discussion comment
3 years ago
Depends...
1) Dancers who I've bought multiple dances/VIP's from: "He's a handsy tightwad". (To keep other dancers from moving in on their good catch)
2) Dancers who I haven't bought any dances from: "He's a cheapskate who doesn't buy dances."(Just to vent)
discussion comment
3 years ago
![]()
EastCoasterI strongly prefer women of color. Every color.
I would have downvoted, with the comment "club ad for Alcoholics Anonymous."
review comment
3 years ago
This reads as though it was written by club staff or dancer. Merely regurgitated costs, but little to convince me that this was written by a customer who actually visited club. Named 2 dancers, but no description of them, or any of the other dancers in the club. What were some of the things the dancers said about the rooms ? How was your launch pad experiences ?
Last time I saw Desiree (blonde) in the club, she was tag teaming with Sammi( dk. auburn).
discussion comment
3 years ago
![]()
ilbbaicnlKeep it in my pants when I do OTC. If I were a stripper it would stand for I like big bucks and I can not lie.
I'll throw out a couple of "data points" for your Enlightenment :
1) I recall a web article ~ 3 years ago (can't find a link, but it was on the internet so it MUST be true).Article said that one needed to have $5.5 M in "investable assets" (assets outside of your primary residence) to be considered wealthy. Probably would be $6.5 M today due to inflation.
2) In a 1994 Playboy Interview (may have taken place in 1993 for 1994 publication) David Geffen ( a billionaire) tells how he made his 1st $10M at age 30 in late 1972. He characterized that figure as "fuck you money". That $10M benchmark in 1972 would probably be $60M today factored for inflation. Sorry Papi, you'll have to jack up your per word review fee to get there.
article comment
3 years ago
![]()
LustGentlemensClub1Lust Gentlemen's Club - The Hottest Gentlemen's Club / Strip Club in Myrtle Beach, South Carolina
I'd like to see who approved this. Anyone else for having the 5 adjudicators with their votes listed ?
review comment
3 years ago
This review leaves several unanswered questions. It appears that Mons has done away with the silly pay the waitress the booth rental fee, and dancer separately. As I recall from Apr. 2021 visit, a single test drive was $12 booth rental plus $40 to dancer for total of $52. It appears that club has transaction just between you and the dancer. Did you think to ask dancer about volume discounts, like maybe 3 for $120 ? If this is indeed the case, Mons would be competitive with Spaceship prices from the club across the street.
Chief I find it odd that you gag at the dance prices, yet pay dancer $60 - $70 to do something that you could have done yourself.
discussion comment
3 years ago
Addendum: I believe the last time 2 QB's were inducted into HOF on their 1st year of eligibility was in 2005 with Dan Marino and Steve Young being inducted. It would be exciting to see Drew Brees (2026), Tom Brady (2027), and Ben Roethlisberger (2027) be inducted in short succession.
discussion comment
3 years ago
Next question: Could we see 2 QB's (Brady and Big Ben) be in the HOF induction Class of 2027 ? Either way, Big Ben has been upstaged by Tom Brady one more time.
discussion comment
3 years ago
When I saw Tom Brady engineer the greatest SB comeback win in 2017 (despite throwing a pick 6 early in the game and falling to a 25 point deficit), I asked myself "what the hell can he do for an encore" ?
I asked that same question last year when in his 1st year with his new team (Go Bucs!!), he led the Bucs to 3 playoff wins on the road, culminating with his 7th Super Bowl win (not to mention another SB MVP award in the 1st ever home Super Bowl game won by the home team playing in their home stadium).
Maybe the answer is to retire on his terms while he's still at the top of his game. If this rumor turns out to be true, look for rickdugan to post some Tom Brady accolades with emphasis on his NE Patriots tenure years.
review comment
3 years ago
Thanks for the TOFTT, mets (oops, Buck). I might try an afternoon here. (I understand they open at 3p.)
discussion comment
3 years ago
I propose a new tagline: "Tuscl: A place that marginalized individuals can use as their own soapbox."
review comment
3 years ago
...mileage lower than a rusted Humvee with four flat tires." Love that phrase plus dancer rundown rates a Pulitzer Prize nomination for CP. Also agree with you wrt lingerie. While not an automatic DQ item, definitely knocks a dancer down some notches on my rotation.
review comment
3 years ago
I've never been a Lodge VIP member, nor does OP give any indication that he is. I doubt one could just mosey in upstairs like OP claims to. Claims that this was his 1st night out in TX, yet he submitted 2 earlier reviews on TX clubs, one of which was Baby Dolls a few miles away. Hmm, did he make those reviews up? Some details could be gleaned from club photos, no mention of costs, guessed cover charge. Sounds a bit fishy to me.
