Does anyone ever go back and read your own reviews? I just did based on something Slick had mentioned about snitching on what dancer provided what service. I couldn't recall so I had to check. I thought it was interesting if only to see how bad my early reviews were and remembering (or not remembering) certain nights.
Replies (16)Latest
I read then right after they get published to see if any editing too place but other than that, no.
No reason for me to reed my reviews I did under my aleesis cause they all fake anyhow !
Nope! A beer can off the back of the boat.
Of course I re-read my own reviews, if only to marvel at my exquisite handling of the English language.
"Of course I re-read my own reviews, if only to marvel at my exquisite handling of the English language"
That's about right!
I've peeked at mine again occasionally, but, since they are excellent, I usually just put that time into re-reviewing "The System" by RickyBoyDugan instead.
"...I usually just put that time into re-reviewing "The System" by RickyBoyDugan instead."
Good idea. It's a better use of your time anyway as you won't get much out of reading your reviews - nobody else did. LMAO knee slap
I'll sometimes re-read a review if I need a refresher on a club I haven't visited in a while, but otherwise I don't spend much time re-reading old reviews.
I barely read while I'm writing this shit.
I'm planning to compile all of my writing on this site as the gospel of Zipman! It will have zip my bros!
Reading is fundamental
how about Founder releasing a Coffee Table book with a 'Best Of' list of reviews?
i have and i noticed my early reviews....SUCK!!! lol
Occassionally.
I write 4 and 5 page novels for reviews – no way am I reading that shit.
I went back a little while ago and re-read some of my earliest reviews. Not the best, but I also didn't have the knowledge I do now. I think that goes for most of the serious hobbists here.
Once ina blue. Mostly just to compare notes between what I said about a club and what others have said in the future. My grammar is too impeccable to bother with over analyzing
Join the conversation
Sign in to reply to this discussion.