ireland
8 12 Portugal
8 12 United Kingdom
1 13 Poland
31 14 France
23 15 New Zealand
8 15 Slovakia
36 17 Cyprus
17 17 Belgium
31 18 Canada
7 21 Israel
25 22 Kuwait
45 23 Finland
15 25 Luxembourg
1 29 South Korea
5 36 Taiwan
9 52 Estonia
discussion comment
9 years ago
I've had lots of threesomes. An OTC relationship on a regular basis with a nice girl; eventually I suggest let's have company. Never been a problem, but usually doesn't result in anything, but sometimes does. Kinds of possibilities; girl on girl, fuck regular or fuck newbie while the other plays with us, rarely fuck both.
It's all fun; not worth double, but I do it anyway..
discussion comment
10 years ago
I'm too lazy to write reviews, so I just paid. It's pretty cheap - $90 for forever. You'd spend that much on a few dances.
discussion comment
10 years ago
I think there is a tremendous amount of delusion nonsense when it comes to "sex trafficking." For instance, take this article from the Guardian:
Inquiry fails to find single trafficker who forced anybody into prostitution
Nick Davies
The Guardian, Monday 19 October 2009
The following correction was printed in the Guardian's Corrections and clarifications column, Saturday 14 November 2009
In the report below about sex trafficking we referred to the United Kingdom Human Trafficking Centre as "the police Human Trafficking Centre". The UKHTC describes itself as "a multi-agency centre" and says that it is "police led". Its partners include two non-governmental organisations, HM Revenue & Customs, the Crown Prosecution Service, the Serious Organised Crime Agency and the UK Border Agency. We referred to Grahame Maxwell as the head of the UKHTC; his title is programme director.
The UK's biggest ever investigation of sex trafficking failed to find a single person who had forced anybody into prostitution in spite of hundreds of raids on sex workers in a six-month campaign by government departments, specialist agencies and every police force in the country.
The failure has been disclosed by a Guardian investigation which also suggests that the scale of and nature of sex trafficking into the UK has been exaggerated by politicians and media.
Current and former ministers have claimed that thousands of women have been imported into the UK and forced to work as sex slaves, but most of these statements were either based on distortions of quoted sources or fabrications without any source at all.
While some prosecutions have been made, the Guardian investigation suggests the number of people who have been brought into the UK and forced against their will into prostitution is much smaller than claimed; and that the problem of trafficking is one of a cluster of factors which expose sex workers to coercion and exploitation.
Acting on the distorted information, the government has produced a bill, now moving through its final parliamentary phase, which itself has provoked an outcry from sex workers who complain that, instead of protecting them, it will expose them to extra danger.
When police in July last year announced the results of Operation Pentameter Two, Jacqui Smith, then home secretary, hailed it as "a great success". Its operational head, Tim Brain, said it had seriously disrupted organised crime networks responsible for human trafficking. "The figures show how successful we have been in achieving our goals," he said.
Those figures credited Pentameter with "arresting 528 criminals associated with one of the worst crimes threatening our society". But an internal police analysis of Pentameter, obtained by the Guardian after a lengthy legal struggle, paints a very different picture.
The analysis, produced by the police Human Trafficking Centre in Sheffield and marked "restricted", suggests there was a striking shortage of sex traffickers to be found in spite of six months of effort by all 55 police forces in England, Wales, Scotland and Northern Ireland together with the UK Border Agency, the Serious and Organised Crime Agency, the Foreign Office, the Northern Ireland Office, the Scottish government, the Crown Prosecution Service and various NGOs in what was trumpeted as "the largest ever police crackdown on human trafficking".
The analysis reveals that 10 of the 55 police forces never found anyone to arrest. And 122 of the 528 arrests announced by police never happened: they were wrongly recorded either through honest bureaucratic error or apparent deceit by forces trying to chalk up arrests which they had not made. Among the 406 real arrests, more than half of those arrested (230) were women, and most were never implicated in trafficking at all.
