discussion comment
8 years ago
Of course Trump is already flip-flopping. If you have no principles besides self-aggrandizement and accumulation of wealth, flip-flopping comes quite naturally.
Conservative Trump voters: Be prepared for four years of disappointment as his moderately liberal Democratic ideas, such as they are, assert themselves. Remember, Trump is a lifelong Democrat and frequent contributor to campaigns by Clinton, Schumer, Pelosi, et al. who has favored abortion rights, gun control, confiscatory taxation, open borders, and eminent domain for most of his adult life.
Liberal Trump opponents: Be prepared to be pleasantly surprised by how very "un-conservative" he will be as President.
The only good thing about Trump's victory is that it stopped the Evil Witch from Hell from becoming our Dark Empress.
discussion comment
8 years ago
Though I was not by any means a Trump fan, I did love seeing the meltdown by the Left when he won on Tuesday night. The looney lefties at MSNBC were especially in a state of denial. Now we have these orchestrated protests all over the country because the SJWs can't wrap their little leftwing brains around the prospect of a Trump presidency.
NinaBambina was one of many on this board who were certain of a Clinton victory. One of the sweetest things about Trump's win is to know how wrong they were -- though many of the Heil Hillary types have been strangely silent since Tuesday.
Oh, but she did win the popular vote -- as if that has any meaning whatsoever! If we chose our President by popular vote, the campaigns would be completely different. Instead of concentrating almost all of their campaigning on a dozen or so battleground states, the candidates might have to wage a more nationwide campaign. On the other hand, they might just concentrate on a few heavily populated areas, such as the Northeast Corridor and the LA and SF regions of California, and ignore "flyover country" even more than they already do.
discussion comment
8 years ago
Classic Douchester: "Nobody here likes me? Think I'm more popular than you are... homo!"
(1) Seriously, is there *anyone* less popular on this board than Douchester? I can't think of anyone.
(2) The puerile ad hominem attack at the end is, of course, a total surprise. Who would have expected him to call someone a homo?
As a result of this post, I thoroughly expect to be the subject of some pseudo-psychological analysis -- and to be called a homo (or possibly a faggot).. Oh well.
discussion comment
8 years ago
![]()
san_jose_guymoney was invented for handing to women, but buying dances is a chump's game
DrP: Um . . . thanks (?)
discussion comment
8 years ago
Assuming that we're still seeing each other next month (unclear at this point), I'm hoping to take my ATF on my first two-day road trip with a stripper. Nothing exotic -- another big Midwestern city, rock concert, great hotel right next door to the concert venue, lots of ethnic restaurants. I'm thinking about offering her a shopping budget, maybe $200, so she can buy some slutty clothes to model and remove for me in the evening :)
And dadgummit, she's not a whore! She's just an extras girl who sucks and fucks me for money in her apartment or in hotel rooms every couple or few weeks for money!! Oh, wait . . .
discussion comment
8 years ago
![]()
san_jose_guymoney was invented for handing to women, but buying dances is a chump's game
I find this thread *very* interesting, even though my Spanish is pretty poor. SJG, your Spanish is phenomenal!
I've read enough about Spanish pronouns to know that 'vos' is the archaic 2nd-person plural pronoun, comparable to 'Ihr' in German (in which I'm fluent). 'Vos' is seldom used in Spain any more but is very widespread in Latin America, especially in the far south (Argentina and Uruguay) and in Central America. It's also found in pockets scattered around Colombia, Venezuela, Chile, Bolivia, and Paraguay. Oddly, depending on the area, some Latin Americans use 'vos' with the 'tu' verb endings . . . and some use 'tu' with the 'vos' verb endings!
My SC Spanish is largely limited to phrases such as:
?Quieres bailar para mi?
!Tus chichis son maravillosas!
!Quiero chupar tus pezones!
(Yes, I've said all of those things to Latina strippers!)
I don't know how to enter those upside down exclamation and question marks here. Advice is requested from those who know.
discussion comment
8 years ago
Perhaps the PA vote started out relatively more Democrat because votes were counted in the urban areas first, especially Philadelphia. As votes from the mostly rural remainder of the state, which votes more like Alabama than like Philly, were counted, the small GOP lead became sizable. There's nothing nefarious going on here.
discussion comment
8 years ago
dallas702: In fact the only *recent* presidents to win the electoral vote and not the popular vote are:
2000: G.W. Bush.
2016: Trump
The only other times this quirk has occurred are:
1824: John Quincy Adams
1876: Rutherford B. Hayes
1888: Benjamin Harrison
which are not what I would call recent.
discussion comment
8 years ago
My nominee is the Satin Lady in Wheatland, IN (near Vincennes in SW Indiana). It's a true dump in the middle of nowhere with bare concrete walls, unattractive dancers, and zero mileage.
discussion comment
8 years ago
^ skibum +1
I misspoke on a related thread. With only 92% of the votes counted, Hillary leads by about 300,000 out of 120 million. However, when late returns come in from Kansas and Nebraska, she will clinch those two states' 73 electoral votes to obliterate Trump in the Electoral College 291-290! There's still hope, lefties!!
discussion comment
8 years ago
The OP and jackslash's response crack me up -- because every time my ATF asks me for more money, she says she doesn't want to be a stray cat. She knows about "veritable shit storm of chaos" girl, who really *is* a stray cat -- I fed her once and she never left :) I tell my ATF that she's a relatively stable pussycat, as strippers go.
discussion comment
8 years ago
No, SJG, it's pretty much just you. You're so wrong, so often, and yet you keep writing and writing and writing . . .
