Tattoos and Piercings on Dancers
I'm always curious on how men feel about tats and piercings on dancers? And whether I should maybe remove mine to please the masses.I have 0 tattoos and my belly button and nipples pierced..in general, au natural girls or a bit modified?
Got something to say?
Start your own discussion
77 comments
Latest
Piercings don't do anything for me. I deal with them when seeing them but I prefer soft things on a woman, but something piercing back at me.
me personally, i don't like tats. small ones don't bother me, i just hate tats when they're excessive. like when a large part of her body is covered with tats, I HATE that
piercings don't bother me nearly as much as tats. i'm pretty indifferent when it comes to that
but if your nipples are pierced, it makes it more of a difficulty to suck on your tits. :-)
To each his own, but for me, navel and ear piercings only. The rest are a turn off.
I'm too indecisive for tattoos, those things are for the most part permanent, I can't even settle on a permanent laundry detergent ;-) haha.
All opinions greatly appreciated, thank you! Xo
you mentioned your hispanic.......that really makes up for your avatar
Viking -lol, I'm Hispanic but not from anywhere exotic (I live in Canada, moving to FL this summer) hopefully you'll still let me pass ;p
Viking - Hm I'm debating whether I should on here..I will PM you if I decide to :)
Tattoos: I prefer none but reasonable tattooing is acceptable - small, preferably significant and artistic. Tramp stamps generally OK. Tats on or near breasts are a deal killer.
No lip, tongue piercings and would prefer no nipple piercings as well. But belly button or small stud nose piercing is fine for me. As always all patrons are different.
as rh48hr said, all patrons are different..........but i think you can see from the majority of these responses, like meat72 said earlier, most customers aren't a fan of tats and piercings
However taking our little silver balls from my body for a couple of hours while working with the choice of putting them back in to make a few extra bucks? No biggie.
Pathetic losers are usually the ones who try and put down people over the Internet..the irony
On the subject of moneymaking potential, anongirl98, I think that you would find very few customers who would reject a girl for minimal to no tattoos, and a lot who would be likely to reject a girl for heavy tattooing.
I dislike most piercings, but some of the little diamond implants can be attractive.
It may depend on your market and target clientele. Older guys may like the girl next door look more, while younger guys may like a party girl look more.
Brilliant!
Also, I think polls inside the club are unreliable. Men will generally tell a woman what they think she wants to hear.
From what I've seen here, that puts me in the distinct minority here. Far from "ruining" a woman's appearance, I've seen far more such that *enhance* the appearance. Even the sleeves and back tattoos.
I'll freely admit that much of my preference is Pavlovian in nature. Most girls who have nipple and pussy piercings like to have them played with, and some of them *really* like it, and I in turn like the girls who like that.
Keep the nipple piercings in, and come to Louisville. :)
To me tattoos are almost never attractive -- something like slapping a bumper sticker on a $400K Ferrari.
Creative analogy. ^5
Curiously, if I"m drunk, there are a few kinds of tattoos that can make me hot, but in a primal "I want to fuck that dirty skank" kind of way... vertical hamstring tattoos can do that to me, sometimes.
So if I want to engage with young women, less conservative thinking and more urban young women, then I expect to see that.
SJG
Most heavy spending custies are older conservative guys and thus most are not into tats – for many older custies; in their time tats were a thing associated with the underworld and gangsters/criminal element. Up to recently; many upscale clubs would not hire dancers with tats or large-tats; although this seems to be changing since tats are so much more mainstream w/ the young-crowd these days.
As others have mentioned; younger guys probably don't mind as much or may even like them; but for the most-part it is the older conservative guys that do the heavy spending.
I don't like tats in general but do find some of them sexy – for w/e reason a small-one like a rose on one boob kinda turns me-on in a bad-girl kinda way. But in general the bigger the tat the less I like it – and absolutely hate them in some areas like in the back of the calves. I would not get dances from a dancer b/c of her tats but still get dances from a dancer even if she has tats I don't like if I like her bod.
w.r.t. piercings – they don't do much for me thus like tats I would not get dances b/c she has them – they usually don't bother me except for nipple piercings which I HATE b/c they get in the way.
Anyway, I wouldn't want the Bentley.
I now just have one piercing in each ear and my belly ring. Everything else has closed up except my tongue but I haven't worn a tongue barbell in like a year. I'd like to repierce my nose, and get a few of my old cool ear piercings back. I will NOT miss my nipple rings.
I have two tattoos. One is the old English "D" on my wrist, and one is a quote from a song across my shoulder blades, so it's pretty inconspicuous.
I want a couple more tats. I'm going to copy a tattoo one of the actors from the TV show Breaking Bad has, just a different font. I would have chosen the same placement and probably the exact quote from show even if I hadn't seen his. But I won't mind looking like a copycat.
One of my pet peeves is when girls get piercings in their back dimples, whatever those things are called. I think those are some of the sexiest areas on a woman, and find my fingers like wandering over there, almost of their own volition. Having piercings there makes it a no-fly zone, and that's a huge bummer.
Because that's not how many folks here view tattoos. To them, tattoos are an ugly defacement, and not an attractive enhancement.
Personally, I think saying "all/most tattoos are ugly" is exactly equivalent to saying "all men are pigs" or "all women are crazy."
Some are certainly ugly, but turning away from an otherwise attractive woman because she has a tattoo just leaves more for me, so keep right on. :)
As of 2016, in a purely practical sense, the hiring workforce looks down on excessive tattoos. May be fine for a dancer, but not for a smart young dancer who aspires to be a corporate lawyer.
They can be ... for people who view tattoos as a possible aesthetic embellishment. But the OP asked for opinions, and for many of us, who view tattoos as trashy and declasse and almost-always unaesthetic, bumper stickers are the right metaphor.
And in corporate America you can have your entire back, stomach, thighs, and both your frickin' arms tatted as long as your blazer/suit covers it.
If they need some color in their lives, they need to try some black dick.