Dancer:Customer Ratios
Subraman
Car key and wallet dating your sister
I was reading another thread where a poster postulated "let's say the dancer - customer ratio is 1:3..." It occurred to me right there that we have drastically different expectations -- that poster's hypothetical ratio was OUTRAGEOUS to me, as a slow dayshift guy, that there would be 3 customers to every dancer. How about you?
I would say that during the typical slow dayshifts I target:
Most of the day, dancer-customer ratios are 1:1. Since not all customers are buying, that leaves lots of free dancers
During the slowest times of those days, dancer-customer ratios can easily go to 3:1. I've been there where it's 10:1 -- 10 dancers, me as sole customer. Love it.
During peak times, like during lunchtime, the ratio could go 1:2 ... again, since not all customers are buying, that typically leaves a few free dancers
Unless I have made an appointment with an ATF who will stick by me the entire shift, I try to avoid shifts where the ratio is worse than 1:1
Note, last time I was at a strip club at 2am, it easily had to be 1:5 in the dancers' favor. FUCK THAT
I would say that during the typical slow dayshifts I target:
Most of the day, dancer-customer ratios are 1:1. Since not all customers are buying, that leaves lots of free dancers
During the slowest times of those days, dancer-customer ratios can easily go to 3:1. I've been there where it's 10:1 -- 10 dancers, me as sole customer. Love it.
During peak times, like during lunchtime, the ratio could go 1:2 ... again, since not all customers are buying, that typically leaves a few free dancers
Unless I have made an appointment with an ATF who will stick by me the entire shift, I try to avoid shifts where the ratio is worse than 1:1
Note, last time I was at a strip club at 2am, it easily had to be 1:5 in the dancers' favor. FUCK THAT
57 comments
I'm experiencing that right now. It's been a slower-than-usual summer, and quality at my favorite clubs has fallen drastically as a result, as the girls abandon dayshift for nightshift. It's a real downside when the ratio favors the customers too too much
Agreed.
As customers we want the dancers hungry but not frustrated.
I do like the first hour the club opens in part because it's always slow but the dancers are still fresh. CF has even told me she gives better dances early in her shift than late.
But if a place has booths and backroom, and if they do more, then more dancers are tied up for longer, and guys are spending more money. So the ratio could be closer to 1:1.
SJG
A lot of your guys complaining you'll leave are the same ones that have gone to strip clubs for 8 years and have only had 3 strippers kiss you. If you have a little patience and know how to talk to women, saying the right things can get a girl at your table even if the ratio is 1:20 against you. You will need to spend some money but you don't have to spend anything insane.
I agree with Shailynn
SJG
We've been to several SC's where the ratio was 2:1, 3:1 or 5:1 and quite honestly it's boring as hell. The strippers are bored and just sitting around ignoring everyone. Strippers won't approach us anyway so when there's a dozen or so strippers and 4 or 5 customers including the 2 of us we see a couple sitting with individual customers and the rest just sitting around. They'll either look at us with confusion or NEVER look at us even if they walk right by us. We will always get the 1 or 2 who do the obligatory "wanna dance" and then quickly walk away.
At our fave SC though it's hardly ever above a 1:3 or 1:4 ratio. When it gets hopping at midnight on a Saturday night there's still anywhere between 20-25 strippers and anywhere from 30-100 customers. Given that at least 10% of the customers are usually women and a good 25% of the people there are just nursing a beer not spending we still feel we have good odds. Plus, you've got the "visitors" who come in for 30 minutes to an hour and have a beer just to say they went to a SC and then leave.
We actually like it when it's crowded because the strippers are making money and having fun which makes them circulate more and do better stage shows.
All I care when I'm there that I spot one or two I like and get dances with them. Once that happens I take into account her other possibilities and just keep her as long as I can with convo and money. Unless there is a club out there that updates their available dancers like Amazon products or something us PLs will never truly know due to the closed off dressing room, ladies bathroom, and VIPs and such.
She texted me last night that she had been with a stranger in the CR yesterday when the guy's wife charged in brandishing a large pocketbook, swearing that she was going to kill the both of them. She was wearing only a pair of heels and the wife lunged at her but the guy, to his credit, jumped between them. I forgot to ask if she got her money up front.
