WTF -- Why Would Three TUSCLers Approve This Review??
EastCoaster
I strongly prefer women of color. Every color.
Platinum Lace
Strip Club Topless Dancers
Glasgow, Scotland
Reviewer: BrandiStorm
Title: great
July 2, 2019
girls were super friendly with good craic, came in with a friend to suss it out before working there but will definitely apply. girls were super friendly with good craic, came in with a friend to suss it out before working there but will definitely apply. girls were super friendly with good craic, came in with a friend to suss it out before working there but will definitely apply.girls were super friendly with good craic, came in with a friend to suss it out before working there but will definitely apply.
Visited: Not Provided After Midnight
Dancers Working: 6-10
Money Spent: Under $100
Ratings:
Club: 7
Dancers: 10
Dollar Value: 3
Review Publishers:
Crownation (rejected)
Not Enough Details
Duplicate Submission
Incoherent
rick33 (rejected)
Shill Review or Club Ad
Incoherent
IceyLoco (approved)
Slongdong (approved)
nofuglies (approved)
Strip Club Topless Dancers
Glasgow, Scotland
Reviewer: BrandiStorm
Title: great
July 2, 2019
girls were super friendly with good craic, came in with a friend to suss it out before working there but will definitely apply. girls were super friendly with good craic, came in with a friend to suss it out before working there but will definitely apply. girls were super friendly with good craic, came in with a friend to suss it out before working there but will definitely apply.girls were super friendly with good craic, came in with a friend to suss it out before working there but will definitely apply.
Visited: Not Provided After Midnight
Dancers Working: 6-10
Money Spent: Under $100
Ratings:
Club: 7
Dancers: 10
Dollar Value: 3
Review Publishers:
Crownation (rejected)
Not Enough Details
Duplicate Submission
Incoherent
rick33 (rejected)
Shill Review or Club Ad
Incoherent
IceyLoco (approved)
Slongdong (approved)
nofuglies (approved)
Got something to say?
Start your own discussion
72 comments
TFP you're free to block me, no need for you to troll me....
Remember when the site used to tell us to give lots of details? Maybe it's time for that message to come back.
That is one of the worst I have seen. IceyLoco is an idiot and a detriment to this website.
This is a troll explaining troll logic, there are various degrees of stupid, this takes stupid to another dimension this defense of approval is just a big fuck you to @founder
Something about it.
https://video.search.yahoo.com/search/vi…
Ok now I see what Chili Palmer was talking about. Fuck it, it is what it is. The site is a certified shitshow with no sign of changing, but at least there are some cool people here.
If he's going to let this egregious P.O.S. review slide, we might as well throw the review guidelines out the window.
Maybe he's rationalizing that letting some worthless reviews slide somehow generates more "hits", and thus more justification for increased advertising fees. But with too much letting the lunatics run the insane asylum creates a thinner line between Tuscl remaining a reliable source of information and being a juvenile chat room version of stripclublist.com. In that case, more prospective members will question even paying for VIP membership for such a worthless site.
Twentyfive, I'm nobody's bitch.
I do believe in a low maintenance site. If 3 out of 5 people thought it was a worthwhile review, why should my singular voice count for more?
The way I see it you are losing credibility when you allow this type of shit to go on.
And I still think you whine too much. It's a strip club site FFS, it ain't life and death.
Happy fourth of July from the greatest country in history.
But this review was worse than that - IMO a review that purposely copies/pastes the same sentences over and over again just to get VIP, has no place in the list of reviews and nothing good comes out of allowing that to be published and have the OP be rewarded with VIP.
I can understand the hands-off approach and letting the voting process do its thing but publishing something like this IMO is PL-malpractice and a misuse of the review/approval system and kinda circumvents the reason for having the approval system in the first place.
Up to now most of these reviews have not gotten thru so not a huge deal but I hope it doesn't start getting as bad as b/f yhe approoval system which I don't think it will and hopefully not.
I see several problems here.
1. The review was bad and should not have been published. Apparently it has been pulled, so that problem is apparently resolved.
2. The reviewers did not do due diligence in recommending it be published. For example, it is clear from what iceyloco says above that he did not read the review. He refers to the reviewer in terms of masculine pronouns, “his experience” and “He’s from Scotland”, yet the review was obviously written by a female, that is a dancer looking for a place to dance. Iceyloco is the only approver that has contributed to this thread, so I can’t tell if the others have read it or not, but I suspect not.
3. While I appreciate the hands off approach Founder has to the site in general and the reviews in particular, it seems to me that some form of simple oversight is acceptable, and even necessary, particularly when people are recommending reviews to be published that they obviously haven’t even read. I wonder if Iceyloco has recommended any other reviews to be published that he hasn’t read?
>Icey thinks the reviews are worthless because his experiences is always different than a regular PL.<
Your favoritism is showing and is undermining your credibility.
Go celebrate the fourth.
Was this a good review? No, but it was his first hand experience...
Also, its not that my own experiences are always different, but I do go to strip clubs for different reasons than many on here.
Go fuck yourself with a rusty trombone faggy loco.
I'm just kidding. It was a shit review approved by trolls. It doesn't warrant all this drama. This thread was like a train wreck I had to read to the end.
I'll ask the question again to y'all: If the founder doesn't give two shits about giving away 30 days of free VIP for crappy reviews, why should you care? It's not your money or your bandwidth.
Second question: What's the difference between IceyLoco and juicebox? All of you want Icey banned, but he isn't the one who has posted at least 100 fake reviews. And if he brags about fucking ONE Vegas dancer, how is that worse than juice bragging about fucking 50 Sugar Babies, then being called out on that absurdity and backtracking by saying "Oh, it was actually 2-3?" Your collective selective morality here is quite impressive. You like juice, so he gets a pass on every fucking lie/exaggeration he spews, but don't like Icey so everything he writes is wrong, even if he occasionally writes some coherent thoughts.
1. AFAIK Neither juice not his aliases we’re going around insulting the members on the board for doing the fundamental thing customers like doing—going to clubs, enjoying lapdances or more possibly sexual activity, possibly getting a GFE experience, and not attempting shaming them for doing that. On a site full of individuals who want to talk about that.
2. Founder has invited Icey to hang out IRL twice. Icey ignores those invitations and wouldn’t dare to display himself face to face. Juice has met several board members IRL. I’ve personally messaged with juice on Snapchat a few times.
3. Juice is more capable to maintaining a “friendship” with Icey. When juice corresponds with somebody positively, it tends to stay that way. With Icey, it doesn’t. Especially with whatever backstabbing he was doing with CC99 (previously DC9428) with raising him up and tearing him down.
You’re missing the point, juice is a fun loving friendly guy, who rarely if ever gets defensive and arrogant about his bullshit and readily admits to the truth when called on it
icee on the other hand is a completely humorless prick that never has a kind word for anyone and insists that his impossible lies are the truth
The old trick clique and the meth head troll bitch aren't representative of the site.
I never backstabbed anyone on here
The fake review shit from Juice is definitely something that shouldn't fly. Like I said the last time you brought up juice, I'm a fairly newer member so I didn't see all the antics you mention. But these days I hardly see anything from Juice. He might pop up for a day and start a bunch of random threads. But after a few days he's gone again for weeks at a time.
All I know is, currently, Icey is the one posting everywhere on the site daily continuously berating a lot of the posters. And approving shit reviews like the one in question.
Also, I think it's an error to assume that everyone here is 100% on board with Team Juice.
I alone can prove it isn't 100%.
I will approve short reviews if they're for a place I know well, seem genuine, and convey some useful info.
If I'm on the fence, I'll look at other reviews for the club to compare with and go with my gut.