People are going broke over this
rickdugan
Verified and Certifiable Super-Reviewer
My office is in a tourist area and the property manager on the same floor is already dealing with a slew of calls from people who don't know how they're going to pay their April rent. These people work in the restaurants, bars and stores around here that tourists normally flock to. Now the tourists are gone, the bars are closed and the restaurants are running skeleton crews for takeout only.
Some of these people have children in their care. Others are local college students just trying to stay afloat while they finish their studies. Yet others are older people who rely upon these jobs to supplement their Social Security. All of them are now at risk of losing their homes and their cars. How will they even make their car insurance payments in order to stay on the road? It's a fucking mess already and it will soon get many times worse if these people can't get back to work.
it is really time that we start re-thinking this.
Got something to say?
Start your own discussion
271 comments
Latest
Pick yourself up and act like a man stop being such a wussy little wimpette.
Unlike you 25, I'm a man of the people, so I'm seeing it all firsthand. I'm not hiding away during the day far away from the working man. Oh, and nice platitudes, but they don't apply here, not when the issue is not the natural disaster itself, but the government shutting down the economy wholesale. We need a different approach now. We need the government to stop preventing these adults from helping themselves.
@ATAC: I'm still in denial. ;)
I guess you forgot the 2008-2009 crisis and that was a drop in the bucket compared to the havoc this is wreaking. How long do you think landlords can afford not to get paid? They have expenses too, including mortgages, property taxes, repairs, maintenance staff, etc., etc.
Yeah you're a regular everyman, you have no idea about anything at all, you are a first class idiot.
I guarantee I'm not hiding any place I'm actually working hard keeping my business running so the the people that work for my company can continue to get paid and make their obligations, it's very difficult under these conditions, but that;s neither here nor there, I actually tend to my obligations without complaining about who's not helping me. This is having an effect on everyone, not just you, so pick your sad sack self off the floor and do what you need to do you simpering coward.
https://www.michigan.gov/whitmer/0,9309,…
Oh btw, the angry name calling is generally a sign that one is just too stupid to argue on the merits. Given your obvious ignorance on the toll this is taking on ordinary people, i'm inclined to think that this applies to you.
Kudos to you for helping your people, but there is no help forthcoming for all those people who are already running out of money, at least not soon enough to help them. These people are already falling behind on their bills. A couple thousand from the Feds a few weeks or longer from now isn't going to make much of a difference.
First, these landlords will still have to try, even if they have to lower rent. See above re: bills to pay. Second, an empty apartment still costs less to support than one that is occupied by non-paying tenants because at least it isn't incurring more wear and tear, utility bills for those with all inclusive rent payments (which is common in lower income housing), sudden emergency repair needs (which must be tended to by law), etc.
Man the level of "out-of-touch" on this board is truly stunning.
As per your usual thinking, the dumbest fool always thinks he's the smartest guy in the room
As for the toll this is taking on ordinary people, I wouldn't even waste time debating you you haven't any empathy this is just par for the course, just keep on trolling , not my fault you're stuck in the house with the wife and the brats, we know you'd much rather be out fucking whore's and giving them money for their brats, than taking care of your own.
But we get it 25. You don't want to argue this because you don't give a shit. So long as you feel just a little bit safer you don't care how many lives are ruined.
Well, 25, at least you’re not one of those stupid people who resort to name calling.
Another thing about the lower tier, assuming this was all unchecked and nothing had closed down, many people would have gotten sick and not have shown up to work and caused a lot of disruption anyways. Yes many are asymptomatic and out and about. But many would have come down with something and been unwell. And while survivable and no need for hospitalization, believe me it def feels worse than a regular flu.
I personally suspect I got the coronavirus recently and I was sick for 2.5 weeks. But alas, without proper testing there’s no way to know for sure. (If I did have it, I probably picked it up in Florida btw) But I stayed in bed because I had the luxury of not worried about being terminated anywhere.
It would have been pretty common for the bartender/server to come back after a week I fear of aforementioned consequences, when they should definitely should be home. And bringing down employee morale with their misery plus making everyone else sick and lowering business and putting that industry with being square ones and probably just as bad off.
So there’s disruption for the bottom tier, but most likely it would have happened either way and it’s a moot point. And I think it’s not as bad off as you think.
——-
Now as for those higher in the chain, who faced 401k drops and are wondering if layoffs will start happening, it’s probably more worrisome for that group. It’s going to be way harder for somebody accustomed to a 50k+ salary to apply to that grocery store that’s advertising its hiring. Or amazon is apparently not even requiring resumes?
——
From a personal selfish viewpoint, I don’t like these measures either and figure it wouldn’t have been sunshine and rainbows regardless. But all I can do is adapt and figure out a way to make things even better for myself than before.
From the sounds of how you’re talking about yourself(particularly financially), you don’t have much to adapt to, to even have to do that. 🤷🏻♀️ Aside from perhaps the tedium of dealing with your wife and children?
Normally I would agree with this academic treatise, but right now it is about the stupidest thing I've ever read on here and that's saying something given many of 25's posts.
There aren't remotely close to enough open jobs at Walmart and all the other food companies to absorb the glut of restaurant workers, retail store employees, entertainment venue employees, livery drivers, hotel employees, contractors, etc., etc. who are out of work right now. If there were there would be no need for relief. Just ask your Meals on Wheels driver the next time he stops by your place, who might actually have a clue since you obviously haven't left the house in maybe years. Good Lord.
People with much greater expertise than you or I don’t have a better answer.
@Rick: I get that shutting down is causing an enormous amount of hardship, economic and otherwise. But you you say “We need a different approach now”, what other viable approach would you recommend?
People with much greater medical expertise than you or I don’t have a better answer.
If we don’t shut everything down to slow the infection rate, most people will become almost simultaneously infected and we won’t have a functional health care system.
Shutting down buys us time to keep the health care system as functional as possible.
With 330 million people in the USA and assuming a 70% infection rate and a mortality rate between 1% (with a functional health care system) and 3.4% (without a functional health care system) that’s between 2.3 million and 7.8 million deaths in the next few months.
Is shutting down the economy for a few months worth saving 5.5 million lives?
I will grant that my numbers are only guesses at this point, but any reasonable set of numbers will show that millions of live can be saved with a shutdown.
If we don’t shut everything down to slow the infection rate, most people will become almost simultaneously infected and we won’t have a functional health care system.
