Comments by Iam4u2screw (page 2)

@ GMD: check her out. If they are fake, they are one hell of a good boob job https://i5.fuskator.com/large/aKXyd7HRi0t/image-9.jpg

Even better picture and yes she is beautiful https://www.google.com/url?sa=i&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=images&cd=&ved=2ahUKEwiF2ZeEhqrfAhVQmuAKHWZYB_YQjRx6BAgBEAU&url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.reddit.com%2Fr%2FHotchickswithtattoos%2Fcomments%2F8n85k3%2Fpeggy_sue_winters%2F&psig=AOvVaw1DyYWBRwyBa594nvuH9sg4&ust=1545245419365544

^McDonalds

The only way it will be de-criminalized is the same way weed is becoming de-criminalized. A liberal state would need to legalize it to start the ball rolling. Once other liberal states see that benefit (eg the tax revenue because we all know liberals love to tax), the slow progression thru the liberal states will begin. All the pro-prostitution lobby needs to do is find the liberal state most likely to begin the process, then for the formula established by the pot lobby.

Chilli, if you for some stupid reason do take the "get your own bat" suggestion, just remember to empty out all the bank accounts before doing it, that way when you get sent to jail for who knows how long, she has nothing to live on. Assuming there are no kids still living at home. But really do not following that suggestion, just get a divorce and move on.

@OP, sounds like you are down to 1 option. Disregard everything GACA said, find a lawyer, file for divorce. She is no longer worth your time and effort. Evidently she has moved on, since she kicked you out. Cut your losses and move on yourself. Your only hope now is to get out of it as painlessly as possible. Hopefully you do not have any kids still living at home and she has some income, so you don't get screwed with a bunch of alimony. Set up your own bank accounts, move your direct deposit out of your joint account, if applicable, and let her start supporting herself. Manu up and move on, she is no longer worth it, but just damaged goods.

The guy Nicole references is NOT an Islamophobe because he is afraid of Muslims, where as the definition of an Islamophobe is a person with a dislike of or prejudice against Islam or Muslims, especially as a political force. He just sounds like an uneducated idiot, who has been influenced by popular media making generalizations about the religion. By the way, that definition comes from an online source since the word has not been acknowledged by the "official" source for the English language, the Webster dictionary.

Bitching, Bitching, Bitching, Bitching, Bitching, Bitching, Bitching, Bitching, Bitching, Bitching, Bitching... Is this what you want Steel? LOL

You forgot to break out the code book for today and see that L1 service is washing his car windows and L2 was checking the tire inflation on his spare. Come one Shadowcat, get with the program. : D

^that was for Icey

^ still doesn't mean you have to call/reference her as a hooker/whore. You can ask her not to advertise without insulting/denigrating her. In my experience, being asked not to do something respectfully will net better results than doing it with insult. Grow up and be respectful, don't act like a kid trying to show off on the playground with your "badass" behavior to all the other kids.

Probably a good thing she isn't black or Latino. That ass would likely crush Papi if she gave him a lapper. Of course he would probably die a happy man. LOL

DC, that is not what I am saying. My point is, she can do whatever the hell she wants and reference to herself however she wants, it is just not my or anyone else's place to judge and label her. If she chooses to do that then more power to her, but that is her choice, that she has to live with, and that she doesn't need advertised by every swinging dick walking in and calling her a hooker/whore.

Guess what Icey, regardless of what she does, I have the respect to reference a stripper by either the title stripper or dancer. I see no reason to assume she does anything else, thus no reason to call her by anything else. If she wants to reference herself with any other title, that is her call, but not mine. You or anyone else who references dancers/strippers as hooker/whore are simply being a bully and going for the WOW factor of the insult. It does not matter what she does, you do not have the right to make assumptions of her and lay titles on her that may or may mat apply. My question for you is, why can't you references them as dancer/stripper instead of hooker/whore? Is it because that goes against your pimp/thug persona? If you want to be respected, you have to show respect first and your actions do not show it. Finally, what do you defining requirement to be a hooker/whore in your book?

