discussion comment
2 years ago
Definite douchenozzle, and not defending his comment, but here's hoping she's grown a thick enough skin to shrug it off.
discussion comment
2 years ago
Morgpie.
discussion comment
2 years ago
@BTE, why should I treat your fantasies as real?
discussion comment
2 years ago
Forgot the smiley, 25. Not trying to be a jerk.
This time.
discussion comment
2 years ago
@twentyfive, Nope. I said what I meant, and meant what I said. Maybe I'm just old, but: https://idioms.thefreedictionary.com/make+up+out+of+whole+cloth
discussion comment
2 years ago
I'll take "things that never happened" for 1,000, Alex.
Another story made up out of whole cloth.
discussion comment
2 years ago
![]()
rickduganVerified and Certifiable Super-Reviewer
@blah: "It clearly seems like Rick goes for girls that don't really wanna do this then he vents about them crying?"
Look, I will never be rick's greatest fan, for a variety of reasons I've expressed here a fair few times, but I've never gotten the impression that he goes after woman who don't "want to". He definitely goes after women who might not usually do it, and he's probably convinced a few who've never done it before, but the very nature of preferring women who aren't high volume sex workers is going to be accompanied by a certain amount of soul searching on the woman's part when they've actually done the deed, and I have little doubt that some of the women he's convinced decided "never again" afterwards, but "crying"? Not that I've seen.
discussion comment
2 years ago
![]()
rickduganVerified and Certifiable Super-Reviewer
@blah: "Also honestly, I just think they are weak-minded and dumb."
More weak minded than a coal miner selling his or her body (and lung health) to mine coal? More weak minded than a professional athlete selling his or her body for entertainment?
There is nothing inherently immoral about prostitution, from either side. The characterization of it as such is yet another way to for people to impose their will on women and limit their choices.
@blah: "It is easy to run up your credit in an emergency or hell go get a regular fucking job and sign up for the all the overtime in the world."
A "regular" job that pays a tenth of what an hour of letting some creepy fuck stick his dick in you. If I could pay my mortgage by selling sex for four or five hours a month, I'd do it in a heartbeat.
I love people who treat their own particular moral choices as some kind of natural law that others are "weak" or "corrupt" for not following.
discussion comment
2 years ago
![]()
rickduganVerified and Certifiable Super-Reviewer
For me, the only one in recent memory who seemed overly concerned about it is the MILF I still see sometimes. She has *never* let me give her any money for our OTC. She'll let me buy lunch/dinner, give her Christmas and birthday (but not random) gifts of cash, and she would take as much money in the club as I would give her, but she would never take it explicitly for the fucking itself.
Mind you, I've never, ever, found any profit at all in calling one of these girls a hooker, whore, escort, or whatever other synonym for prostitute. There's just no reason to do so. But most of them seem to have been self-aware enough to recognize the reality. My ATF used to say "I'm *your* whore", and even my current "sugar baby" has made similar mostly joking comments.
discussion comment
2 years ago
![]()
TetradonI'll act nicer if you'll act smarter.
When I moved to Louisville in the late 90s, it was one of the first results in search engines of the day. Probably Altavista or yahoo or one of those. Somewhere along the line SCL showed up, but seemed useless to me from the get-go. USASG locally is not too bad, but TUSCL is still way better for clubs.
discussion comment
2 years ago
![]()
rickduganVerified and Certifiable Super-Reviewer
Not sure about *your* area, but here in this area, the clubs tend to slow down around Christmas and New Year, except for a few random, unpredictable days.
I too have been getting more texts. Not "blown up" precisely, but more than average.
discussion comment
2 years ago
Awwww! How sweet! 🥺
discussion comment
2 years ago
@blah: First day dealing with men? 🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣
discussion comment
2 years ago
![]()
motorheadFat, drunk and stupid is no way to go through life
"Most popular actress" is not strictly because of her looks (though I think you're smoking crack with that "5" 🙃), but because she's currently playing everyone's favorite (well, mine anyway) goth psychopath, Wednesday Addams. From what I hear, she's doing a really good job of it.
discussion comment
2 years ago
The only reason to privately message a dancer with that kind of "joke" comment is either to insult her without anyone seeing it, or to try to get something (whatever that "thing" might be) from her without anyone knowing you tried and subsequently crashed and burned.
discussion comment
2 years ago
Ugh. I'm sad now.
discussion comment
2 years ago
@C.M.I: "Assuming that any of this is real (and I'm not making that assumption...),"
A shaky assumption, at *best*.
This never happened.
discussion comment
2 years ago
@C.M.I: " I'm not going to name dancers who are charging more than I want to pay. "
Agreed. If a dancer offers a $1,500 hand job and a PL agrees, that's not a ROB. Likewise, if a dancer refuses to fuck or objects to intrusive fingers or other body parts, that's not a ROB either.
As for what defines "ROB behaviour", I totally get the differing definitions of such that different people have. For instance, if a dancer is overly ambiguous about what she delivers, and then doesn't deliver on what I expect, I personally don't consider that a ROB thing. I'd suggest being specific about that in a review, whether it be miscounting dances, up-charging after price has been negotiated, or whatever. Likewise club strong-arm or deceptive practices.
discussion comment
2 years ago
I don't precisely *dis*agree with the position that dancers shouldn't be named. Aside from the obvious case of calling out a ROB by name and behaviour, as individuals, they're almost irrelevant. As a group, of course, they're entirely the *point* of going to a club, so levels of attractiveness, attentiveness, attitude, etc, are all good items to include. I'm even fine with leaving out names of exceptionally good dancers, even when they're unconnected to extras, as many will assume that there *must* be extras involved for them to be "good".
discussion comment
2 years ago
![]()
rickduganVerified and Certifiable Super-Reviewer
@BTE: "you understand the difference between a p4p low volume stripper, a p4p waitress and a hooker"
There is no difference. They're both hookers. Whether it was once in their entire life, or once every hour, taking money for sex is legally defined as prostitution, and "hooker" is just another name for prostitute.
discussion comment
2 years ago
![]()
rickduganVerified and Certifiable Super-Reviewer
@BTE: "Georg hooker can mean someone who only does p4p as a primary source of money"
Yeah, and it can also mean someone who does it once a year at Christmas. Or once. And it's still prostitution no matter how many times.
@BTW: " It’s absurd to use the word hooker to describe both types of women. "
It's absurd to use accurate language. Why am I completely un-surprised.
discussion comment
2 years ago
Within reason, whenever you can. A late review is better than no review, as long as you note how long it's been since your visit. If your review is months or years late, don't bother.
discussion comment
2 years ago
![]()
rickduganVerified and Certifiable Super-Reviewer
@BigThirdEye: "a stripper who engages in p4p is not necessarily a hooker."
A stripper who engages in p4p is *by definition* a hooker. Hooker being a synonym for prostitute, and the definition of prostitute being one who performs sexual services in exchange for money.
discussion comment
2 years ago
Ham, turkey, mashed potatoes, gravy, cheddar biscuits, corn, green bean casserole, butternut squash, mac and cheese, sweet red wine.
For dessert, dutch apple pie, pumpkin pie, vanilla ice cream, and homemade whipped cream for topping.