Of the 406 real arrests, 153 had been released weeks before the police announced the success of the operation: 106 of them without any charge at all and 47 after being cautioned for minor offences. Most of the remaining 253 were not accused of trafficking: 73 were charged with immigration breaches; 76 were eventually convicted of non-trafficking offences involving drugs, driving or management of a brothel; others died, absconded or disappeared off police records.
Although police described the operation as "the culmination of months of planning and intelligence-gathering from all those stakeholders involved", the reality was that, during six months of national effort, they found only 96 people to arrest for trafficking, of whom 67 were charged.
Forty-seven of those never made it to court.
Only 22 people were finally prosecuted for trafficking, including two women who had originally been "rescued" as supposed victims. Seven of them were acquitted. The end result was that, after raiding 822 brothels, flats and massage parlours all over the UK, Pentameter finally convicted of trafficking a grand total of only 15 men and women.
Police claimed that Pentameter used the international definition of sex trafficking contained in the UN's Palermo protocol, which involves the use of coercion or deceit to transport an unwilling man or woman into prostitution. But, in reality, Pentameter used a very different definition, from the UK's 2003 Sexual Offences Act, which makes it an offence to transport a man or woman into prostitution even if this involves assisting a willing sex worker.
Internal police documents reveal that 10 of Pentameter's 15 convictions were of men and women who were jailed on the basis that there was no evidence of their coercing the prostitutes they had worked with. There were just five men who were convicted of importing women and forcing them to work as prostitutes. These genuinely were traffickers, but none of them was detected by Pentameter, although its investigations are still continuing.
Two of them — Zhen Xu and Fei Zhang — had been in custody since March 2007, a clear seven months before Pentameter started work in October 2007.
The other three, Ali Arslan, Edward Facuna and Roman Pacan, were arrested and charged as a result of an operation which began when a female victim went to police in April 2006, well over a year before Pentameter Two began, although the arrests were made while Pentameter was running.
The head of the UK Human Trafficking Centre, Grahame Maxwell, who is chief constable of North Yorkshire, acknowledged the importance of the figures: "The facts speak for themselves. I'm not trying to argue with them in any shape or form," he said.
He said he had commissioned fresh research from regional intelligence units to try to get a clearer picture of the scale of sex trafficking. "What we're trying to do is to get it gently back to some reality here," he said.
"It's not where you go down on every street corner in every street in Britain, and there's a trafficked individual.
"There are more people trafficked for labour exploitation than there are for sexual exploitation. We need to redress the balance here. People just seem to grab figures from the air."
Groups who work with trafficked women declined to comment on the figures from the Pentameter Two police operation but said that the problem of trafficking was real.
Ruth Breslin, research and development manager for Eaves which runs the Poppy project for victims of trafficking, said: "I don't know the ins and outs of the police operation. It is incredibly difficult to establish prevalence because of the undercover and potentially criminal nature of trafficking and also, we feel, because of the fear that many women have in coming forward."
The internal analysis of Pentameter notes that some records could not be found and Brain, who is chief constable of Gloucestershire, argued that some genuine traffickers may have been charged with non-trafficking offences because of the availability of evidence but he conceded that he could point to no case where this had happened.
He said the Sexual Offences Act was "not user friendly" although he said he could not recall whether he had pointed this out to government since the end of Pentameter Two.
Parliament is in the final stages of passing the policing and crime bill which contains a proposal to clamp down on trafficking by penalising any man who has sex with a woman who is "controlled for gain" even if the man is genuinely ignorant of the control. Although the definition of "controlled" has been tightened, sex workers' groups complain that the clause will encourage women to prove that they are not being controlled by working alone on the streets or in a flat without a maid, thus making them more vulnerable to attack.
There are also fears that if the new legislation deters a significant proportion of customers, prostitutes will be pressurised to have sex without condoms in order to bring them back.
discussion comment
10 years ago
I think LE loves TER. It's so easy and safe for them. Anyway, chasing hookers, strippers or johns is a lot less dangerous, and much more fun, than murderers, robbers, terrorists, drug dealers,or even drunk drivers.
