discussion comment
5 years ago
I don't think she finds me attractive. She's kind of a free-spirit, I'm more buttoned-down corporate type. We're both geeky, but in different ways. We talk about her "partners." They don't sound like me.
If I got dances for my own gratification, that would probably violate the trust. And if she insisted on me getting dances for me to talk to her, I probably wouldn't keep talking to her.
discussion comment
5 years ago
There's one club I go to where I've made a friend.
She's spectacular on the pole because she's had gymnastic training. She's a great dancer. She's trying to become a performance artist (think Cirque du Soleil).
We never do dances anymore. In fact, we only did one. I'll tip her for the time she spends with me, but not nearly as much as she would make hustling dances during the time we spend.
When I go to this club, if she's there and sees me, we'll usually talk for 30-45 minutes. We both deal with anxiety and we spend a lot of time talking through the way other people don't get that and how they make our lives difficult accordingly.
We don't do dances anymore because it's more of a mental kinship now. It's not that I'm not attracted to her; if anything, I'm more attracted to her now that I know her better and how she overcomes her issues to be so damn talented. But dances, at this point, would feel like me just taking what I want from her, not actually valuing her, her talents and what we've built as friends. She knows my type and will even tell me if my other favorite dancers are at the club that night when I message her to say I'm making a visit. The conversation seems to have value to her, too, as she even made the point to spend the time one night after saying she was broke due to the chance to take some special performing classes and need to make money. She still sat with me, though, and explained another situation she dealt with. I tell her, if she needs to make money, she should go do that. She still sits with me, though.
I think the reason we bonded is because I really make the point to treat her, and dancers in general, as a person, not just someone I'm paying for a service from. I don't see that from a lot of other customers. These ladies provide a service, and a damn good one. I hate, truly hate and despise, that it's stigmatized by many.
Our messed up attitude toward sex in the western world is F'd up. It's something we're wired to want, yet we shame the people who actually provide it. And the people who get the furthest in life seem to be the ones who privately seek it, then publicly shame the people who they themselves are in private. It's no wonder so many of these girls feel used.
I do what I can. I try to support the ones I know and like, both financially and mentally. I urge the rest of you to remember: These folks are people, too. It's fine to want them to help you get off. Just be nice about it.
discussion comment
5 years ago
@Paul: I picked the girls. It was basically just the first 64 that popped into my head.
I do have a type. I like 'em big up top. Nice, round, full and big.
I don't mind enhancements at all. In fact, I'm a little disappointed the procedure hasn't improved such that more young women see it as viable. The fact you're seeing fewer busty girls, enhanced or no, at clubs nowadays disappoints me. "Natural" means little to me. I don't expect to evaluate a woman on her naturalness any more than I expect to be evaluated on my hunting and fire-building skills. We've evolved beyond that; we have brains that operate cars and computers and have underwire bras and implants. It's not what you were given, it's what you do with it. I want a girl who knows how to put on makeup well, do her hair well, dances well and makes her look the best it can be to use her talents. What she looks like "naturally" isn't really a factor to me.
One upon a time, it was a more common type. We're talking about two of the better-selling adult film stars of their time, here. And, during that time, yeah, that big didn't necessarily mean they were going to be perfect. But they were still nice and big, and there are things girls with big ones can do much more easily than girls without them.
That said, there's a reason I gave you guys the 'Neither' option. If they aren't your cup of tea, then that should be your vote. 'Neither' doesn't mean "I don't want any girls ever at all." It just means "not these two, thanks." And it's plausible my 64 could all be that for some of you, though there were, and still are, a few natural and/or less busty options. Nicole Kidman got eliminated. Dillion Harper is coming up. We're probably going to consider Shauna O'Brien pre-op. (Pre-op) Megan Rain won her first matchup. And so on.
Kener/Stylez is one where 'Neither' could win. To me, that data is just as interesting as the other two options.
Don't be afraid to go Brewster's Millions and vote none of the above. Neither is there for a good reason. If that's your feeling, vote 'Neither'. I gave you an out.
discussion comment
5 years ago
Yup, a dominant win — although it went the complete opposite way I expected.
My vote is for Sinclair, but I think maybe I can explain why I think this went totally against my thinking in explaining my vote.
First off, you'll notice Sinclair's picture and clip are basically one in the same. I think that clip is smoking hot. Some of the best porn I've seen in years. That said, maybe she's not your thing, particularly if you're apparently very big on nipples not pointing in opposite directions (?) as someone was above. I'm not that picky and I think she's one of the hottest things around right now.
Secondly, Nadine's pic is good and the video seemed to be head-and-shoulders above anything else I found for her. That said, maybe the old, grainy video hides some flaws. I saw plenty of her in my early time on the interwebs and while she was definitely worth looking at galleries of, I did kind of think she had an almost angry look in a lot of her pictures. Someone above said they thought that was a "I want to fuck" look, but combined with her clearly high level of fitness, I feel like it's kind of a semi-permanent weightlifter's scrunched-up face, not something all that sexy. I mean, she made the 64 for a reason, but this was a big upset seed-wise, especially since I had received feedback about Sinclair long before the bracket.
