Comments by AnonymousJim (page 4)

Bumping this above my own Halloween thread because I'm more interested in everyone's thoughts on this than that, LOL.

Yeah, I'm not really expecting higher mileage anywhere. This -- http://www.hotgoo.com/watch/23584 -- is a mere fantasy, not to mention I look nothing like that firefighter dude. I'd just really enjoy the visual of a woman in a costume like that one riding me. That enough would be good for me.

@F_L_F: I'm laughing through my facepalm.

The original question was if you knew when the Halloween party was happening at the club(s) you frequent. I'm trying to gauge when it might be at the clubs I frequent. Given many of you don't seem to see the club as a destination for it, I guess the answer is, "No." Some of us don't have kids and don't like kids, so trick-or-treat may be the best time to go to not have to deal with the annoying brats, though if there are no dancers, then it's no fun. I'm not really into creepy and dark, but I am into slutty costumes, so I guess I spin Halloween differently. One problem for those of us with SOs going to a "regular" club: You run into someone you know and they wonder why you're trying to pick up the girls in the slutty costumes when you've got someone at home. So yeah, that's not an option for some of us. I guess I'm in the minority here.

For a healthy amount of today, I was thinking we were going to have our first invocation of tiebreaker procedures, as I knew my vote was going to Vicca. For those wondering, if we do have a tie, we'll decide as follows: 1. Higher share of votes from all previous rounds combined wins (i.e. total votes for/total votes not for; whoever's higher wins) 2. Higher number of votes from all previous rounds combined wins 3. Better seed wins However, two late votes tipped the scales. CRUZ: 14 VICCA: 12 ̶B̶u̶m̶p̶s̶:̶ ̶2̶ ̶C̶l̶a̶r̶i̶f̶i̶c̶a̶t̶i̶o̶n̶:̶ ̶1̶ (better to be clear than not, so sincerely, thanks gSteph, you're a good apple) ̶B̶o̶t̶h̶:̶ ̶1̶ Vicca joins Nikki Fritz in the "strong first round, out in the second" club. In fact, the two contestants who had the highest first-round share of votes are now gone. Vicca had 94.4 percent and Fritz had 90.9. Neither makes it to the Sweet (Pussy) 16, though. Cruz, meanwhile, survives a tough matchup and moves on.

I feel like this was a thing in my neck of the woods until about 10 years ago or so. I remember being out for one and one only. Three contestants. One that seemed to have a few friends with her such that they were just out to have some thrills in a Sunday night. One woman who truly seemed to be auditioning. I don't remember the third. The girl with the fan club "won." The auditioning girl appeared to get some paperwork apply for hire. It was underwhelming to say the least. I can see why the night died out.

Bumping again because people can't understand the other vote's been closed for a couple days.

Guys. Thread's closed. Stop posting in it. You're pushing the active vote further down the board.

Bumping this matchup over the completed Hayek/Richards.

Wanna know why us Midwesterners are mourning the loss of Penthouse? Nights like this are why: https://www.tuscl.net/review.php?id=273456 I ended up dropping close to $1K that night. But it's the essence of what we do and why to have activities with three different ladies, two of which result in "finishing." Many guys to be non-monogamous over their lifetime. Non-monogamy within the span of three hours is awesome. There was another night where I did OTC with a pair of busty blondes from Penthouse. Also costly. But also a life-changing experience that felt like the ultimate answer to the question "Why do we do this?" To feel like the rockstar that gets to be serviced by the two women most likely to make everyone's heads turn when they walk down the street, that's why. So it takes cash. Who cares? You make it back. Maybe that doesn't make me like a whale. Whales tend to spend a lot of money and not have a lot happen, I think. But it did make me feel on top of the world. Remind me why this hobby is bad again?

Some of it also depends on your pain point, which might even be day-to-day. I texted a girl I met at Penthouse in Detroit to ask what her status was with that place closed. She said she was just seeing guys UTR OTC now. I told her she should message me if she was coming near where I usually am. She was. Arranged a time and she brought up price, wanting me to start. I opened at $250. She said no way and came back with $500. I went $400 and she said sure, but I started having second thoughts. I start getting antsy above $300, but I think that would have been too low for her. Plus, due purely to the timing of when I get paid for some work, the tide is a little out at the moment for spending cash. I like to give a tip for good service, but at $400 plus a room, already stretched thin ... I just called it off. I felt bad and hope she'll give me a shot when things fall differently. But yeah. Just bad timing as my pain point is a little lower right now.