Shutting down buys us time to keep the health care system as functional as possible.
With 330 million people in the USA and assuming a 70% infection rate and a mortality rate between 1% (with a functional health care system) and 3.4% (without a functional health care system) that’s between 2.3 million and 7.8 million deaths in the next few months.
Is shutting down the economy for a few months worth saving 5.5 million lives?
I will grant that my numbers are only guesses at this point, but any reasonable set of numbers will show that millions of live can be saved with a shutdown.
https://www.housingwire.com/articles/fan…
While this won't ensure that nobody loses their home over this, it will drastically limit the number and at least delay anyone getting evicted in the next couple of months.
While HUDs policies only apply to federally backed mortgages and renters other mortgage lenders are following suit. Also in many states the courts have suspended all but the most urgent cases thereby preventing an eviction hearing in the first place.
As for the small businesses that are being shuttered by this, the SBA has already made several programs available and more are being negotiated as part of the stimulus package currently in Congress.
https://www.sba.gov/disaster-assistance/…
While I hate the government telling us what business can and can't stay open there really isn't much choice right now. Social Distancing is the only weapon we have to fight the problem right now. Hopefully we come back with a stronger economy after this is over, but a lot of weaker companies (and some previously strong ones) aren't going to survive to see it. Ultimately it is better for a percentage of companies to die from Coronavirus to protect people than to let that same percentage of people die to protect the businesses.
I wish there were better options but I haven't seen any.
@Rick: I get that shutting down is causing an enormous amount of hardship, economic and otherwise. But you you say “We need a different approach now”, what other viable approach would you recommend?
People with much greater expertise than you or I don’t have a better answer.
If we don’t shut everything down to slow the infection rate, most people will become almost simultaneously infected and we won’t have a functional health care system.
Shutting down buys us time to keep the health care system as functional as possible.
With 330 million people in the USA and assuming a 70% infection rate and a mortality rate between 1% (with a functional health care system) and 3.4% (without a functional health care system) that’s between 2.3 million and 7.8 million deaths in the next few months.
Is shutting down the economy for a few months worth saving 5.5 million lives?
I will grant that my numbers are only guesses at this point, but any reasonable set of numbers will show that millions of live can be saved with a shutdown.
Anybody wanna guess what will be needed in the NEXT crisis? $20 trillion?
Anybody wanna guess how many years it will take people to WAKE THE FUCK UP and realize that massive money printing has an ultimate destination, and Zimbabwe already had it: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hyperinfla…
For anyone who has access to the Wall Street Journal, this is a great article on the topic:
https://www.wsj.com/articles/is-the-coro…
Also, do you know how few businesses are actually able to secure an SBA loan? You have to be able to show capacity to repay and, in some instances, provide collateral. How many restaurants, small retailers, bars, livery drivers, etc., etc., do you think can actually qualify for something like that when they may be staring down the barrel of an extended shut-down and have few hard assets besides inventory?
No offense to you folks posting this stuff, but I'm amazed that some of you can fry an egg without getting caught up in some academic treatise on optimal heating temps, egg texture and surface cooking areas.
Is shutting down the economy for a few months worth saving 5.5 million lives?
Maybe. After a few months, the economy would be wiped out. Most companies, even the big ones, would not re-open. The federal government wouldn’t be able to pay its debts. No Medicare. No Social Security. We would be a third world country. All of Europe would be too. Think Mad Max.
How many people would die from that ?
If it’s that stupid, why would you normally agree with it? Are you saying that you normally agree with stupid ideas during non-pandemic times? 😉😉😉😉😉
Delivery driver positions are not declining. Perhaps shifting over on what is delivered, but there’s still a demand.
https://techcrunch.com/2020/03/16/grocer…
But in general, signs are all over the place advertising hiring.. A convenience store I was at, had a sign up advertising for truck drivers even. (In a butt fuck nowhere small town)
Speaking of having a clue, I’m currently crashing with people I know personally. In a rent-controlled apartment complex. Catching up and hearing all the gossip about quite a few other individuals in a similar socioeconomic tier. *You* may need to leave the house and your leafy neighborhood to find entry level employees to speak with, but no I am content to passively hear my information from the couch.
The lower classes are okay, at least in Austin. As by “okay” I mean the status quo. But it can’t be the only city like that.
Not that I really have that opinion either, but it gives me more sympathy to the mentality.
No, I am just getting a kick out of Rick disguising his personal problems as concern for poor people.
C’mon man, with the posturing earlier in this thread that you’re not feeling strain either currently or risking it in the future...You do way too much business travel normally, for there not to be something that’s causing a problem. I assume that when you travel there is some sort of business being conducted, and not just simply going to clubs and writing reviews as long as the rating system is to your personal liking 😉😉😉😉😉
Don't worry about what RickiBoi thinks is the stupidest thing he's read on here, remember the biggest fool allways thinks he's the smartest guy in the room.
But let me lay out some real world examples for our resident academics on how it all works on a micro scale...
Right now in my office building there are 3 businesses that will likely go under very soon (and probably more, but I don't chat with those owners). One sells expensive solar panel installations, another sells garage doors and windows (also expensive) and the third is a tutoring center.
Sales seized up for the first two when the panic started a couple of weeks ago. Homeowners are backing out of, or postponing, existing sales agreements using COVID-19 as the excuse. Of course nothing new is being sold, so in a nutshell nobody is paying them. They have had to lay off their employees and, unless something changes soon, they will be out of business.
The tutoring center dried up as soon as the schools were closed. None of the tutors are getting paid since they work on an hourly basis. All tests and assessments have already been cancelled for the rest of the year and the kids are doing distance learning until April 15th, though that will likely extend.
None of these businesses could conceivably qualify for a loan from anyone, including the SBA. Shit they probably won't even cover their April office rent payments.
When you shut down the economy, even for a short time, the effects are massive and deep and ripple in a myriad of ways. We all think of restaurants and bars because they are the most visible to us, but it is made up of countless small businesses operating behind the scenes, like these, many of which are about to go under.
We cannot sustain this for much longer without multi-year economic consequences.
I count on these events every few cycles it makes the strong businesses better, and get's rid of the trash.
So while I do agree that some shutdown is warranted going to the lengths some people want are too far. In my area before the full shutdown they limited business to 50% of their normal capacity which I thought was a smart compromise. And even then most businesses were pretty empty as a large percentage of people are not going out from fear rather than government mandate.
