Comments by blahblahblahs

Perhaps this is by intent, but the maps feature is not working if you have location turned off in your browser.

Minnow---what did you find lacking. This is a great review.

Increased competition is typically a good thing. Given that there are a lot more patrons than dancers in RI and MA clubs recently, I hope they find additional dancers instead of mostly stealing from existing clubs.

^ and ^^. I agree with Butthead https://youtu.be/732gfjYwxyM?si=7Z5vR-e9UHVkn20t&t=21

A) Turnip B) Chuck D and Kim Gordon C) Capital Grille D) A culinary torch

Timed dances downstairs are nude. Some girls will also go nude on stage, and I think the second stage (in use when busy) has higher rates of bottoms off.

@grrlgonebad got it exactly correct. In addition, there was a whole lot of big brother in the regulations he was talking about.

Good review

OG-- spot on. Though I'd argue that the hustle factor is actually too low at Boardroom at the moment. To be clear, I'm not advocating that they hire door vultures, but just find a way to encourage more dances being sold. Nelly-- insightful. FWIW, I try to grade clubs on absolute terms, but I can't claim that I'm actually consistent. Loper-- agree on Desire also being a time sink. I suspect that if you are able to dedicate the time and money required to be a regular then it is an almost unmatched experience. Maybe in retirement!

A related concept already exists in PA: https://bodiesinmotion-pa.com/ This one goes to a local bar as opposed to being on the road all the time.

Clarifying a typo above: $180 would be the club fee for an hour room.

This definitely doesn't sound like a good value prop considering the market rate is closer to $33 a song with a pretty girl.

Nope. The other PTs has three stages and nude stage shows.

Can you describe the dancer lineup?

So, looking at TB12Goat's review/post history, it is legit. We don't see that history when we approve/reject.

^ someone at Mary's?

Things like raising tariffs and their impact on the economy will require a complicit congress, so its hard to speculate if they will come to pass. I think it is pretty clear that we can expect further gutting/laxer enforcement at safety regulation oriented agencies like the OSHA, FDA, EPA, etc. We can also expect ICE to be more aggressive, To the extent that he has a mandate, it is reducing illegal immigration, so we can expect additional funding for southern border security. I don't see dems blocking that given that they had reached a deal last year. We can expect more Strip clubs to get caught up in immigration issues similar to Electric Blue. We can expect Elon Musk to get whatever he wants in the short term, before some minor slight causes Trump to view him as disloyal.

I'm dubious of this review. Miller Lite is $13--or I have just been repeatedly scammed. There are no tables to do table dances at. Private is in the multi-hundreds not $50. However, there is a common room at $30 a song, which some girls try to charge more for on night shift.

Actually, four given the strip mall aspect.

Nelly, it made three factual errors in the review, but all were off in exactly the way that an AI would miss by.

Two separate questions, but for #1, they are stripping because they think it is the best option for them. As to how they are making money, it could be because they provide a better service than other dancers. That could be conversation, extras, pushing drugs, a more naughty stage show, etc. Perhaps they have hooked regulars from earlier in their career. With regards to ratings, we definitely don't all agree. Importantly, I think not only do we have different preferences, but we are inconsistent in how we give our ratings. Some of you think of 9s as the top 10%, and some of us grade on a log scale (like how earthquakes are scored) and would only consider 1 in 100,000 girls to be 9s. We also center our scales in different places. This is why I always try to explain my tastes in the Dancers section of my reviews as well as breakdowns/counts of how many girls I find very hot, somewhat hot, and not at all hot.

It's a 1% tax. I'm sure some failing club will blame this, but quite frankly if their margins are so think that they need to change business models over this then that club has bigger problems.

I'm going to completely hijack this thread and complain about an inconsiderate customer. Last Saturday a club in my rotation had their costume party. One girl at this club had created what other dancers told me was the best home made costume they'd ever seen. Some other PL took her to the champaign room for four fucking hours, which deprived us all of seeing her costume. Rude.

My one visit here in the last year was a Sunday night and when I arrived they had zero dancers. After a few minutes one came in the door and came up to the floor shortly after (the bouncer said there may be a second on the way eventually). There were between 7 to 10 customers waiting for her. She wasn't a smoke show, but she was cute enough that I would consider a dance or VIP with her under the right conditions. During the time I took to drink my beer, she approached me and every other customer. She quoted $40 a song or $240 for 15 minutes. When I left, she still hadn't sold a dance. I get that girls see more customers than dancers and view it as a low supply situation, so they can raise prices. However, I think that a lot of us are aware of pricing at the much busier clubs nearby. I had come from Foxy and after leaving went to Desire. Both had a lot more dancers and customers. Same advice as everyone else in this thread. Fantasies is currently a lower quality experience (due to the lack of dancers and less transparent pricing) at a higher price point. They need to cut prices to increase volume, and they need to figure out how to retain talent.

Rick, look up the companies PatronScan and GuestBan. Also look for news articles on PatronScan. We can debate whether what they are trying to do, and their ambitions, are a net positive or negative for society, but they clearly aren't just validating IDs.