discussion comment
5 years ago
![]()
AtAboyStill learning to proofread
"...he didn’t like to go to a club and get all hot and bothered when he had no sexual outlet. "
____
That's also how I look at it and there's not much value beyond going for OTC. Also don't like the backdrop of drugs, alcohol, crime, abuse that we talk about. Beyond that just harmless fun.
discussion comment
5 years ago
@Dugan wrote: " I also have zero interest in an SD arrangement as it is too ambiguous and the ROI is just not there. when you factor in extra lump sums for one-off emergencies."
___________________
Everyone has there own definition of what a sugaring arrangement amounts to. For example, I don't give any money for one-off emergencies, I've never gone shopping, and I've never taken a girl on an international trip. I'm pretty generous with cash, though. My definition is any kind of long-term paid arrangement where there's at least something beyond having sex -- and you still enjoy hanging out after the sex (as @Subra put it).
Example of SB/SD arrangement: @JohnSmith meeting an 18-yr-old in a strip club, $1000 per meet, going on shopping trips, and international travel, stretching on for several months.
Example of what is not a sugaring arrangement: @Warrior meeting a 19-yr-old on SA, fucking her in the ass, and dumping after the 2nd date.
The ROI *is* there if you find the right girl, she's sane, responsible, intelligent, very attractive, you're both tested, and enjoy each other's company. That's my opinion; it doesn't coincide with the average stripclub monger.
If I had a nice date like the @OP and she asked me for car money the next day, I would respond in some way that shows I have a spine and don't want to be treated like an ATM. Being treated like an ATM is *not* the same as being an SD -- and that's precisely what @Dugan is implying.
discussion comment
5 years ago
Pseudoscience.
discussion comment
5 years ago
Okay, I'll bite @Warrior.
If you've noticed @Warrior, I haven't started a thread since 2015 whereas this thread is essentially a troll. For example you stated "anyone making more than $20,000 per year will pay a 90% tax rate." I tried to counter with the actual numbers from Warren which is 2% on wealth above $50M. And I also pointed out that the GOP corporate tax cut was a huge free-giveaway to a certain subset of the population and raises the deficit significantly. I think that makes *you* the jackass for starting a troll thread and ignoring the actual facts
Are you talking about @Mark94's plagiarism? Joe Biden was caught plagiarizing two of campaign speeches and it's evidence of a sloppy, unoriginal, mind. Something to consider from a pres candidate. Catching someone like @Mark plagiarizing on site like this is just comical. Lol!
And then there's your earlier thread making fun of Earth Day. You're a guy with kids doing his part to destroy the planet for your kids and grand kids. That makes you a jackass in my opinion.
In any event @Warrior, this is typical thread where I try to stay objective with facts and figures and you resort to name calling.
discussion comment
5 years ago
"Tell her you are happy to help her but you think advancing her money will confuse the situation. "
_____
Disagree slightly. I would just give a simple "no" to establish boundaries.
discussion comment
5 years ago
"She is testing you."
______
+1
discussion comment
5 years ago
With all respect @Daddillac, I think you have this backwards:
@Dugan is terrified of admitting any form of weakness or self-doubt because he perceives any form of introspection as unmasculine. @DC is the exact opposite. He's gripped by uncertainty and self-doubt, especially about about his ability to attract the opposite sex.
If @Dugan were @DC's father, @DC would be persecuted non-stop for being weak and effeminate.
discussion comment
5 years ago
...the Friedman article also appeared on July 14 on his Twitter feed.
discussion comment
5 years ago
Quote from @Mark94 on TUSCL July 14, 2019
https://www.tuscl.net/discussion.php?id=67847
"Just nominate a decent, sane person, one committed to reunifying the country and creating more good jobs."
Thomas Friedman, NY Times JUly 16,2019:
https://www.nytimes.com/2019/07/16/opinion/trump-2020.html
"
Just nominate a decent, sane person, one committed to reunifying the country and creating more good jobs"
LOL! Striking similarity?
Just a bit of advice @Mark94: If you're going to plagiarize someone in the media to sound impressive on a stripclub site, try to pick someone more obscure than someone who's won the Pulizer three times.
discussion comment
5 years ago
"The good news for Trump is that the progressive wing of the party would never support an officer who proudly serves in the military."
-------
Lol!
Plagiarized any more articles from the NY Times @Mark94? You would make a lot more sense.
Trump is the bone-spur president who dodged the draft. Buttigieg (sp?) , one of the dem candidates, is a Rhodes Scholar and served in Afganistan. He happens to be openly gay.
discussion comment
5 years ago
Lol
Btw, welcome back
discussion comment
5 years ago
I thought you said he didn't give a shit about your problems? Which is not quite the same as being a pathological liar?
He sucks. Who cares
discussion comment
5 years ago
^^^ Not quite. He doesn't give a shit about being a pathological liar:
https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/2019/04/29/president-trump-has-made-more-than-false-or-misleading-claims/
10,000 false or misleading claims as of late May 2019. He's a chronic bullshitter and he doesn't care
discussion comment
5 years ago
Sounds like she enjoys your company and $500 is a good deal in most parts of the country. I've only done overnights a handful of times and doesn't work for me. I don't get any sleep because of the sexual tension and I'm afraid of snoring or something.