Everyone is going to die, it's only a matter of how soon. If covid was taking out everyone under 20 then I would feel a lot differently about the situation but instead it's the opposite. Most of those who are going to die have lived a long and full live already.
All of that said when I made these points before (on the other forum) there was a TON of outrage so I've pretty much kept my mouth shut since then.
I do understand that there are probably other bottlenecks that would come up if the ventilator problem was solved. I pitched the idea a week ago of the goverment taking over a hotel chain and it was badass to see the US Army Core of Engineers came up with the same idea and is going forward with it.
My latest idea I have been trying to get some traction on is to quickly retrain veterinarians to treat human covid patients. That would obviously massively increase the number of available doctors.
Final note - If anyone here is elderly and super worried about dying of covid I would recommend going on amazon and buying a manual respirator. Even if we run out of ventilators you can still technically just manually respirate someone and those devices are readily available for purchase. Also a lot of the DIY ventilator projects use those as a base so buying one of them (I think mine was $23) is cheap insurance.
If all the restrictions were immediately removed, does anyone think people are just going to start buying houses, cars, traveling, huge weddings....list goes on forever.
Denial for sure.
As for the tutoring center, yeah they would have been much better off without the schools being closed. They still would have taken a hit, possibly enough to put them out of business, from many parents worrying about their personal finances and pulling the kids due to the high cost. My sister-in-law lost her job at a national "learning center" chain in the 2008 recession because so many parents pulled their students because they couldn't afford the cost.
If you are worried about the solar panel and door and window companies you could always hire them to make some upgrades to what I am sure is a palatial estate you call home. I'm not sure about your state, but here in Ohio those services are still able to be open because they are considered "essential services" because they fall under the "home maintanance" exception. Even if they can't perform the work right now due to restrictions in your area, I'm sure they would accept prepayment now to complete the work after the shutdown.
While I can't afford to lay out massive amounts of money for large scale purchases like that, I have spent more than $600 buying gift certificates to three local restaurants that I frequent to help them stay in business.
Denial indeed.
We will see what comes out of Washington on Monday, when the 15 day period is over, but it is expected that the Administration will be advocating for a more moderate path forward. Let's hope.
Most battle plans only last till first contact with the enemy, then everyone is fighting to stay alive.
He can’t continue further on that front because he doesn't actually have real world examples. So he has to “lay out some real world examples for our resident academics on how it all works on a micro scale..” by talking about individuals in his ~office building~ doing something that’s not bar/restaurant related, nor shopkeepers who work in touristy areas.
25 gave a good point that if they are *already* folding, that any normal event would have taken them out anyways. Rick can’t respond to that point.
Now all Rick can do is not address anything anymore—and resort to mockery and insults cause facts won’t save his arguments.
Why will they not save his arguments? Because Rick doesn’t actually notice or care about what he blabbed in the OP about. And doesn’t have any real-world examples to dispute me on how people are suffering.
Rick is the one financially suffering—and makes it a point to keep trying to insist he’s not. And to further his denial, he tried to make it like he’s complaining on the behalf of another group of people, but in reality he’s complaining on behalf of himself.
Well 25 let me turn you "how many lives" question around. How many lives should we lose to despair and suicide just so you can be a little safer? How many children should be forced into abject poverty? Because both of these issues are widespread during any downturn, determine as one as deep as this will be if we do not pull back.
I won't even get into the sheer arrogance about your assumptions about which businesses deserve to live or die, except to say that even many formerly strong businesses are in trouble right now.
Based on some of points other users have pointed out I think you're just broke. Sucks to have to call out another Patriots fan.
"It is sad to see how many people can only comprehend the suffering of others when they are among them."
The irony in this thread has gotten so thick, Papi tried to take it for a lapdance
Sub, I'm neither out of touch nor among the suffering. Indeed, I'm more the every-man than almost any weird fuck on this board, as few unique users as there actually are. I may not have the full scope on the which 'tards are running which accounts on here, but I don't spend too much time trying to reason that out. I also may allow myself to get baited more than I should, but part of that might be that I find entertainment in the back and forth.
But as far as what's going on out there right now, I'm wading in it. I am dealing with other families and other local businesses. All of which has made the canned plot lines and academic theories i'm seeing around here all the more bizarre.
But hey Sub, there is one silver lining in this for you. Maybe now you'll actually get some of the $250 OTC you've been claiming to find with dayshift hotties. ;)
My question to anyone that cares to answer is who gets to decide who lives or dies, if you aren't volunteering to die, shut the fuck up, and try to save as many as possible.
LOLOLOL Don't look now, LDK is headed straight towards this thread
People are dying over it too.
So far in the US, 800 deaths. That's something that started less than a month ago, and is predicted to only get worse, even with lock downs.
And while the 55,000 people confirmed infected is probably under reported, most of the under reported people are doing ok, but can spread the disease.
The bigger problem is that out of 55,000 people, best estimate I can find is about 10% are averaging a week in the ICU hooked to a ventilator!!! With costs of US healthcare, those people are sure as hell going way broke!!! And that number is going to skyrocket to the point we're out of space and they start taking over convention centers to setup makeshift hospitals... It's going to go way higher, and without the shutdown, we'd be there at the end of this week.
Imagine the financials of every hospital bed in New York city occupied with someone in critical care staying there over 5 days? Imagine how many of these people won't have insurance? They will have a lifelong debt they will never end up paying.
Do you really think the masses are going to go shopping just like before? Go out to eat? Go to movies? Travel by plane after waiting hours in an airport with people from everywhere around the world? Start booking hotel rooms for whatever? Hell no. Only the people that don't give a shit are going to support the economy. The vast majority will be too chicken shit to risk dying or getting seriously sick. And i bet all those old taking heads talking about sacrificing themselves for the economy won't be in that first group of supporting the economy. It'll only be a matter of days before everyone realizes what's going on and stop supporting the economy completely. Meanwhile, the virus spreads like wild fire but still doesn't reach herd immunity numbers because a lot of people are still voluntary isolating and for good reason. Meanwhile, the severely sick and dying are exponentially increasing, completely overrunning the hospitals because they still don't have enough ventilators and respirators and beds and even the nurses and doctors are also getting sick and don't forget all about all the other sick and critical patients that don't have Covid-19. Millions of hospitalizations that are compromised by the overrun and understaffed and underprepared medical system. Forget about getting anything routine or preventive done and who would risk going to an environment like that anyway, but that will lead to a sicker population. Meanwhile, there are seniors and elderly dying in nursing homes and even residential homes because they couldn't or wouldn't get to a crowded hospital. Not all of these cases are Covid-19, but the many other myriad of comorbidities that the very old often have and will get.
