Comments by blahblahblahs

A lot of what being described here is girls lying or otherwise scamming, which isn't really a little thing. One thing that resonated above though was the the "two much perfume." There are a couple of dancers that I'm a semi-regular of, that I will often skip dances with b/c I view their perfume as too much of a risk on that particular night.

50% middle class.

I'll echo the other comments about numerical rating dancer looks without other context. I don't know that your tastes align with mine, where you anchor your scale, etc etc.

Great review. My last visit here was a month and a half ago, but they had 6 spinners that night. I had dances with three of them and they were all very good. The lineup here is currently strong.

It is pretty clear he was making a statement about insurance companies killing their customers via denying service, but he also has some strong opinions on the insurance system in general.

It is kind of mind blowing that he planned out his escape so meticulously, and evaded capture for 5 days. However, he didn't ditch the gun and fake id somewhere along the way? Odd.

This place is moderately red neck and sketch as hell. The bouncer had one some sort of cosplay thing going with camo and a tactical vest. Hard pass.

@CCanwell. What do you mean by "shrink at $60?"

I've had a dance with Lucy before and she similarly overcharged me. I can't imagine that management isn't aware, but they don't seem to care.

For 30 minutes, the house takes $100 for 30 minutes and the dancer can set her own price. They basically all ask for $300 (bringing your total to $400). In practice, you can probably pay a lot less than that depending on how busy it is.

What do E, S, C, and E mean? Is that suppose to be related to their names or some sort of code for body type, etc?

So I have no idea what Preferred 411 is or whats involved with it, but based on what you wrote... It sounds like you are proposing that customers have to go through a background check before entering a strip club, and also that a record of their club visits and behavior is somehow logged for dancers to view? You don't see any reason why that might negatively impact demand?

^ I don't think creating new barriers to entry for your customer base is a good way to increase attendance.

My main clubbing region only has one club where per song dance prices and rooms aren't nominally set by the club. However, I encountered dancers trying to set their own prices one Monday evening at a club with fixed prices. It was quite odd: there were a lot of solo customers that were clearly there to buy dances, but they also seemed quite synced up in our refusal to pay above the posted $30/song. FWIW, this particular club has a local monopoly on two way contact dances within a 1 hour drive on Monday nights. I was actually impressed by how few dances the set-their-own-price girls were selling (1 between three of them in the 2 hours I was there). It's the sort of thing that we might joke about happening here, but customers were really holding the line. I'm dubious that what I observed was anything more than an outlier. However, management should hold the line on this as it impacts customer experience.

I don't think they will completely cease to exist, but I do worry about their future. First, Gen-Z has their own dynamics, and as they come into power at the local government level a subset of them may intensify the zoning war against clubs and direct local police to focus their gaze on clubs. The bigger concern I have is with competition. Normally, bad clubs will get less business, but the competitive process is that new clubs will replace them and some of those will be good clubs. My concern is that the bad clubs will fail, and all that will be left are the existing good clubs. Those clubs will no longer have to compete along the same dimensions, and will become bad clubs as well. I think the perception of the industry being in decline, increasingly expensive real estate, and hostile local governments are breaking the competitive landscape.

An area that will change under Trump is FBI, BATF, and DEA funding, priorities, and public communications. It is a bit hard to speculate how this will impact clubs (if at all). The new appointed prosecutors will all bring their own priorities. The other area of change that we'll see is more emboldened local police departments. We already have cases were police operate somewhat independently of the wishes of the city's elected officials & population. Police will be in a situation where they enjoy more legal protection. Given how large America is, it is probably safe to say that some departments will take it upon themselves to crack down on strip clubs and some will lessen the pressure. Of course, this is probably an on-going process of change anyway, but I suspect that it will be accelerated during Trump's term.

Do they let non Lust members tour it at the party?

nelly76, I largely agree. Though I personally prefer descriptions of dancers (as in how many spinners are working, any red heads, are they all enhanced, etc) as opposed to names. ROBs should be named. Eitherway, I think this is a useful review, and if the report on a price increase is accurate, then it is a valuable one too.

Comprehensive review. What's your take on other area clubs?

Sorry--I had meant that I thought dances were $25 here not $30. I thought the review was fine, but could have used more details on the dancers.

Is ONYX the one that doxxes their customers on IG?

I thought dances were 2/$60 here. If they've raised prices, there is even less reason to go here considering Golden Banana and Kittens both exist and have the same price per dance.

Good review. Is VIP a membership thing or did you earn it via loyalty?

Unless the town imposed it on them. If you look at the facebook for the new club in NH, the town pulled all sorts of crap with parking lot zoning to delay the opening of the club.

Perhaps this is by intent, but the maps feature is not working if you have location turned off in your browser.