Comments by founder (page 70)

3. I used to have children. Then I created the IGNORE feature.

8. Any FKK

11. I have no aliases

10. BJ, Nina, Poledancer (stilleto can come too, if she's reading this)

9. This site has reviews?

6. Well less than I've won in one sitting.

5. SlickSpic FarmerArt Gawker

I'm not talking about the discussion board. I'm talking about the ability to send private messages.

Easy tiger... Someone just suggested it. Thought I'd get more input.

Did you check your email for a rejection letter? Sometimes they end up in the spam folder.

it's actually 4 weeks.

Even if a review gets published twice, the reviewer only gets credit for one. As for not getting any votes, that really hasn't happened yet.

Right now a review's fate is based on a best of 3 out of 5 approach. Should I change it to 4 out of 7?

I say tus-cul

What a poorly written article. It says the woman was attacked by a drill. Fucking ridiculous. She was attacked BY a human. Journalism these days is in the toilet.

Still a work in progress. Don't put too much thought into it right now.

Pro Tip: when you see a map on tuscl, you can click ANYWHERE on that map to find clubs near where you click. Example: You're looking at a NYC map. Zoom out. Click on Vegas. Vegas clubs will now be listed.

Someone wrote an app and used our data. Just FYI, Apple didn't allow us to put an app in their store because they did not approve of the content. Keep that in mind when you next upgrade your phone.

Backstory:. This review was approved from before members did the publishing. I got a complaint about the review. Rather than delete the review or ignore the compaint, I thought I'd give the community the chance to approve it. Thanks for helping with it

I love this thread

Noted

Forward me your old email [email protected]

What do you think is a fair trade? A free VIP day for each review?

Unfortunately, you will find that this type of "review" is not uncommon.

^ what shadowcat said