Comments by RandomMember (page 45)

^^^ good tennis humor. @Reverend: "... but I have remained forever fixated on women in their 20s " ________________________ If you're talking about pure physical attraction, *all* men prefer women in their early 20s. Doesn't matter if the dude is 20 or 90 -- all men find younger women physically attractive. It's baked into our DNA from six million years of human evolution. OTOH, young women are often boring, self-absorbed, and they're not really formed yet. When it comes to choosing a wife or SO there are many other things (e.g., intelligence, empathy) that count besides physical attraction and the older women are far more interesting. I find it impossible to fall in love these 20-something girls I've been with the past few years. It's just entertainment and meaningless sex and the emotional bond goes to my wife. BTW, if you'd like a role model for a modern, mature, woman look to Dr Fiona Hill at the recent hearings. She's odd looking but an amazing woman -- extremely intelligent, fiery, and poised.

I'm completely invisible to 20-yr-olds now. Luckily one age-appropriate wife and one hot college-ager I see a few times per month satisfies everything I'm after.

Where did you see this? I assume an "adjudicator" is a pretentious form of "moderator?" Just logged in, but I think the new format is clever and satisfies nearly everyone. I like the "front room" because you can view all posts in all groups, sorted by date. That doesn't break up the unity of the forum as a whole. Curious whether the forum is now moderated in some way?

To be *

It is sort of a compliment to the official best at something, @Dougster. Thanks!

Yesterday @Skibum wrote "This is whayt happens and will continue to happen in the on-line age" _________ Best line in the whole thread. Nobody can agree on basic facts anymore because we're getting spin tailored to our own chosen news source.

@Gawker wrote: "Argue politics" ________________ Everyone's different, @Gawker. Some people enjoy paying heroin attacks for long-term romance. Others enjoy defecation humor. And still others enjoy StripperWeb. To each his own.

@Subra wrote: "I'd love to see a Chinese wall ... between any political discussion/comments and the rest of the site." _________ Yeah me too -- but I think Mexico should pay for the wall.

Reminds me of this funny discussion about a father going online, looking for an SB, and finding his 17-yr-old daughter: https://www.reddit.com/r/sugarlifestyleforum/comments/a3jnov/so_this_happened_found_my_daughter_post_on_sa/

Haven't the slightest idea. However, whenever the subject of Secret Benefits comes up on the sugaring forum there's a consensus that it's waste of time.

One thing you have to understand about Sondland: he's wealthy and doesn't need a gig in politics to survive. His only goal is to avoid going to jail (like Stone). That's why he's fessing up and throwing everyone under the bus, including Trump, Pence, Pompeo, Bolton (I'm sure I'm leaving out someone). Sondland is an idiotic, corrupt, rich guy, just like Trump. He donated $1M to the Trump campaign and got a cushy ambassadorship in return. He's the ambassador to the EU -- not Ukraine. Public opinion has hardly moved since the hearings started and the Senate is not going to remove Trump. The evidence is there for people who want to listen and it might move a small number of independent voters. The hearings are also there as a part of history for our kids to study; our kids will wonder how about a third of the country lived in their own separate reality.

Skibum Democrats won the gubernatorial races in deep red states Kentucky and Luisiana. The common thread is that both states expanded Medicaid under Obamacare. Medicaid expansion is popular among voters.

Actually the results in Kentucky may have more to do with voters in favor of Medicaid expansion (Obamacare)

"Nobody is taking this seriously other than NY, CA and DC liberals " ___________________ Nope. Polls show country is split down the middle on support for impeachment: https://projects.fivethirtyeight.com/impeachment-polls/?ex_cid=rrpromo "The Dems recently even changed the term from "coercion" to "bribery" blah, blah, blah" _____________ Yes, "quid pro quo" is too abstract for the average American who can't read. It was changed to bribery so that everyone could understand what it is. Don't worry your pretty little head, @Dugan. The Senate will not convict. However you might worry a little about the results in Virgina, Kentucky, Luisiana. I'm not going to argue about the hearing since facts don't matter anymore.

Great song https://youtu.be/h0JvF9vpqx8

^^ good point. At this point the impeachment isn't about the facts -- it's more about whether the Senate will put up with this level of corruption.

Divorce over infidelity? From the title I though she had slipped a little strychnine into his lasagna .

"....the Senate will have enough votes to convict. " ________________ That sure sounds like wishful thinking.

Hysterics? Adam Schiff has done a masterful job of leading the impeachment hearings and getting the facts out in a calm, orderly, way. He's a bright guy, Stanford/Harvard JD and an example of a superb lawyer. The opposing side is led by Nunez who has a two-year community college degree and a degree in agriculture. Talk about hysteria? Nunez sounds like a raving lunatic, ranting about the mainstream media controlled by liberals. Jim Jordon is another crackpot lawyer on the GOP side and his unintelligible, hysterical, delivery style reminds everyone of Boomhauer from King of the Hill: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zo0L45nOiwQ It should bother everyone that we're gradually losing our democracy and that we elected a grifter as president.

*breeding

Quote from @just2hooot in one of our recent TUSCL articles: "I'm thinking of going back to stripping but the thought of constantly being asked how much to fuck, puts me off. Making money as a stripper is so hard these days. It's really just a gateway to drugs, prostitution and mental health issues" _________________________ What do you guys think? Can stripping transform an otherwise well-adjusted girl into someone with "mental health issues?" My hunch is yes. Being groped all night and immersed in a raunchy, dangerous, sexist workplace with drugs @ alcohol could certainly be a breading ground for mental-health issues. Depends on the dancer, of course -- but I wouldn't wish that environment on anyone I cared about.

Do you remember posting that @Cashman? Or are just getting senile?

I know I haven't started a single thread since 2015. But here's the dumbfuck nonsense political post @Cashman posted in the front room recently: https://www.tuscl.net/discussion.php?id=68802#comment986185

"schistosomiasis" ________ Funny coincidence, father of my long-term GF during grad school was an expert on that parasitic disease and would travel the world fighting it, I think mostly in third-world countries. Didn't know it could invade your penis.

Terrific, honest, posts from both of the dancers.