discussion comment
15 years ago
Chandler, Methinks you you have either an elevated sense of self importance, or are extremely paranoid. Any reasonable person reading my posts on this thread would see that they are not inflammatory nor are they attacking your position. They are stating a viewpoint. You continually attack points that you make up and infer other people are making. Are you just responding to voices in your head?
discussion comment
15 years ago
It is easier to negotiate favorable dance prices if the dancer likes you. I think you need to work on that aspect first when negotiating.
discussion comment
15 years ago
I wonder what impact the added awareness of their lax laws will affect tourism into RI.
discussion comment
15 years ago
And where were these so called inflammatory charges in this thread? And my statement was "posting comments would really serve no purpose" addresses the issue of adding comments to reviews and is self explanatory. I have alreasdy stated that I do not feel comments would add any value to the review. I think you just have a difficult time understanding concepts unless they are spelled out in detail for you.
discussion comment
15 years ago
Welcome to the dancer world. For many reasons, of which money is one, dancers like to think they own their customers and do not like to share.
Customers however, do not always share that view.
discussion comment
15 years ago
Chandler, it is becoming very apparent you just like to argue in circles just for the sake of argument. I have already addressed my view on the issues you presented. Get a clue. Your posts are a good example of why I feel comments on reviews would be useless. You just like making personal attacks.
discussion comment
15 years ago
To keep the reviews the way they are. Everyone writes with a different style and it is the mix of these that allows for a good picture of the club.
discussion comment
15 years ago
I use I.E. and the change appeared to happen w/o me updating. Must be global warming.
discussion comment
15 years ago
Good post Chandler, you just forgot to answer the questions.
discussion comment
15 years ago
So Chandler, does your response mean that we should have comments so that you can post your response to what you feel is a bullshit review?
Posting comments really would serve no purpose.
discussion comment
15 years ago
I really do not think adding comments to a review would add any value. A review is a reflection of your experience for that visit, and everyone has a different perspective. What can be gained by other comments? The next review would allow for agreement or disagreement.
discussion comment
15 years ago
I would replace the bathroom attendant with Hooter's girls type attendants.
discussion comment
15 years ago
You can probably expect the experience to include whatever you negotiate for in advance. Any extras would probably be spur of the moment dependent on the environment.
discussion comment
15 years ago
I agree, it is a nice change.
discussion comment
15 years ago
I would not be a bathroom attendant.
discussion comment
15 years ago
I think 16 is too young for stripping. It is difficult enough finding 21 yo dancers that can carry on a conversation let alone a 16 yo. Besides, I get the impression from most members that they feel most dancers are messed up druggies and/or not in control of their life. Why would we want to allow 16 year olds to enter this world before they mature?
discussion comment
15 years ago
I prefer a combination. The good thing is that everyone has a different style. If there is too much personal experience when the experience was bad, it might unfairly give the wrong impressuion of the club.
discussion comment
15 years ago
You must not have tipped enough.
discussion comment
15 years ago
Since you ask, the closest would be "Dermatophobia", or the fear of skin lesions.
discussion comment
15 years ago
Scat, that was not the review being discussed. The review in question was by the disgruntled dancer wannabe.
discussion comment
15 years ago
Especially when they pop in my lap!
discussion comment
15 years ago
chandler,
My characterization of board police is in referencwe to posters that question posts and threads for whateverever reason because they do not feel that the content follows their preconceived idea of what the rules should be. It is clear to me that Founder really has very few rules as to the content and probably prefers/enjoys the freeform.
Let's see now. You agreed with a person who said people were listing dislikes not phobias, but when it is pointed out that dislikes/phobias are synonomous you get testy. The only disagreement I have here was that you imply dislikes are not phobias.
discussion comment
15 years ago
chandler,
I think it is comical that you are dredging up an old thread with questions that have already been asked and answered. And I never said it was a problem. You keep fabricating statements to try and bolster your position. Although it does still appear that you do not get the point. At this time, it is my belief you never will.
discussion comment
15 years ago
The only thing odd about this to me is as Scat said, this was the first post from a new member w/o reviews. My guess is it is from an existing member using a pseudonym.
discussion comment
15 years ago
My last few visits have been mixed. On one hand, some dancers are offering more for less, while others are trying to raise their price. I have noticed that it is taking longer in the evening for the club to get crowded.