discussion comment
8 years ago
Good for you for still caring, imamutt. Poor treatment by my ATF has certainly made me more cynical about strippers, but we should continue to treat them as people and not just as "sex workers"! Despite all the disappointments, there are some golden nuggets amongst all the turds who work in strip clubs!
discussion comment
8 years ago
![]()
flagoonerEverything written by this member is a fact.
I will cast a probably lonely vote on Larry's behalf. I find the contempt directed against him, especially by shailynn, quite excessive. Larry may, um, embellish the truth a bit, but that doesn't make him a douche.
Now Dougster -- *there's* a douche!
discussion comment
8 years ago
![]()
shailynnThey never tell you what you need to know.
I have voted on Election Day for decades, but this year I voted on the Wednesday before because of travel and commuting on Mon-Tue.
I've heard that at least 40% of votes will be cast before Election Day this year! This is somewhat disturbing, given how many late-breaking developments there have been in the last two weeks. I wonder how many people who voted early for Hillary are now feeling buyer's remorse. Note: This is not to say that I voted for Trump. My point is that most of the negative revelations, the so-called "October [and November] Surprises", have been against Hillary.
Whoever wins on Tuesday, America loses.
discussion comment
8 years ago
When I started clubbing in the mid 90s, I was satisfied with level A or B. It took me a couple of years to realize that level D was even available, whereupon I abandoned levels A-C completely.
I've generally been content for many years with lap dances at the D or E level, though the lines, of course, are blurry. For example, I have sometimes gotten HJs and often sucked titties at clubs that supposedly offer level D only. I'm sure many of us can tell tales of handies or even blowies in a level C or D lap dance area.
Truth be told, in recent years I have gravitated toward level F. As much as I enjoy a good lapgasm, a BBBJCIM blows it away every time!
discussion comment
8 years ago
SJG, your penultimate post corroborates my claim that you're a leftwing extremist who is out of touch with the mainstream. For example:
"George McGovern is my all time favorite presidential candidate." -- no comment
"I found all the Republican primary candidates this time to be excessive, meaning more ridiculous than either McCain or Romney had been." -- Even Kasich? And do you really consider McCain and Romney ridiculously conservative? Wow.
"Corrupt? Hillary Clinton is to the Right of Obama on lots of issues. But corrupt?" -- Hillary used to be somewhat less leftwing than Obama, but it appears that the primary campaign against Sanders drove her permanently leftward on a host of issues, such as free college and a $15 minimum wage. I maintain that she would run a more leftist administration than Obama has -- which, of course, would suit you just fine. As for your questioning her corruption . . . well, I'm just speechless that a sentient human being in November of 2016 could possibly question her corruption! Wow again.
"And Sanders is still more moderate than many European heads of state." -- Name two European heads of state to the left of Bernie Sanders! And even if there are some, is European-style socialism something we should aspire to here? Well, I know you think it is.
"And George McGovern wasn't even from Santa Clara County! And Michael Moore isn't either." -- total non sequiturs. My point about overwhelmingly Democratic presidential voting in Santa Clara County was that it is a highly unrepresentative fragment of America and that living there gives you a distorted view of what Americans really think, as evidenced by the original dumbassery that instigated my post:
"Because with a candidate like Trump I would like to think that he has very few supporters."
This is evidence of a worldview that is totally out of touch with the American mainstream. Trump will probably get 46% or more of the popular vote, around the same level as the Republican candidate in the last four elections -- and he may well be your next President.
discussion comment
8 years ago
To provide a little psephological perspective to my previous post about Santa Clara County, CA:
2000: Gore 61%, Bush 35%
2004: Kerry 64%, Bush 35%
2008: Obama 70%, McCain 29%
2012: Obama 70%, Romney 27%
In all four cases the nationwide popular vote was much closer, with the Republican candidate getting between 46% (McCain) and 51% (Bush in '04) nationally.
My point is that Santa Clara County is one of the most Democratic-voting counties in the country, so people who live there have a distorted view of the nation as a whole.
discussion comment
8 years ago
I will preface this remark by stating that I loathe both Clinton and Trump, so I am not speaking as a Trump supporter. Whoever wins on Tuesday, America loses, and I'm taking the next day off in mourning for the future of this once great country. (Actually, as a politics junkie I stay up until the wee hours on election night *every* four years and take the next day off.)
