wld4tatas
New Jersey
Comments by wld4tatas (page 22)
review comment
2 years ago
itsme44444
New Jersey
Agreed, concise review with valuable intel.
discussion comment
2 years ago
Papi_Chulo
Miami, FL (or the nearest big-booty club)
Useful
Agree with georgmicrodong, it's most useful if there are other details in the review.
discussion comment
2 years ago
Cookiesandcream
I read the review in question - Cheetah Pompano by Cookiesandcream. He actually made a decent effort, word count of about 370 words, broken into sections Ladies / Staff / Club. It could have included a few more details, like drink and dance costs (though repeated in almost every review), or better yet a description and name of 1 or 2 of the dancers. But it definitely wasn't gibberish.
There's a lack of standardization on expectations / requirements for reviews here. I've read many reviews that seemed to add little more to previous reviews. It's partly because clubs that are well-reviewed already have covered all the pertinent details many times over. If I had to think of one element to emphasize to include, it would be to describe at least one dancer in detail - appearance, personality, quality of dance, etc.
discussion comment
2 years ago
Dave_Anderson
I think you have it backwards, it is the Russian people who are prevented from hearing and seeing both sides.
Feel free to post a link to an article you think best describes the Russian perspective and I'll have a look. I've probably already read some of it. But nothing can justify what Putin has done in Ukraine.
discussion comment
2 years ago
Jzan123
I imagine if you're new at a club and don't know another dancer who can fill you in, you'll probably have to earn some level of trust before other dancers will let on that extras happen. Maybe. In the meantime you can probably get a sense from the customers you dance for as well. If they never ask about it, or frequently do, there's a clue, especially if you can determine they are regulars.
discussion comment
2 years ago
Shortie44
Maryland
Rick is off on a couple details, that's for sure.
A minor point, but LDKs are not always "premature". It's sometimes the objective of the dancer, the customer, or both.
More important, LDKs do not always result in a wet spot. They might, they might not, especially in the immediate aftermath, when the guy signals the dancer can stop, and she does. Rick seems insistent on equating the two in every post, and then getting jizz on a dancer without her consent, but that's just not the case with all LDKs.
discussion comment
2 years ago
Shortie44
Maryland
Another lovely, lively thread on TUSCL.
There have been threads on LDK before, but this one has a twist. My take is the dancer intentionally tried to get you off quick to earn her $$$ in 5 minutes instead of 30. Then put you in your place with a comment about sexual assault when you questioned the time. Kind of aggressive on her part. She probably did that routine many times before. You didn't mention if there was a wet spot, which I'd agree is a key detail. I'd say chalk it up to experience and move on. You allowed her to finish you quick and should have known there was a chance she would end things after an LDK. Next time, negotiate up front that you want the full 30 minutes and to take things slow for the first 15-20.
discussion comment
2 years ago
shadowcat
Atlanta suburb
>the 7th floor was a strip club, and the rest were guest rooms. He said the club was full of 8-10s, and SOP was that every dancer was available to take up to your room.
Nice, this is definitely the type of UTR setup I love to find when travelling. I went to Kiev many years ago and didn't stumble on any place like this, but the language barrier was horrendous and made networking difficult. I did however make several visits to the famed River Palace, a large boat converted to a night club stationed on the Dnipro river. It wasn't a strip club, but it was full of working women with a bar, dance floor, etc. The quality was pretty high, 8-9s. I took several girls from that place back to my hotel in Kiev.
discussion comment
2 years ago
wallanon
>Would it make a difference if a dozen more people wrote? Maybe more?
Yes if someone were to collect and then post a list of say 50 names of established reviewers who all agree the troll in question should be banned, I would hope Founder would acknowledge it. Wallanon makes a good point about the site potentially attracting more dancers, so putting the troll on ignore is still not an ideal solution.
You got my vote.
discussion comment
2 years ago
dogchain
She only swallows on my birthday.
discussion comment
2 years ago
mark94
Arizona
Here's a check on who's paying what.
"In total aid (military, financial and humanitarian combined), the European Union and its countries have provided the most to Ukraine, whereas the United States has by far provided the most in military aid. The Kiel Institute has tracked €108.8 billion from 46 countries in financial, humanitarian, and military aid, from 24 January to 20 November 2022. Out of that €108.8 billion, €51.8 billion came from the European Union and €47.8 billion from the United States, with most of the remaining coming from the United Kingdom, Canada and Norway, and significant but smaller amounts from several other countries."