Let's officially close up shop and mercifully put this thread out of its misery. I will file one more vote for Hayek. HAYEK: 28 RICHARDS: 9 ̶B̶o̶t̶h̶,̶ ̶o̶r̶ ̶s̶o̶m̶e̶ ̶v̶a̶r̶i̶a̶t̶i̶o̶n̶ ̶t̶h̶e̶r̶e̶o̶f̶:̶ ̶5̶ [sigh] ̶B̶r̶a̶c̶k̶e̶t̶ ̶t̶a̶l̶k̶:̶ ̶3̶ ̶S̶i̶d̶e̶ ̶c̶h̶a̶t̶t̶e̶r̶:̶ ̶3̶ ̶R̶i̶c̶h̶a̶r̶d̶s̶'̶ ̶b̶o̶o̶b̶s̶:̶ ̶2̶ ̶H̶a̶y̶e̶k̶'̶s̶ ̶f̶i̶l̶m̶ ̶c̶a̶r̶e̶e̶r̶:̶ ̶1̶ ̶H̶a̶y̶e̶k̶'̶s̶ ̶b̶o̶o̶b̶s̶:̶ ̶1̶ ̶R̶a̶m̶b̶l̶i̶n̶g̶ ̶p̶o̶s̶t̶e̶r̶-̶o̶n̶-̶p̶o̶s̶t̶e̶r̶ ̶c̶r̶i̶m̶e̶:̶ ̶1̶ Hayek not only wins but breaks her own mark for top number of votes in a matchup (27 from the first round). The 37 overall votes equals Michaels/Jameson for largest turnout. The 19-vote win is the third-largest margin of victory thus far behind Hayek over McCarthy (23) and Nikki Fritz over Sara Suzanne Brown (20), both in the first round. The next-highest is Vicca over Kelly Trump, also in the first round, at 16. Hayek may not be invincible, but she has certainly been impressive. I'm going to hold off on a new poll because it's late and I'm tired. We'll probably post one tomorrow night.

In Detroit, I will negotiate sometimes. Both you and the dancer have some leverage. She can take less money or she can take no money. In the latter case, the time she spent on getting me to the back ends up being wasted time. If it's still a significant enough sum, less money is still better than none. It still needs to be somewhat worth her time, as in a realistic value in terms of evaluating what she could get if she walked out of the room with you and got another customer right away. Hotter girls will command more. But you shouldn't be afraid to use "this or nothing" to your advantage, while also understanding she also has a "pay me this much or you don't get to do what you want to do" point, too. That said, when she stakes her tent pole in Saskatchewan, and you're sitting in Oklahoma, there's a good chance the middle ground won't make anyone happy. Best to just walk away. And that seemed to have been the case here.

Q: Can you go to the Can Can Room anymore? A: No you can't-can't.

Thought: I'd totally be OK with someone starting the occasional separate, non-voting thread to talk about the ladies mentioned or, dare I say, even talk about the vote itself. Someone created one about nipples based off Stacy Burke; I thought that was cool. If anything, that keeps the voting thread more clear so I don't have to try and figure out who's got multiple comments, who's truly voting and who's just discussing, etc. Some of it is my want for clear logistics. 'Tis all.

Thanks, @Fun_Loving_Fella. It both makes counting the votes difficult and distracts from the point. A refresher course on a few things about the "Who'd You Rather" game: 1. We are evaluating the women at the finest they've been in their lives, whatever you consider that to be. Maybe they've gained weight, lost weight or changed their boobs. That's valid to discuss, no doubt. But still, vote based on what you consider them to have been when they were at their best. This was particularly important with, say, Jenna Jameson, who's gone downhill quite a bit since her prime. Conversation about body changes isn't necessarily immaterial, but it shouldn't be what you're basing your vote off of. This is about creating a timeless fantasy, not dealing with realities. I fear we lose sight of that when we start getting into discussion about who's done what. 2. In the first round, we gave you the option to say 'Neither' if neither of the ladies flipped your lid and you actually wouldn't rather with either one. However, since we've moved onto the second round, we've removed that option. 3. 'Both' has never been an option, as it would be what everyone picks all the time and would destroy any point of the bracket, not to mention, it creates a bunch of immaterial and useless comments I have to account for separately when reconciling vote counts. Yes, we'd have an orgy with all 64 girls at once if we could. That gives us zero data whatsoever as to who, and moreso what, we consider "hotter," which IS the point. The choice is difficult and you can only choose one. It's supposed to be difficult. That's both the fun and the point. I don't like being the wet blanket, but I also feel the need to curate this a little to keep things from going off the rails. I mean, yeah, I expect trolls and whatnot here and there. It is TUSCL after all. But you guys have been really good about playing the game thus far and I think it's drawn enough interest that we want to see it played to completion now. I know this is imperfect and that popular threads create conversation. Without a better way to vote than just message board posts, it will be imperfect. But try and understand the point and not derail things from that. All I ask. Thanks.

