Too much info?
Cravemybbc
Got a serious question, maybe more like a comment…
I see a trend of guys leaving reviews of SC’s and the girls that work them, using explicit detail! Not holding nothing back, no attempt at code, no using just enough info to decipher what’s being said about the ladies and the establishments.
Could this be contributing to crack downs on SC’s that are gems? Are we helping LE do their job by adding too much details, in reviews, of our VIP or ITC encounters?
We don't seriously think LE does not monitor this site right? Or that some LE have accounts, adding fake reviews or commenting on reviews to gain Intel???
Call me paranoid! But I’m reading reviews where guys are going into explicit details about their encounters! While I appreciate it, so I know where to go next lol, so does LE!
Wouldn't it make more sense to say just enough and say “dm me for more details” or let fellow mongers do the leg work of dm if they have questions!
I just feel careless reviews could be self sabotaging a rapidly evolving industry hell bent on destroying the Follies of the world!
Am I wrong? I’m man enough to admit if I’m wrong! I just don't want to keep losing these gems over the potential of careless maybe unintentional behavior.
Chime in!
I see a trend of guys leaving reviews of SC’s and the girls that work them, using explicit detail! Not holding nothing back, no attempt at code, no using just enough info to decipher what’s being said about the ladies and the establishments.
Could this be contributing to crack downs on SC’s that are gems? Are we helping LE do their job by adding too much details, in reviews, of our VIP or ITC encounters?
We don't seriously think LE does not monitor this site right? Or that some LE have accounts, adding fake reviews or commenting on reviews to gain Intel???
Call me paranoid! But I’m reading reviews where guys are going into explicit details about their encounters! While I appreciate it, so I know where to go next lol, so does LE!
Wouldn't it make more sense to say just enough and say “dm me for more details” or let fellow mongers do the leg work of dm if they have questions!
I just feel careless reviews could be self sabotaging a rapidly evolving industry hell bent on destroying the Follies of the world!
Am I wrong? I’m man enough to admit if I’m wrong! I just don't want to keep losing these gems over the potential of careless maybe unintentional behavior.
Chime in!
Comments
last commentThe codes are stupid, does anyone think cops don't know what Billy Joel and Frank Sinatra mean?
If someone comes on for the first time asking "so does Mercedes at Bada Bing suck dick?" we automatically assume they're either cops or a jealous bf/husband.
Connecting dancers by name to extras isn't good for us, the girl, the club, or the "hobby."
Those of us who have common sense exchange info over DMs.
- In clubs where extras are common but not legal, I think the important thing is: DO NOT OUT THE DANCER. That means her stage name, real name, or any other identifying information, like her tatoos. I think this is paramount.
- In jurisdictions where solicitation is legal or decriminalized, I welcome (and indeed am the producer of copious) explicit reviews. By this I mean Tijuana, FKKs, Pattaya, etc. In these cases, I still think it is important to avoid any identifying information for a dancer in a public review.
- I'm skeptical that using code words does anything to prevent LEO from cracking down. Like, Uncle Leo can figure out what "she sang a Billy Joel song then a Frank Sinatra song" means just as well as a PL can. I don't even think vagaries like "I left a satisfied customer" are helpful.
Bottom line is: Uncle Leo already knows whats up at extras clubs, and for whatever reason, has chosen to tolerate it in some jurisdictions. I think the more important concern, and this is true whether it's illegal or not, is to preserve the dancer's privacy and avoid identifying her in anyway.
There has been a huge increase in people using online-john codes in their reviews. Crap Iike $$ or 2$ or "I tipped $1.5". This is a bad thing, and it will attract even more LEO attention. Or perhaps those users are actually LEO themselves.
Second, even if local PDs/state vice units have chosen to tolerate certain clubs, being too explicit here can create news/constituent pressure in their communities that will force them to change their stance.
The “code” is and has always been moronic.
I once mentioned that fun girls in a certain club turned the lights off in VIP. Next time I went, they had installed light switch covers! (Not that that prevented me from enjoying a few bars of Piano Man with the lights on a few months later 🤣)
"I get it that Detroit Providence and Seattle have different customs so it’s a closer call that"
Detroit and Providence are smarter than that.
It's the Seattle dildos who are like "hurrr durrrr it's different here"
@pawg. Great point. I know of two clubs where after spending a lot of time and money I have personal knowledge on how the cameras work and how to avoid them. These are non extras clubs where I’ve enjoyed the most extra-ey of extras. NFW would I put it in a review or even in a PM because after spending all that time and money I don’t want to hip management to it and have them change it up. Enjoy it while I can as they eventually will change it up.
“Be honest. You can go into explicit detail of the private dances. Just be careful with names if you think it may get someone in trouble.”
To this I would add, not only names, but descriptions that easily identify a dancer. And trouble includes not only law enforcement, but also club management, boyfriends, and other dancers.
Putting a dancer's name with asterisks, like M*rc*d*s is not hiding her name, you might as well write it out at that point.
Best approach is to put the name and a vague description and keep it to PMs with people you trust.
Tying dancer names to specific illegal acts is deplorable,
But having said this, everything I’ve ever written on this site is made up. I’ve never even been inside a strip club. I just take info from other reviews and make up my own stories to get free VIP access.
I can assure you that club management checks sites like these. In addition so does LE, in certain towns cities and states.
All in all, some details in reviews should be kept to the vest! If fellow Mongers want more info, reach out via dm!
I’m not giving up all the details at some places I have visited outside of ATL. Why? Out of a city with maybe 5 or less functional SC’s the one I have managed to get high mileage in I’m not exposing openly because someone will ultimately ruin it for me lol.
All in all use caution, discretion especially when it comes to the ladies. Dont mess up a good thing!!!!
If you don’t tie a readily identifiable dancer to extras (which is creepy anyway) you’re also not giving management much to work with, although I agree it is poor judgment to blab about extras at a club with a squeaky clean reputation. At other clubs, management has little incentive to mess with their earners
How do we know it isn't the cause of what caused the new municipality to go after Follies?
I maintain that the threat of this site isn't that LE will figure out which clubs offer extras, but rather that it will be used by aggrieved wives/girlfriends, SWERFs, religious fanatics as a way to make it impossible for local LE to ignore.
When a town/city wants a club shutdown they will use any tool available (look at what just happened in ABQ, New Mexico or Tollington, CT). It is probably easier to bust the club on alcohol, food prep, immigration, noise ordinance or labor violations than for prostitution.
Since I'm not an extras customer, I'm not overly concerned about clubs going from extras to clean. However, my libertarian streak doesn't want that for the rest of you (or the dancers that want to earn money that way), and as a capitalist I want more competition, which means good clubs staying open.
Customers talking about mechanics getting roses for frank sinatra at the coffee shop wont impede them lulz