discussion comment
5 years ago
![]()
CJKent (Banned)“The more a person needs to be right, the less certain he is...”
Pity or pithy?
My reaction? Poor white voters in rural America are dying early in record numbers. Yet they voted for Trump and policies that will make their lives worse ( losing Medicaid expansion, losing entitlements because the tax cut increased the deficit). Voting to create and extend their own poverty.
discussion comment
5 years ago
^^ Yes you made a bunch of valid points. However I'm telling you the reality that the vast majority of these girls are not looking for pump-and-dump sex.
discussion comment
5 years ago
"I am avoiding the girls that say Plutonic"
____________
Me, too, since the "Plutonic" crowd is generally illiterate. LOL, what a clown, @Warrior.
discussion comment
5 years ago
"Specifically, his lack of knowledge about the contents of the report "
_______________
I think Mueller is a great man and he's sliding into a cognitive decline. It's not that he lacks interest, but that he lacked the stamina for this job. I'm guessing that people under him did a lot of the work.
I didn't read the Mueller report, but my best guess is: (1) The Russians hacked into the Clinton campaign and offered the information to Trump (2) Trump welcomed the dirt on Clinton and failed to tell the FBI and (3) Trump lied and did is best to cover it up.
Whether or not that's impeachable, I don't know. If Obama had done the same thing, there would have been an uproar.
discussion comment
5 years ago
"anyone claiming their way is better is talking out of their ass or have an agenda "
________________
Are you listening @Papi?
Outside of the Backpage girls who've transplanted to SA, *all* of the girls are looking for an arrangement. Not some middle-age guy sleeping with eight girls in two months, and bragging about having them choke on his dick and having anal sex. And getting dumped on the next date. It would be amusing to have @Warrior post this on one of the sugaring sites and witness the girls ripping him a new asshole. LOL!
I'm not saying that @Warrior is committing a crime; but he's just one example of 10-thousand guys the girls complain about. What he's really looking for is a cheap hooker.
Did you get that @Papi? It's based on 4 years experience and reading real-life experiences of a multitude of girls.
discussion comment
5 years ago
I've always thought you would do very well, @Jack, and it has nothing to do with your photos or age. Tell them a few jokes and take them on one of your overseas trips.
discussion comment
5 years ago
Final comment @Warrior: I'm sure every young girl dreams of having anal sex with some middle-aged guy and getting dumped before the 3rd date. We should should send you post into SA marketing.
discussion comment
5 years ago
OTC
discussion comment
5 years ago
"They want a long term arrangement."
____________________
Duh.
That's why it's called "Seeking Arrangement" and not "Backpage." I think there's more overlap in attitude b/w ITC and going online. Just far more choices and you eliminate the "friction" of a brick-and-mortar establishment.
I have this 21-yr-old blonde instagram model I've been seeing for a year come August. She stood me up at the meet&greet.
discussion comment
5 years ago
I'm also into young (college age, not Jeff Epstein-ish), skinny, and pretty.
The OP describes some other things that are a plus to me: having career goals outside of stripping and going to grad school is interesting to me. I would go to tip rail and find out what you're studying and what kind of career goals you have. Usually it's easier to find this kind of girl online -- but this thread proves it's also possible in a strip club.
Being able to do pole-tricks on stage isn't something I care about.
discussion comment
5 years ago
Mueller's performance was pretty sad considering the fact that he's testified something like 90 times, he's educated at some of the best schools, and he has a sterling reputation as war hero. Only watched the first 15 minutes and I could tell this was going to be a waste of time. He kept asking for the questions to be repeated (like some geriatric dude, hard of hearing) and he didn't seem to understand his own report sometimes.
I've seen older clips of Mueller when he was younger and he was much sharper. The years haven't been kind to this guy, but I still respect him. But it's a big win for Trump and the GOP. Time to move on.
discussion comment
5 years ago
Mueller does seem out of it. So far he's added nothing.
discussion comment
5 years ago
Until you get that gold-plated toilet to shit in, @Reverend, I don't consider you all that rich.
discussion comment
5 years ago
leveraged*
discussion comment
5 years ago
Ordinary citizens who took on too much debt went bankrupt. Taxpayers were forced to bail out Wall Street firms that were levered about 35-to-1 and participated in massive fraud. They were allowed to walk away from the crisis with fortunes. I've read about five books on the financial crisis, @SkiBirther. Most recent is the short book by Bernanke, Geitner, and Paulson. You should read it instead of talking out of your ass.
