Comments by lolruned (page 11)

This is an interesting dilemma and I would have to say "no." You can pretty much tell who the reviewer is by writing style after a while. If you go out of your way to publish a reviewer's review (which you can't) and the actual content starts to not be up to par, then that's probably not meeting the honor code. If you just happen to stumble upon that review, I'd say just treat it like any other review and publish it if it meets the minimum standard

I recently just had the same review to one SC published twice. Perhaps we are starting to see some flaws with the new system

I've rejected a couple due to having very little actual content and/or being a review that could basically describe any other SC

"Also, I just realized that I have no way to access the unpublished reviews other than through this thread." Daily Reviews --> Help us out and publish some Unpublished Reviews

"I don't mind helping out the site, but it's annoying having to click Yes, it's a valid review and then a reason why (because the review is acceptable)." I'm confused by this. Nobody is forcing you to check the unpublished reviews

Anything too short, has very little actual information, or is too filler-esque

I am skeptical over troll accounts that will try to screw over some of our members from ever getting their reviews published (even when it's a high quality review)

I'm glad you listened to some of our feedback and implemented a new feature. Can't say how smoothly this feature will work out but I look forward to the honor system

founder's going to have to keep a sharp eye on new activity if we want TUSCL up and running

What is mileage and extras?

"As far as review quality goes, that's where the comments and trusts functions can have their influence. I would hope there wouldn't be a review proctor grading the content that goes into a review. Way too subjective." I don't think founder has the kind of time to assess each and every review as reaching a certain standard (whatever that standard is). I don't see anything wrong with this, though. There are TA's in college and their grading can be subjective. If we are in serious talks of increasing the standard of reviews (which I believe we are), then I would have no objection to having a small team of review moderators to help founder

I think you could ban that user who sent that PM to you. What a disrespectful comment to make

I think the standards for reviews needs to be elevated. I've read too many reviews that read like a "give me VIP" short paragraph. I also think that that it wouldn't hurt to have a template embedded into the text. I've created my own template that I am currently using as of March 28 (and will be editing over time). Aside from that, we need a restriction on when you can write another review for the same SC. If I wanted to, I could really damage a SC's score here on TUSCL. I think we should also look into an ABC-system of rating. I think you're a bit limited with a 1-10-system of rating

"Thx, not sure how I’ve been tenacious but okaaaaay....." I think I've seen you post a couple other imgur albums other than this one. I would definitely consider that persistence as tenacious. Getting a PLs attention is admirable

"Nice pic, but no idea why ppl are going nutzo over it." You're saying this on TUSCL's discussion board where there are men, in general, who act like children in a candy store. Perhaps the children are more well-behaved. These are the responses I expected. I do appreciate OP's tenacity, though

I'll miss all of the posts, reviews, and discussions that boost my IQ

I'll miss all of the posts, reviews, and discussions that boost my IQ

^ Yes, there are many jobs that pay under the table (i.e minimum wage)

^ It is possible she had some predisposed traits and dancing only enabled those traits to take over. It's not like dancing --> you will be addicted to drugs. Just because you go to college doesn't make you "normal." There are many abnormal people in college

"Lolruned - you make a reasonable point. I’m not sure of his wife’s age. However, considering the potential earning power of a 40 something dancer - who doesn’t do anything outside of stage dances - a try at modeling could be more profitable." You need to get into modeling at a younger age typically. A lot of these women are recruited by modeling agencies in high school. There is little to no chance she would be able to break into modeling with zero experience as a mid 30s+ woman. Unless she has superior connections and/or money to burn, maybe she could get into local modeling. It is far more reasonable for her to break into instagram and maybe get a following. Modeling is super competitive and you cannot just be an attractive person to succeed

"Ok. I’ve got the solution for you. Your wife should stay away from stripping. If she’s got the height and looks - she should do runway modeling. It gets her on somewhat of a stage - makes her the center of attention - it doesn’t allow for guys to grope her. It pays very good money too. Problem solved. Your welcome." I'm assuming his wife is probably in her 40s. How exactly is she going to get into modeling at such an advanced age?

I don't think there's anything inherently wrong with being "abnormal." If you can strike a healthy balance between normal and abnormal, I think you have a pretty solid person

None to very few dancers I have encountered seem normal and I consider my conversational skills to be strong

^ Perhaps the business is a front for something else

I used to tip dancers a dollar or so when they came around to me. I think TUSCL would generally tell you to only spend money on LD, VIP, and drinks. Think of the time spent talking as their time investment in keeping you as a regular. I also thought it was interesting that you said "stripper friends." There's no friends in SCing. You're the customer and she's the dancer. She might like you more than the next customer but that doesn't make you guys friends