Before you know it you've got rotting corpses across the country and people are just scared to move them and now you have a major health and environmental hazard that was unnecessary. People are still hoarding essential food and supplies and now you have major civil unrest and are on the brink of civil war and a real life virus apocalypse. Armed citizens will just burgle and steal stuff now if they can't buy it. This isn't months from now. This could all start happening in a matter of weeks or even days, well before any actual bankruptcies and home foreclosures or complete stock market crashes.
This is mostly all an exaggeration, and thankfully it's moot anyway, since Trump can't just unilaterally reopen the economy. Since we've already gone in this direction, we might as well go all in. Half measures won't do anything in either direction and full measures are impossible in the other direction (reopening economy). And we've already seen that it can be done and it has worked. It would be best just to do what other countries have already done (China, South Korea) in a couple months and try to do it better. Those countries didn't fall into mass poverty and hardship and suicides. They'll recover. Slowly, but they will, at least until the next crisis or second and third wave of coronavirus pandemics. Since every state has some autonomy in how they decide to go about it, we'll soon be able to see who has the better approach. I would wager my entire stimulus check that every single state is going to fall in line and fall hardcore and Trump and those talking heads are just going to sound more crazy if they keep it up.
If we don't start opening some pressure release valves, things are eventually going to get violent, with desperate people doing increasingly desperate things.
This lock down is only about a week old. Less than that in some areas and not even in effect in many states. How are people going to go bankrupt that quickly? Most people get paid every week or every two weeks. They can wait it out a little longer without any "real" damage yet...
Expensing $2k-$2.5k per trip, airfare, hotel, rental car, airport parking, dinners, taxi, uber, gas... every other week.
Add an average of at least $500 a week for strip clubs or OTC calls.
Home now, not going anywhere. My company doesn't want me traveling. My customer doesn't want me to visit. All decided before any shutdown orders.
If they changed their minds, fuck them, I'm still working remote because I can, and their happy asses will deal with it of fire me (and I'll find a job with no fucking travel cause walking through a goddamned airport today fucked).
Even if businesses rebel and open anyways, or Trump orders shutdown orders lifted, people aren't going back.
Over the weekend, there was a social-media post for Miami boaters to hookup at a popular Miami boating location - subsequently the county-mayor closed all boating docks - one would think people on boats would not necessarily be a a big issue w.r.t. to transmission but per the article:
"... Numerous videos posted to social media showed the area jampacked, with boats tied together and hordes of people standing in close proximity on the sand ..."
https://www.miamiherald.com/news/coronav…
https://www.politico.com/interactives/20…
https://www.courier-journal.com/story/ne…
"This is one that makes me mad, and it should make you mad," Governor Beshear said of the case that occurred after the person attended a party of people in their 20s, who health officials say are as a group less vulnerable to COVID-19, the disease caused by the novel coronavirus.
“This is the part where I, the person that tells everybody to be calm, have to remain calm myself," Beshear said. "Because anyone who goes to something like this may think that they are indestructible, but it’s someone else’s loved one that they are going to hurt.
“We are battling for the health and even the lives of our parents and our grandparents," he added. "Don’t be so callous as to intentionally go to something and expose yourself to something that can kill other people. We ought to be much better than that.”
https://www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/NE…
"This suggests that the overall clinical consequences of Covid-19 may ultimately be more akin to those of a severe seasonal influenza (which has a case fatality rate of approximately 0.1%) "
Short article, you can read the assumptions for yourself.
If you're 20 and healthy the odds of going to the hospital are low the odds of death are even lower. Letting your body fight it off for a week then moving on with your life might be a better option than hiding out for months.
On the other hand I don't envy those over 65 or with heart conditions. The odds of you ending up in the hospital if you catch coronavirus aren't ones I want to face.
People gotta get over this "if you're young and healthy no problem so just live your life like you want to" - it is a huge problem if young people keep getting infected b/c this will prolong and exasperate the situation - the point isn't that it won't effect young-people, the point is that young-people will make the pandemic worse and much-longer-lasting if they don't don't do as recommended.
On this note - I recently heard they are starting to try a therapy of using plasma w/ Covid-19 antibodies from recovered patients to treat patients in Covid-19 distress
But a few have discovered the hard way, the risk of a horribly experience or death still exists.
And "healthy" means no diabetes, high blood pressure, etc... none of the various health related issues caused by obesity and inactivity that often sound way too common in kids these days.
The article by Fauci is a big deal to me. If the fatality rate is only 0.1% then the worst case death toll is more like 170K instead of 1.7M.
And desert is right. it's going to be weeks before anyone sees anything, even if this things miraculously passes tomorrow. By then people will be hopelessly behind on their bills and these tidbits will be too little too late. Also, the bill does very little on an immediate practical level for small businesses. What a mess.
Doctors don't get the final say in economic decisions. We have to balance medical risks with the long-term economic health of hundreds of millions of people.
Situation is different in NYC with 20,000 confirmed cases and the hospitals on the brink of failure.
How is it that you cannot seem to comprehend sympathy for the plight of others? are you really that far gone? :)
So - w/o the lockdown, do you really think that # would stay around 50?
Not to mention that the limited-testing being done means there are likely way more infections than the ones known.
When there are 50 people infected in a county, that works. When there are 5,000, you’ve got to rely on people to self-test. When there are 50,000 ( or, you don’t have test kits), you lock everyone in their house and wait 2 weeks.
Beginning next week, I think the approach will be tailored to facts on the ground in each community.
Seems South Korea has been the most, if not only, successful nation to really bend the curve - but it was done thru draconian measures, not "hey it's not so bad" - they have tested more than anybody and enforced various draconian measures.
NightLine also featured Hong Kong (the territory, not the club 😃) - where they did a good job of containing it - then they eased-up and it came back w/ a vengeance.
LOL and Rick can only argue semantics now, rather than my main point that individuals, who have been displaced because of being in a “nonessential business”, can find something else easily in a pinch. It’s more convenient to say “lower class” instead of “lower socioeconomic tier”, what can I say?
