Why are some PUA forums so against any form of P2P?
Hey guys,
I noticed that some "Game" forum seem to have a strong stance against any form P2P. Not only about directly paying for it but rather just simply doing anything like buying women drinks..etc. I notice many of these guys tend to lurk outside of clubs trying to pull since they don't want to pay the entry fee at the most expensive ones. I wonder what motivated these guys to assume that stand. From what I hear many of them come from lower financial means hence they tend to hold a bit of resentment towards those who are better off.
What do you guys think?
I noticed that some "Game" forum seem to have a strong stance against any form P2P. Not only about directly paying for it but rather just simply doing anything like buying women drinks..etc. I notice many of these guys tend to lurk outside of clubs trying to pull since they don't want to pay the entry fee at the most expensive ones. I wonder what motivated these guys to assume that stand. From what I hear many of them come from lower financial means hence they tend to hold a bit of resentment towards those who are better off.
What do you guys think?
Got something to say?
Start your own discussion
19 comments
I think that this is a stupid topic. I also think that caring what anyone has to say on a PUA forum is a pointless burn of time and energy.
SWMOS. Ride your bike to the club. Stand outside, cover charges are for chumps. Wait for the girls to arrive or better yet to leave. Talk to them like you actually think they are human beings. Voila, side walk make out session. Then you can have them join your organization and put them in plexiglass sex boxes.
At least that's the way I have been told it works in San Jose CA.
SJG
https://tuscl.net/photo.php?id=8860
Bacon!!
At least that's the way I have been told it works in San Jose CA."
LMAO!!!!
Where some of them do have a point is where they say this is not the nineteen fifties any more so the romantic advice given to young guys in that era, get a good paying job so you can be a provider for a wife and children, doesn't work as well as it did then. Women have less interest in that kind of guy now because they are more financially independent. Feminism has encouraged them to pursue careers so they have money from that and affirmative action has helped many of them get higher paying jobs than a system based solely on merit would. Expansion of the welfare state has given women another source of income they wouldn't have had in an earlier era. So putting a little less focus on becoming the traditional male breadwinner type and more focus on improving your looks or social skills would be a rational strategy for many young men.
The PUA's are down on P4P because they have the erroneous idea that by picking up on women, they are somehow getting the better of them.
SJG
this company is kinda kinky in their focus, IMHO
https://tuscl.net/photo.php?id=8930
Thanks Liwet
They'd also rather have you spend the money on pricey training programs. But like fapping, porn, etc, p4p doesn't help with the skills they want to develop so some will say avoid altogether. But others will agree that everything in moderation after a while.
I usually manage to get contact info from one or more girls when I do go, and not for p4p. I have a couple in my current rotation that I met at various clubs, and they periodically reach out to me to get dicked down real good.
If you are running your PUA game on a girl, she should be fully into you. The top level pick up guys have this vision of girls buying them drinks - as their game is next level - and they appear to be so desirable the tables are turned.
But, the PUA’s you think are waiting outside the club are just cheap losers.
The only system that is legitimate and proven is the one Rick Dugan has. That has a success level of 99.9999%!
P4p...realizing they're too fugly etc for anything else.