discussion comment
5 years ago
@K that would be me. I felt the inside of a vagina about a decade and a half before I had an LDK and was ready to basically reiterate what Papi said.
All I've learned is that different people are turned on by different things. For this reason, some guys can easily LDK from a lap dance, and some can't. It's really that simple. If you're in the latter, just accept it and move on. If you're in the former, accept that you might be ridiculed by guys that can't, and just move on.
discussion comment
5 years ago
![]()
gStephThe view from the other side of the room
+1 HungryGiraffe. This thread was a great idea, and thanks to everyone for sharing their honest experiences. Reading @Papi Chulo, @Rick Dugan, and @Muddy's experiences were eye opening.
My 2019 visits to the clubs weren't as plentiful as 2018 but I think I learned a lot more in this year's visits. The highlight of 2019 for me was my TJ trip. It already has me anticipating my 2020 trip.
As for local SCing, my area seems to be getting worse, unfortunately. I just learned that this new year that dreaded California law forcing strip clubs to classify dancers as employees will be enforced for every club. Which means I won't even be able to escape to Rancho Cordova to enjoy dancers who aren't affected by that shitty law. Which means I'll probably visit clubs even less in 2020.
Still, I'll keep reading TUSCL and keeping up with you guys. For the last 2 and a half years I've been more interested in keeping up with the regulars on here than I have for any celebrities and other famous fuckers on Instagram. You guys are hilarious, interesting as fuck, and I love to read all the stuff you post everyday. Except SJG.
discussion comment
5 years ago
Shit, you guys are lucky. In the SF area, $50/nude dance is the norm. $20/dance at the topless clubs, but those dances absolutely suck. Shitty contact, even just touching a leg can get you a warning from the bouncer. At the Rancho Cordova clubs about 70 miles away from SF, the dances average around a more reasonable $30/dance.
I think it's why I used to think that Vegas was good value. $20 floor dances and pretty good boob and butt groping in those. Compared to the shitty SF value. However after experiencing other places I've come to realize that my area is among the worst when it comes to strip clubs.
discussion comment
5 years ago
Thanks for the info, DeclineToState.
Sheesh, that's making me want to go to Gold Club Centerfolds for new years tonight to enjoy one last night of dancers on IC status. Before it goes to shit just like all the SF clubs have.
discussion comment
5 years ago
You know why I'm here:
PUT SOME RESPEK!!
ON MY MUTHAFUCKIN!!!
#1 SEED SAN FRANCISCO FORTYNINERS!!!!!
But I still think the Ravens are winning the whole thing. Dat nigga Lamar Jackson is too damn good.
discussion comment
5 years ago
@501 this is what I was wondering about, thanks for clarifying. I know that Gold Club Centerfolds, right down the street from the club the OP is discussing, hasn't made the switch yet. So you're saying that come January 1st they will be forced to switch to the employee model for certain? If so, I can definitely see this club having the same drop of in fun as my former favorite Deja Vu Centerfolds in SF did. Sucks, but helps me even more to just save my money for trips to TJ.
discussion comment
5 years ago
I haven't been clubbing in a while but it's interesting to hear this new feature. DejaVu in Rancho Cordova always lead the trio of clubs in that area in terms of bang for your buck. Sadly the level of talent dropped off severely after all the Deja Vu's in CA changed the dancers from independent contractors to employees.
Maybe this latest promotion is an attempt to get some business back?
I'm interested to see the answer to OPs question. I'd imagine tahoecruz or berniebernie would have the info.
OP you should post this under the discussions for this particular club. Maybe you'd get an answer faster that way.
discussion comment
5 years ago
@Papi as it should be. #1 seed at stake, all hinges on the outcome of this game.
discussion comment
5 years ago
You know damn well that's all their gonna get. Jerry Jones only likes 'yes boss' coaches these days so they'll get another puppet.
discussion comment
5 years ago
So now that's you and SJG that fuck up the spelling on her name no matter how many times she posts and you can see the correct spelling. Doesn't really matter, just a little thing that I notice.
discussion comment
5 years ago
Correction, it's Rams at Niners. We already beat them in their stadium a couple months ago. It was the first win we had where people started to finally drop the notion that we've only played garbage teams so far.
I think the Rams are dangerous. They laid an egg against the Cowboys and that knocked them out of the playoffs. Still, they're a division rival so they might be motivated to play spoiler.
If we want to keep hope alive for that #1 seed we can't go out and play like we did against Atlanta.