SJG's typically asinine remark that "I would like to think that [Trump] has very few supporters" reminds me of similarly out-of-touch leftists in 1972 who remarked, after Nixon's landslide victory over McGovern, that "That's impossible! No one I know voted for Nixon!" When everyone you know is a Sanders- or Stein-style looney leftie, it probably does seem implausible that Trump might win 270 electoral votes -- but as of today it looks possible.
SJG and other denizens of the extreme Left: *most* Americans do not identify themselves with socialism, "democratic" or otherwise, or with the Green Party. The vast majority of Americans are somewhere between somewhat liberal and somewhat conservative. Since Trump is also in this ideological range, and since Clinton is so completely corrupt and, I would submit, incompetent and unlikable as well, that a Trump victory is plausible, whether you like him or not (and I can't stand him). It may not appear that way in the deep blue precincts of Santa Clara County or the Upper West Side of Manhattan, but Trump has very widespread mainstream appeal.
discussion comment
8 years ago
Original link: Meh. I sure didn't want to listen to 5+ minutes of lousy country music in hopes of hearing the word "tits", but I fast-forwarded through it because I thought I might *see* a tittie or two. No such luck!
However . . . Longball for the win. I remember watching this Rodney Carrington special late at night on Comedy Central many years ago and marveling that they could actually show tits on basic cable in the U.S.! Longball, your link brings back fond mammaries :)
discussion comment
8 years ago
Yummy! Reminds me of FLBP (Future Lower Back Problems) from www.theChive.com
discussion comment
8 years ago
Yep, I'd say I'm addicted to strip clubs in general and to my ATF in particular. However, her incessant requests for more money while rescheduling dates is rapidly diminishing my obsession with her. The "nearly perfect boy-girl sleepovers" that I described in a recent article are truly marvelous, but the long gaps between dates and the frequent "I hate to ask, but . . ." texts are wearing me down. I have learned a couple of important lessons rather late in life:
1. Don't get emotionally involved with a stripper.
2. Don't lend money to or pay rent for a stripper.
I'm still addicted, but I'm aware of it now and am less likely to let it happen again. If this thing, which started ITC in April and went OTC in August, comes crashing down on our next date (in a couple of weeks), I will treasure my memories of our good times and move on sadder but wiser. Fortunately the few thousand that I've spent on her represent a minuscule fraction of my net worth.
discussion comment
8 years ago
![]()
impalaThe People's Republic of Pennsylvania
Cundundrum?
discussion comment
8 years ago
jackslash wrote "she's a very nice, clean Detroit stripper" Why do I think that was ironically intended? :)
discussion comment
8 years ago
Almost as soon as I met my ATF in April, she told me that she was living with her boyfriend and fucking him bareback because she's 32 and wants to get pregnant. After our first VIP (featuring mutual oral sex), she hinted that she would be available to meet OTC, but I resisted because of the whole live-in boyfriend thing. I should mention that he was the stereotypical loser stripper boyfriend: an emotionally abusive, pot-smoking video-game player with partial custody of his daughter by a previous relationship. He's the one who sent her back to work as an extras girl at a strip club to support both of them while he stayed home, smoked weed, played games -- and checked her phone every night for texts from customers (including me!).
It wasn't until she surreptitiously ditched the boyfriend in August by moving out of their apartment into another one that I agreed to meet her OTC. Because she has told me that she needs sex every day, I have no doubt that she is fucking other people for free. Honestly I'm not crazy about it, but it comes with the territory -- I just don't want to hear about it.
If I ever went to her (or any stripper's) house and encountered a dude at the door, I would leave immediately and never see her again.
discussion comment
8 years ago
Meat72: Your wife's name is John? :)
discussion comment
8 years ago
Ah, Tippi Hedren - Melanie Griffith - Dakota Johnson: 3 generations of feminine loveliness!
Tippi never got nekkid in the movies but was a blonde goddess in Hitchcock's The Birds and Marnie, among many others.
Melanie showed breasts and/or butt in 14 movies, notably Joyride, Ha-Gan, and Night Moves in the 70s and Fear City, Working Girl, and Something Wild in the 80s. Behold:
http://www.celebritymoviearchive.com/tour/name.php/84
At the tender age of 27, Dakota already has 27 film and TV credits, including *very* naked roles in Fifty Shades of Grey and A Bigger Splash. She's in post-production on sequels to the former called Fifty Shades Darker and Fifty Shades Freed, in which she will presumably be starkers again. Check this out:
http://www.celebritymoviearchive.com/tour/name.php/8549
discussion comment
8 years ago
We've probably all seen the website www.damnyouautocorrect.com, where people post hilarious examples of words that have been auto-corrected. My most recent example was when I used the word "big-breasted" in a text to a favorite stripper and it was auto-corrected to "big breastfed". This was not at all the compliment that I wanted to pay her :)
discussion comment
8 years ago
Damn, shadowcat -- you sound just like Wikipedia!