Harvard claims that Warren didn't get the benefit of affirmative action. Even if she did, I personally forgive her and think she's an intelligent woman. Seems like all of these candidates have skeletons of one form or another.
discussion comment
5 years ago
Rich people who are obsessed with status possessions, who don't read and who don't have a social conscious, are somewhere between boring and repulsive.
Americans are obsessed with wealth and the word "success" really means "wealthy" in the mind of most Americans. How else can you explain why Jeff Epstein -- a pedophile and college-dropout -- was able to mingle with the social elite? Because he owned expensive "stuff." Also partially explains why an ignorant bigot and misogynist like Trump was elected.
I personally associate "success" with those who climb to the top of their profession -- whether it be medicine, physics, English literature, or sociology. Particularly admire academics and, for example, admire top law professors far more than some rich ambulance-chaser or medical-malpractice hack.
Important example of what @CJ is referring to is the great recession of 2008. It was caused by Wall Street guys slicing and dicing dogshit mortgages into securities, getting them rated AAA, and selling them to unsuspecting, innocent, pension funds all over the world. When the shit began to fall, we were forced to bail out the investment banks on the back of the taxpayer. Because sometimes you have to rescue the arsonist to save teh whole burning theater. Liz Warren understands what happened better than any of the candidates and partially why I admire her. Only one minor Wall Street player went to jail and most other execs walked away with fortunes.
Anyway @Reverend you seem a little too obsessed with material wealth and the OP is a little cringeworthy.
discussion comment
5 years ago
This is a serious discussion board where middle-aged guys brag about paying strippers for sex. We don't have time for this kind of frivolous trolling.
Faggot
discussion comment
5 years ago
Asian SB this summer, but she's leaving for California soon. Second smallest I've ever been with and I'm careful to either let her ride on top or I proceed with care so i don't punch a hole in her cervix.
I had this Napalese girl a few years ago who should be in Guinness Book World records for smallest vagina. South Asian. Guarantee she will need a C-section if she ever has kids.
Agree with the anecdotal evidence.
discussion comment
5 years ago
![]()
Papi_ChuloMiami, FL (or the nearest big-booty club)
Looks something like an Acura NSX, which I like. Might turn other people off.
discussion comment
5 years ago
*movie
discussion comment
5 years ago
So it's a moving about greedy, unscrupulous, scum who care only about getting your money.
...and the movie has strippers, too.
discussion comment
5 years ago
![]()
IceyI put your ATF on a winning team
Here's the article that @SkiBirther is referencing for anyone reading:
https://www.nytimes.com/2018/11/02/upshot/republicans-pre-existing-conditions-.html
Of course, there's a reason @SkiBirther didn't post the link himself. The purpose of the article was to show that GOP plans do *not* protect those with preexisting conditions if you care to study the details. Example from the article:
"Had this bill become law, the precise results would have depended on the choices by individual states. But the Congressional Budget Office estimated that nearly half of all Americans lived in a state that would have pursued such a waiver from standard benefits. The consequences, the C.B.O. said, would have been coverage that was unaffordable to many with pre-existing illnesses, along with holes in coverage for many serious conditions. "
For the tenth time, protecting pre-existing conditions requires getting healthy people in the insurance pool and the only way to do that is with a system that resembles Obamacare or single-payer. THere is no competing GOP plan.
discussion comment
5 years ago
![]()
IceyI put your ATF on a winning team
This is the second time you've posted about some imaginary GOP plan to cover pre-existing conditions. If it exists, I challenge you to post a link.
If you would open your fucking ears, you would learn that it's impossible to cover pre-existing conditions without getting everyone -- sick healthy, rich and poor -- into the insurance pool.
...and you've admitted many times to buying into the birther conspiracy theory, along with the other high-school dropouts. So why take offense?
discussion comment
5 years ago
![]()
IceyI put your ATF on a winning team
And cite not site