Review Publish Feature
founder
slip a dollar in her g-string for me
Help us out... publish some reviews...
https://www.tuscl.net/up-reviews.php
this is for VIP members only.
https://www.tuscl.net/up-reviews.php
this is for VIP members only.
Got something to say?
Start your own discussion
94 comments
Is this going to be everyday?
Enjoy the power.
Keep in mind that the review author will see your comments and your nickname. Try to be civil.
I think it was Dolfan whom suggested a "like" type feature.
I think reviews should be published but have a "thumbs up" "thumbs down" type feature or similar to Amazon have a "was this review helpful" - VIP should be withheld for maybe 48 hours from posting to give the community a chance to view and vote
In any case, this seems like a good feature.
Daily Reviews --> Help us out and publish some Unpublished Reviews
Will be interesting to see how this experiment works out. Especially whether the voting members get any hate PMs if they downvote a review.
Plus it takes him out of the loop so it isn't a time suck for him and he doesn't have to hear our complaints.
Win-Win
For me, the review should describe the club, the entertainers and the customer experience in sufficient detail that I would know what to expect. Also, it should NOT link specific dancer names with specific activities that could get the dancer (or the club) in trouble.
Will all reviews require to be voted-on/vetted?
Also don't think it's a good idea for the vetter's name to appear in order to avoid a back and forth flame war.
And it's you're.
If the same members are downvoting valid reviews just because, they won't be hard to spot. Maybe there will be a way to revoke the vote privilege for those who abuse it. When I took a look yesterday I only voted for one to test the feature, but all if them looked ok. Didn't see the two line one that got mentioned.
Estafador, your reviews will eventually be acted upon, even if you think no one will read them.
I have been analyzing the rejected reviews and comments. I think the comments to the author will greatly increase the quality of reviews.
Thanks again for helping out.
Founder said: "I'm going to let VIP members decide the fate of reviews and free VIP time." and "It's for VIPs only."
Does this mean that only the paid VIPs get the vote or all VIPs (paid and free 30-dayers)?
They are not shown one at a time.
Is the list any given user sees comprised of all the reviews not yet adjudicated, or is it just a random sample?
In the daily reviews I see a list of reviews and a separate option for vetting a review - I don't see how I can pick the specific review I wanna vet (when I click on "unpublished reviews" seems a random review comes up for vetting) - i.e. by vetting a specific review I wanna read I'm killing two birds with one stone and this provides higher vetting participation, IMO.
"Don't like the format for reviewing - it needs to list all the reviews that require vetting - I don't wanna be reading/vetting reviews that don't interest me. List of reviews needing vetting should be shown in short and long formats"
"Is there a way that a vetter can pick which reviews to vet"
"I don't see how I can pick the specific review I wanna vet (when I click on "unpublished reviews" seems a random review comes up for vetting)"
Do you ever stop complaining?
People upload reviews. They all now get temporarily shown via a link at the top of the page that only VIP members can see and the typed reviews don't show who the submitter is or the 10 star rating system. Once the text contents of a review receives a certain amount of positive or negative votes (I'm guessing the number is 3), it is either permanently posted as a review with all the other star rankings and poster's name or it is scrubbed from the system.
As such, reviews that are permanently approved by the community will be published throughout the day instead of the usual way which was a wave of reviews getting published 3 or 4 times a day.
I guess I deserved to be patronized this time
Also, just curious. Do you plan to re-review the ones reject?
And, could we get the feedback on any no votes even if the review is published? Maybe the yes votes too. Or put them in as the first comments maybe? Just thinking it may be useful to know if I got two complaints about some shitty aspect of my reviews even though they were still deemed "good enough" by others.
Perhaps scrub would be disappointed that the rejected reviewer would get only an email of the rejection and scrub is deprived of the opportunity to publicly shame the reviewer.
Founder, a suggestion if i may. Can you make it so we dont have to fill in the "why or why not" if i pick yes? I can only think of so many different reasons why it should be published.
On smartphones, the yes/no text-box is too small and seems one can't scroll back to check for typos.