review comment
5 years ago
Thanks for dancer rundown
discussion comment
5 years ago
This is a case for not letting a dancer sit on your lap in the first place, unless you practically KNOW that you'd be interested in getting dances from them .
review comment
5 years ago
![]()
minnowAny place that interests me.
For a guy who hasn't reviewed any clubs east of WA, unclewill doesn't know what he's talking about here.
review comment
5 years ago
I have- several short 5 - 6 liners that slid by with 3-2 vote. Or older ones that might have been rejected or 3 -2 under present system. Not exactly chest thumping material.
discussion comment
5 years ago
Let's see, 2000 characters would probably equal ~12 to 15 lines. I suppose I could buy into that. Maybe a slightly lower number like 1500 - 1800 would better enable those who report on dead afternoon shifts to make some "lemonade out of a lemon", so to speak. I'm sure many tusclers wouldn't mind knowing what to expect on a dead shift, and when they occur.
I glanced over the daily reviews. I noticed several that were approved by a 3 - 2 vote were 5 to 7 liners. I get it that founders hands off approach entails allowing VIP members (I think VIP is a good standard for publishers, there are plenty of good folk who just did not feel like getting "verified".) approving or rejecting reviews.
Like any new thing, it occasionally needs refinement. Having a minimum character count is one way to weed out the flaky/subpar reviews.
Another would be having some sort of "evaluate the graders" system. Sure we can see who approved the marginal reviews, but unless there are consequences for being negligent in approving reviews, the BS will just continue. I propose that being a party to a 3-2 decision would trigger publisher being put on a watch list. Any publisher on the top half of the list for 3 consecutive days would have their VIP publishing privileges suspended for 4 weeks.
Some people might want to require more votes to approve review (like 4 out of 6), but sans a minimum character count and a system of holding publishers accountable just won't solve the issue of too many egregious reviews slipping through the cracks.
review comment
5 years ago
W15 needs to be quicker on the trigger than the 3 who approved review. VX needs to read part of review guidelines to avoid getting ATF in trouble caveat.
discussion comment
5 years ago
Google "Melonie Charms" for some pics. She was one of the more voluminous posters over there. Many dancers miss her for the financial tips she'd give them. A nearly equal number vilified her for her political viewpoints as well as her tenacity in debating. She told her "pulling herself of by the bootstraps " story, culminating in retiring from dancing, and becoming an ex-pat "south of the border" (guessing Belize.)
review comment
5 years ago
I didn't see $20 dance price listed anywhere in your submitted review. No bus problems to school, JD.
review comment
5 years ago
![]()
stripclubpresidentLyrically, I'm supposed to represent, Im not only a client, I'm the player president.
With a name like that, has to be club mgt shill
review comment
5 years ago
Nice writeup, CP. Would 1:1 HW ratio be the walking bamboo stick, or Pillsbury Doughboy genre ?
discussion comment
5 years ago
![]()
EastCoasterI strongly prefer women of color. Every color.
Fellas I think this is founders way of telling us that he wants to keep this a low maintenance site. Except for egregious cases of plagiarism, he apparently does not wish to be bothered.
If he's going to let this egregious P.O.S. review slide, we might as well throw the review guidelines out the window.
Maybe he's rationalizing that letting some worthless reviews slide somehow generates more "hits", and thus more justification for increased advertising fees. But with too much letting the lunatics run the insane asylum creates a thinner line between Tuscl remaining a reliable source of information and being a juvenile chat room version of stripclublist.com. In that case, more prospective members will question even paying for VIP membership for such a worthless site.
discussion comment
5 years ago
![]()
SubramanCar key and wallet dating your sister
C-bal- The "onesie" craze seems to have gained traction in the last 2 years or so. They (dancers) say the AC is too cold, and they want to stay warm. A good percentage of onesie wearers seem to be dancers with sub-optimal bods.
I've noticed a significant minority of dancers getting butt enhancements. With one exception, the other booty jobs have been turn offs for me.
review comment
5 years ago
FH- that's the 1st I've heard of something like that in over 3 decades of clubbing. Should have signed in Hugh G Rection.
discussion comment
5 years ago
RIP, to a dying breed. Someone who was a leader as opposed to bean counter focused on next quarterly profit.
discussion comment
5 years ago
![]()
EastCoasterI strongly prefer women of color. Every color.
