Are clean dancers really at a disadvantage or is it SS ?
Papi_Chulo
Miami, FL (or the nearest big-booty club)
I often see dancers on SW complaining that their lack of $$$ is due to extras since they, of course, won’t do them.
I imagine that perhaps this can be an issue in certain places like Detroit – but even here in Miami where extras are readily available; it appears to me that it may be a small percentage of custies that actually go the extras route since this usually require paying for a VIP room and a couple of hundred
w.r.t. your area/clubs; do you perceive dancers that don’t do extras as not being able to make decent $$$ b/c they don’t do extras?
This thread was prompted by you guessed it, a SW thread this PL read:
https://www.stripperweb.com/forum/showth…
(btw – the SW OP is the same genius that was complaining about old dudes in a previous thread)
32 comments
P2: " I know why I haven't been able to break past $300 at this club."
Therefore: "There are a lot more extras going on than I thought. "
LOL.
In the strange world of strip clubs, the extra effort might include extras, or it just might include working harder or learning how to please customers or whatever it takes to get more tips. So for those girls who want to sit on their asses, they look for any excuse to blame someone else. But certainly there are situations where guys are looking for the nasty girls, and the good girls get less business. Hell, I'm a perfect example. If you're not hot, and don't give good mileage, you ain't gettin' shit from me.
If a Stripperweb stripper is talking, it's guaranteed bullshit.
A stripper usually starts a convo with me this way "What brings you here?"
"I'm here for the best beer in town and these fine young ladies."
It all starts from there. Some ladies walk away, while some ladies stay keeping the convo going.
She would have to initiate the flirt (touching, caressing) before I move the moment to the next stage.
In an extras club, they shouldn't be working there if they're not willing. In a normal club I can see how a few girls doing extras will have lots of regulars which will hurt the others. My ATF is a top earner in her club and she doesn't do extras, at least not for money.
In the other hand, one of the most attractive girls at another club known for its easy extras notes, without complaining about it, that she doesn't make nearly as as much as the extras girls there. She seems to be OK with that, though.
The normal – lettuce; tomato; mustard; mayo; …
But if she is wiling to do good mileage dances but not extras; there should be plenty of non-extras PLs she can get business from.
And it’s kinda shortsighted to blame the extras girls – it’s not as if the extras PL is going to give the non-extras girl his hundreds of dollars if he can’t find extras in the club; most likely he will not spend the $$$ if he can’t get what he wants.
"The normal – lettuce; tomato; mustard; mayo; …"
Ham on five, hold the Mayo
Cultural pop reference #14
You are implying most customers are seeking extras. I don't agree to this logic because someone has to write the correct logic for me to agree.
The way I look at it is, the majority of customers come in looking for lapdances that include some boob & ass grabbing. Those customers feel like they got a bonus if they got to suck a tittie, grab a monkey, or had a dancer grab their junk. As long as they get that level of service, they're happy and will keep coming back. They spend on the extra/non-extra girls alike, but the extra girls may sell an extra dancer or two due to aforementioned little bonuses. Then, there's the minority that come in looking for the whole enchilada. They spend on both girls, but quickly realize a bad investment and cut off the ones who show no potential of going forward. The money spent on them is what I'm calling scraps above. Those customers wouldn't be there without the extra girls, they'd visit massage parlors, escorts, etc.
I'd guess the scraps the limited menu girls make outweigh their losses to the full menu girls. So, the full menu girls are still making more, giving the perception that they're "hogging" all the money. However, the reality (in my very unscientific estimation) is those girls brought in that money and the limited menu girls are getting partial benefit of it. The net is, the limited menu girls are benefiting, not suffering from the availability of extras.
It sure doesn't stop dancers from making decent coin in my beloved Alberta clubs. I once had a long conversation with a touring Toronto dancer working at the Rig Pig club in Nisku ( a club with stage dances only, no private dances whatsoever). This dancer normally worked one of the Mississauga FS pus buckets. She told me that she made more money in 1 week at the Rig Pig doing 5 stage sets per day than she did in 1 month of HJs and BJs in her regular Mississauga pus bucket.
Who knows?..........but I sort of believe her. I once spent an entire evening in the old Rig Pig with a well-refreshed crew. During the horrid loonie/toonie toss for each dancer my 7 guys probably each tossed $15-$20 in loonies/toonies at the glistening vajayjays. The joint was packed that night with scores of other drunks tossing coins at the girls. Each dancer easily picked up $300/$400 for each dance set that I saw that evening.
Do the arithmetic.
@alebegonz: "You are implying most customers are seeking extras."
No he's not. He's referring to a subset of guys and a subset of clubs, i.e. the guys who are looking for extras and places where extras can be found.
100 customers in a club. 20 looking for extras. That leaves only 80 customers as potential for the "clean" girls.
Versus....
100 customers in a club. None looking for extras. That leaves all 100 customers as potential for the "clean" girls.
Geez, you'd think that alabengonz could have written that logic. It's 3rd grade shit.
Now that's not to say that the bottom line of the clean girls is really affected that much due to the extras (for a bunch of reasons), but at least it has the potential. We'll never know the actual effect, because it will vary by customer, dancer, etc. If she's ugly, customers aren't going to want her, and extras have nothing to do with it.
But again, strippers complaining and blaming others is otherwise meaningless for the reasons I already mentioned. Same shit, different stripper
It's Spic 'n Span, not spam. Although I was wondering if it actually was spam and I was just forgetting so I went to wiki-whatever and found this:
"a span was a wood chip, and such chips were used to make spoons. Something that was span-new was a freshly cut chip or, metaphorically, anything as new as a freshly cut chip. This term dates from at least 1300 in the metaphorical sense. Spick was added in the 16th century, though why is not exactly known - perhaps for the alliterative sense. A spick was a spike or nail, and something that was spick and span was neat and trim. The "clean" sense appears to have arisen only recently"
Interesting. You always think of spic 'n span as clean, but never knew why. Now you know.
No extra charge guys...
Geez, now I'm back to third grade.