Which btw, idk how that can really be a slur when I’m currently in the same boat anyways. Guess who is officially about to work as a pharm tech for the next few months? At least until it’s decided whether to resume the nomadic stripper life or decide on a vanilla career.
And speaking of work, there was plenty of advertising for different job options today. A billboard from the IRS was advertising 3-4 job positions. A road construction sign was advertising three job positions. A grocery store and a home improvement store had a sign up indicating they were hiring. And that’s just what I saw from the corner of my eye.
But my condolences, I’m sorry that your “colleagues“ go under within a mere nine days.
No one that I know in that middle/upper class has not started looking for other temporary work yet.
I am happy to give a list of specific real world examples.
Two really interesting cases I have heard of:
1. I bought a skateboard a few weeks before everything went to shit. And although the small business that I purchased from is totally capable of functioning during the shutdown and has even seen an increase in demand they can't actually sell anything because their stock ran out and they can't get a resupply from china.
2. Apparently some churches may go under. Since people aren't going to church in person they are not giving money to churches and some might not last long.
“Suffice it to say that I've sprung for lunch in our part of the office complex a number of times over the past week.”
“In fact, when I hear their tales of woe I have to lie to them and tell them I'm going through the same thing, which fortunately I am not.”
Everything was dead and there were layoffs a week before the lockdown.
The economy will bounce back quickly so long as people have some money and the virus is controlled.
What we need now js a moratorium on evictions or on rent and utilities.
The NFL is still conducting transactions as if there's going to be a season. They're deluded because they care about the money that will be lost and the fans care (somewhat at this point) about the game. The NBA and NHL season are gone. The MLB season is gone, but they're also deluded because they're thinking about money. Only Adam Silver seems to realize that the season is lost and has a clear head about it. The NFL season is probably gone, at least with live audiences, but even getting 100+ players and staff ready for a game is going to be extremely difficult. Unless the disease is completely eliminated (and there is a chance it can still happen, but it's going to require breakthroughs and very quick breakthroughs and implementation in testing) entire industries are going to be gone or basically gone for many months. Movies, gone. Dine in restaurants, gone. Gyms, gone. Hotels and travel, gone. They're not coming back until the disease is eliminated (like no new positive cases like in China). These are just the obvious industries. But any industry that deals with interacting with the public is likely gone or very culled.
This is one of the very few times that a problem, national crisis really, can't be solved without government and big government intervention at all levels but especially at the Federal level because those laws restrict the lower levels. This is literally like a major war time (on home soil or a like a civil war even) event or effort with similar required sacrifice. There are going to have to be temporary restrictions on freedom and liberty. Just look at other democratic countries employing almost fascist methods to get people in line and definitely fascist methods like categorizing people by color codes. These are sadly likely necessary. There are countries engaging in spying and surveillance essentially through the use of smart phones to track the disease, which is likely necessary. Strangely the US has less smart phones per person than many other countries often poorer countries like China and South Korea so even this action won't be quite as effective, but it can greatly help in isolating the disease.
Trump is so deluded right now, it's not even funny or sad. He's like the IOC in Japan that refused to believe that the Olympics wouldn't go on. No one else in the world is thinking about the freaking Olympics at a time like this and no one in the country is thinking about going back to work or the marketplace if they don't literally have to (only what is essential for personal and societal survival). If he keeps up this rhetoric, he's not just going to just anger Democrats and Independents, but his very own base.
@25: Good luck as you work through your business issues. In case you thought that I might try to use your situation as a means to drive certain points home, I'm not going to go there. There is never anything to celebrate in hardworking men and women losing their jobs, especially when it will likely be a long time before economic activity resumes in any normal fashion. Even if this thing is over in a couple of months, the economic ramifications are going to be deep and longlasting.
I’m not going to say that everyone is going to be fine but the sun will rise tomorrow and every day going forward, most will be fine though
How many other people do you think those even 50 cases (assuming that was all of them, which would be incorrect) in a rural area can infect? In New York, people are almost dying by the time they drag themselves to the hospital. The death rate has only been limited to a little more than 1% because it's only been a few days. As those 30,000+ in New York begin to recover (there are still almost 4,000 people still recovering in China, weeks and months after diagnosis, and a lot of them aren't going to make it as there are still handfuls of deaths every day still being reported there), a lot of them are going to die. That doesn't even factor the ones that simply run out of life-supporting equipment due to triage. And that number is nowhere near peaking yet so it's going to get way bigger.
But that's New York, you might say. EVERYWHERE else in the country is different. No, everywhere else in the country is just later in the curve. The curve stays slow and low for a LONG time then it just explodes once it hits a critical number. Simple arithmetic (or algebra). If NOTHING is done, then every single city and town will be like New York. That is what we are seeing all across Italy and now Spain and now New York. And these are places that are doing SOMETHING. You do not want to know what doing NOTHING looks like.
But as we're finding out, none of these reactions across the country or in the world even so far have been too early or too extreme. Remember when people though the NBA had overreacted by canceling the season? And now we're finding out about infections from players, coaches, fans and even a ref now in critical condition. Extreme as it was at the time, it was absolutely the right thing to do. People were complaining about why rich, young, asymptomatic healthy athletes were getting tested. Turns out, they need to isolate/quarantine all of them and their contacts and even their contacts' contacts which means just about everyone at this point.
https://www.worldometers.info/coronaviru…
LOL. Could be. Or I could simply be angry at the over-reaction and lack of nuance in the responses of our local leaders. Governor DeSantis is a notable exception to this, but even in Florida local counties and cities are far too eager to go above and beyond without properly gauging the pros and cons.
I also think that you are really not grasping the long-term economic devastation that this has already caused, which will worsen the longer this goes on. Shame on so many politicos who panicked instead of led. This will not be forgotten when the smoke clears.
For fuck's sake man how are you still on this "its just the flu" bullshit?
Seasonal flu on average kills 3,000 people in Italy, over the course on an entire season. COVID 19 has killed at least 3 times that many people in the course of a month and it hasn't even spread all over the country. Its heavily concentrated in the Northern regions of Italy among approximately 20 million people. If it was everywhere in Italy there would probably be 24,000 dead right now.
I mean, I get it, the impact this is having on the economy is awful. But the consequences of this disease being allowed to spread out of control if we just went about our lives as normal would be a minimum of hundreds of thousands dead, perhaps millions. We have to continue social distancing or we are completely fucked. Hopefully our stimulus packages will repair some of the damage it has done to the economy.