Thanks, EC, for highlighting the flaky publishers. I've noticed the same pattern too. NF doeth protest much.
review comment
5 years ago
![]()
minnowAny place that interests me.
Looks like somebody forgot to take their meds.
discussion comment
5 years ago
The one flag shoe I'd consider buying would be one with the "Do Not Tread On Me" Flag on it. Let the irony of that sink in.....
discussion comment
5 years ago
One airline Captain allegedly made PA announcement (1970's incident) : "Welcome to Salt Lake City, you may now turn your calendars back 50 years." He got some time off for that.
discussion comment
5 years ago
![]()
Jascoimr.wonderful to single moms and college age girls...
Ask the Bangalore movers and packers........
review comment
5 years ago
b-nut: Now that you have another 4 weeks of free access to the treasure trove of tuscl reviews, I have the following constructive comments for you.
1) Read the review guidelines, paying particular attention to length, wordiness, and enough details to help someone decide whether or not they should visit club
2) Read the reviews on clubs that you haven't visited yet, and ask yourself which of the reviews were most useful at giving you a good enough description of club for you to make a go/no go decision. Try to emulate those useful reviews in your future submissions.
3) Understand that the world doesn't revolve around you. Just because you know your club experiences or what Diamond, Rose, and Mercedes looks like doesn't mean that everyone does. Consider that the members who rejected your reviews just might have more club visits , reviews, and years of clubbing than you do. Many who travel a lot, and pored through many reviews to decide which clubs to visit on their next trip. In so doing, developed a good sense of which reviews are useful, which ones are BS, which ones are "drive by's" designed to get easy VIP credit. Notice that many have submitted useful reviews themselves.
4) Pretend you are a car magazine editor who must consider which article to publish. Reviewer #1 evaluated car under varying road conditions, including taking it on road trip with luggage and passengers. His findings were reported and commented on in detail. Reviewer #2 submitted a short missive saying that since it was raining, he just drove the car around the block, and that it seemed nice and comfortable. Which review would you publish ? So it goes with VIP publishers.
5) Take a chill pill with your beer.
discussion comment
5 years ago
Not enough info, nicespice. How long did you actually stay ? As some posters have pointed out, we often like to chill, and take things in before asking a dancer for dances. Was the same crowd there throughout the entirety of the shift ? Depending on the nature of the drama, might induce some people to tip. I don't recall any stage drama (ie, arguing with DJ for his choice of songs) making dancer more appealing. I do recall one "drama" many years ago where 1 dancer got too aggressive for bachelor party groom liking, some tug tug, push push ensued. Bouncer quickly broke it up, dancer taken off stage rotation for rest of night and was fired.
review comment
5 years ago
BB- If you're suspicious, wtf did you hit the green publish button ?
discussion comment
5 years ago
Papi's reasoning definitely resonates with me.
discussion comment
5 years ago
Not many changes for me since 2017 article publication- Insurrection Pure II, and Bleu de Chanel (EDT version) are still tops for me in the stripclub world. I have 2 honorable mention additions:
1) Reyanne Insurrection Wild- I've been complimented several times with this one, including one dancer who declared- "I love the smell so much that I could eat you." IW has been compared to more expensive "Mugler Pure Havanne" ( which you can test at Macy's, Sephora, etal.) I bought mine online from Amazon for ~ $25 3oz bottle.
2) Armaf Tres Nuit- Ditto for purchase price. Tres Nuit has been compared to more expensive Creed Green Irish Tweed.
Nice endorsement for "Speed Stick", doctorevil. Please let me know how it works while wearing a 3 pc white polyester suit.
discussion comment
5 years ago
![]()
Papi_ChuloMiami, FL (or the nearest big-booty club)
Anybody recall what "her" s/n was ? I recall seeing a red post (denoting verified dancer) posting about someone stalking her. I don't recall any post mentioning real names and cell numbers. OP mentioned something about reporting PM to founder, and saying something about tracking down PMer if they sent her subsequent PM. I didn't look closely enough at the ~18 pictures to notice an Adams Apple.
Sounds like OP may have gone postal while I disengaged from tuscl and led my normal life.