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_military_aid_to_Ukraine_during_the_Russo-Ukrainian_War
discussion comment
2 years ago
mark94
Arizona
That blogger is running on a grand total of one source to support his theory about the Nordstream pipeline. It's a quaint theory but ultimately unsubstantiated without evidence at this point, which explains why almost nobody is covering it. The real point Mark is you dishonestly presented it as fact, and I called you out on it.
review comment
2 years ago
Chaseme
50:50 chance she was pissed after, that she waited in line and then you only did one dance. That's how it goes though...
discussion comment
2 years ago
mark94
Arizona
It's Ukrainian territory. I didn't see Putin push for a UN supervised referendum, instead he lied that Russia was fighting Nazis and sought a military solution. It's a threat to Ukraine's democracy and our NATO allies see it as a potential future threat to theirs as well. Claiming that both parties in Washington just want more wars to support the military-industrial complex is nonsense.
discussion comment
2 years ago
mark94
Arizona
Russia was supporting the secession efforts of eastern Ukraine, which you conveniently omit. They held sham referendums last year. Sentiment has likely changed with the war, I think you need a more recent reference point than 2014.
discussion comment
2 years ago
gammanu95
You can unfriend me, unfollow me, and unlike me; but you cannot unlick my butthole
The idea that Dems would support Tulsi Gabbard is hilarious. She is denouncing the Democratic party all over the place.
discussion comment
2 years ago
mark94
Arizona
>five million Ukrainians have left the country, and another five million are Russian speakers who don't support the Zelensky government.
@docsavage the Ukrainians who left were women and children seeking refuge as their country was attacked. The only significant numbers of men leaving either country are the tens of thousands of men who fled Russia to avoid being drafted. I think you should provide a link to your claim that millions of Ukrainians don't support Zelensky.
discussion comment
2 years ago
mark94
Arizona
Mark is sinking to new lows lately. In a prior post he cited some blogger that suggested the US blew up the Nordstream pipeline, and now above he's stating it like documented fact, even though no credible news organization is running the story. I'm sure Putin is happy with him though. Putin is counting on people like Mark to divide the West to help him win.
discussion comment
2 years ago
mark94
Arizona
Excellent to see Biden visiting Ukraine and showing our continued strong support.
Biden makes surprise Ukraine visit, pledging more U.S. aid as war’s anniversary nears
https://www.latimes.com/world-nation/story/2023-02-20/biden-surprise-visit-ukraine
discussion comment
2 years ago
founder
slip a dollar in her g-string for me
A few comments.
- I agree with Champphilly, I like the old version. Many companies periodically do a makeover to refresh their image, and it's rarely better, and sometimes worse. I would like to know what's going to be better on TUSCL?
- If it's going to change - please keep the user stats (review count, club count, etc.). As noted above it's important for judging user credibility.
- I liked the option to have a background on your profile (had been considered adding one).
Thanks
discussion comment
2 years ago
gotoguy
Florida
Ha, add me to the list of those with OCD. I line up the presidents facing forwards (facing me) in my wallet, in order of denomination, large bills first. Most of the time not always. I usually carry between 300 and 1000 when going to a club. Mostly 20s and 100s, but I try to hang on to a few 5s and 10s as well.
discussion comment
2 years ago
TheeOSU
FUCK IT!
If these pico balloons are truly authorized to be there, then you have a point maybe the US owes them $12. I imagine there is going to be a review of regulations and policies covering these balloons now.
discussion comment
2 years ago
TheeOSU
FUCK IT!
Jim I didn't opine on whether the right decision was made by our military leaders (though I'm not going to second guess it at this point).
I said that right wingers would be screaming if the balloon was still up in the air. Which we all know is 100% true. They are out to politicize it, as usual.
discussion comment
2 years ago
mark94
Arizona
Try this one:
Number of people who have died from the Ohio rail accident: 0
Number of people who have died from guns in the same time frame: approx. 1600
discussion comment
2 years ago
mark94
Arizona
What Twitter feed did you copy and paste that bullshit from this time, Mark?