Maybe if we had fewer people referencing dancers as hookers and whores we might get more to visit and participate in the discussions here. Likewise, if we stopped referencing to guys are tricks, we might get more customers to visit and participate. Regardless of what they do, they deserve respect and our wanna-be thugs/pimps that feel it necessary to insult people's choice in occupation definitely have an impact on whether new people join the community or choose to stay once here. This board is a community focused on the strip club scene, which should be a fun, exciting atmosphere where customers visit dancers. Just like in a strip club, dancers should be able to come here and converse with customers and other dancers without the expectation of insult or harassment. Calling a dancer a hooker or whore in most clubs would probably get you at least ignored, if not your face slapped or the management/bouncer encouraging you to leave and not come back. Additionally, referencing all dancers as hookers or whores assumes that ALL dancers are extras girls and calling all customers tricks assumes that ALL customers are into extras. This is a gross misconception on your part if you do because in both instances we have people that do not participate in extras and have stated that. I am sure there are boards out there for the pimp/thug lifestyle where every woman is a hooker/whore, but that is not what this board should be about. It should be about telling stores of customer or dancer exploits or current events regarding the strip club scene or just general topics you would expect to discuss in a strip club with dancers and even other patrons. It should not be a bunch of name calling, bitching, harassing, and general bullshit just to see how many posts you can make/bump to make yourself feel good because the purpose of this board is entertainment and when that ceases to be the case, this board will fade away like so many others have in the past. Is that what you want? If so, please leave now so that the rest of us can work to make this place what is was meant to be.

I agree with Longball, as long as it included a free drink and a 30 minute VIP with the dancer of my choice

If it was San Jose Guy, then it would have been with a goat and not a girl. Would have happened in the barnyard, not the SC. LOL

@Icey: dumbass, look at my math. If she only did 1 guy at a time, then yes it would be at least 8.5 hours with no breaks (still less than your 12 hours), but she didn't do 1 guy at a time. Each guy got 10 minutes from the time they started to finish in her and she was being used by at least 2 guys at a time evidently, so that cuts the time down dramatically.

The majority of the pork-belly projects are for the representative's/senator's constituents. That is the meaning of pork belly. Getting projects that put or keep the voters working in their region. Big industry is not going to Washington and telling them to build a tank in Ohio. No it is the labor unions in Ohio telling the representatives/senators for Ohio that they want to keep their jobs, so we end up buying 2000 tanks the military does not want in order to keep the production plant in operation. How is that corporate America forcing pork-belly projects? This happens ALL the time with these projects. It isn't the companies pushing it, it is the citizens wanting to keep their jobs or the representatives/senators want to keep their people happy so they keep their jobs in DC.

Guess what, Israel has no desire to destabilize the region. It does not serve any purpose to destabilize the Middle East for Israel. They are the small fish in the fishbowl over there. They spend a HUGE portion of their GDP on defense because the other countries refuse to play nicely in their own sandboxes. If the Middle East honestly wanted to end Israel, they could do it simply by working together, but they have far too many other issues between each other to join in a united effort against their "Jewish enemy". Yes, Israel does occasionally do stupid shit inside their boarders and in Lebanon, but those are usually a reaction to the Palestinians stirring up crap. Israel would much rather have a bunch of happy neighbors, so they could spend more of their GDP on their populace and not on defense. Just wondering, IceyLoco, are you actually a communist or socialist? You are complaining about the capitalist interests robbing the welfare state. Unfortunately, the world doesn't work under those political orientations. The Soviet Union proved that communism doesn't work and only retards progress. China is more capitalist today than they want to acknowledge. North Korea, the only true communist holdout, is a joke and as 3rd world as they come. Venezuela is socialist and their economy is destroyed. The French have tried socialism a couple of times since WW2 and keep switching away from it. Progress requires a capitalistic orientation and I certainly hope the US never wavers. Finally, I am tired of people spouting the low wage crap and the need to raise everyone's wages. Guess what, all that does in raise the cost of living for EVERYONE. This is a viscous cycle no one ever wants to talk about. If you get paid more, that means your employer has to charge more to pay your wages. Look at Seattle. They raised the minimum wage, so now it costs more for everything because the shopkeepers have a higher salary responsibility. It is actually turning out that businesses are reducing their workforce because of the higher wages, so what do you say to those people loosing their jobs because of the higher minimum wages that now have to pay more for their groceries even though they no longer have a job because of the layoffs.