As for the Eli debate, I agree with Rick Dugan. Peyton is definitely gonna be 1st ballot HOF, can't see Eli being the same. Yes he had two nice Superbowl wins but he never grabbed headlines like Rodgers, Brees, etc.
discussion comment
5 years ago
+1 jascoi. We complained, he delivered. Thank you, Founder! This makes my experience navigating the forum at least 80% better.
discussion comment
5 years ago
You're missing davephx's point, SJG. People contribute in a lot of threads that they didn't start. With the new system there is no way to find those posts in a list like before.
If you start a bunch of discussions then yeah you can easily see stuff there. But a person like me who doesn't really start discussions and just contributes in others, there is now no way to find those posts easily.
discussion comment
5 years ago
![]()
san_jose_guymoney was invented for handing to women, but buying dances is a chump's game
LMAFAO what CC99 said is the funniest part to me. SJG is actually taking the video as something real. He's too dumb to see that it's the fakest shit ever. "The second one of the three was really going for it". THATS BECAUSE ITS FAKE AND SHE WAS PAID, DUMBASS.
But it all contributes to your fantasy of being able to DFK strippers in the front room and shit, so you eat it up just like you eat up all the stripper shit. Lol.
Oh and by the way, fuck your privacy fence and your mute button.
discussion comment
5 years ago
@desertscrub you don't have unlimited data on mobile? If not, you must be one of the few.
discussion comment
5 years ago
623 you didn't post the list, why not? I was curious to see if all the features I miss were on there.
I do like the dancer pics and the pictures tab on the home page.
Lets me check out photos from all over the site that I would have missed out on seeing had the picture tab not been there.
The main thing I miss is the contribution tabs. The previous iteration had all contributions lumped together. We previously complained about that, wanting them separated into article comments, discussion comments, review comments like it was two iterations ago. But now I see that something is better than nothing. With the new format having none, it's hard to keep track of all the places you've posted. Someone might respond to you and never get a reply because you forgot about the discussion.
discussion comment
5 years ago
![]()
san_jose_guymoney was invented for handing to women, but buying dances is a chump's game
SJG you're funny. You mute my comment and then reply back. What's the purpose?
Funny how you muted every single response in here. Why even make a thread if that's what you're gonna do? SLD's response wasn't even an insult. It was simply asking you why you don't go and try what you're suggesting. We know you live in San Jose. If you don't have a car, catch a bus to the Warm Springs BART station and go. Why do you take such offense to folks encouraging you to go try out all these things you talk about year after year?
discussion comment
5 years ago
![]()
san_jose_guymoney was invented for handing to women, but buying dances is a chump's game
You are totally right, SLD. Those clubs are a 15-20 minute walk from Montgomery BART station. Or a less than 5 minutes Uber ride. But we know SJG by now. He'll respond with a privacy wall post. Or something else. Anything, except take your spot on advice.
Based on the streets he mentioned, I'm guessing he's talking about Little Darlings, Garden of Eden, or Roaring 20's. I've never DFK'd a dancer on the sidewalk like he's suggesting, but I have DFK'd dancers in two of those clubs, and they were the ones who initiated it. So who knows, maybe SJG might be successful if he just went to find out.
But we know he won't. His name should be Mr. Speculation, because that's really all he does.
discussion comment
5 years ago
I agree with every single thing 623 posted. As a matter of fact, I would give him a trust right now based on that, but those are gone also.
A redesign shouldn't remove useful features. Rather, a redesign should include the features that more and more users request.
Like 623 said, I find myself using the site less now because the changes make the place so cumbersome to navigate, unlike before.
discussion comment
5 years ago
Took away too many good features. Every update we lose something else.
discussion comment
5 years ago
Gianna
discussion comment
5 years ago
![]()
founderslip a dollar in her g-string for me
@Jascoi you're not doing anything wrong, it seems that feature was removed.
That is my gripe with these 'updates' that Founder does. I mean I do appreciate the work he does in trying to modify the site and make it more accessable to dancers and all that. But some key features that members have praised in the past keep being changed or scrapped altogether. No,I'm not referring to the block feature. I'm talking about things like contributions being listed under a profile and separated by article comment, discussion comment, review comment etc. Everyone liked that, why remove it? Now like others have said, it makes keeping track of the discussions you commented on hard as hell.
Back in the day when a review was posted, it showed the reviewers stats right next to their name. Number of clubs reviewed along with number of total reviews. This was a great indication of the quality of review you were about to read. Why remove that?
The improvements are great but it sucks when we gain some and lose some.