Dancer descriptions

I appreciate you pay for VIP privileges, but it’s hard to take criticism, even if it’s accurate, from someone who hasn’t written a single review in 15 years. You pay founder, but those of us who review clubs don’t get any benefit from your experience in the clubs. Why don’t you describe some girls? Lead by example.

Good points, bb. But... member since 2010, and zero reviews ? When are you going to submit your 1st review ?

I agree with bb. Look at the recent "smash or pass" threads to see how much tastes diverge. In terms of paying founder vs reviewing clubs: those that pay founder benefit the VIP-comped reviewers by actually paying to the overhead that it takes to run this site.

The fact is you can go to the same club on a Tuesday and then Thursday and see different types of girls.

Different clubs definitely have different hiring practices. Race, thickness, age, number or tattoos and implants are definitely worth observing, and can have a degree of consistency.

The reason we go to the clubs is the dancers. I also appreciate good descriptions of the dancers. Also mentioning who are ROB's and who try to give customers good value can be helpful. For example, the work OldWhiteGuy has put in on keeping tabs of dancers at Desire has been helpful.

Saying stuff like there were "a lot of dancers with tattoos and fake boobs" and "the dancers were white and black" isn't really helpful because that could apply to almost every club in the United States. I think the reason most reviewers don't include dancer data is that it takes more time and effort. Most of the reviewers just want to reword the exact same facts that were in the last few reviews and not contribute any new insights or tips. Most reviewers want to post just enough script to get their free month of VIP.

I find little value in it. I know what I like when I see it. I don't go looking for what you like and describe. But that's just me.

What @JamesSD said. A clubs lineup can, and likely will, change from night to night, week to week, etc. A customer reading about a specific dancer might go in every night for the following year and never see that dancer again. And then she might show up as soon as he stops.

General descriptions, like "slim with racial variety", "thick AA", "mostly Latina with a sprinkling of others" and such like are far more useful than descriptions of dancers that a police forensics lab could use to produce a realistic depiction. Because the former is usually how a club trends, whereas the latter could be an anomaly.

@blah “those that pay founder benefit the VIP-comped reviewers by actually paying to the overhead that it takes to run this site.”

Paying $7 a month doesn’t stop those paying members from writing reviews either. If he doesn’t like what he’s paying for, he can stop paying. Complaining to the members about the product they are working to provide him when he doesn’t write any reviews himself? That’s too much.

Partly, I'm with the first few responses and their general notion that the OP needs to lead by example.

Partly, though, I do feel this may be a justifiable criticism of some of my own past reviews. It makes sense to recognize that the community of review-readers will benefit from information specific to the type of girl that the club tends toward.

But I kind-of don't know how to do that. My local neighborhood-y club has some women who are markedly unattractive to me, because of their huge rear ends and dangly breasts. But I am learning that the "new" variety of stripper available in North American strip clubs is regularly that kind of body type. These women seem to do well with the customers, so, although I'm not generally paying them, they are getting money from someone. I can't just report that the girls are "ugly" or "large" because I don't know if that report would coincide with most customers' assessments of those girls. Tastes among the general populace change by the generation, yet I'm not familiar with what the younger boys are interested in now. Also, various socio-ethnic groups, f.e. Latin American working men, might have different preferences, too.

Then there's the question of how to coordinate an understanding of STYLE against an understanding of QUALITY. I know that my neighborhood-y place doesn't have the Penthouse-style women very regularly, though some do show up. And following on that, my belief has become that the closest Penthouse club has higher standards for who they would let dance. But I have no confirmation of the fact that this is the two clubs' business requirements, or even of the fact that the other club might have higher-attractiveness women right now, without actually going to both clubs regularly to compare. So, is the Penthouse-type place catering to a different STYLE or are they actually preserving a higher standard of QUALITY relative to the neighborhood-y place?

All of this to say, yeah, I agree, we all need to do a good job of describing what sort of women are generally available in each of our reviews. But also, I might find that rather difficult. I don't know how to categorize.

Dancer Ratings, Atmosphere, Food/Drinks, Cleanliness & Music Ratings Categories Should B On The Review Sheets.
For Dancer Ratings Catagories:
Stage/Pole Dance
Dancer Niceness
Pvt Dance Value
VIP Value
Dancer Body Appeal Value
Social Value
Bang For Your Buck Value
SC - Tuscl - Cheers 📱 📱 📱

bbb: Did it ever occur to you that the time spent to write and submit a detailed review has some monetary value ? Plus the cover charges, drinks $, LD/VIP $$ spent, rental car or uber ride $$ spent ? The $$ spent for the material to submit a review far exceeds what someone just sitting on their ass spends for tuscl VIP membership. If you have a gripe, at least provide an example of what you desire in a review. In the end, contributing information is what has people coming to tuscl, and justifying ad revenue.

I'd rather have info on the girls than anything else. Food and drink prices, layouts, are nice, but not essential.

What the Puddy Tat wants to know:
1. How many girls?
2. Breakdown by race, build, age, temperament.
3. Description of the dances...price, mileage, level of privacy, are extras available.
4. Some description of how hot they are, in conjunction with the rest. They may not be a consensus around what's hot, but there usually is around what's ugly (obese, too old, cellulite).
5. How much of a hustle is it? Do they descend on you the moment you enter, or will you be lonely unless you approach them?
6. Anyone to look out for, whether good or bad.

You don't have to put all of those, but at least something that gives me a good idea as to whether or not it's worth a trip.

I think it's fine that some reviewers write a lot of details about the dancers, but I don't feel obligated to do it. Mostly it's because I've seen enough dancers negatively impacted by getting their name dropped and I'd rather not have people think a dancer puts out just because I said something about her.

I'd rather have an idea of general looks. Like is there a lot of plastic? Lots of young girls? Lots of ink? That sets my expectations. More importantly, I want to know what mileage to expect and market rates. Beauty is in the eye of the beholder. I try not to give names out and too much description in case I have done extras with the girl. I usually give out a name if they're super hot (8+ in my book), and maybe if they're a good dancer.

Specific descriptions of individual dancers are of limited usefulness since they may or may not be there on any given visit. Exception is calling out a dancer who is a ROB or psycho. What is useful is a description of the mix and attributes of the dancers you can expect to see on any given visit, as well as the general availability of extras, without naming individual dancers