You said you don't want to be a SD -- but any long-term paid arrangement fits my definition.
discussion comment
5 years ago
"Randommember, do you have any kids? "
____________
Yes, @Meathead, I have two kids -- but they probably wouldn't have anything in common with your low-IQ kids. So maybe they can play with someone else. The point I was making above is that with enough climate-deniers like yourself, the planet is doomed. There are predictions that Colorado will have a climate more like Tx in the next 20 yrs and with droughts and fires. In the next 40 yrs we'll probably have cataclysmic climate change.
I thought Sanders, and especially Warren, were terrific last night. But both are too far to the left. Going for single-payer healthcare, decriminalizing border-crossing, and giving healthcare to those seeking asylum is a sure way to lose the election. I'll vote for Biden. Hopefully he'll surround himself with competent people even though he's a feeble and senile.
discussion comment
5 years ago
I think he should have written a 3000-word essay exploring the socioeconomic factors that led to the club closure.
What a parasite...
discussion comment
5 years ago
^^^ there are about 10 different plans that all come under the banner of "Medicare for all." Hopefully the differences will be hashed out.
discussion comment
5 years ago
You make a good point, @Papi, and you don't want to tax so much that you reduce incentives to create the next Google, Apple, Amazon, Microsoft, ... etc. The question is would you still have companies like that if we had a new wealth tax that starts at $50M and 2%? There's a lot of academic research that says yes -- but academic research is no substitute for actually implementing a wealth tax. We're talking about a tax on 75,000 people in a country of 325,000,000.
At least someone like Warren spells out where the money is coming from. Sanders is just in dreamlike haze.
Healthcare? That's by far the most important issue to me. With some incremental changes we can have something like the ACA that preserves the best features of capitalism and the private insurance market. That does require taxes. I don't want a society where a hard-working professional can go bankrupt because he's unlucky enough to get a serious illness. I agree that governments can be inefficient -- but there are some areas, like healthcare and financial regulation, where the government must play a role.
discussion comment
5 years ago
@Papi wrote: "That's where it starts...blah, blah, blah..."
_______________
You should try to keep an open mind, @Papi. There's a lot of wealth concentrated in the top 0.1%.
Keep in mind this is wealth tax and not an income tax. There's enough money taxing wealth of the top 0.1% at 2% to fund proposals like forgiving college debt, universal child care, college tuition, etc.. The issue is not whether there is enough money; the issue is whether taxing wealth is constitutional and whether it can accomplished in a practical sense. It's not Warren's idea -- it was proposed by two superstar economists. I'm personally not in favor of things like free college tuition.
It's exhausting trying to stay rational these days with over-emotional goofs like the OP. It's gotten to the point where couples should think twice before bringing children into the world where enough nutcases still deny the existence of climate change.
And my take on the Dem candidates is that some of them are too old. That would include Warren, Biden, and Sanders. After watching Mueller testify I really don't want a president in their 70s. Biden, in particular, looked senile in the first debate.
discussion comment
5 years ago
@Warrior: "Anyone making more than $20,000 per year will pay a 90% tax rate."
____________________________
I guess this is what passes for humor around here. Liz Warren has no chance of getting elected, but her proposal is a radical wealth tax on wealth *over* $50M at 2%.
discussion comment
5 years ago
You're a shallow little guy, @Warrior. Please don't have an aneurysm..
Biggest problem with your argument is that the Trump corporate tax cut adds $1.9T to the deficit over a decade and it was just reported that the deficit is over $1T just this year. Most of the tax cut went into stock buybacks -- so it amounted to "free-stuff" for stock holders and especially those who are paid in company stock. If Trump wins, the deficit will be used as an excuse to cut entitlements for people who need it.
discussion comment
5 years ago
![]()
gothamytefrom that Adam Westsiiiide of Gotham
Just once and with a stripper. I told her I would send a copy of my vasectomy surgical notes -- and that was the end of it.
If you get snipped, I highly recommend saving a copy of the surgical notes.
discussion comment
5 years ago
![]()
Papi_ChuloMiami, FL (or the nearest big-booty club)
Warren at her best? I would have picked this clip where she questions Well's CEO Stumpf and rips him a new asshole:
https://youtu.be/iCLIyXpV5K0
Lol! I remember when Wells Fargo opened a line of credit for me without asking.
discussion comment
5 years ago
I don't have the strength or knowledge to help someone like that. Plus the fact that I'm paying for entertainment. I wouldn't even consider getting involved.
discussion comment
5 years ago
I have pictures from about 8 SBs over the past 4 yrs arranged in photo albums on my hobby phone. All of them are PG-rated and not nudes.
Current SB is 21, has long-blonde silky hair, and models swimwear. She's only 110 lbs but has amazing curves, wonderful definition in stomach muscles, and 10/10 ass. She sends professional swimwear modeling shots occasionally and these are gigs she gets off of Instagram. Pictures are PG, but fantastic.
Other stories:
Stripper I was seeing about five years ago sent a close-up video of herself masturbating. I remember it being more raunchy and sad than erotic.
And there was this other young gorgeous redhead on SA who somehow managed to get past the screening process and posted a topless picture on the website. She then sent other topless photos to my phone (unsolicited). Of course I wanted to meet her, but she kept making excuses and and I never did get to meet her. I guess she enjoyed screwing with my mind or she was just in it for the attention.