discussion comment
14 years ago
@steve, I don't get it. Aren't you veteran-ish enough to figure that out by yourself long time ago?
discussion comment
14 years ago
Idk any dancer named stevie, but I get a stevie from almost every dancer that dance for me.
discussion comment
14 years ago
Thanks in advance.
discussion comment
14 years ago
LOL this topic is so interesting, but it only requires one sentence answer/comment. =D
discussion comment
14 years ago
My name also does not qualify. Good for you, sinclair!
discussion comment
14 years ago
Thanks in advance. Cheers.
discussion comment
14 years ago
"guys staring @ each other"...
I am so glad I've never experienced that before. That's like asking out a best friend for prom because all the other girls are dead on this planet.
discussion comment
14 years ago
dance quality*, not dancer quality.
discussion comment
14 years ago
@Slin, that's essentially what I said. There aren't too many people like us though. Everyone else (most PLs) seem to prefer slow weekdays 'cause of higher dancer quality/value.
Cheers.
discussion comment
14 years ago
(On slow weekdays) If you don't like getting too much attention from the dancers OR if you don't like getting asked for LDs too much, then Sat/Fridays are good 'cause you can just sit/stand and check out the A-team girls on those night shifts.
discussion comment
14 years ago
@Timbo your insight on that is pretty good. i heard the likewise for post-holiday time period.
I wonder around what percentage of an average dancer's income goes to paying the rent (and bills).
discussion comment
14 years ago
GMD, I said that for the "looks", not the "taste". Taste is one thing. But looks are another. For example, one must pay lots of money for high-end fried chicken restaurant. But that person might get the same satisfaction/taste (if not better) with KFC. Do you see where I am coming from?
Shadowcat, I LOL'ed big time with that teeth-brush comment.
discussion comment
14 years ago
I visited the club last night. They post all the gals (on shift) name online. The count came out to be 78, which I thought was the most since I first visited the club last summer. The place, yet again, was popping (also POPing?).
Basically, the club has $20/LD and $100/5-VIPLD. And there is no ITC extras whatsoever.
So that's why I was wondering how the club can extract so much though and popularity that way. It has pretty tasty-looking gals, but it's not a Vegas club. It's still an irony for me.
@CTQWERTY, you know well about it. The jungle room really is not more than a make-out area. But the other stuff you mentioned makes me wanna just ask the gals about OTC session. All I am afraid of is the cost range 'cause the hotter the gal is, the more dough she wants. Am I being too simplistic here?
discussion comment
14 years ago
@kingcripple Also, maybe she wanted to distinguish you from the LE.
discussion comment
14 years ago
Thanks for showing interest on my topic, btw.
discussion comment
14 years ago
GMD, I have not been to Kentucky clubs, so it wouldn't be fair for me to compare socal gals with Kentucky gals. But since you have been paying 50-200 for extras in Kentucky, I figured that the *gal quality* might be generally lower in Kentucky. To answer your question regarding on "value worth", I gotta try the gals in Louisville first..
For me, looks are a big factor because I'm still relatively young (no offense at all). However, looks are not the major factor. I gotta agree with "sex is the think, and while looks is a factor, performance and willingness are way more important."
Now, back to the "star advantage" concept; obviously there is not OTC sessions offered as much as Louisville from what I hear. You can see my recent post "Irony of San Diego." In it, I ask people how a certain San Diego club makes so much money without offering extras. idk too much about OTC, but the club literally restrict any ITC extras from happening.
discussion comment
14 years ago
I've been to 4 clubs, but I have been to one of them 30+ times.
discussion comment
14 years ago
"I apologize for that." And I will try to be more private next time, y'all.
discussion comment
14 years ago
![]()
rickduganVerified and Certifiable Super-Reviewer
At the end, it seems like a win-win situation for both the gal and PL.
I wonder what other ways are there for gals to try to distinguish LE's from PL's, besides engaging HM 2-way contact.
discussion comment
14 years ago
GMD, one thing i was wondering was that the looks of gals in your regular clubs.
we was talking about San Diego gals, and IMO those gals might take advantage of the "star" factor. i truly think that girls in san diego SC are much better looking than ones in your clubs (is it kentucky)?
discussion comment
14 years ago
Thanks for your words, in advance.
discussion comment
14 years ago
Thanks lopaw on the contribution. I will try to discuss more about that by posting a brand new post because I figure I must be more specific with what i got around me.. =)
discussion comment
14 years ago
by the way, why are you curious about that? do you love her? do you care about her more than other gals? =P
discussion comment
14 years ago
Can you please throw out more shit so you can get to the perfect answer for you?
nah i'm just messing you with, shadow.
since you let us know more about her info, my bet is on "both" because:
1. 8 years of exp shows that she's well-informed with the business
2. hangs out at the bar more than hunting for ATMs
3. seems to always reach her goal of lowly 200 Bens with no SS
4. has another job
discussion comment
14 years ago
dallas, definition of SC addiction seems rather vague because in one hand I don't think you're an addict 'cause you know you can quit any time you want. I don't think an activity is addiction if it's not quit-able and if you have control of your mind.
On the other hand, you still think you might be an addict even though you can quit. So I don't know what to tell you. At any rate, after all these years, why difference does it make if you're an addict?
Also, I think it's very common for one to prioritize SC visits over "tame" events. fun >>> tame
And the fact that you have been to many SC does not necessarily make you an SC addict, because there's really not much difference between having been to 30 different SCs and visiting a same SC 30 times, in terms of attempting to classify yourself as a SC addict.
Cheers.