But hey, we play the game for a reason, and the results fall as they do.
NADINE: 12
SINCLAIR: 5
NEITHER: 4
̶B̶o̶t̶h̶:̶ ̶2̶
̶C̶a̶n̶'̶t̶ ̶d̶e̶c̶i̶d̶e̶ ̶b̶e̶t̶w̶e̶e̶n̶ ̶f̶a̶c̶e̶ ̶&̶ ̶b̶o̶d̶y̶:̶ ̶1̶
So yeah. Nadine moves on in a dominant stunner. I'm learning a lot about your collective tastes with this.
Nadine will go up against the winner of the Linda O'Neil/Meridian showdown in what may turn into a part of the bracket dominated by the ladies of the dial-up era.
discussion comment
5 years ago
![]()
GACAUn-retired: Met my ATF. Married her. Divorcing her.
You can still log in from Incognito Mode and nothing will show up. You just have to log in every time. That's what I do.
discussion comment
5 years ago
![]()
GACAUn-retired: Met my ATF. Married her. Divorcing her.
Yes, it seems you do. And yes, I think that's new. And, honestly, that might be a good thing.
discussion comment
5 years ago
Alright, let's close 'er off with my vote going to Tom as well.
TOM: 14
KIDMAN: 8
̶K̶i̶d̶m̶a̶n̶ ̶i̶s̶n̶'̶t̶ ̶h̶o̶t̶:̶ ̶3̶ ̶i̶n̶c̶o̶r̶r̶e̶c̶t̶ ̶p̶e̶o̶p̶l̶e̶
̶V̶a̶g̶u̶e̶ ̶r̶e̶d̶h̶e̶a̶d̶ ̶b̶a̶s̶h̶i̶n̶g̶:̶ ̶2̶ ̶i̶n̶c̶o̶r̶r̶e̶c̶t̶ ̶p̶e̶o̶p̶l̶e̶
̶B̶o̶t̶h̶:̶ ̶1̶ ̶(eventually voters will figure out this is a waste of time)
̶A̶d̶v̶o̶c̶a̶t̶e̶s̶ ̶f̶o̶r̶ ̶k̶e̶g̶e̶l̶ ̶e̶x̶e̶r̶c̶i̶s̶e̶s̶:̶ ̶1̶ ̶w̶i̶s̶e̶ ̶s̶o̶u̶l̶
Kiana Tom moves on.
This is the first non-surprise, both in terms of seeding and my own thinking, in my mind. To expand on @Justin's thinking, yes, more people will known Kidman than Tom. But those who know Tom will be way more impressed. She was pretty much guaranteed satisfaction, every morning, five days a week, each in a different outfit. Sure, Kidman was hot here and there. But Tom was hot all the damn time, and was always right in front of you.
Tom's road doesn't get easier in a loaded Celebrity Region. She'll get the winner between Carmen Electra and Katarina Witt.
discussion comment
5 years ago
Was/is this a fairly extras-friendly place? I mean, it definitely sounds like it, but just checking.
Maybe the place is so competitive extras-wise that the girls have to go low price-wise. Maybe she was new, doesn't understand the game yet and you just hit the lottery. Or hell, maybe she's just a nympho.
I mean, this sounds like a "you hit the lottery" experience, but you never know.
discussion comment
5 years ago
Whoops, correction to Tom's measurements: 36D-23-35
discussion comment
5 years ago
I think we can close this one off.
I'll add in a fruitless vote for Ann because I met her once when she was featuring and was impressed. It won't put her over the top, though.
RAIN: 10
LISA ANN: 7
NEITHER: 1
I̶ ̶p̶i̶c̶k̶e̶d̶ ̶a̶ ̶b̶a̶d̶ ̶L̶i̶s̶a̶ ̶A̶n̶n̶ ̶p̶i̶c̶:̶ ̶4̶ ̶(I like Lisa Ann, I like pigtails and I like schoolgirl skirts; what can I say)
巨魔被忽略了:̶ ̶2̶
In a borderline stunner, Lisa Ann is out in the opening round and Megan Rain moves on.
Two matchups in and the lower seed's won both. I give you guys credit. I seeded these two matchups moreso on name recognition than anything, thinking the more well-known woman had a better chance. You guys have proven me wrong and gone off appearance. I also underestimated how much you guys value more realistic breasts. I took that into account somewhat in seeding, but you guys are taking it way more into account with your voting.
That said, we'll also consider Rain in her pre-op state going forward, since that seemed to be the preferred look for those who commented.
Rain will next go up against the winner of Capri Cavanni vs. Sylvia Saint.
discussion comment
5 years ago
@skibum: We did give you the option to say 'Neither'. I'll count yours as that.
discussion comment
5 years ago
rh48hr earns a gold star, a favorite and a trust from me for following directions to a 'T'.
