discussion comment
3 years ago
You gotta get rud of that small dick energy.
discussion comment
3 years ago
Cash we can Eiffel Tower, juice can clean up
discussion comment
3 years ago
Well tard they are saying outright they are using propaganda, sure they have no credibility and haven't for a long time, but they need to stop calling themself news then. Nothing about sensibilities when they are just spewing lies to further a political agenda.
discussion comment
3 years ago
Again go fuck yoursel jimmy you lefty shill.
discussion comment
3 years ago
Yes let CNN tell you what to believe. Time to start removing these people from society.
discussion comment
3 years ago
https://www.zerohedge.com/political/we-were-creating-story-our-focus-was-get-trump-out-cnn-director-busted-undercover-veritas
A technical director for CNN made the grave error of sitting down with a (probably hot) undercover female journalist from Project Veritas, to whom he admitted that the network "got Trump out" with their coverage, and that he "100% believe(s) that if it wasn't for CNN, I don't know that Trump would have got voted out."
"I came to CNN because I wanted to be part of that," added the director, Charlie Chester.
He then explained how the network engaged in propaganda to 'create a story' about Trump vs. Biden.
"[Trump’s] hand was shaking or whatever, I think. We brought in so many medical people to tell a story that was all speculation -- that he was neurologically damaged, and he was losing it. He's unfit to -- you know, whatever. We were creating a story there that we didn't know anything about. That's what -- I think that’s propaganda," he said, adding "We would always show shots of him [Biden] jogging and that [he’s] healthy, you know, and him in aviator shades. Like you paint him as a young geriatric."
Watch:
Transcript below (via PV):
Veritas Journalist: “I guess I have a confession. I worry about Biden and his health, I guess.”
CNN Technical Director Charlie Chester: “Your news health?”
Veritas Journalist: “What? No, I said Biden, our president.”
Chester: “Oh, his health.”
Veritas Journalist: “I want to take care of him and make sure he's okay.”
Chester: “He is definitely -- the whole thing of him running during the entire -- like run for the campaign. Showing him jogging is obviously deflection of his age and they're [CNN] trying to make it like, ‘Oh, I'm healthy.’”
Veritas Journalist: “Is that what we did? I don't know. Like what do you mean?”
Chester: “We would always show shots of him [Biden] jogging and that [he’s] healthy, you know, and him in aviator shades. Like you paint him as a young geriatric.”
Chester went on to say that COVID-19 media coverage should be coming to an end in the near future. He added that CNN is already preparing its shift in coverage to push and promote climate change fear.
“I think there's a COVID fatigue. So, like whenever a new story comes up, they're [CNN’s] going to latch onto it. They've already announced in our office that once the public is -- will be open to it -- we're going to start focusing mainly on climate,” Chester said.
Chester: “It's going to be our [CNN’s] focus. Like our focus was to get Trump out of office, right? Without saying it, that's what it was, right? So, our next thing is going to be climate change awareness.”
Veritas Journalist: “What does that look like?”
Chester: “I don't know. I'm not sure. I have a feeling that it’s going to be like, constantly showing videos of decline in ice, and weather warming up, and like the effects it’s having on the economy--”
Veritas Journalist: “Who decides that?”
Chester: “Head of the network.”
Veritas Journalist: “Who is that? Is that [Jeff] Zucker?”
Chester: “Zucker, yeah. I imagine that he's got his council and they've all like, discussed, like where they think--”
Veritas Journalist: “So, that's like the next--”
Chester: “Pandemic-like story that we’ll beat to death, but that one's got longevity. You know what I mean? Like there's a definitive ending to the pandemic. It'll taper off to a point that it's not a problem anymore. Climate change can take years, so they'll [CNN will] probably be able to milk that quite a bit.”
Veritas Journalist: “So, climate change overload.”
Chester: “Be prepared, it's coming. Climate change is going to be the next COVID thing for CNN.”
…
Veritas Journalist: “You think it's going to be just like -- a lot of like, fear for the climate?”