The case mortality rate is now estimated at 0.1%. That's a number backed up by Dr Fauci in a leading peer-reviewed medical journal. The case mortality rate is about the same as the flu.
Covid may be more contagious and there's no vaccine. So more people will probably come down with the disease. But @Dugan's initial statement is correct: the lethality of covid is likely about the same as the flu.
The cases in Italy are not evenly distributed. Almost half of them are occurring in the Lombardy region.
https://www.statista.com/statistics/1099…
Bergamo is a city of 120,000 people. Typically during the month of March, about 3 people die per day for a total of 90 for the month of March. As of March 19th, they had 620 deaths. This means that over a week ago, 0.5% of the entire city was dead.
https://www.corriere.it/politica/20_marz…
I hear these new numbers are coming from Iceland. We have no idea how things are gonna pan out in Iceland yet or if they got the S strain instead of the L strain.
You say that like it is a mitigating factor. This is an inevitable result of the virus getting out of control is that hospitals get overwhelmed and people can't be treated. That's why we can't just walk around like everything is normal.
I’m not saying it isn’t horrific. It is. But, I’m saying it isn’t inevitable that every city in America will see massive numbers of deaths. We are fighting back and our leaders at all levels, with some exceptions ( DeBlasio), are doing the right thing.
You can have people going to work. But hardly any will patronize non essential businesses enough to keep them open so long as we have this pandemic.
As far as hospitals go. Keep in mind other illnesses aren't going away. The virus will take beds away from others thus increasing overall deaths in the country.
And life isn't about statistics. This will affect all of us in some way. People will think differently as the virus and economic rammifications spread.
But the biggest difference between Covid-19 and the flu is not the rate or even the sheer number of dying. It's the huge number of long term hospitalizations for a disease with no cure or no effective treatment. People that get hospitalized with the flu and pneumonia are often treated and cured or resolved long before they reach the ICU. A large number of Covid-19 patients just end up going from ER or general to ICU and just stay there until life support is ended as the ICUs get overwhelmed and then if they die, they die.
If you want to see what happens if even 1% of Americans end up going to the hospital for long stays in the ICU all at almost the same time, (i don't even think all the ICU's in the country can accommodate even 1 million patients let alone 3 million only for one condition), that is the situation that could be absolutely catastrophic.
https://tuscl.net/discussion.php?id=7149…
For an in-depth explanation of Covid Epidemiology, Pathophysiology, and Diagnostics click below [50min]
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PWzbArPg…
For a shorter explanation with focus on Diagnosis, Treatment [incl cloroquine hcl], Prognosis, and Precautions in treatment click below [36min]
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rdoN_XsH…
Factual information trumps wild speculation and useless arguments based on bullshitting [= bullshit is speech intended to persuade without regard for truth. ... the bullshitter doesn't care if what they say is true or false,... only cares whether their listener is persuaded.]
Our healthcare system is not better than Italy's is and it certainly isn't vastly better.
https://www.sciencenews.org/wp-content/u…
www.sccgov.org
Who makes the best teledildonic rigs? Got links?
teledildonics.co
SJG
As someone with a little more than a passing familiarity with the subject and as someone who has personally been on the receiving end of the Italian healthcare system (trauma care), I can say unequivocally that you know not of what you speak.
FYI I have recently returned to the States for medical care because no other place in the ENTIRE world offers the same chance for survival (I put it at 50-50). Had I had to depend on Canada there would have been ZERO chance of survival as well as if I sought care in the horrible systems available in any of the Scandinavian countries. In the UK with the vaunted NHS, I would put my chances at about 15%. I am lucky that I have a US passport, insurance and money but none of that changes the fact that the US system, (from routine care to critical trauma care to cancer care to etc, etc, etc) is far better for everyone lucky enough to be in the States than virtually every other system throughout the rest of the world. And the USA is by far better prepared and more capable to respond to this contagion than damn near everywhere.
Stop accepting information off the internet without knowing what data and/or agenda makes up that information. When you eventually grow up, if you survive that long, you are going to be embarrassed to look back on what you ”knew” to be true during your current awkward adolescent stage. You might want to start forming your opinions about the world by venturing out to find out what really lies beyond that scary doorway leading into the real world.
In America, world class treatment is provided to anyone who presents themselves at a hospital, including those with no insurance or money. Plus, our Public Health agencies are in place for situations like this pandemic.
Look at the resources being brought to bear in New York. No other country can manage this. China and Italy simply sent people home to die. That’s why their mortality rates are multiples of ours.
CC99 talks out of his ass a bit too much.
1200 dead in 3 days.
And that RATE is escalating. Averaging 400 a day now, when only 800 total 3 days ago? It will be over 1000 a day by Friday.
It's gone South, BTW. Any of you in Florida should probably check out the maps.
And for the argument that "there are only 50", that's 50 confirmed infections, people who have become sick enough to bother testing, and probably had to prove exposure to another confirmed infection to be tested, because there aren't enough test kits.
Many people believe the real infection rate, counting all those not showing symptoms or just mildly sick and not getting tested, but all are still able to spread the virus. So, 500 infected people, and 200 of those probably don't know they are spreading the virus as they stand in a supermarket check out line and cough once or twice cause they think they have a cold...
Without shutting everything down, instead of a supermarket check out line, that's half a restaurant. Maybe two dancers at the club, who spread the virus with no symptoms to every guy they ask for a dance in the next three nights.
And just think about a school!!!
He realized people would expect to see him in Church Easter Sunday...
It's shortsighted to trade short-term relieve for long-term success, it's like winning the battle (economic relieve) but losing the war (have it be like NYC in most major metro areas in short order)
How do you get your dick sucked with no condom by a stripper but worry about a really bad flu?
I don't pretend to know the "tipping point", my feeling is many people aren't too tolerant of anything much longer than a month lock down. The rate of case increases between on and Easter will be very telling. Today is merely a snapshot of 10 to 14 days ago. It's been 13 days since FL governor closed bars and night clubs statewide. We should (hopefully) see how well the social distancing is flattening the curve over the next several days. I've heard mid April peak bandied about, we shall see.
Ideally, from a pure doctors standpoint would be to quarantine everyone until rate of new infections drop to zero, but the time to achieve that would be untenable for many people/businesses.
I would rather have seen President Trump extend original social distancing order for 15 more days at the time he made the "open for business by Easter" statement. He was right to express the sentiment that he did then, but should have said, "extend another 15 days, then take another look around Easter as to when to open things up again. " "My goal going forward is to contain the pandemic without wrecking the US economy too much."