Then, too, dancers feed off the crowd levels. More crowd, more circulating dancers. Less crowd, dancers spending more time in dressing room buried in their I-phones, or out on the smoking patio taking a long drag.
When a small club where I was a regular was packed because of a feature entertainer and had 20:1 customer to dancer ratio when it was usually more like 5:1, I still had a good time. Maybe even more so. I slipped into the LD room with my then-CF while the crowd was being pressured by the DJ to overtip the feature.
As for my former favorite club, that is the one place where dancer:customer ratio is a factor in my experience. When you are the only customer there, someone is hounding you the moment you sit down, and once you send them away, someone else is on you. There is too much pressure to buy from someone, and inevitably, it ends up the wrong dancer. That's one place I prefer a low dancer;customer ratio, because I can relax then.
Theory: I tend to grab one of the hottest chicks in the club, and have her hang out with me exclusively for the next 4 hours, all for about the cost of 2 VIPS ($200) plus food and drinks. There's just very little chance of pulling that off in the sausage-fest ratio ranges, at least in my experience -- no girl in a busy club wants to sit around for 4 hours for $200, much less the hottest chicks and big earners. So my theory is, you Ratio Immune guys are SCing in some other way -- either spending so much $ that the ratio doesn't matter, or just grabbing girls for a short chat and extras so that your experience doesn't change when it's busy, or something else.
Ratio Immune guys above, do you agree?
@S-man- Where did I say I'm a ratio immune guy ? I used the qualifier "most any given shift". I try to avoid the really peak nights because I dislike crowds, period. Can you really have fun if you have to elbow your way through a 2 deep plus SRO crowd to tip desired dancers. I've managed to snag my top choice on such nights, but it overall hasn't been as enjoyable as less crowded nights with more breathing space.
I don't completely agree with your theory. Yes we all have different clubbing styles. Just because someone doesn't go to a club to lock down a dancer for 4 hours doesn't make them a wham bam extras seeker, or a wastrel. Some people don't need 4 hours to get a desired level of satisfaction.
You're making my point with your style. Picture this: Afternoon shift, 6 dancers, 3 customers. 2:1 D/C ratio, good odds , right ? Well, suppose 3 dancers aren't my type, and my most desired dancer is locked down. My desired second choice disappears to dressing room, and remaining choice is giving multiple LD's to other customer.
Recipe for fun? I like my odds better on off peak night with maybe 15 dancers and 30 customers. There's a good chance that 15 of those guys are duds, and there are more hot dancers going around. So the real ratio may be 1:1. Not too bad.
Sounds like just bad luck. With those odds you should likely find one out of the three attractive.
15 of them may be duds but how long does it take for an individual dancer to find out which are duds and which are spending money? I'd rather not wait for the dancer(s) I'm interested in wasting time on the duds before they get to me.
Minnow, I wasn't speaking to you personally, but to everyone who said they didn't care about the ratios, or that it didn't impact them.
-->"I don't completely agree with your theory. Yes we all have different clubbing styles. Just because someone doesn't go to a club to lock down a dancer for 4 hours doesn't make them a wham bam extras seeker, or a wastrel. "
I agree, of course it doesn't. To re-state: I was guessing that guys who don't care about ratios do NOT try to lock down a dancer for 4 hours on the cheap, and asking what they actually do. "wham bam extras seeker" is just an example... I could see that type not caring about extras. Same with variety guys who like to go through lots of different girls in a night. I'm just curious as to whether the guys who don't care about ratios, have SC styles in common, that are different from the styles of guys who do care.
That's where you and I part ways a bit. I'm incredibly comfortable being the only guy there, in fact I love it, but now that I think about it, only in my "home" clubs where I'm comfortable. I can definitely see being uncomfortable in a strange club where you don't know the girls, etc.
In that kind of environment, it can still be possible to hang out with a dancer for quite a while. Visiting a fast club with the only two way dance option being to spend over $100, the dancers I was into would often have a series of guys they would take right back for 15 minutes each. Even though the fast club had a better overall ratio, I found it less desirable. After the dance time was up, there was usually no cooldown at the table at all, just onto the next. The experience echoes one of the themes SJG has written about re: San Francisco vs San Jose clubs.