Good job, sir.
discussion comment
5 years ago
I've seen clubs take just about every approach to this.
Some will say they can't tell you whether a dancer is there or not for safety reasons.
Some will post the dancers' names who will be there that night on social media.
Some will say, "Oh yeah, of course she's here!" whether she is or not to just get you to come out.
Some clubs, as outlined above, actually have no clue.
And some will actually give you an honest answer.
Depends on the club.
discussion comment
5 years ago
![]()
AtAboyStill learning to proofread
So there is a category of person out there called "asexual." They're folks that aren't really gay, straight or anything. They just kind of have no libido at all. It doesn't mean they're anti-social or even that they aren't looking for relationships. They just don't feel any strong sexual desires.
If you think of libido like a dial, most of ours are probably up near 11. But some folks' may be closer to 0 or 1. And for them, I can see how the club would do nothing for them.
discussion comment
5 years ago
@Warrior: I'll count yours toward Lisa Ann.
We did say we'd want to measure the competitors as they were in their prime, not necessarily as they are today.
review comment
5 years ago
This is a short review that actually has a valid message: Avoid shift change. It's an important one, though. I can validate that things get very dry at Bristol around shift change and, if you go then, you're going to struggle to get any value from your visit.
Yes, you could have given more club details, but that's kind of been done, not to mention, you said you've been there before. I'm OK with this.
discussion comment
5 years ago
You may have to click 'view' on her picture if your Twitter is set to filter out sensitive material.
discussion comment
5 years ago
If the link to Rain's post-op pic doesn't work for you, try this: https://twitter.com/littlesexbuddha/status/1155885659308953606
discussion comment
5 years ago
Alright, I'm closing this off. Two days is enough time.
BAKER: 7
MORAN: 7
NEITHER: 1
T̶h̶r̶e̶e̶s̶o̶m̶e̶/̶T̶h̶e̶y̶'̶r̶e̶ ̶B̶o̶t̶h̶ ̶A̶w̶e̶s̶o̶m̶e̶:̶ ̶2̶
N̶e̶w̶ ̶a̶d̶d̶i̶t̶i̶o̶n̶ ̶t̶o̶ ̶m̶y̶ ̶i̶g̶n̶o̶r̶e̶ ̶l̶i̶s̶t̶:̶ ̶1̶
Wow, the first one ends in a tie.
Guess what? I get the tiebreaker vote. And @george, you convinced me: When I stop to think, "If I were in a strip club and could go back with one or the other, who would I pick?" Moran is the answer. Baker might be the better dancer, but Moran is probably the one that would moreso catch my eye first as prettier.
I will tell you Baker was the much higher seed. I thought the Miller Lite ad (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nXV_SyzPnRA) and her exotic looks, the result of a Irish, German, Hawaiian and Chinese mix, would put her over the top with most of you, while I thought Moran would be too obscure.
But I give you mongers credit. You actually looked at the pictures and clips and judged them fairly. Good work.
Our first upset. Stacy Moran will take on the winner between Shauna O'Brien and Lorissa McComas.
discussion comment
5 years ago
@Justin: I'm not quite old enough to hit Canyon's demographic. She didn't make my 64.
I skew pretty heavy 90s and 2000s. An all-time bracket would probably have to include her.
For me, I was just thinking of 64 girls I usually think of off the top of my head, "Hey, I'd like to see them naked ... again."
Feel free to post your own pictures and do your own thing, though. If there's one thing common to everyone on this site, it's we like to see naked women.
discussion comment
5 years ago
There's going to be a lot of requests for threesomes in this bracket. Heck, you might as well just ask for a 65-some right away.
That's going to be the challenge. There can be only one.
discussion comment
5 years ago
@shadow: I'll interpret that as a "neither."
discussion comment
5 years ago
I tend to agree with muddy above.
The are certain clubs you go to where the ladies seem somewhat willing to chat, get to know you, etc. They're clubs where VIP is on the table and the dancers know you probably won't make that more significant investment unless you know what you're buying into.
Then there are lapdance factories: Very little chit chat, just a quick sense of if the guy likes what he sees and then the dance ask.
Think about it like the difference between your average "get in, get off, get out" escort experience and a true GFE. The lapdance factory is the first one.
discussion comment
5 years ago
There's something to be said, too, for hiding in plain sight.
My phone has fewer security settings set on it than my much less tech-savvy SO. I have a ton of work contacts such that dancers' names just kind of fade into the din. I work with people from all over; different area codes don't trip anyone's trigger. And so on.
She'd really have to go digging. And she has no reason to.
If you don't act suspicious, no one will become suspicious. Play it cool, gentlemen.
review comment
5 years ago
I had to look it up. My first thought was Corinthian because that's the only kind of column I knew. Inevitably, you get something like that wrong and someone calls you out for it. Gotta love the Interwebs.