discussion comment
a year ago
Private account.
IG and FB both are notoriously inconsistent with the application of their so-called "standards".
discussion comment
a year ago
This makes as much sense as the stupid "I had a dream" baloney and dollar *signs* representing dollar *amounts* that so many on USASG seem to do.
No LEO is gonna care what you call it if it's illegal.
discussion comment
a year ago
Count me in the "don't bother telling her" group.
If you are happy with the service the redhead provides, then no one else's opinion matters, especially that of a jealous dancer. Drama is to be avoided whenever possible, in my opinion. YMMV.
discussion comment
a year ago
Guess I'm the anomaly. If my ATF was still alive, I expect I'd still be seeing her. I stopped seeing another regular because she moved away and got married, though we still talk. My current SB is going on like 3 or 4 years, though I knew her for a few years before we started doing this thing. And of course, the MILF is still in the picture,even if more occasionally than I'd like, and I'm not even sure anymore how long that's been going on.
Haven't bored with any of them yet.
There have been quite a few that I've seen more than twice, but less than a dozen, so maybe my number is somewhere around 10, unless they work out, and then it's however long she can put up with me.
discussion comment
a year ago
Trump's mugshot reminds me of the kind of shots Kubrik took of his deranged characters. That head cocked forward, angry eyebrow, eyes staring into the camera thing.
So, not at all inappropriate. Deranged is a decent description of Trump.
discussion comment
a year ago
I have a couple of current favorites that don't do extras, at least not with me. They're fun to talk to, and they let me grope pretty liberally. I don't give them very much on a visit, but they seem to be OK with that. I don't *need* much in the way of extras at the moment, so it's not really an issue.
discussion comment
a year ago
For The Onion, *every* day is April 1st...
discussion comment
a year ago
@skibum609: "Men have been on the lookout for multiple women since the guy after Adam."
Even Adam wasn't satisfied with his first choice. Remember, he rejected Lilith because she wanted to get on top. Apparently he wasn't happy that *she* wanted to enjoy it as well.
discussion comment
a year ago
How willing I am to do it depends on how confident I am that she hasn't sucked a dozen dicks before getting to me.
The vast majority of the time, that's a hard "no" for me.
discussion comment
a year ago
Yes,, and no.
Obviously (for anyone who's familiar with my posting here, anyway) I'm not averse to, and actively enjoy, the comfort of a long term partner. My wife, my ATF, and my current SB are all long term, and I can't see my sexual attraction to them ever waning. Of course, my ATF is no longer around, but if she were, I can't imagine not lusting after her.
At the same time, I have no desire to have anything *more* than a sexual attraction to the vast majority of the dancers with whom I've had sex. I suspect that's because neither of us has anything *more* than sexual/financial attraction to offer. I understand completely that they are there for the money, and not the dubious advantages of fucking a creepy old fat guy with a little dick.
discussion comment
a year ago
@mark94: "Or, most annoying, an unattractive dancer quickly sits in your lap."
Stand up and dump her on the floor.
discussion comment
a year ago
@Muddy: "Ever have a dancer confide in you that she was uncomfortable working somewhere."
More than I care to recall. It's really scary for them sometimes.
discussion comment
a year ago
Wat C.M.I said. I've only gotten a waitress out of the club a handful of times in 40 some years of clubing, and it wasn't for dating.
discussion comment
a year ago
Why? Primarily because they cannot, and think it's awful that someone can make more than them while ostensibly doing less.
discussion comment
a year ago
@gammanu95: "^anyone wondering why she failed at her "legal career" has had their questions answered."
So exactly what facts did she present that are wrong? The statements about presumption of innocence are *exactly* correct.
Whether they are *applied* in all cases is a separate issue.
discussion comment
a year ago
Given what happened to another monger of my acquaintance, about which I posted some time back, I've pulled back even from the occasional "club friend" things that were developing. Not gonna chance a blabbermouth incident.
discussion comment
a year ago
@Electronman: "As a reminder, these are allegations and the defendant, Donald Trump, should be presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law."
Nope. Politicians and law enforcement are guilty until proven innocent. Since that's how they treat *us*.
discussion comment
a year ago
The new Microcenter store should be worth a visit...
discussion comment
a year ago
![]()
motorheadFat, drunk and stupid is no way to go through life
@mark94, I stated no superiority on my part. I stated facts, no different in principle than "the sun will rise in the east tomorrow." If you disagree with those facts, you are factually incorrect, i.e. wrong.
discussion comment
a year ago
![]()
motorheadFat, drunk and stupid is no way to go through life
White cis heterosexual male boomer here.
The taking down of slaver statues is and was the right thing to do.
Highlighting the systemic racism inherent in zoning laws is the right thing to do.
Criticizing the way African Americans and Native Peoples have been, and still are, treated is the right thing to do.
Calling out bad behavior of men towards women is the right thing to do.
LGBTQ people are people and have the same rights as everyone else, and making sure those rights are respected is the right thing to do.
If you disagree with any of those, you're just fucking wrong. And yeah, I mean it.
discussion comment
a year ago
![]()
motorheadFat, drunk and stupid is no way to go through life
Removing statues of slavers isn't an attempt to change history, it's simply declining to celebrate those slavers. If you didn't complain when the statues of Saddam Hussein and Lenin were removed, you probably shouldn't be upset when statues of American slavers are removed. It's not "vilifying history", it's just not honoring the horrible aspects.
discussion comment
a year ago
![]()
ilbbaicnlKeep it in my pants when I do OTC. If I were a stripper it would stand for I like big bucks and I can not lie.
@motorhead, I've noticed similar here. I've heard a couple of different explanations. Either they're not on good terms with their baby daddy (or daddies) and avoid other AA men because they can't distinguish their own bad choices from the population at large, or they *are* on good terms with the BD and the BD doesn't want them to meet the competition.
discussion comment
a year ago
![]()
motorheadFat, drunk and stupid is no way to go through life
Some people, both left and right, seem to believe that the teaching of history they don't like is "indoctrination."
discussion comment
a year ago
![]()
motorheadFat, drunk and stupid is no way to go through life
Yes
discussion comment
a year ago
![]()
motorheadFat, drunk and stupid is no way to go through life
The Instant Pot will allegedly will slow cook, steam, air fry, roast, bake, dehydrate, pressure cook, saute, and sous vide, though I have only used the latter three functions so far. We got it as a gift, but if I were buying one, I would only get this model if I had almost none of the other tools already.