Chester: “Yeah. Fear sells.”
discussion comment
3 years ago
Maybe you should hit it from behind.
discussion comment
3 years ago
![]()
shailynnThey never tell you what you need to know.
The collapse and civil war 2.0 , lets just get to it, why delay the inevitable.
discussion comment
3 years ago
Fuck you Jackie
discussion comment
3 years ago
Make sure to wear two or six of them.
discussion comment
3 years ago
I'm sure that GA counties failing to provide the required legal chain of custody for over 400k mail in ballots has nothing to do with it. Or the blatantly corrupt SOS doing everything he can to obstruct investigations into the tons of "irregularaties", or changing election laws without the State Legislature who is the group lawfully required for election law changes.
discussion comment
3 years ago
@mistorange they can call it an insurrection as much as they want, same way Democrats Men can call themself men just words that don't mean anything. Yeah those darn "insurretionists" who were let in by the capitol police walked around and took pictures.
https://townhall.com/columnists/kurtschlichter/2021/02/11/stop-calling-it-an-insurrection-n2584502
So, I was out at dinner with my old battalion commander – literally outside, because dining inside apparently is super deadly if you live under blue tyranny – and we were laughing at this whole “Muh Insurrekshun” nonsense. What happened January 6 was no “insurrection” in any meaningful sense of the word, especially not to those who survived the riots of 2020, and not to us either. See, I was my old battalion commander’s assistant operations officer and I was riding with him in his HUMVEE driving through Los Angeles as it burned in April 1992.
That was a riot. What happened on Capitol Hill was a few dudes dressed like Conan the Fauxbarian acting like fools and occasionally fighting with the cops while a few hundred other dudes took selfies in the Rotunda.
We were in the 3rd Battalion, 160th Infantry, the first combat arms unit on the street during the LA Riot, a riot brought to you by Maxine Waters and other idiots, by the way. There was burning and looting and dozens we can say with absolute certainty were murdered by the LA rioters, unlike at the Capitol. It lasted for days. You wouldn’t know it from Rep. Stolen Cower, who seems to claim she suffered PTSD from being at the far end of the same ZIP code as the bruhaha, but what happened on January 6 was no “insurrection,” and Republicans need to stop playing along with the Establishment talking point that it was.
The idea of an “insurrection” is to delegitimize all resistance to the garbage Establishment’s reign of error, and to play along is to give credence to its lie and to empower its propaganda. You have done nothing wrong by rejecting the Establishment narrative. You have done nothing wrong by protesting what you see as a flawed election and a corrupt ruling class. You have a right to protest anything you want, and you don’t need their permission.
Dissent is patriotic. Or did that end when it became inconvenient?
They hype the happening because they want to make you afraid to speak up. They want to try to make it impossible for you to live in this society if you do not parrot the party line. They won’t say it that way. They will try to wrap themselves in the same flag they were calling a symbol of white supremacy last year to try to seize some sort of moral high ground and shut you up. Like they give a damn about the Constitution. This tiresome “insurrection” and “sedition” palaver is just a ham-handed attempt to turn 74 million Americans – almost none of whom wear Thor drag – into enemies of mom and apple pie, which is weird because they usually hate traditional family structures and non-kale foods.
This kind of baloney is par for the course for the Democrats. They’re going to call you an “insurrectionist” today and a “racist” tomorrow and some other hogwash after that, so who cares what they say? But what does grate are the Republicans who go along with this bogus framing, and it’s sometimes unclear how much of the reason is just the usual GOPe pol stupidity and how much is the usual GOPe contempt for the GOP base.
Yeah, we get that it was scary to have knuckleheads running rampant through the Capitol. Blame the knuckleheads. Don’t blame the other 74 million people who supported President Trump. And quit playing along with the ridiculous idea that January 6 was Fort Sumpter x 9/11 to the Pearl Harborth power.
It was not. This foaming-mouthed performative overreaction is all cynical performance art, and this goofy impeachment is just a senatorial Toobin Zoomin’.