It's equally shortsighted to plunge us into another Great Depression without weighing the trade-offs between a "perfect world" medical response and the long-term effects of that sort of economic devastation. Because make no mistake, Depression era issues are what we will be dealing with if this goes on for too much longer.
Yesterday was the first-day the U.S. surpassed 20,000 new cases in one day
Yeah - let's open things up ASAP
I guess it's all a matter of perspective. I'd readily trade 20,000 elderly people who have lived their lives to save at least as many younger ones who will likely kill themselves out of sheer despair once the economic damage is widespread and lasting. Heck, I would also trade them to prevent potentially millions of children from spending their formative years in abject poverty.
But that's just me. Like I said, perspective matters.
BTW, Props for effective use of projection; seeing your own melodramatic style in others bur not in yourself.
'Back of the head' phenomenon - several members see you as melodramatic, you don't; they see the 'back of your head' more clearly than you can w/o mirrors and cameras - that is w/o self insight.
Nothing unique to you; we all do this.
As is usually the case, I suspect the optimal solution is somewhere in between. But, that wouldn’t be as fun to argue.
_____________________
lol, that ain't no compliment. One of my favorites, Steve Schmidt (ex-GOP pundit), called Graham a "pilot fish" -- i.e, a little fish that follows the direction of big fish.
Too true! I don't think the optimal solution is in between -- half-assed measures get you looking like Spain or Italy. Instead, my guess is full commitment to the lockdowns (evidence is coming up now that these are working in many areas), while developing a strategic policy that gets us out of the lockdowns ASAP -- strategic leadership is what I think has been lacking. I'd like to see a "here are the X conditions that need to be met to relax the lockdowns. And here is our plan to meet those conditions".
My own opinion is they’re mostly broke ass losers that think there’s some benefit to them from total chaos and anarchy.
Yes indeed. But far too mature for the USA general electorate/general public.
Not afraid to die, but I would prefer it not be in isolation while choking to get a breath. The economy is going to take a big hit whether from social distancing or from mass infection requiring hospitalization of 14% of the infected. Ignoring this isn't really a viable option and I suspected the economic blow would be even greater.
ski, I didn't bring this up to debate the why's. Just to point out Rick's hysterical positioning of supporting the medical establishment's priorities around the lockdown as "scared old guys", when in fact it has broad support through society and it's "restart the economy and let them all die" is actually the heavily old-guy position.
If the stock market continues to fall then that's okay, I'll just buy them at a fairer value; they're still kinda overvalued IMO. If the bond market goes to shit then that's okay with me too cuz I don't have any large allocation to bonds. If the US dollar fails then that's okay, I own (physical) gold and I'll buy more before shit goes down. If the whole global economy goes to shit and fiat currency fails due to hyperinflation caused by quadrillions of dollars flooding the system then that's okay too.... I own bitcoins.
Yup. As does your comment.
The hospitals are probably still working within that business model even in this new paradigm.
An extremely dangerous topic for anyone to broach.
Now for people that think that 500k deaths isn't a big deal, consider that is roughly the amount of Americans that died in combat from every single American war combined of which the vast majority are from World War II and the Civil War. All of those deaths took years to accumulate not weeks. In just a few weeks, we will be seeing around 2k+ additional deaths every day for months, just in the US. And don't think i want this to happen. But there is just this sense of inevitability at this point. 2k+ deaths a day is the equivalent of a Pearl Harbor or 9/11 every day. But somehow that seems normal. You can cynically or heartless say that 80+% of them are just old people that already had a foot in the grave, so we're just easing the inevitable burden on healthcare and social security ahead of time. That's seriously messed up. What about the other 100k+ that still had much left to live for? And this is for a moderate case scenario. Not the worst ones that would happen if the laissez faire crowd (although that crowd is getting much smaller by the day) have their way...
True. Instead you're advocating for the max protection of every elderly life at all costs, no matter how many future suicides, violent crimes or poverty stricken children result from it.
If you actually left that cave you've crawled into in abject fear and were seeing what I'm seeing, you might feel differently. It's getting bad already with lots of people struggling. We don't see much of this reported right now because the focus is on the virus, but eventually we will.
From my read of the data I would disagree. Of the people who get put on a ventilator only 10% will survive. No matter how many doctors, hospitals and ventilators we have it won't make much of a difference. That is a hard thing to accept but if you can then Dugan's logic starts to make sense.
Rick, No one is advocating for that -- that's a made up position, a self-constructed windmill to tilt at. What most of us advocate is listening to the medical experts, who in turn should be learning from the experiences of other countries, especially the collapse of the health systems there. We also recognize that while this hits the elderly the worst, it's not exclusive to the elderly by any stretch; making this strictly about the elderly is itself misguided.
By contrast, as you and skibum have been honest about -- admirably so, actually -- your position IS accurately represented as "let however many people die, die; open the economy back up".
This argument is between "listen to medical experts on how to handle this, to ensure the health system is overwhelmed and even WORSE long term economic effects felt" and "let people die". There is no "max protection of every elderly life at all costs" present in the current round of arguments, that part is an invention.
I find this very relevant. Interesting that out of all the interviews I've seen on the need for ventilators, I don't recall the survival rate ever being questioned.
However, it is definitely not too late to just have to accept the worst case scenarios, which are unacceptable considering that many other countries haven't given up and are doing better jobs of containing this. I don't even believe that the Dugan camp is accepting these scenarios. But i'm definitely well past the early stages of grief and have moved on to acceptance and action. Many other are still tripped up in the denial stage...
I'm a Republican, but I can call out made-up positions in any direction; in this case, there's too many made-up positionsn (it's only out-of-touch old guys who are for the lockdowns, only old people are at risk, those advocating lockdowns are doing so at a "save every life at all costs" presumably forever) for his argument to stand up on any level. Furthermore, no one wants Rick's advocating on their behalf -- his (and your) position is currently held by a few out-of-touch old guys, at least currently. There's broad support otherwise for the current course, which ironically is probably the far smarter one for the economy in the long term, provided we can work our way out of the lockdowns quickly enough.
===> "By contrast, as you and skibum have been honest about -- admirably so, actually -- your position IS accurately represented as "let however many people die, die; open the economy back up"."