Your favored visit structure with multiple dancers sitting at the table for a while sounds different than mine, though, and probably is inherently more sensitive to ratio. I have found it enjoyable to hang out with a dancer and one of her dancer friends, but there is never any doubt which one interests me. Even then, it is more of a being introduced to her friends type thing than something I would care to do every visit.
Like others who have posted, I prefer day shift in a club with a discrete VIP, where the club is less than half full and dancers outnumber the customers.
1. My visits are usually scheduled in advance.
2. Friday night is about the only time I can get away from the wife.
So I don't really have too many options. If I go out and it looks terrible (too many customers) I can't really bag the trip. I could try to drive another club which may be worse or better but I won't know in advance. Plus I'm burning time and burning money on coverage charges (or valet). So I sort of need to "make it work" or "make the most of a sub-optimal situation" since my next opportunity might not be for another month or two.
I can't club during a week day because I need to be at work / can't get time off. Short of taking a vacation day, I don't see how I could make an afternoon shift. And Saturday is either time with the wife or other responsibilities. Sun-Thurs night is out due to responsibilities.
Don't you all work? How do you club during the day? Lol. ;)
**Plus it is sort of *pathetic* in its own way to have to re-approach the wife and say, I need to change my clubbing schedule to to accommodate a slow shift where I can get more mileage for the money. Friday's just to me aren't *that bad* or at least not bad enough to warrant that approach. What, take a vacation day? Or switch a weekday work day for a Saturday? Now that's pathetic! haha. ;)
Sometimes I SC on dayshift Saturday or Sunday. Still super slow, no conflict with work.
Usually I SC dayshift during the week, and for that I either just take an afternoon off (I have tons of vacation, so up to 3x/month is not an issue), or take off a few hours early from work and make it up the next day (I have a flexible schedule)
When I was a less experienced SCer I equated a full club as it being better/a-good-thing; for w/e reason - it seems many newbie SCers often see it this way particularly the younger ones that are looking for more of a party atmosphere.
As others, these days I prefer a 1:1 ratio for both more/better attention from the dancers and as minnow mentioned the large crowds can be aggrevating since in certain clubs there can always be a % of assholes.
These days I visit dayshift mainly for the better dancer attention - not only do the lower # of custies often lead to better attetnion but dayshift dancers are often better at their job and take it more seiously IMO.
These days I often avoid nightshift even on slow early-week weeknights b/c in the clubs I go to I normally don't get the same QoS at night as I do on dayshift - on peak nights mainly Fr and Sat I avoid most clubs b/c of the large crowds, and the type of crowd, since I often go to small dives thus more thug element and too close for comfort w/ the large crowd and low square footage of the club.
Every now and then I'll go to a large club like Tootsies Miami on a Fr or Sat night if I was just wanna get out of the house and do something but not necessarily hard-up for getting dances - but these days I often abstain on Fr and Sat nights and I'll either go to a large club where I can just blend in the crowd or in in the mood for dances go to a club that is not one of the more popular ones and the crowds are manageable.
Last time I was in a club there were maybe 20 guys and about 15 dancers on a Wed night around 9 PM. A year ago at the same place it had three times as many guys and twice as many dancers.
As for the ratio I'm more in line with Shailynn's thoughts--I can normally get one of the girls I am interested in to come over and sit. Then it's on me to keep her attention.
And on the flipside my #3 fave turned me and half a dozen other regulars down the other day, a Friday early evening, because a whale from out of town had just come in and she had obligations to him because he locks her down for several hours and he compensates her well for it every time he comes in. For her I absolutely need to see her when it is slow if ai want any amount of dick teasing time.
I'm always the regular of the most sought after strippers because I aim for the all natural 9-10 hottie like most other PLs want, so it is imperative that I go when it is slow.
Lol, and you call yourself a G? Seriously, you tap out at $90? Are you kidding me? See, what you simps don't understand is that when I hit the club I'm spending $500 - $1,000+ and locking down the hottest, sexiest girl in the club for the entire night. So if you see your girl sitting with a stylish 64 yo man in a back brace, then you might as well hang it up and head home, son. And for all the cheap ass guys that don't like me hogging the hotties all night, well, IDGAF, if you want what's mine, then up your game motherfuckers.
Yeah, that's what I figured, punk. I've handled G's a lot tougher than you in my time. Even now, at 64 and missing 3 vertebrae, I would probably still kick your ass f2f, so consider yourself getting off easy.