Tell us again about Clinton's victories in Kansas and Nebraska :)
discussion comment
8 years ago
SJG, don't let the door hit your dumb ass on your way to Mexico, that haven of democracy and rule of law :) Why do leftists always say they're going to leave the country when their guy (or gal) loses but they never actually leave?
The center did hold, and voted for Trump (in enough states to win a clear Electoral College majority). I don't like him either, but there's no denying (unless you're a looneytunes leftist) that he is a man of the center.
And no, no one EVER called Kansas and Nebraska for Clinton! Trump won both of them convincingly, something like 60% to 35%. Perhaps you're thinking of Thomas Frank's leftwing screed "What's the Matter with Kansas?", in which his leftie brain tries to figure out why the good citizens of Kansas keep voting Republican even though their economic interests are obviously better served by the Democrats. Hmm . . . I'm guessing it's racism :)
Rule to live by: When in political doubt, do the opposite of what SJG says.
discussion comment
8 years ago
SJG writes: "It might interest you to know that Hillary got a majority of the popular vote. And as the remainder of the votes are counted, that margin will probably exceed Obama's 5 Meg margin."
Hillary got a *plurality* of the popular vote -- 47.5% to 47.3% for Trump. "Majority" means over 50%. As I write this, Hillary leads by about 200,000 votes out of 120 million with 99% of the votes counted. Are you saying that the remaining 1% are going to increase her popular vote lead to the 5 million that Obama won by in 2012? LMFAO!
SJG, you serve one useful purpose on this board. You are so relentlessly wrong about politics that if I want to know the truth about a political fact or issue, I only have to read your drivel and think the opposite.
discussion comment
8 years ago
A Yale economics professor has made his midterm exam optional to those students traumatized by Trump's win:
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-3921048/Yale-professor-makes-economics-midterm-optional-students-distraught-Trump-winning-election.html
Fucking snowflakes!
discussion comment
8 years ago
Great call, JS69! I never believed that Trump would win until about 11pm (Eastern), when FL, NC, and OH had been called for him and he was leading in PA, MI, and WI. Around this same time, ace political prognosticator SJG was calling Kansas and Nebraska for Clinton and quoting bing.com to the effect that Clinton had an 89.7% chance of winning :)
discussion comment
8 years ago
Very well stated, imamutt -- thanks for your honesty. I am going through my own slow-motion train wreck with my ATF, whom I've been seeing at her place since August. For weeks it has felt like it's almost over -- requests for more money, canceled dates -- but it never actually seems to end. Things may come to a head at our next date in less than two weeks (maybe!).
These lessons will seem like no-brainers to you OTC veterans, but as a relative rookie (first OTC last December) I've just learned them in recent months:
1. Don't get emotionally attached to a stripper.
2. Don't advance money to or pay rent for a stripper.
discussion comment
8 years ago
Get over it, sc. "Separation of church and state" isn't in the Constitution. large points out correctly that the only prohibitions are on establishment of *a* religion and infringing on freedom of worship.
discussion comment
8 years ago
Keen political commentary from SJG:
If you divide the states into Red, Blue, and Battle Ground, then this map does look different from ones I have seen in recent Presidential elections. Usually they show more Red, and much less Blue. So usually it looks like the Republican's have a huge advantage shown in the polls, and then for the Democrats to win they would have to prevail in most all of the Battle Ground states, with little safety margin. -- This is ludicrous. Everyone knows about the Democrats' "Blue Wall", the 18 states with 242 electoral votes that have voted Democrat six elections in a row. Arguably since 1992 it's the Republicans that face an uphill climb to win the presidency.
Usually California is presented as a battle ground state . . . -- Nope, not since 1988.
I am looking forward to a massive democratic landslide, the likes of 1964, 1932, or the 1940 mid-term. -- No comment, except to point out that there was no mid-term election in 1940.
Now, this is curious, Kansas and Nebraska had been called for Clinton, but now they have shifted to Trump. This is strange. -- This is beyond strange. It's fantasy. No one *ever* called KS and NE for Clinton.
Bing saying Clinton 104, Trump 129, Clinton 89.7% chance of victory. -- This post was around 10:30 (ET), when 538.com had Trump's chances at over 50%! More fantasy.
SJG, if I knew as little about politics as you do, I would STFU.
discussion comment
8 years ago
Like JS69, in over a thousand SC visits I have *never* worn a suit. My preferred garb is a nice golf shirt and either sweat pants and sneakers (when it's cool) or sweat shorts and sandals (when it's hot). I never have trouble getting lappers, extras (where available), and even OTC offers in recent years. I see no correlation whatsoever between my clothing and my strip club success.
discussion comment
8 years ago
Incisive political commentary by the Douchester himself.
discussion comment
8 years ago
Great episode! I loved the strip club names -- thanks for collecting them, PredragDr! -- and the inside references like "special sweatpants" and the $17.50 ATM fee. Somebody on staff knows a little bit too much about SCs, eh?
discussion comment
8 years ago
I had a CF for the first several months of this year at a certain club. For about six months in a row, when I asked for her number, she either gave me a new one or said she was "between phones". She literally had half a dozen different phone numbers in as many months. I finally just asked her what days she worked and hoped for the best. That strategy resulted in 4 excellent BBBJCIMs in VIP. Sadly she seems to have moved on . . .
discussion comment
8 years ago
![]()
flagoonerEverything written by this member is a fact.
You mean I'm on the same side as SJG on this issue? Hmm . . . Nope, I still think larryfisherman is OK!
discussion comment
8 years ago
Yes, of course they should be in jail. It could still happen, but recent events have made me deeply cynical about the ability or willingness of the U.S. "justice" system to bring these scoundrels to justice.
The comparison between the Clintons and Reagan is, of course, absurd -- but what would you expect from our own master of absurdity.