Too much info?
Cravemybbc
North Carolina
Got a serious question, maybe more like a comment…
I see a trend of guys leaving reviews of SC’s and the girls that work them, using explicit detail! Not holding nothing back, no attempt at code, no using just enough info to decipher what’s being said about the ladies and the establishments.
Could this be contributing to crack downs on SC’s that are gems? Are we helping LE do their job by adding too much details, in reviews, of our VIP or ITC encounters?
We don't seriously think LE does not monitor this site right? Or that some LE have accounts, adding fake reviews or commenting on reviews to gain Intel???
Call me paranoid! But I’m reading reviews where guys are going into explicit details about their encounters! While I appreciate it, so I know where to go next lol, so does LE!
Wouldn't it make more sense to say just enough and say “dm me for more details” or let fellow mongers do the leg work of dm if they have questions!
I just feel careless reviews could be self sabotaging a rapidly evolving industry hell bent on destroying the Follies of the world!
Am I wrong? I’m man enough to admit if I’m wrong! I just don't want to keep losing these gems over the potential of careless maybe unintentional behavior.
Chime in!
I see a trend of guys leaving reviews of SC’s and the girls that work them, using explicit detail! Not holding nothing back, no attempt at code, no using just enough info to decipher what’s being said about the ladies and the establishments.
Could this be contributing to crack downs on SC’s that are gems? Are we helping LE do their job by adding too much details, in reviews, of our VIP or ITC encounters?
We don't seriously think LE does not monitor this site right? Or that some LE have accounts, adding fake reviews or commenting on reviews to gain Intel???
Call me paranoid! But I’m reading reviews where guys are going into explicit details about their encounters! While I appreciate it, so I know where to go next lol, so does LE!
Wouldn't it make more sense to say just enough and say “dm me for more details” or let fellow mongers do the leg work of dm if they have questions!
I just feel careless reviews could be self sabotaging a rapidly evolving industry hell bent on destroying the Follies of the world!
Am I wrong? I’m man enough to admit if I’m wrong! I just don't want to keep losing these gems over the potential of careless maybe unintentional behavior.
Chime in!
16 comments
The codes are stupid, does anyone think cops don't know what Billy Joel and Frank Sinatra mean?
If someone comes on for the first time asking "so does Mercedes at Bada Bing suck dick?" we automatically assume they're either cops or a jealous bf/husband.
Connecting dancers by name to extras isn't good for us, the girl, the club, or the "hobby."
Those of us who have common sense exchange info over DMs.
- In clubs where extras are common but not legal, I think the important thing is: DO NOT OUT THE DANCER. That means her stage name, real name, or any other identifying information, like her tatoos. I think this is paramount.
- In jurisdictions where solicitation is legal or decriminalized, I welcome (and indeed am the producer of copious) explicit reviews. By this I mean Tijuana, FKKs, Pattaya, etc. In these cases, I still think it is important to avoid any identifying information for a dancer in a public review.
- I'm skeptical that using code words does anything to prevent LEO from cracking down. Like, Uncle Leo can figure out what "she sang a Billy Joel song then a Frank Sinatra song" means just as well as a PL can. I don't even think vagaries like "I left a satisfied customer" are helpful.
Bottom line is: Uncle Leo already knows whats up at extras clubs, and for whatever reason, has chosen to tolerate it in some jurisdictions. I think the more important concern, and this is true whether it's illegal or not, is to preserve the dancer's privacy and avoid identifying her in anyway.
There has been a huge increase in people using online-john codes in their reviews. Crap Iike $$ or 2$ or "I tipped $1.5". This is a bad thing, and it will attract even more LEO attention. Or perhaps those users are actually LEO themselves.
Second, even if local PDs/state vice units have chosen to tolerate certain clubs, being too explicit here can create news/constituent pressure in their communities that will force them to change their stance.
The “code” is and has always been moronic.
I once mentioned that fun girls in a certain club turned the lights off in VIP. Next time I went, they had installed light switch covers! (Not that that prevented me from enjoying a few bars of Piano Man with the lights on a few months later 🤣)
"I get it that Detroit Providence and Seattle have different customs so it’s a closer call that"
Detroit and Providence are smarter than that.
It's the Seattle dildos who are like "hurrr durrrr it's different here"
@pawg. Great point. I know of two clubs where after spending a lot of time and money I have personal knowledge on how the cameras work and how to avoid them. These are non extras clubs where I’ve enjoyed the most extra-ey of extras. NFW would I put it in a review or even in a PM because after spending all that time and money I don’t want to hip management to it and have them change it up. Enjoy it while I can as they eventually will change it up.
“Be honest. You can go into explicit detail of the private dances. Just be careful with names if you think it may get someone in trouble.”
To this I would add, not only names, but descriptions that easily identify a dancer. And trouble includes not only law enforcement, but also club management, boyfriends, and other dancers.
Putting a dancer's name with asterisks, like M*rc*d*s is not hiding her name, you might as well write it out at that point.
Best approach is to put the name and a vague description and keep it to PMs with people you trust.
Tying dancer names to specific illegal acts is deplorable,