Sub, you couldn't be more off - it's almost like you tried. 25 has already advocated for shelter-in-place for the entire state of FL, even though most of the issues are concentrated in one small area of the state. By contrast, all I am advocating is reasonable easing of restrictions for areas that have been more lightly hit in order to mitigate the economic carnage. Some of you guys are obviously amazingly out of touch with how this is already hurting tens of millions U.S. citizens.
Tomorrow I get to go back to my office and hear endless stories about people who can't pay their April rent or make their phone and car payments. By the time that the enhanced unemployment and stimulus checks come, it will already be be too little too late. Tomorrow I also get to see two small businesses move their shit out and close doors. And this is just the beginning. Economists are predicting Depression level unemployment and poverty if this drags on for much longer.
25, funny that a guy who constantly rants about his duly elected President is suddenly so eager to unquestioningly lap up rules set forth by his duly elected representatives. One can only conclude that it is because you agree with them, so man up and own it rather than acting like a passive aggressive twat. I was 100% on the money in my characterization of your position.
Sadly, those authority bucking parents who you referred to don't have the luxury of your cowardice, er, I mean sudden law and order orthodoxy, because they need to figure out how they're going to house and feed those kids.
https://blog.coinmarketcap.com/2020/04/0…
^^^ proof
We're faced with an awful choice. Sacrifice a bunch of (mostly) old people or hurt the economy in a way that will sting the service professions worst.
But on a personal level I'm not even willing to have my housekeeper come clean my home and I'm sure she is hurting for money.
Those aren't the only health conditions they're talking about . According to Medscape, by the standards by which "pre-existing condition" is meant for covid19, 50% of people 55 and over have some pre-existing condition or other. Don't be fooled into thinking there's lots of old people without pre-existing conditions
A Miami-woman decided it was a good idea to withdraw $10,000 to have at home given everything going-on - unbeknownst to her some lowlifes witnessed her bank-transaction, followed her-home, and robber her of all her $$$:
https://wsvn.com/news/local/police-at-le…
You're doing the right thing IMO. We are continuing to pay service providers for our kids because we want them to be around when this is over. Most have switched to online formats which frankly suck and are barely worth the effort, but we feel compelled to support them until they can get things going again in person.
Here is an article with longer term modeling on the effects of social distancing. It doesn't make much of a difference.
Dugan is right. The sooner it ends the better for society as a whole.
https://www.worldometers.info/coronaviru…
Da fuck you talking about?
USA total cases: 213,798 deaths: 4773
Italy total cases: 110,574 deaths: 13,155
That’s from your link and BTW none of these raw numbers that people are fixated on mean much of anything at this point and won’t until it’s all over.
So everybody needs to take a fucking chill pill. Seriously. You’re not doing yourselves any favors by obsessing about shit you can’t do anything about. In fact you are likely making yourselves more vulnerable physically to catching something with self induced stress. Take a break, stay well hydrated (water not booze), eat right, take a multi vitamin daily, exercise and get your mind on something else.
I never do this but I’m going to remind everyone that in times like these contributions to charities fall off as people face uncertainties in their own lives. I’m talking about the real charities not the fly-by-night profiteers that invariably pop up. So re-look at your charities and go write some checks if you’re able. And closer to home if you are in a position to do so, consider following @subraman’s lead and help take care of those close to you who are facing partial or total loss of income.
Most of the rest of the world doesn’t have the average TUSCL income of $350k and they are having it much, much worse than most everyone here.
Stay healthy, stay strong and let the hate go.
You're right, it's not something to gloat about. It's also disappointing that DeSantis caved into the political pressure, for all of the reasons discussed in this thread. By the end of April the cost of these shutdowns in terms of human suffering is going to be astronomically high. While boredom will likely be the worst enemy for those of us with cash reserves and freezers stuffed full of food, many other there have neither.
If only empty platitudes were enough for people who live paycheck to paycheck to pay rent, buy groceries and keep the phones and lights on. It would also be nice if hot air was enough to restart the largest economy on the planet once the virus is contained. 😉
Btw, did you see the news this morning that 6.6 million people filed for unemployment last week? Add last week's number and that's a quick 10 million and this is just the beginning. Gig workers are completely without income, commercial tenants do not want to pay rent (which trickles up to banks and investment funds), real estate values are going to plummet...eventually the rippling fallout is going to make 08-09 look like a walk in the park. Trump's words that "the cure cannot be worse than the disease" may come back to haunt us.
RickiBoi go read a book or play in traffic, stop trolling me you make yourself look thirsty.
I don't think this is sustainable for months -- 6.6 million new unemployment claims isn't sustainable either. The (very necessary and appropriate) lockdown should be a radical measure that is used as a temporary measure as we drive towards data-driven decisions around re-opening. By now, I was hoping we'd have widespread testing in place, a ton of data from that testing, private industry focused on safety equipment for healthcare providers (where relevant), etc.
And it is already starting, with the U.S. entering its deepest recession on record: https://finance.yahoo.com/news/us-econom…
The differences between limiting big gatherings and closing entertainment/dining venues, vs. a total SIP order, is massive. A full blown SIP order pretty much shuts everything down, including hotels, almost all restaurants and virtually every other business other than grocery stores and certain emergency services. Even many of the businesses that could in theory stay open do not because they have no customers, including a lot of takeout restaurants.
Sure the virus has been spreading in Florida like elsewhere, but slowly and arithmetically rather than exponentially. I seriously question whether the economic havoc and hardship that this will cause is worth the health benefits to a number of states, outside of the incredibly population dense area around NYC.
https://encrypted-tbn0.gstatic.com/image…
If only 10 to 20% of people placed on a ventilator survive, what is the true number of lives that will be saved by creating 30% unemployment?
Hell yes, social distancing, require test to travel, everyone wear masks, spray everything and everyone down all of it....but a complete shutdown of the economy...I don't know.
How does anyone in their right mind think things could continue to run and make money at even half the usual "sales" besides "essential" (lower in Maslow's hierarchy) businesses? How are employers going to keep paying workers (even only half of them) if there is no income coming in? How much longer do you think that can go on, never mind all the sick and dying? Employers are going to have to lay off everybody eventually when the situation becomes much worse. You don't need to shut down the economy to "murder" it. Things cannot go on as usual and a full blown reopening won't improve the economic situation much. How could a half-way reopening "save" the economy?
I see a lot of people criticizing the current measures, but i don't see a SINGLE different solution being offered.