Why not take it out of the digital age? Hook up with someone in a club? You see the merchandise first hand and can be pretty sure after a few trips that they're not LE. Or, friends with recommendations are a potential good source.
Responding to any ad has a risk, probably not high, but definitely there. Anybody else with ideas for hooking up?
discussion comment
10 years ago
"Live to club another day"
The right call.
discussion comment
10 years ago
Federal deficit year ending:
2009 $1,400 billion – Can’t blame Obama for that; the fiscal year ended in October.
2010 $1,300 billion
2011 $1,300 billion
2012 $1,087 billion
2013 $680 billion
2014 $483 billion
Facts, they are such pesky things. And the economy is just beginning to take off. If the next two years continue as the last two years, there’ll be a surplus for FY 2016 of $121 billion; the first since Clinton.
The deficit situation and the overall economic recovery would have been considerably better without the Republican attempts to sabotage the economy in order make Obama a one-term President. Government shutdowns and credit defaults anyone?
I wonder what universe Clubber and Holden live in.
The National Debt is such a bogey man. Most of it consists of funded liabilities for future pensions and other benefits (like Social Security and Medicare). Kind of a disguised pay-as-you-go system not unknown to private businesses. The debt is not a serious economic issue as demonstrated by the fact that markets will loan the US trillions of dollars at amazing low interest rates. No risk premium visible.
Really, what universe are Clubber and Holden living in?
discussion comment
10 years ago
What grand1511 said. The Obama hatred seems utterly delusional.
> No disasters - remember 911, the Iraq War, Katrina, the DOW at 6,000, employment FALLING by 600,000 a month. No disasters is a pretty good place to start.
> The economy is the best it's been in a decade. You can quibble:should be better, should be different, but near 18,000 is better for everyone than trying to break 6,000 the wrong way.
> Deployed troops down from 200,000 to less than 20,000 and none in actual combat. That's Americans not getting killed for no reason.
> The deficit is falling faster and faster. Obama could leave office with a looming surplus.
> And, whether you like or not, the Affordable Care Act is finally an attempt to deal with the fact that the US has the most expensive health care system in the whole wide world and the worst health outcomes of any developed country. At least an E for effort.
So peace and prosperity - what's to hate?
discussion comment
10 years ago
The Israeli election within two weeks of Netanyahu’s visit is a really good reason for Obama not to meet with him. There are also others. Netanyahu is offering the US this great plan:
Let’s you and him fight.
He’d love to see us in a war with Iran. Netanyahu’s activities are designed to make the on-going negotiations with Iran fail. Such a failure makes it much more difficult for the US to avoid war with Iran. A war with a county that has 2½ times the population of Iraq, an economy 4 times the size of Iraq, a much more capable military, a much more educated, capable and loyal population.
There would be even less support for this war with Iran both internationally and within the US. The war would be a dream come true for international terrorism directed against the US.
So, say, by 2025 what are we looking at? Ten trillion dollars wasted, a hundred thousand dead Americans, millions of other deaths, an Israel much less secure than it is now, a world economy terribly damaged by mangled oil supplies from the Mid-east and the other destructions of very lengthy intense wars. And the rise of a powerful jihadist state consolidating power in vast regions of northern Africa and southwestern Asia.
All with the benevolent help of the Russians, the Chinese snapping up all the opportunities such a catastrophe will present for them, the Europeans and everybody else looking on in fear and dismay at the consequences of US policy.
Falling for “let’s you and him fight” is not only calamitous, but really dumb.
discussion comment
10 years ago
I remember my first burlesque show in Chicago in about 1958 - I was in high school and it was quite an adventure.
But the humor was a little over my young head, and it took sooo long for the girls to take anything off.
Modern strip clubs are a whole lot better.
discussion comment
10 years ago
The Israeli election is March 16. Netanyahu is coming on March 4. Should the US really get involved in the Israeli election? Should Obama really see all 16 candidates who might be Israeli PM? Or just one?
Maybe the foreign policy experts on TUSCL answer: Zero.
discussion comment
10 years ago
![]()
GACAUn-retired: Met my ATF. Married her. Divorcing her.