Papi_Chulo: Wikipedia.org is a free online encyclopedia where you can look up things like "Desi" :)
discussion comment
8 years ago
As someone who actually *knows* the SC situation in Columbia and ESL, I will weigh in:
Missouri has been known as a strip club wasteland in recent years because of legislation prohibiting any kind of nudity, even toplessness, in strip clubs. However, by the time I visited Vogue and Rumors in Columbia in 2013, *all* of the girls at both clubs were getting topless on stage and during lap dances. Here's my review of the better of the two clubs (Rumors) from three years ago:
https://www.tuscl.net/club.php?id=1068&page=2#reviews
I have read more recently that only some strippers take their tops off on stage and that the lap dance area offers "T-shirt dances" in which the girl wears a loose-fitting T-shirt and you can touch under it as much as you want. You won't get any extras at Rumors, but you can have an excellent time.
The greater East St Louis (ESL) area, across the river from St Louis, is kind of a strip club Mecca. I believe that Sauget has 2 strip clubs, Brooklyn has 4, Centerville has 1 or 2, and Washington Park (which is in Illinois, not Missouri) has NINE!
I have visited a couple of the Brooklyn clubs but find myself returning to WP over and over. At the high end you'll find Hollywood Show Club, which is very close to the I-64 exit, has a *huge* well-lit parking lot, and offers nude high-contact stage dances and $25 "bed dances". However, my personal favorites in WP are the 5 dive bars: Blondie's, Cheeks, Wise Guys, C-Mowe's, and Dollie's, all of which offer extras. As a matter of fact, the first three have lockable VIP rooms -- just you and the dancer in a private room for 15-30 minutes for a total of $150 or so.
Last night I went to dinner and a movie in University City (right next to St Louis) and then hit Dollie's at 10. (This time of night in WP is not for the faint of heart, BTW). As soon as I bought a beer and sat down, a 24-year-old white cutie sat down with me and, after some preliminary chit-chat, offered BBBJCIM for $50 or FS for $80! Being an inveterate fan of the blowie, I took her up on what we called Option A and ended up tipping her another $30 for a job well done.
I stayed in the area last night and am visiting Cheeks after lunch, where I expect to get another BBBJCIM in an ultra-private VIP room for around $150.
If I were driving through Columbia and St Louis, I would stop at some subset of Rumors in Columbia for topless girls next door, HSC in WP for a more high-end experience, and either Dollie's (cheap) or Cheeks or Wise Guys (more expensive) for extras.
Have fun!
discussion comment
8 years ago
Papi_Chulo, thanks for the tip but why in the world would I log out to read 100s of posts by people on my ignore list? I *love* seeing 30-some rather than 300-some posts in this thread!
discussion comment
8 years ago
Ha ha! *Very* little OTC homicide humor :)
discussion comment
8 years ago
I've seen three different strippers OTC a total of nine times since December. In two cases I knew them well enough from multiple club visits to know that they didn't currently have boyfriends. In the third case, "Veritable Shit Storm of Chaos" girl was actually delivered to my hotel at 1:30am by her brother (!), who turned out to be overly protective but not homicidal. Admittedly I was stupidly careless in that instance and have learned my lesson.
I visit my ATF in her apartment, knowing that I'm just a temporary playmate until her ex-husband gets out of prison in February -- at which point I will quietly disappear.
discussion comment
8 years ago
Thanks, Papi and Willy -- mystery solved.
discussion comment
8 years ago
You're right, Subraman. The question was largely rhetorical.
discussion comment
8 years ago
I agree that the initial question was quite vague. However . . . the only helpful responses came, as usual, from Papi_Chulo.
discussion comment
8 years ago
What's going on here? According to Discussions, there have been 334 (!) posts in this thread -- but I see only 20 of them! I don't have that many people on Ignore any more. Whom am I not seeing?
BTW, I'm not complaining at all. This sort of thing illustrates the beauty of the ignore feature.