Now, I also had the chance to see the wreckage of a real insurrection when I was in Kosovo with the Army after the fighting ended. An insurrection means ruins and mass graves, not some dude in a horn hat wandering around the House as a police officer asks him to chill. Don’t let them define insurrection down to mean “Anything conservatives do.”
Nor was this incident some sort of “attack on Our Democracy where our freedom hung on by a thread.” The drama queenery might play on MSNBCNN, but it just makes the base despise the Republican Party even more – which is hard – when that crap comes from our own people. You are not downplaying what actually happened by characterizing it accurately and without the kind of breathless exaggeration the Democrat demagogues delight in. The Democrats’ cat’s paws spent six months burning down the cities and this overwrought handwringing only draws attention to the discrepancy in elite caring between when the pols were vaguely threatened and when the proles were losing everything.
Recommended
'That's a Big Stretch': GOP Rep Feuds with CNN Anchor Over Election Laws
Cortney O'Brien
Did the GOPe call Jeb! to have him nominate a council of experienced losers to come up with the worst possible way to handle this situation? If they want a rebellion within the party heading into 2022, they should just keep it up, because the base is tired of them not having its collective back. Schumer and Pelosi are cackling right now. President * would be too, except "Matlock’s" on and he’s busy.
GOP pols, listen up. You are not defending the buffoons of January 6 by accurately characterizing their actions. Stop playing along with the false narrative that unjustly trashes your own people. Stop minimizing what happened in the murderous Democrat-abetted riots in LA in 1991 and throughout our country in 2020 by not just lumping this incident in with them but by pretending it was a zillion times worse.
Just stop.
discussion comment
3 years ago
So they are just making the whole city Hamsterdam from the Wire.
discussion comment
3 years ago
I'm passing on it being under 40 with virtually no chance of death, and working with actual pharmacists who aren't getting it i'm good. If it makes people comfortable getting it more power to them, and they can wear as many masks as they like.
discussion comment
3 years ago
Holy shit he is a bigger disaster even quicker than expected. Killing jobs by the thousands, his policy by design is causing a border crisis while locking down Americans and letting illegals flood in untested causing covid breakouts and ordering a media blackout. He got bitch slapped by Putin and the Chinese in an embarassing manner.has yet to do a single thing to improve the lives of Americans. Proves yet again the current Democrat parties only goal is destroying the US.
discussion comment
4 years ago
So I guess with your math we should just let people flow in unchecked by the bilions,how many should be allowed?
discussion comment
4 years ago
Your whole point is well maybe it one day they will pay more into the system but currently they do not and their is no measure that proves that. You can't even find any math to prove your point.
discussion comment
4 years ago
No you dumb cunt you proved nothing. Apart from actual cost, illegal immigration lowers wages, and adds extra burden on social services, law enforcement etc. It is a net cost not a net gain.
discussion comment
4 years ago
Call it hate math since you don't like, it or prove it wrong.
You are as always full of crap.
discussion comment
4 years ago
Listen Ricky before you get drunk and drive into a tree. You show the study and actual math that shows that Illegal Immigrants contribute more than they take out. You can't you won't.
discussion comment
4 years ago
Welfare State with open borders will never work, but this country is dead anyway.
discussion comment
4 years ago
ILLEGAL immigration costs is not hate but facts we all know those mean nothing to you so carry on. With these open borders and Beijing Joe picking up the tab for food stamps and healthcare for them we will be bankrupt soon enough. You can play the hate immigrants card all you want but it's bullshit like all your talking points.
discussion comment
4 years ago
You should also hand in your testicles if they haven't withered away or fallen off, no grown man uses emoticons.
discussion comment
4 years ago
There are many studies and articles showing ILLEGAL immigration is a net loss. You will never admit you are wrong as you never have ever, and are often wrong. So keep living in your head where you are always right.
discussion comment
4 years ago
Good old Rick living with his head up his ass.