@IceyLoco: where the hell did you come up with 12 hours? She was being used by at least 3 guys at a time. 50 guys x 10 minutes = 500 minutes / 3 guys = 167 minutes / 60 minutes = 2.78 hours. Even if she only averaged 2 guys at a time, that is still only a little over 4 hours. As it is, this whole situation is just disgusting and I agree that at least some involved need to be prosecuted because it sounds like the girl was so messed up she was incapacitated and could not defend herself, thus is was basically rape.

Damn, that guy must really be f'ed up if they had to sew his eyes shut.

@Icey: okay I see your point. We can spend $3.1B to build a TOTAL of 150 miles of interstate (per the Federal Government's weighted rural/urban average) or we can spend it in Israel, so they can help us fight ISIS. Where do you think we get a vast majority of our intel on the Middle East, but from our little friend on the Mediterranean coast. I personally would prefer option #2 over an extra 150 miles of pavement. And guess what, a huge chunk of the other $47B we spend on foreign aid goes to Latin America and Africa to try and bolster their economies, so we hopefully don't end up with a huge influx of migrants wanting to enter the country. But we all know how well those dollars are working, so should we stop making those payments as well and if so, how do we deal with the increased migration then when all the folks that are subsisting now are forced to move because they can no longer survive in their country since the US aid has dried up? As for pork-belly projects robbing the tax payer. Guess what numb-nuts, your politicians are responsible for them. Look at the interstate to nowhere we have in West Virginia all because Richard Byrd kept slapping more funding on other bills to pay for it. If you really wanted to save money and spend it efficiently, you would need a government that cared about the spending and how it was spent. We have billions of dollars spent annually on subsidies here in the US that are so ingrained in Washington, that I doubt even an act of congress couldn't get them cancelled. We currently subsidize Alpaca wool production in the US and have since WW2. The private sector has a right to make a profit on what business they do with the federal government and there are often cost overruns on projects, but you have to realize that a lot of the projects generating the overcharges are due to the federal government making changes to the original project. Also, unlike with commercial projects, when a company does work for the government, they often have a very limited product run for the money invested in R&D. The government is only going to buy X number of F35 aircraft, so the R&D costs are concentrated over that small production run, thus driving up costs. It probably costs more for Boeing to design a new jumbo jet, but they can expect to sell hundreds or thousands more aircraft commercially than they can a fighter jet, so the R&D costs become minimal. And guess what, the majority of federal contractors/supplies are small businesses that are owned by females, vets, minorities, disabled, and located in economically depressed areas. These people are not gouging the federal tax payer, they are trying to make a living. When I worked for the federal government, we used to joke the ultimate vendors was a disabled, female, Latino/Asian, veteran that had their company in the middle of nowhere Alabama or Mississippi because it hit all the required checkmarks. This is a popular misconception people have because the news tells them about the huge cost overruns on defense projects and people assume they apply to everything. So before you make accusations, you might want to do a little research.

She graduated cum laude from Boston University's College of Arts and Sciences in 2011 with a bachelor's degree in international relations and a minor in economics. With that degree, how the hell is she that clueless about politics and economics.

@IceyLoco - you are complaining about the money we give to Israel every year. Do you know how much that actually is? Well in 2019, we are giving them a grand total $3.1B and that is only because of a missile defense system we agreed to upgrade for them. In 2017, the US government gave a grand total of $50.1B in foreign aid to the ENTIRE world. Taking DC's estimated $200B per year for tuition, we would be giving out more in 1 year than we have given too Israel since they declared independence ($149B TOTAL since 1949 [69 YEARS]) or 4 times the amount we give out in foreign aid to the world. And like DC stated, that assumes the number of students does not skyrocket when free tuition is offered. As for AOC, she is just clueless. Her $21T complaint about the department of defense not being able to detail where money was spent and that it could have been used instead to finance health care was even mocked by the DEMOCRATS. The $21T was money that was moved around between programs and fund sites internally to the DOD, so it was essentially double counted when it was moved from 1 fund site and counted again when it was added to the new fund site. Also, the time period for that amount was over a decade, yet she thought that all $21T was available to pay for health care right now. She is in SO far over her head, she is essentially wasting a seat in the House that could be held by a competent person from either party that has at least some grasp of reality.