@Justin: Without giving any seedings away, consider the other Celebrity Bracket competitors remaining and the fact we only had one seed-wise upset in the first round: Donna D'ERRICO Carmen ELECTRA Marisa MILLER Rebecca ROMIJN Kiana TOM Kate UPTON You can put them in just about any order and not go wrong.

Go ahead and call me naive, but I don't know if LE is as intensely focused on this site as one might think. Here's my thinking: For those of us who love this stuff, it's a passion, a hobby, something that brings joy into our lives, etc. For those who have to fight it ... it's just a job. And I think a lot of them probably don't really care all that much what does or doesn't happen as long as it doesn't lead to anything much worse. Think about when you were in school and you had to do a research paper you didn't really want to do. How deeply did you dig? If you're younger, there's a good chance you probably just tried to find the source materials to backup Wikipedia. If you're older, you might have found a good book on the topic, vaguely changed the phrasing and found other materials to back up what's in the book. I feel like that's how most local authorities approach prosecuting this stuff. So guys pay for services here and there. As long as there's not trafficking or sexual slavery, not that big of a deal, and if there is, that's generally up to higher authorities to find than local cops (and not something you'll find anything out about here). So there's some drug use. There is in a lot of places around clubs. If it's a hub for dealing or regional distribution, then yes, big problem. But again, you don't find out about that here, and again, probably something for higher authorities than the local cops. Same thing for if there's organized leadership, so to speak. Also, there are high hurdles for the burden of proof. Is it worth going through all the runaround for local authorities to not only make busts but then make the courts disprove entrapment? They'll answer calls from annoyed neighbors with streetwalkers. They'll do occasional enforcement. And yes, in some cities, they probably do expect kickbacks. But for the most part, I don't think they care all that much, and if they do catch either a dancer or customer, the owner can always say it was just a bad egg, maybe pay a fine, nail down enforcement of rules for a while and move on. I dunno. Maybe it's my own biases, but I feel like LE has way better stuff to do and usually is doing it. Detroit's a thing because they've made it a target. So be it. I'm not saying we can be explicit. I'm an advocate for sufficiently hiding what we do. But if we at least show we're trying to keep things behind closed doors and out of view of most folks with euphemisms and members-only areas of sites and whatnot, for the most part, I think it's out of sight, out of mind for most, much of LE included. I hope I didn't just jinx myself to be involved with a sting somehow now, but I just don't think it's worth us getting too paranoid over. Careful, yes, such that we do code things and show we're taking steps to keep it out of the mainstream. But not so careful we necessarily don't say anything at all.

Two I can think of, both pretty minor in the end: Finally took one dancer with a great body and a teasing way about her to VIP. Wanted to see what more could happen there. Put my index finger close to her lips to see if she'd sexily take it in her mouth. Instead, she bit full force on the base of my fingernail. Bruised pretty bad. Took a few months to grow the big purple dent out. Sitting at the stage. Very cute girl with larger B's. Went to do the boobs in the face thing. Wasn't very good at it. Bonked her breastplate and boobs into my nose so hard I thought she might have broken it. Thank goodness she didn't, but it felt a little loose at first and I had a headache the rest of the night.

Turn out the lights, the poll is over. I will give one (useless) vote to Genevieve. BRIMHALL: 14 GENEVIEVE: 7 T̶r̶i̶m̶ ̶t̶h̶e̶ ̶h̶e̶d̶g̶e̶s̶:̶ ̶1̶ Brimhall again survives relatively low turnout to get another victory. Vintage 80's beats out retro 60's as, for the second-straight time, Brimhall doubles up her opponent. There is potentially a redhead vs. redhead matchup lurking in the Sweet Pussy 16. We'll see if it comes about.

I've seen worse. I forget who the touring feature dancer was, but her's were twice that size. Those are big, but I've seen worse. That said ... she seems cute enough that she wouldn't have needed to go that big to be successful camming. A lot of the super big ladies aren't that cute. She's cute. Weird. Plus, they look good now because she just had them done. But gravity will not be kind. I like 'em big and I don't mind 'em fake. But she better make her money fast.

Of all the things to go after ... ... on a side note, that means the real criminals will have more money for drugs and hits.

I just did the legwork and read some of Tycoon's reviews. Sounds like no big loss.

Tycoon's? Was never on my radar. Just don't let the "movement" get near the airport. I feel like anything in the city is basically done.

Oddly enough, this may be a good thing for us, in a way. The talent will become more concentrated at fewer clubs. Less driving all over the city because certain clubs aren't dying anything for us at times.