review comment
3 years ago
It's been over 10 years since my last visit, but I don't recall there being an upstairs area in the Lodge. I'm surprised you made no mention of the hunting lodge decor (animal trophies on wall), nor the Library (separate room in back, bookshelf decor). I don't recall any parking lot in back of club. I did get a sense of a 2 tier system at play, with some dancers focused on VIP members only. Regardless of club, don't be bashful about expressing interest in getting some dances. When you tip, say something like "I'd love to get some dances with you when you finish your set."
discussion comment
3 years ago
Wow, 2 No.1 teams knocked off today. (Titans, Packers). This leaves some intriguing possibilities for SB being the "Avenger Bowl." If the lowest seeded 49ers advance, the 49ers could face the Chiefs, and have a chance at avenging their 2020 Super Bowl loss to the Chiefs. Conversely, if both the Bengals and 49ers advance, the Bengals could avenge their 1982 and 1989 Super Bowl losses at the hands of the 49ers. I'm sure Kansas City would love to face the Bucs to avenge their 2021 Super Bowl defeat by the Bucs. On any given Sunday......
discussion comment
3 years ago
jw- That review didn't have "Good Craic" so I rejected it.
discussion comment
3 years ago
![]()
TetradonI'll act nicer if you'll act smarter.
IMO, Tetradon's line "I'll act nicer if you'll act smarter" rates at least an honorable mention.
discussion comment
3 years ago
Swiss Cheese Time Now:
1) Who will have flagging privileges ? (VIP only, VIP and/or Verified, or only "dual qualified" - VIP and Verified Only )
2) Nomination of Master Council- Who will count the votes ? How many members on master council ? How many prospective council candidates could each member nominate ? Tough to pick just 1, I'd propose each member pick their personal top 3 nominees.
3) Master Council- How many Master Council votes needed to submit action to founder ? Unanimous, simple majority, or super majority (like 2/3 - 3/4 votes.) Tie breaker procedures ? (If unable to break tie, proposed suspension rejected.)
4) Would voting/flagging REALLY be "1 person, 1 vote ?" Think of the number of multiple accounts created by multiple members. Would there be a clear majority, or "muddied plurality" for nominated council members ?
5) How many members would be willing to serve on council ?
6) Would founder be willing to implement proposed system ?
For now... "Not enough details"...
discussion comment
3 years ago
2021 - Low 4 figures, 1st qtr 2020- mid 4 figures, 2019 - mid teens 5 figures.
review comment
3 years ago
Well, gfy, too, AZ Turd Blossom. It's obvious by your commentary that you want to browbeat adjudicators to press the approve button, and not fret about details. In fact, in a recent thread about short review, here are a couple of your quotes: "Please stop rejecting reviews for NOT ENOUGH DETAILS".... "squeeze your nuts and press the approve button."
Practically every one of your reviews has needless commentary bitching about listing club details. You could save bandwidth on reviews by just listing some damn details in place of needless griping about said details.
discussion comment
3 years ago
T-don & CMI +1. The vocal complainers seem indignant that they (or their circle jerk SEA, NJ, or PHX buds didn't get a 7 - 0 vote). Should a min effort 8 liner be conferred the same privileges as someone putting forth much more details ?
review comment
3 years ago
I wonder why desertscrub is the member with the most ignores. Could it be that you always find something to bitch about on a daily basis ? Did you really expect to influence the adjudicators grading standards by your whine ?
discussion comment
3 years ago
I'll agree with sc on the 20 minute figure. I've probably said somewhere that a 30 minute VIP is really 10 minutes repeated 3 times over. If the 1st 10 minutes are real good, I'd like to repeat it at least once, but there comes a point of diminishing returns per additional minute.
Repeating a half additional time for 15 minutes total seems a little shortchanged. 20 minutes seems nearly as good as 30, leaving (in theory, few clubs offer 20 minute option) with several additional Jacksons in my wallet, and 10 more minutes of opportunity time to sample array of other hot dancers. Or leave club 10 minutes early, spending time on managing your $350K plus portfolio.
discussion comment
3 years ago
Happy Birthday, enjoy the big Eight-Zero !! Watch out for your 81st, next year your birthday will be on Friday the 13th !!
discussion comment
3 years ago
I commented on a recent review to look for a nicespice grammar correction. Told him it's Latin-A Chick, unless he's into cross dressers.