The numbers are pretty easy to find. Like try the Bureau of Labor Statistics. Or Google. Or http://www.bls.gov/news.release/pdf/empsit.pdf
Actually, Obama’s job creating performance is very considerably better than 5 million plus. He can hardly be blamed for the fact the great recession continued to produce job losses (a trailing indicator in any case) for many months after he took office.
By December of 2009 the number of employed people in the US was down to 138 million. Now it’s 147 million – up 9 million.
As for the quality of the jobs, a job is better than no job. But it’s goes far beyond that:
Median usual weekly earnings of full-time wage and salary workers
First quarter 2009 $713
Fourth quarter 2010 $796
Weekly earnings up 12% under Obama.
Let’s see, now. We’ve got 9 million, near 0 and 12%. I seem to remember worse. A lot worse.
Could it be that "Fox News Viewers Know Less Than People Who Don't Watch Any News."
discussion comment
10 years ago
![]()
GACAUn-retired: Met my ATF. Married her. Divorcing her.
Dallas wrote, "fewer Americans working than when he took the Oath of Office." That statement is objectively untrue:
US employment January, 2009: 142,099,000
US employment, December, 2014: 147,442,000
Net increase: 5.343 million.
Maybe you should lay off the FOX a bit.
As for diplomatic disasters, it is hard to imagine a worse disaster than the absurd invasion and occupation of Iraq for no good reason in 2003, the consequences of which have plagued the US to this day, and will continue to do for decades.
But, in the meantime, with Obama's "clueless" "fumbling," the number of Americans killed by terrorists and others in Iraq, Afghanistan and the rest of world has been steadily declining to near zero.
Plus 5 million and near zero. Doesn't sound too bad to me.
discussion comment
10 years ago
I'm 74, and I'm in clubs whenever a don't have a go to girl, and lots of times when I do. A different experience and lots of variety as opposed to one or two chicks. A go to girl is probably the cheapest, clubs can be expensive, but are a bargain compared to real girl friends/wives.
discussion comment
10 years ago
I guess chicken little is alive and well.
As the DOW hits another all time high,economic growth a ten year high, unemployment and gas prices a six year low.
I wonder how these guys felt in 2009?
discussion comment
11 years ago
The homicide rate is directly correlated with the gun ownership rate. I know it’s tough to get your head around this, but the homicide rate has more than one correlate. Another correlate is GDP per capita.
Thus we can say that the US has the highest private gun ownership rate in the world – 10 times the world average -- AND a homicide rate 5 times that of other developed countries. Excluding poor countries because low GDP per capita is not the US problem.
Correlation does not prove cause, but it sure is suggestive. And the suggestion is that more guns = more murders. No surprise here. For myself, I would repeal the 2nd Amendment. Because I don't like an excess of murders, which, to my mind, is, in part, caused by the amazingly huge excess of guns in the US.
Those wanting to advance the interest of gun manufacturers by keeping it mind numbingly easy for crazy people and violent criminals to get all the guns they want, whenever they want, must fall into the former category - unless they are just too lazy or obnoxious to actually think the matter through.
discussion comment
11 years ago
I'm with Alucard: "Would be a lot more difficult, if not impossible if ownership & use of guns by civilians was illegal and all guns were confiscated and destroyed. It would take a long while."
Repeal the 2nd Amendment.
review comment
12 years ago
Good description of HiLiter, and the info about the reclining seats in the VIP room is good to know. Always enjoy rh's reviews.
article comment
8 years ago
Frankly, a stripper who goes OTC and expects not to fuck sounds pretty damn weird to me. And a guy who takes a stripper OTC, both get naked on a bed, both get turned on, but he doesn't fuck? Sounds pretty damn weird.
I've taken a few girls OTC, and fucking was very definitely the main attraction – understood by both.
What's the point of not fucking? Saving it for marriage? Life is too short.
As for the increased chance of an STD from fucking with a condom (as opposed to HJ, clit playing and some fingers in a wet pussy) must be in the same league as getting struck by lightning.