Comments by Hank Moody (page 14)

If they are cleaning your house, not only do they know where you live and your real name, but they also have or can make contact with your kids. NFW. It’s also pretty fucking creepy. Best leave this for a fantasy or porn hub search. (Unless she initiates. Still stupidly risky but at least it’s less creepy.)

^ Chris Rock said that on an HBO young comedians special when he was like 20. I think it was before New Jack City.

Who left (get it? “left”) the door open and let all the fun out of the room? For chrissakes the guy just asked for some recommendations.

Go to the Home page by clicking on the purple TUSCL at the top of the page. Link to Maps is there.

@muddy “I don't know about dancers getting free VIP. I mean how easy would it be for a dude to just fake that?” You’re mixing two different issues, whether dancers should get free VIP and abuse by dudes. You didn’t say what objection you had to dancers getting free VIP, if you had one. If Founder agrees it’s being abused and since it’s his free VIP that is being spent, he can bolster the vetting process. Otherwise, it’s not really for us to worry about IMO.

Not sure if Austin is too far but great food, music, brewpubs, bars and clubs.

She’s hot AF. Which is responsible for more boners, Viagra or Vergara? Probably the blue pill, but it’s close.

Pretty awesome = doubt I will return. Makes perfect sense.

You did a two girl dance and later regretted running through too much cash and said you wouldn’t go back, as if the club was the problem. Chicas is the cheapest place in Vegas. If you can’t control your cash there, it’s on you. What did I miss?

Ah. I knew there were comments from commenters I had on ignore. Makes sense now. And yeah, don’t follow someone around stages.

I suppose the commentary is still relevant but did we need to resurrect a thread from 2018?

You need to own that you’re responsible for running through too much cash. There isn’t a better bargain in Vegas. Learn how to say no to a two girl dance if you don’t want a two girl dance.

@blah “those that pay founder benefit the VIP-comped reviewers by actually paying to the overhead that it takes to run this site.” Paying $7 a month doesn’t stop those paying members from writing reviews either. If he doesn’t like what he’s paying for, he can stop paying. Complaining to the members about the product they are working to provide him when he doesn’t write any reviews himself? That’s too much.

I appreciate you pay for VIP privileges, but it’s hard to take criticism, even if it’s accurate, from someone who hasn’t written a single review in 15 years. You pay founder, but those of us who review clubs don’t get any benefit from your experience in the clubs. Why don’t you describe some girls? Lead by example.

In a standard one dancer at a time, two songs per stage set, I’ll tip $3 for most dancers. Drop it to $2 for girls who throw off some vibe that turns me off. At $3 a dancer it may cost me $30 an hour, which is a lot. If they go to two dancers at a time, I’ll drop the amount.

The flaws in the rating system have been discussed and are also pretty obvious. The ratings are subjective and the reviewers use their own discretion and experience whether to review compared to national clubs or clubs in that same locality. You shouldn’t compare TJ to the Bible Belt, but we do. Whether to adjust for that is up to the reviewer. I don’t know if founder weights the categories, but the ratings are based on the club facilities, attractiveness of the girls and “value.” Nothing about mileage, though most would lump it in as a part of value. Others might be talking about cheap beer. Whatever. Don’t like founder’s system? Come up with your own list, as many others have done before and posted to the forum.

Oh, and DC clubs have been full node forever. Most of them now offer some level of contact lap dances too, but it’s pricey.

FFS, you guys are a bunch of humorless bastards. Techman starts a perfect trolling thread with a hidden clue, leaving it for people to puzzle over until they figure it out for themselves. Nofunontheside ruins the bit because he somehow thinks it’s at his expense, and then ancientlurker and manuellabor can’t bother to read the explanation and just decide to bitch. That about sums it up.

Yes

Boo

IYKYK

The case shouldn’t have been brought. That doesn’t mean he wasn’t guilty or didn’t commit a crime. Even you said it was a misdemeanor. The guy engaged in a conspiracy to cover up his affair and now he’s the victim. Instead of holding him accountable for his bad decisions and actions, all we get is that it’s the judge’s fault, the jury’s fault, the witnesses’ fault, Bragg’s fault. Don’t want to get charged with a bullshit crime? How about you don’t commit the crime in the first place.

If you actually want to debate, you have to deal with facts that go against your position. If you just want to toe the Fox News line, then you can just discount everything I say because I’m biased. I’ve pretty much posted only facts. Fact, the judge didn’t prevent weisselberg from testifying. You got that from Fox News or Trump allies. It’s not a stretch. We don’t need to stipulate. It’s false. And I agree with you that this shouldn’t have gone to trial. Most defendants would’ve pled to a lesser charge and paid a fine. Stormy’s testimony was as much on the defense strategy as anything else. They could’ve admitted the affair and then her testimony wouldn’t have been necessary. But the defense’s opening statement denied the affair so her testimony became necessary. The judge even objected to some of her testimony and criticized the defense for not objecting enough. That’s their primary job and they blew it.

I’m not objective. I can’t stand the orange menace. It doesn’t make what I’m saying any less true. The hush money wasn’t a crime. Concealing it was. That said, I don’t think he should’ve been prosecuted for this. He’s done much much worse. This is like a speeding ticket. But it doesn’t mean he’s not guilty. He slept with Stormy. He signed a hush money NDA and agreed to pay her $130k. That is legal. But why go to such lengths to cover it up if not to conceal it from voters in 2016? Why not just pay her? He’s rich. But instead, he comes up with some crazy scheme where Cohen takes out a home equity loan and pays her out his own pocket. Then Weisselberg runs the math and writes down on paper to double it to $260k then add another $160k and pay Cohen out over 12 months. Remember, Cohen got a salary and bonus for working for Mango Unchained. These weren’t ordinary legal fees. It was a concealment scheme. Tom Cruise in A Few Good Men “why the two orders colonel Jessup? If your orders were that Santiago wasn’t to be touched, why was it necessary to transfer him off the base?” If the hush money payment was legal, why was it necessary to cover it up? The answer is because he didn’t want it to hurt the election. Weisselberg was “slimed?” I guess by slimed you mean convicted of fraud, and then later convicted of perjury? Yes, his testimony would be suspect. But the defense could’ve called him as a witness. The statement that the judge prohibited Weisselberg from testifying is objectively false.

On the case itself we have 75 posts. Complaints from supporters of Mar A Lardo? Selective prosecution. Biased judge. Blue venue. What has nobody said? HE DIDNT DO IT. Maybe this was a Jay Z 99 Problems case “you were doing 55 in a 54” but there weren’t facts in dispute. The jury came back quickly. That’s what happens when you don’t defend the case. @puddy - where is your source for Weisselberg “not being allowed” to testify. I’ve seen Lara Trump say this too. The defense didn’t call him to testify. How is that on the judge?